Effects of Segmental and Suprasegmental Speech Perception on Reading in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine whether suprasegmental speech perception contributes unique variance in predictions of reading decoding and comprehension for prelingually deaf children using two devices, at least one of which is a cochlear implant (CI). Method: A total of 104, 5- to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of speech, language, and hearing research language, and hearing research, 2022-09, Vol.65 (9), p.3583-3594
Hauptverfasser: Grantham, Heather, Davidson, Lisa S, Geers, Ann E, Uchanski, Rosalie M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3594
container_issue 9
container_start_page 3583
container_title Journal of speech, language, and hearing research
container_volume 65
creator Grantham, Heather
Davidson, Lisa S
Geers, Ann E
Uchanski, Rosalie M
description Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine whether suprasegmental speech perception contributes unique variance in predictions of reading decoding and comprehension for prelingually deaf children using two devices, at least one of which is a cochlear implant (CI). Method: A total of 104, 5- to 9-year-old CI recipients completed tests of segmental perception (e.g., word recognition in quiet and noise, recognition of vowels and consonants in quiet), suprasegmental perception (e.g., talker and stress discrimination, nonword stress repetition, and emotion identification), and nonverbal intelligence. Two years later, participants completed standardized tests of reading decoding and comprehension. Using regression analyses, the unique contribution of suprasegmental perception to reading skills was determined after controlling for demographic characteristics and segmental perception performance. Results: Standardized reading scores of the CI recipients increased with nonverbal intelligence for both decoding and comprehension. Female gender was associated with higher comprehension scores. After controlling for gender and nonverbal intelligence, segmental perception accounted for approximately 4% and 2% of the variance in decoding and comprehension, respectively. After controlling for nonverbal intelligence, gender, and segmental perception, suprasegmental perception accounted for an extra 4% and 7% unique variance in reading decoding and reading comprehension, respectively. Conclusions: Suprasegmental perception operates independently from segmental perception to facilitate good reading outcomes for these children with CIs. Clinicians and educators should be mindful that early perceptual skills may have long-term benefits for literacy. Research on how to optimize suprasegmental perception, perhaps through hearing-device programming and/or training strategies, is needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00035
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9913132</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A719992560</galeid><ericid>EJ1362383</ericid><sourcerecordid>A719992560</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-ccdaa59fff3feb5e2c8598f6d26e470e1eb61dd9d0d2d326679d22bcd961bce53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl2L1DAUhoso7of-AlEKwuJN13w0aXMjLMPo7jKg7Oh1yCQnM1napCat4L8346yzOzI00EPOc96TnLxF8QajS4zq-iNBhMjb5eL6riKkQghR9qw4xYy1lcCIPM8xEqSqadueFGcp3WcE4Zq_LE4oz1HL69Oin1sLekxlsOUS1j34UXWl8qZcTkNUab-1HAD0pvwGUcMwuuDLvO5AGefXpfM5YZwao9PlLOhNByqWN_3QKT9mSrvBZZn0qnhhVZfg9cP_vPjxef59dl0tvn65mV0tKs1qPFZaG6WYsNZSCysGRLdMtJYbwqFuEGBYcWyMMMgQQwnnjTCErLQRHK80MHpefNrpDtOqB6Nz76g6OUTXq_hbBuXkYca7jVyHX1IITDElWeDDg0AMPydIo-xd0tDl-0CYkiQN4g1uGrTt9f4_9D5M0efrZQpvJ80YeaTWqgPpvA25r96KyqsGCyEI4yhT1RFqDR7yIYMH6_L2AX95hM-fgd7powUXTwo2oLpxk0I3bR80HYJ0B-oYUopg98PDSG7tJx_tJ3Pw13656t3Tue9r_vktA293AGSn7NPz2zwnQltK_wDpWN9R</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2713600552</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Segmental and Suprasegmental Speech Perception on Reading in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Grantham, Heather ; Davidson, Lisa S ; Geers, Ann E ; Uchanski, Rosalie M</creator><creatorcontrib>Grantham, Heather ; Davidson, Lisa S ; Geers, Ann E ; Uchanski, Rosalie M</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine whether suprasegmental speech perception contributes unique variance in predictions of reading decoding and comprehension for prelingually deaf children using two devices, at least one of which is a cochlear implant (CI). Method: A total of 104, 5- to 9-year-old CI recipients completed tests of segmental perception (e.g., word recognition in quiet and noise, recognition of vowels and consonants in quiet), suprasegmental perception (e.g., talker and stress discrimination, nonword stress repetition, and emotion identification), and nonverbal intelligence. Two years later, participants completed standardized tests of reading decoding and comprehension. Using regression analyses, the unique contribution of suprasegmental perception to reading skills was determined after controlling for demographic characteristics and segmental perception performance. Results: Standardized reading scores of the CI recipients increased with nonverbal intelligence for both decoding and comprehension. Female gender was associated with higher comprehension scores. After controlling for gender and nonverbal intelligence, segmental perception accounted for approximately 4% and 2% of the variance in decoding and comprehension, respectively. After controlling for nonverbal intelligence, gender, and segmental perception, suprasegmental perception accounted for an extra 4% and 7% unique variance in reading decoding and reading comprehension, respectively. Conclusions: Suprasegmental perception operates independently from segmental perception to facilitate good reading outcomes for these children with CIs. Clinicians and educators should be mindful that early perceptual skills may have long-term benefits for literacy. Research on how to optimize suprasegmental perception, perhaps through hearing-device programming and/or training