Exploring pattern recognition: what is the relationship between the recognition of words, faces and other objects?

Debate surrounds processes of visual recognition, with no consensus as to whether recognition of distinct object categories (faces, bodies, cars, and words) is domain specific or subserved by domain-general visual recognition mechanisms. Here, we investigated correlations between the performance of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cognitive processing 2023-02, Vol.24 (1), p.59-70
Hauptverfasser: Maratos, F. A., Chu, K., Lipka, S., Stupple, E. J. N., Parente, F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 70
container_issue 1
container_start_page 59
container_title Cognitive processing
container_volume 24
creator Maratos, F. A.
Chu, K.
Lipka, S.
Stupple, E. J. N.
Parente, F.
description Debate surrounds processes of visual recognition, with no consensus as to whether recognition of distinct object categories (faces, bodies, cars, and words) is domain specific or subserved by domain-general visual recognition mechanisms. Here, we investigated correlations between the performance of 74 participants on recognition tasks for words, faces and other object categories. Participants completed a counter-balanced test battery of the Cambridge Face, Car and Body Parts Memory tests, as well as a standard four category lexical decision task, with response time and recognition accuracy as dependent variables. Results revealed significant correlations across domains for both recognition accuracy and response time, providing some support for domain-general pattern recognition. Further exploration of the data using principal component analysis (PCA) revealed a two-component model for both the response time and accuracy data. However, how the various word and object recognition tasks fitted these components varied considerably but did hint at familiarity/expertise as a common factor. In sum, we argue a complex relationship exists between domain-specific processing and domain-general processing, but that this is shaped by expertise. To further our understanding of pattern recognition, research investigating the recognition of words, faces and other objects in dyslexic individuals is recommended, as is research exploiting neuroimaging methodologies, with excellent temporal resolution, to chart the temporal specifics of different forms of visual pattern recognition.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10339-022-01111-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9898371</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2736664270</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-a5f659b55fc186f9ec7b6c25ac54de094610069ae072da7a35d8659bd1b87e933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uctu3CAURVWj5vkDWVQsu4gbHjaYLFpFUdJWipRNukYYX88w8oALTKf9--LOZJRuygbEedyjexC6pOQjJUReJ0o4VxVhrCK0nIq_QSdUUFbVUpG3h3fLjtFpSitCmCK8foeOueBSFPAExftf0xii8ws8mZwhehzBhoV32QV_g7dLk7FLOC-hAKOZf9PSTbiDvAXwe-CgwGHA2xD7dIUHYyFh43scCini0K3A5vT5HB0NZkxwsb_P0PeH--e7r9Xj05dvd7ePlS3hcmWaQTSqa5rB0lYMCqzshGWNsU3dA1G1KEsQygCRrDfS8KZvZ0FPu1aC4vwMfdr5TptuDb0Fn6MZ9RTd2sTfOhin_0W8W-pF-KlVq1ouaTH4sDeI4ccGUtZrlyyMo_EQNkkzyYUQNZOkUNmOamNIKcJwGEOJnsvSu7J0KUv_LUvPAd-_DniQvLRTCHxHSNPcEES9Cpvoy9L-Z_sHnPqirw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2736664270</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring pattern recognition: what is the relationship between the recognition of words, faces and other objects?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Maratos, F. A. ; Chu, K. ; Lipka, S. ; Stupple, E. J. N. ; Parente, F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Maratos, F. A. ; Chu, K. ; Lipka, S. ; Stupple, E. J. N. ; Parente, F.</creatorcontrib><description>Debate surrounds processes of visual recognition, with no consensus as to whether recognition of distinct object categories (faces, bodies, cars, and words) is domain specific or subserved by domain-general visual recognition mechanisms. Here, we investigated correlations between the performance of 74 participants on recognition tasks for words, faces and other object categories. Participants completed a counter-balanced test battery of the Cambridge Face, Car and Body Parts Memory tests, as well as a standard four category lexical decision task, with response time and recognition accuracy as dependent variables. Results revealed significant correlations across domains for both recognition accuracy and response time, providing some support for domain-general pattern recognition. Further exploration of the data using principal component analysis (PCA) revealed a two-component model for both the response time and accuracy data. However, how the various word and object recognition tasks fitted these components varied considerably but did hint at familiarity/expertise as a common factor. In sum, we argue a complex relationship exists between domain-specific processing and domain-general processing, but that this is shaped by expertise. To further our understanding of pattern recognition, research investigating the recognition of words, faces and other objects in dyslexic individuals is recommended, as is research exploiting neuroimaging methodologies, with excellent temporal resolution, to chart the temporal specifics of different forms of visual pattern recognition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1612-4782</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1612-4790</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10339-022-01111-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36376612</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Artificial Intelligence ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Face ; Humans ; Neurosciences ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Reaction Time ; Recognition, Psychology - physiology ; Research Article ; Visual Perception - physiology</subject><ispartof>Cognitive processing, 2023-02, Vol.24 (1), p.59-70</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-a5f659b55fc186f9ec7b6c25ac54de094610069ae072da7a35d8659bd1b87e933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-a5f659b55fc186f9ec7b6c25ac54de094610069ae072da7a35d8659bd1b87e933</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5738-6491</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10339-022-01111-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10339-022-01111-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36376612$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maratos, F. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipka, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stupple, E. J. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parente, F.</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring pattern recognition: what is the relationship between the recognition of words, faces and other objects?