A comparison of the efficacy of tocilizumab versus azathioprine for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A study protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the nervous system, which is frequently accompanied by a pathological humoral immune response against aquaporin-4 water channel. The most common feature of the disorder is recurrent episodes of longitudinally extensi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine (Baltimore) 2023-01, Vol.102 (4), p.e32748-e32748
Hauptverfasser: Tang, Qi, Yao, Mengyuan, Huang, Yuanyuan, Bian, Jiangping, Wang, Yupeng, Ji, Wenbo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e32748
container_issue 4
container_start_page e32748
container_title Medicine (Baltimore)
container_volume 102
creator Tang, Qi
Yao, Mengyuan
Huang, Yuanyuan
Bian, Jiangping
Wang, Yupeng
Ji, Wenbo
description Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the nervous system, which is frequently accompanied by a pathological humoral immune response against aquaporin-4 water channel. The most common feature of the disorder is recurrent episodes of longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis and optic neuritis. Frequent relapse leads to the gradual accumulation of neurological dysfunction. Azathioprine (AZA) is an empirical attack -preventive immunotherapies drug to prevent the relapse of NMOSD, and tocilizumab (TCZ) has been also reported reduce the activity of NMOSD. Therefore, we designed this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy between TCZ and AZA in the treatment of NMOSD patients. This study followed the PRISMA guidelines. We searched the English literature between 2000 and 2022 by using relevant medical subject heading and entry terms in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL databases. A meta-analysis of drug efficacy was performed using expanded disability status scale score and annualized relapse rate (ARR) as the primary outcome indicators. The literature search found a total of 1546 articles about TCZ and AZA in the treatment of NMOSD, 27 of which were included in this study after a series of screening. 930 and 148 patients with NMOSD were enrolled, who had been treated with AZA and TCZ, respectively. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) of expanded disability status scale score before and after AZA treated was -0.40 (95%CI: -0.50, -0.30) (I2 = 65.4%, P < .001), before and after TCZ treated was -0.84 (95%CI: -1.08, -0.60) (I2 = 45.6%, P = .076). The SMD of ARR before and after AZA treated was -1.01 (95%CI: -1.12, -0.90) (I2 = 83.4%, P < .001), before and after TCZ treated was -1.27 (95%CI: -1.52, -1.03) (I2 = 52.7%, P = .039). In addition, TCZ reduce ARR more significantly compared with AZA (P = .031). The results of this study showed that the treatment of NMOSD patients with AZA and TCZ are associated with decreased number of relapses and disability improvement as well. In addition, compared with AZA, TCZ more significantly reduce ARR.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/MD.0000000000032748
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9876016</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2770119249</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4002-f46f0e59e9a48d74706a1d7b389a621b4d1f550fe5c380733a661764ab14cd143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkdtu1DAQhiMEokvhCZCQL7lJ8Sn2hgukquUkteIGrq1ZZ8IanDjYzq7S5-FBcXdLOcyNNfb_f-PRX1XPGT1jtNWvri_P6J8SXMv1g2rFGqHqplXyYbWilDe1brU8qZ6k9I1SJjSXj6sToTRthFSr6uc5sWGYILoURhJ6krdIsO-dBbsc-mCddzfzABuyw5jmROAG8taFKboRSR8iGXGOYVjQu-wSCVMubpImtDnOA-kKOnYYX5NzkvLcLWSKoWCDP5jTkjIOUDwk4s7hnsDYkQEz1DCCX5JLT6tHPfiEz-7O0-rLu7efLz7UV5_ef7w4v6qtLKvWvVQ9xabFFuS601JTBazTG7FuQXG2kR3rm4b22FixploIUIppJWHDpO2YFKfVmyN3mjcDdhbHHMGbsugAcTEBnPn3ZXRb8zXsTLvWijJVAC_vADH8mDFlM7hk0XsYMczJcK0pYy2XbZGKo9TGkFLE_n4Mo-Y2X3N9af7Pt7he_P3De8_vQItAHgX74HOJ67uf9xjNFsHn7YHX6JbXnHJBGde0vr3i4hewR7VI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2770119249</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of the efficacy of tocilizumab versus azathioprine for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A study protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wolters Kluwer Open Health</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tang, Qi ; Yao, Mengyuan ; Huang, Yuanyuan ; Bian, Jiangping ; Wang, Yupeng ; Ji, Wenbo</creator><creatorcontrib>Tang, Qi ; Yao, Mengyuan ; Huang, Yuanyuan ; Bian, Jiangping ; Wang, Yupeng ; Ji, Wenbo</creatorcontrib><description>Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the nervous system, which is frequently