strategies, is needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-4388</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00035</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36001864</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</publisher><subject>Assistive Technology ; Auditory Perception ; Babies ; Care and treatment ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Children &amp; youth ; Children, Deaf ; Cochlear Implantation ; Cochlear Implants ; Deafness ; Deafness - rehabilitation ; Deafness - surgery ; Decoding ; Decoding (Reading) ; Female ; Gender ; Gender Differences ; Hearing ; Hearing loss ; Humans ; Intelligence ; Language ; Listening ; Literacy ; Medical personnel ; Noise ; Patient outcomes ; Pediatric research ; Phonological Awareness ; Phonology ; Psychological aspects ; Reading ; Reading ability ; Reading Comprehension ; Reading Skills ; Reading Tests ; Scores ; Speech ; Speech Perception ; Standardized Tests ; Stress ; Suprasegmentals ; Transplants &amp; implants ; Word recognition ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 2022-09, Vol.65 (9), p.3583-3594</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Sep 2022</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-ccdaa59fff3feb5e2c8598f6d26e470e1eb61dd9d0d2d326679d22bcd961bce53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2174-1230</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1362383$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36001864$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grantham, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Lisa S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geers, Ann E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uchanski, Rosalie M</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Segmental and Suprasegmental Speech Perception on Reading in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients</title><title>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</title><addtitle>J Speech Lang Hear Res</addtitle><description>Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine whether suprasegmental speech perception contributes unique variance in predictions of reading decoding and comprehension for prelingually deaf children using two devices, at least one of which is a cochlear implant (CI). Method: A total of 104, 5- to 9-year-old CI recipients completed tests of segmental perception (e.g., word recognition in quiet and noise, recognition of vowels and consonants in quiet), suprasegmental perception (e.g., talker and stress discrimination, nonword stress repetition, and emotion identification), and nonverbal intelligence. Two years later, participants completed standardized tests of reading decoding and comprehension. Using regression analyses, the unique contribution of suprasegmental perception to reading skills was determined after controlling for demographic characteristics and segmental perception performance. Results: Standardized reading scores of the CI recipients increased with nonverbal intelligence for both decoding and comprehension. Female gender was associated with higher comprehension scores. After controlling for gender and nonverbal intelligence, segmental perception accounted for approximately 4% and 2% of the variance in decoding and comprehension, respectively. After controlling for nonverbal intelligence, gender, and segmental perception, suprasegmental perception accounted for an extra 4% and 7% unique variance in reading decoding and reading comprehension, respectively. Conclusions: Suprasegmental perception operates independently from segmental perception to facilitate good reading outcomes for these children with CIs. Clinicians and educators should be mindful that early perceptual skills may have long-term benefits for literacy. Research on how to optimize suprasegmental perception, perhaps through hearing-device programming and/or training strategies, is needed.</description><subject>Assistive Technology</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Children, Deaf</subject><subject>Cochlear Implantation</subject><subject>Cochlear Implants</subject><subject>Deafness</subject><subject>Deafness - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Deafness - surgery</subject><subject>Decoding</subject><subject>Decoding (Reading)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Hearing loss</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Listening</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Pediatric research</subject><subject>Phonological Awareness</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reading ability</subject><subject>Reading Comprehension</subject><subject>Reading Skills</subject><subject>Reading Tests</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Standardized Tests</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Suprasegmentals</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Word recognition</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>1092-4388</issn><issn>1558-9102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl2L1DAUhoso7of-AlEKwuJN13w0aXMjLMPo7jKg7Oh1yCQnM1napCat4L8346yzOzI00EPOc96TnLxF8QajS4zq-iNBhMjb5eL6riKkQghR9qw4xYy1lcCIPM8xEqSqadueFGcp3WcE4Zq_LE4oz1HL69Oin1sLekxlsOUS1j34UXWl8qZcTkNUab-1HAD0pvwGUcMwuuDLvO5AGefXpfM5YZwao9PlLOhNByqWN_3QKT9mSrvBZZn0qnhhVZfg9cP_vPjxef59dl0tvn65mV0tKs1qPFZaG6WYsNZSCysGRLdMtJYbwqFuEGBYcWyMMMgQQwnnjTCErLQRHK80MHpefNrpDtOqB6Nz76g6OUTXq_hbBuXkYca7jVyHX1IITDElWeDDg0AMPydIo-xd0tDl-0CYkiQN4g1uGrTt9f4_9D5M0efrZQpvJ80YeaTWqgPpvA25r96KyqsGCyEI4yhT1RFqDR7yIYMH6_L2AX95hM-fgd7powUXTwo2oLpxk0I3bR80HYJ0B-oYUopg98PDSG7tJx_tJ3Pw13656t3Tue9r_vktA293AGSn7NPz2zwnQltK_wDpWN9R</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Grantham, Heather</creator><creator>Davidson, Lisa S</creator><creator>Geers, Ann E</creator><creator>Uchanski, Rosalie M</creator><general>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2174-1230</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Effects of Segmental and Suprasegmental Speech Perception on Reading