Exploring pattern recognition: what is the relationship between the recognition of words, faces and other objects?
Debate surrounds processes of visual recognition, with no consensus as to whether recognition of distinct object categories (faces, bodies, cars, and words) is domain specific or subserved by domain-general visual recognition mechanisms. Here, we investigated correlations between the performance of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cognitive processing 2023-02, Vol.24 (1), p.59-70 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 70 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 59 |
container_title | Cognitive processing |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Maratos, F. A. Chu, K. Lipka, S. Stupple, E. J. N. Parente, F. |
description | Debate surrounds processes of visual recognition, with no consensus as to whether recognition of distinct object categories (faces, bodies, cars, and words) is domain specific or subserved by domain-general visual recognition mechanisms. Here, we investigated correlations between the performance of 74 participants on recognition tasks for words, faces and other object categories. Participants completed a counter-balanced test battery of the Cambridge Face, Car and Body Parts Memory tests, as well as a standard four category lexical decision task, with response time and recognition accuracy as dependent variables. Results revealed significant correlations across domains for both recognition accuracy and response time, providing some support for domain-general pattern recognition. Further exploration of the data using principal component analysis (PCA) revealed a two-component model for both the response time and accuracy data. However, how the various word and object recognition tasks fitted these components varied considerably but did hint at familiarity/expertise as a common factor. In sum, we argue a complex relationship exists between domain-specific processing and domain-general processing, but that this is shaped by expertise. To further our understanding of pattern recognition, research investigating the recognition of words, faces and other objects in dyslexic individuals is recommended, as is research exploiting neuroimaging methodologies, with excellent temporal resolution, to chart the temporal specifics of different forms of visual pattern recognition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10339-022-01111-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9898371</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2736664270</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-a5f659b55fc186f9ec7b6c25ac54de094610069ae072da7a35d8659bd1b87e933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uctu3CAURVWj5vkDWVQsu4gbHjaYLFpFUdJWipRNukYYX88w8oALTKf9--LOZJRuygbEedyjexC6pOQjJUReJ0o4VxVhrCK0nIq_QSdUUFbVUpG3h3fLjtFpSitCmCK8foeOueBSFPAExftf0xii8ws8mZwhehzBhoV32QV_g7dLk7FLOC-hAKOZf9PSTbiDvAXwe-CgwGHA2xD7dIUHYyFh43scCini0K3A5vT5HB0NZkxwsb_P0PeH--e7r9Xj05dvd7ePlS3hcmWaQTSqa5rB0lYMCqzshGWNsU3dA1G1KEsQygCRrDfS8KZvZ0FPu1aC4vwMfdr5TptuDb0Fn6MZ9RTd2sTfOhin_0W8W-pF-KlVq1ouaTH4sDeI4ccGUtZrlyyMo_EQNkkzyYUQNZOkUNmOamNIKcJwGEOJnsvSu7J0KUv_LUvPAd-_DniQvLRTCHxHSNPcEES9Cpvoy9L-Z_sHnPqirw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2736664270</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring pattern recognition: what is the relationship between the recognition of words, faces and other objects?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Maratos, F. A. ; Chu, K. ; Lipka, S. ; Stupple, E. J. N. ; Parente, F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Maratos, F. A. ; Chu, K. ; Lipka, S. ; Stupple, E. J. N. ; Parente, F.</creatorcontrib><description>Debate surrounds processes of visual recognition, with no consensus as to whether recognition of distinct object categories (faces, bodies, cars, and words) is domain specific or subserved by domain-general visual recognition mechanisms. Here, we investigated correlations between the performance of 74 participants on recognition tasks for words, faces and other object categories. Participants completed a counter-balanced test battery of the Cambridge Face, Car and Body Parts Memory tests, as well as a standard four category lexical decision task, with response time and recognition accuracy as dependent variables. Results revealed significant correlations across domains for both recognition accuracy and response time, providing some support for domain-general pattern recognition. Further exploration of the data using principal component analysis (PCA) revealed a two-component model for both the response time and accuracy data. However, how the various word and object recognition tasks fitted these components varied considerably but did hint at familiarity/expertise as a common factor. In sum, we argue a complex relationship exists between domain-specific processing and domain-general processing, but that this is shaped by expertise. To further our understanding of pattern recognition, research investigating the recognition of words, faces and other objects in dyslexic individuals is recommended, as is research exploiting neuroimaging methodologies, with excellent temporal resolution, to chart the temporal specifics of different forms of visual pattern recognition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1612-4782</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1612-4790</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10339-022-01111-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36376612</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Artificial Intelligence ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Face ; Humans ; Neurosciences ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Reaction Time ; Recognition, Psychology - physiology ; Research Article ; Visual Perception - physiology</subject><ispartof>Cognitive processing, 2023-02, Vol.24 (1), p.59-70</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-a5f659b55fc186f9ec7b6c25ac54de094610069ae072da7a35d8659bd1b87e933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-a5f659b55fc186f9ec7b6c25ac54de094610069ae072da7a35d8659bd1b87e933</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5738-6491</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10339-022-01111-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10339-022-01111-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36376612$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maratos, F. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipka, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stupple, E. J. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parente, F.</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring pattern recognition: what is the relationship between the recognition of words, faces and other objects?