accompanied by a pathological humoral immune response against aquaporin-4 water channel. The most common feature of the disorder is recurrent episodes of longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis and optic neuritis. Frequent relapse leads to the gradual accumulation of neurological dysfunction. Azathioprine (AZA) is an empirical attack -preventive immunotherapies drug to prevent the relapse of NMOSD, and tocilizumab (TCZ) has been also reported reduce the activity of NMOSD. Therefore, we designed this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy between TCZ and AZA in the treatment of NMOSD patients. This study followed the PRISMA guidelines. We searched the English literature between 2000 and 2022 by using relevant medical subject heading and entry terms in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL databases. A meta-analysis of drug efficacy was performed using expanded disability status scale score and annualized relapse rate (ARR) as the primary outcome indicators. The literature search found a total of 1546 articles about TCZ and AZA in the treatment of NMOSD, 27 of which were included in this study after a series of screening. 930 and 148 patients with NMOSD were enrolled, who had been treated with AZA and TCZ, respectively. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) of expanded disability status scale score before and after AZA treated was -0.40 (95%CI: -0.50, -0.30) (I2 = 65.4%, P &lt; .001), before and after TCZ treated was -0.84 (95%CI: -1.08, -0.60) (I2 = 45.6%, P = .076). The SMD of ARR before and after AZA treated was -1.01 (95%CI: -1.12, -0.90) (I2 = 83.4%, P &lt; .001), before and after TCZ treated was -1.27 (95%CI: -1.52, -1.03) (I2 = 52.7%, P = .039). In addition, TCZ reduce ARR more significantly compared with AZA (P = .031). The results of this study showed that the treatment of NMOSD patients with AZA and TCZ are associated with decreased number of relapses and disability improvement as well. In addition, compared with AZA, TCZ more significantly reduce ARR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7974</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-5964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032748</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36705346</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Azathioprine - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Meta-Analysis as Topic ; Neuromyelitis Optica - drug therapy ; Recurrence ; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ; Systematic Reviews as Topic</subject><ispartof>Medicine (Baltimore), 2023-01, Vol.102 (4), p.e32748-e32748</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4002-f46f0e59e9a48d74706a1d7b389a621b4d1f550fe5c380733a661764ab14cd143</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7981-8435 ; 0000-0003-1419-7011</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9876016/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9876016/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27922,27923,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36705346$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tang, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Mengyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yuanyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bian, Jiangping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yupeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Wenbo</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of the efficacy of tocilizumab versus azathioprine for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A study protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Medicine (Baltimore)</title><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><description>Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the nervous system, which is frequently accompanied by a pathological humoral immune response against aquaporin-4 water channel. The most common feature of the disorder is recurrent episodes of longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis and optic neuritis. Frequent relapse leads to the gradual accumulation of neurological dysfunction. Azathioprine (AZA) is an empirical attack -preventive immunotherapies drug to prevent the relapse of NMOSD, and tocilizumab (TCZ) has been also reported reduce the activity of NMOSD. Therefore, we designed this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy between TCZ and AZA in the treatment of NMOSD patients. This study followed the PRISMA guidelines. We searched the English literature between 2000 and 2022 by using relevant medical subject heading and entry terms in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL databases. A meta-analysis of drug efficacy was performed using expanded disability status scale score and annualized relapse rate (ARR) as the primary outcome indicators. The literature search found a total of 1546 articles about TCZ and AZA in the treatment of NMOSD, 27 of which were included in this study after a series of screening. 