in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients</title><author>Grantham, Heather ; Davidson, Lisa S ; Geers, Ann E ; Uchanski, Rosalie M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-ccdaa59fff3feb5e2c8598f6d26e470e1eb61dd9d0d2d326679d22bcd961bce53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Assistive Technology</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Children, Deaf</topic><topic>Cochlear Implantation</topic><topic>Cochlear Implants</topic><topic>Deafness</topic><topic>Deafness - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Deafness - surgery</topic><topic>Decoding</topic><topic>Decoding (Reading)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Hearing loss</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Listening</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Pediatric research</topic><topic>Phonological Awareness</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reading ability</topic><topic>Reading Comprehension</topic><topic>Reading Skills</topic><topic>Reading Tests</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Standardized Tests</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Suprasegmentals</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Word recognition</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grantham, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Lisa S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geers, Ann E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uchanski, Rosalie M</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grantham, Heather</au><au>Davidson, Lisa S</au><au>Geers, Ann E</au><au>Uchanski, Rosalie M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1362383</ericid><atitle>Effects of Segmental and Suprasegmental Speech Perception on Reading in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients</atitle><jtitle>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</jtitle><addtitle>J Speech Lang Hear Res</addtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>3583</spage><epage>3594</epage><pages>3583-3594</pages><issn>1092-4388</issn><eissn>1558-9102</eissn><abstract>Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine whether suprasegmental speech perception contributes unique variance in predictions of reading decoding and comprehension for prelingually deaf children using two devices, at least one of which is a cochlear implant (CI). Method: A total of 104, 5- to 9-year-old CI recipients completed tests of segmental perception (e.g., word recognition in quiet and noise, recognition of vowels and consonants in quiet), suprasegmental perception (e.g., talker and stress discrimination, nonword stress repetition, and emotion identification), and nonverbal intelligence. Two years later, participants completed standardized tests of reading decoding and comprehension. Using regression analyses, the unique contribution of suprasegmental perception to reading skills was determined after controlling for demographic characteristics and segmental perception performance. Results: Standardized reading scores of the CI recipients increased with nonverbal intelligence for both decoding and comprehension. Female gender was associated with higher comprehension scores. After controlling for gender and nonverbal intelligence, segmental perception accounted for approximately 4% and 2% of the variance in decoding and comprehension, respectively. After controlling for nonverbal intelligence, gender, and segmental perception, suprasegmental perception accounted for an extra 4% and 7% unique variance in reading decoding and reading comprehension, respectively. Conclusions: Suprasegmental perception operates independently from segmental perception to facilitate good reading outcomes for these children with CIs. Clinicians and educators should be mindful that early perceptual skills may have long-term benefits for literacy. Research on how to optimize suprasegmental perception, perhaps through hearing-device programming and/or training strategies, is needed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</pub><pmid>36001864</pmid><doi>10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00035</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2174-1230</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1092-4388
ispartof Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 2022-09, Vol.65 (9), p.3583-3594
issn 1092-4388
1558-9102
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9913132
source MEDLINE; Education Source; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Assistive Technology
Auditory Perception
Babies
Care and treatment
Child
Child, Preschool
Children
Children & youth
Children, Deaf
Cochlear Implantation
Cochlear Implants
Deafness
Deafness - rehabilitation
Deafness - surgery
Decoding
Decoding (Reading)
Female
Gender
Gender Differences
Hearing
Hearing loss
Humans
Intelligence
Language
Listening
Literacy
Medical personnel
Noise
Patient outcomes
Pediatric research
Phonological Awareness
Phonology
Psychological aspects
Reading
Reading ability
Reading Comprehension
Reading Skills
Reading Tests
Scores
Speech
Speech Perception
Standardized Tests
Stress
Suprasegmentals
Transplants & implants
Word recognition
Young Children
title Effects of Segmental and Suprasegmental Speech Perception on Reading in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T03%3A33%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Segmental%20and%20Suprasegmental%20Speech%20Perception%20on%20Reading%20in%20Pediatric%20Cochlear%20Implant%20Recipients&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20speech,%20language,%20and%20hearing%20research&rft.au=Grantham,%20Heather&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3583&rft.epage=3594&rft.pages=3583-3594&rft.issn=1092-4388&rft.eissn=1558-9102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00035&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA719992560%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2713600552&rft_id=info:pmid/36001864&rft_galeid=A719992560&rft_ericid=EJ1362383&rfr_iscdi=true