</title><title>Cognitive processing</title><addtitle>Cogn Process</addtitle><addtitle>Cogn Process</addtitle><description>Debate surrounds processes of visual recognition, with no consensus as to whether recognition of distinct object categories (faces, bodies, cars, and words) is domain specific or subserved by domain-general visual recognition mechanisms. Here, we investigated correlations between the performance of 74 participants on recognition tasks for words, faces and other object categories. Participants completed a counter-balanced test battery of the Cambridge Face, Car and Body Parts Memory tests, as well as a standard four category lexical decision task, with response time and recognition accuracy as dependent variables. Results revealed significant correlations across domains for both recognition accuracy and response time, providing some support for domain-general pattern recognition. Further exploration of the data using principal component analysis (PCA) revealed a two-component model for both the response time and accuracy data. However, how the various word and object recognition tasks fitted these components varied considerably but did hint at familiarity/expertise as a common factor. In sum, we argue a complex relationship exists between domain-specific processing and domain-general processing, but that this is shaped by expertise. To further our understanding of pattern recognition, research investigating the recognition of words, faces and other objects in dyslexic individuals is recommended, as is research exploiting neuroimaging methodologies, with excellent temporal resolution, to chart the temporal specifics of different forms of visual pattern recognition.</description><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Face</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Recognition, Psychology - physiology</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><issn>1612-4782</issn><issn>1612-4790</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uctu3CAURVWj5vkDWVQsu4gbHjaYLFpFUdJWipRNukYYX88w8oALTKf9--LOZJRuygbEedyjexC6pOQjJUReJ0o4VxVhrCK0nIq_QSdUUFbVUpG3h3fLjtFpSitCmCK8foeOueBSFPAExftf0xii8ws8mZwhehzBhoV32QV_g7dLk7FLOC-hAKOZf9PSTbiDvAXwe-CgwGHA2xD7dIUHYyFh43scCini0K3A5vT5HB0NZkxwsb_P0PeH--e7r9Xj05dvd7ePlS3hcmWaQTSqa5rB0lYMCqzshGWNsU3dA1G1KEsQygCRrDfS8KZvZ0FPu1aC4vwMfdr5TptuDb0Fn6MZ9RTd2sTfOhin_0W8W-pF-KlVq1ouaTH4sDeI4ccGUtZrlyyMo_EQNkkzyYUQNZOkUNmOamNIKcJwGEOJnsvSu7J0KUv_LUvPAd-_DniQvLRTCHxHSNPcEES9Cpvoy9L-Z_sHnPqirw</recordid><startdate>20230201</startdate><enddate>20230201</enddate><creator>Maratos, F. A.</creator><creator>Chu, K.</creator><creator>Lipka, S.</creator><creator>Stupple, E. J. N.</creator><creator>Parente, F.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5738-6491</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230201</creationdate><title>Exploring pattern recognition: what is the relationship between the recognition of words, faces and other objects?</title><author>Maratos, F. A. ; Chu, K. ; Lipka, S. ; Stupple, E. J. N. ; Parente, F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-a5f659b55fc186f9ec7b6c25ac54de094610069ae072da7a35d8659bd1b87e933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Face</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Recognition, Psychology - physiology</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maratos, F. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipka, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stupple, E. J. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parente, F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cognitive processing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maratos, F. A.</au><au>Chu, K.</au><au>Lipka, S.</au><au>Stupple, E. J. N.</au><au>Parente, F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring pattern recognition: what is the relationship between the recognition of words, faces and other objects?</atitle><jtitle>Cognitive processing</jtitle><stitle>Cogn Process</stitle><addtitle>Cogn Process</addtitle><date>2023-02-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>70</epage><pages>59-70</pages><issn>1612-4782</issn><eissn>1612-4790</eissn><abstract>Debate surrounds processes of visual recognition, with no consensus as to whether recognition of distinct object categories (faces, bodies, cars, and words) is domain specific or subserved by domain-general visual recognition mechanisms. Here, we investigated correlations between the performance of 74 participants on recognition tasks for words, faces and other object categories. Participants completed a counter-balanced test battery of the Cambridge Face, Car and Body Parts Memory tests, as well as a standard four category lexical decision task, with response time and recognition accuracy as dependent variables. Results revealed significant correlations across domains for both recognition accuracy and response time, providing some support for domain-general pattern recognition. Further exploration of the data using principal component analysis (PCA) revealed a two-component model for both the response time and accuracy data. However, how the various word and object recognition tasks fitted these components varied considerably but did hint at familiarity/expertise as a common factor. In sum, we argue a complex relationship exists between domain-specific processing and domain-general processing, but that this is shaped by expertise. To further our understanding of pattern recognition, research investigating the recognition of words, faces and other objects in dyslexic individuals is recommended, as is research exploiting neuroimaging methodologies, with excellent temporal resolution, to chart the temporal specifics of different forms of visual pattern recognition.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>36376612</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10339-022-01111-3</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5738-6491</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1612-4782 |
ispartof | Cognitive processing, 2023-02, Vol.24 (1), p.59-70 |
issn | 1612-4782 1612-4790 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9898371 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Artificial Intelligence Behavioral Sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Face Humans Neurosciences Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology Reaction Time Recognition, Psychology - physiology Research Article Visual Perception - physiology |
title | Exploring pattern recognition: what is the relationship between the recognition of words, faces and other objects? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T14%3A48%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20pattern%20recognition:%20what%20is%20the%20relationship%20between%20the%20recognition%20of%20words,%20faces%20and%20other%20objects?&rft.jtitle=Cognitive%20processing&rft.au=Maratos,%20F.%20A.&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=70&rft.pages=59-70&rft.issn=1612-4782&rft.eissn=1612-4790&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10339-022-01111-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2736664270%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2736664270&rft_id=info:pmid/36376612&rfr_iscdi=true |