</title><title>Cognitive processing</title><addtitle>Cogn Process</addtitle><addtitle>Cogn Process</addtitle><description>Debate surrounds processes of visual recognition, with no consensus as to whether recognition of distinct object categories (faces, bodies, cars, and words) is domain specific or subserved by domain-general visual recognition mechanisms. Here, we investigated correlations between the performance of 74 participants on recognition tasks for words, faces and other object categories. Participants completed a counter-balanced test battery of the Cambridge Face, Car and Body Parts Memory tests, as well as a standard four category lexical decision task, with response time and recognition accuracy as dependent variables. Results revealed significant correlations across domains for both recognition accuracy and response time, providing some support for domain-general pattern recognition. Further exploration of the data using principal component analysis (PCA) revealed a two-component model for both the response time and accuracy data. However, how the various word and object recognition tasks fitted these components varied considerably but did hint at familiarity/expertise as a common factor. In sum, we argue a complex relationship exists between domain-specific processing and domain-general processing, but that this is shaped by expertise. To further our understanding of pattern recognition, research investigating the recognition of words, faces and other objects in dyslexic individuals is recommended, as is research exploiting neuroimaging methodologies, with excellent temporal resolution, to chart the temporal specifics of different forms of visual pattern recognition.</description><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Face</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Recognition, Psychology - physiology</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><issn>1612-4782</issn><issn>1612-4790</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uctu3CAURVWj5vkDWVQsu4gbHjaYLFpFUdJWipRNukYYX88w8oALTKf9--LOZJRuygbEedyjexC6pOQjJUReJ0o4VxVhrCK0nIq_QSdUUFbVUpG3h3fLjtFpSitCmCK8foeOueBSFPAExftf0xii8ws8mZwhehzBhoV32QV_g7dLk7FLOC-hAKOZf9PSTbiDvAXwe-CgwGHA2xD7dIUHYyFh43scCini0K3A5vT5HB0NZkxwsb_P0PeH--e7r9Xj05dvd7ePlS3hcmWaQTSqa5rB0lYMCqzshGWNsU3dA1G1KEsQygCRrDfS8KZvZ0FPu1aC4vwMfdr5TptuDb0Fn6MZ9RTd2sTfOhin_0W8W-pF-KlVq1ouaTH4sDeI4ccGUtZrlyyMo_EQNkkzyYUQNZOkUNmOamNIKcJwGEOJnsvSu7J0KUv_LUvPAd-_DniQvLRTCHxHSNPcEES9Cpvoy9L-Z_sHnPqirw</recordid><startdate>20230201</startdate><enddate>20230201</enddate><creator>Maratos, F. A.</creator><creator>Chu, K.</creator><creator>Lipka, S.</creator><creator>Stupple, E. J. N.</creator><creator>Parente, F.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5738-6491</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230201</creationdate><title>Exploring pattern recognition: what is the relationship between the recognition of words, faces and other objects?</title><author>Maratos, F. A. ; Chu, K. ; Lipka, S. ; Stupple, E. J. N. ; Parente, F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-a5f659b55fc186f9ec7b6c25ac54de094610069ae072da7a35d8659bd1b87e933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Face</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Recognition, Psychology - physiology</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maratos, F. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipka, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stupple, E. J. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parente, F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cognitive processing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maratos, F. A.</au><au>Chu, K.</au><au>Lipka, S.</au><au>Stupple, E. J. N.</au><au>Parente, F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring pattern recognition: what is the relationship between the recognition of words, faces and other objects?</atitle><jtitle>Cognitive processing</jtitle><stitle>Cogn Process</stitle><addtitle>Cogn Process</addtitle><date>2023-02-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>70</epage><pages>59-70</pages><issn>1612-4782</issn><eissn>1612-4790</eissn><abstract>Debate surrounds processes of visual recognition, with no consensus as to whether recognition of distinct object categories (faces, bodies, cars, and words) is domain specific or subserved by domain-general visual recognition mechanisms. Here, we investigated correlations between the performance of 74 participants on recognition tasks for words, faces and other object categories. Participants completed a counter-balanced test battery of the Cambridge Face, Car and Body Parts Memory tests, as well as a standard four category lexical decision task, with response time and recognition accuracy as dependent variables. Results revealed significant correlations across domains for both recognition accuracy and response time, providing some support for domain-general pattern recognition. Further exploration of the data using principal component analysis (PCA) revealed a two-component model for both the response time and accuracy data. However, how the various word and object recognition tasks fitted these components varied considerably but did hint at familiarity/expertise as a common factor. In sum, we argue a complex relationship exists between domain-specific processing and domain-general processing, but that this is shaped by expertise. To further our understanding of pattern recognition, research investigating the recognition of words, faces and other objects in dyslexic individuals is recommended, as is research exploiting neuroimaging methodologies, with excellent temporal resolution, to chart the temporal specifics of different forms of visual pattern recognition.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>36376612</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10339-022-01111-3</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5738-6491</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1612-4782
ispartof Cognitive processing, 2023-02, Vol.24 (1), p.59-70
issn 1612-4782
1612-4790
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9898371
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Artificial Intelligence
Behavioral Sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Face
Humans
Neurosciences
Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology
Reaction Time
Recognition, Psychology - physiology
Research Article
Visual Perception - physiology
title Exploring pattern recognition: what is the relationship between the recognition of words, faces and other objects?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T14%3A48%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20pattern%20recognition:%20what%20is%20the%20relationship%20between%20the%20recognition%20of%20words,%20faces%20and%20other%20objects?&rft.jtitle=Cognitive%20processing&rft.au=Maratos,%20F.%20A.&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=70&rft.pages=59-70&rft.issn=1612-4782&rft.eissn=1612-4790&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10339-022-01111-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2736664270%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2736664270&rft_id=info:pmid/36376612&rfr_iscdi=true