930 and 148 patients with NMOSD were enrolled, who had been treated with AZA and TCZ, respectively. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) of expanded disability status scale score before and after AZA treated was -0.40 (95%CI: -0.50, -0.30) (I2 = 65.4%, P &lt; .001), before and after TCZ treated was -0.84 (95%CI: -1.08, -0.60) (I2 = 45.6%, P = .076). The SMD of ARR before and after AZA treated was -1.01 (95%CI: -1.12, -0.90) (I2 = 83.4%, P &lt; .001), before and after TCZ treated was -1.27 (95%CI: -1.52, -1.03) (I2 = 52.7%, P = .039). In addition, TCZ reduce ARR more significantly compared with AZA (P = .031). The results of this study showed that the treatment of NMOSD patients with AZA and TCZ are associated with decreased number of relapses and disability improvement as well. In addition, compared with AZA, TCZ more significantly reduce ARR.</description><subject>Azathioprine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meta-Analysis as Topic</subject><subject>Neuromyelitis Optica - drug therapy</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</subject><subject>Systematic Reviews as Topic</subject><issn>0025-7974</issn><issn>1536-5964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkdtu1DAQhiMEokvhCZCQL7lJ8Sn2hgukquUkteIGrq1ZZ8IanDjYzq7S5-FBcXdLOcyNNfb_f-PRX1XPGT1jtNWvri_P6J8SXMv1g2rFGqHqplXyYbWilDe1brU8qZ6k9I1SJjSXj6sToTRthFSr6uc5sWGYILoURhJ6krdIsO-dBbsc-mCddzfzABuyw5jmROAG8taFKboRSR8iGXGOYVjQu-wSCVMubpImtDnOA-kKOnYYX5NzkvLcLWSKoWCDP5jTkjIOUDwk4s7hnsDYkQEz1DCCX5JLT6tHPfiEz-7O0-rLu7efLz7UV5_ef7w4v6qtLKvWvVQ9xabFFuS601JTBazTG7FuQXG2kR3rm4b22FixploIUIppJWHDpO2YFKfVmyN3mjcDdhbHHMGbsugAcTEBnPn3ZXRb8zXsTLvWijJVAC_vADH8mDFlM7hk0XsYMczJcK0pYy2XbZGKo9TGkFLE_n4Mo-Y2X3N9af7Pt7he_P3De8_vQItAHgX74HOJ67uf9xjNFsHn7YHX6JbXnHJBGde0vr3i4hewR7VI</recordid><startdate>20230127</startdate><enddate>20230127</enddate><creator>Tang, Qi</creator><creator>Yao, Mengyuan</creator><creator>Huang, Yuanyuan</creator><creator>Bian, Jiangping</creator><creator>Wang, Yupeng</creator><creator>Ji, Wenbo</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7981-8435</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1419-7011</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230127</creationdate><title>A comparison of the efficacy of tocilizumab versus azathioprine for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A study protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Tang, Qi ; Yao, Mengyuan ; Huang, Yuanyuan ; Bian, Jiangping ; Wang, Yupeng ; Ji, Wenbo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4002-f46f0e59e9a48d74706a1d7b389a621b4d1f550fe5c380733a661764ab14cd143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Azathioprine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meta-Analysis as Topic</topic><topic>Neuromyelitis Optica - drug therapy</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</topic><topic>Systematic Reviews as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tang, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Mengyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yuanyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bian, Jiangping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yupeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Wenbo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tang, Qi</au><au>Yao, Mengyuan</au><au>Huang, Yuanyuan</au><au>Bian, Jiangping</au><au>Wang, Yupeng</au><au>Ji, Wenbo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of the efficacy of tocilizumab versus azathioprine for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A study protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><date>2023-01-27</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e32748</spage><epage>e32748</epage><pages>e32748-e32748</pages><issn>0025-7974</issn><eissn>1536-5964</eissn><abstract>Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the nervous system, which is frequently accompanied by a pathological humoral immune response against aquaporin-4 water channel. The most common feature of the disorder is recurrent episodes of longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis and optic neuritis. Frequent relapse leads to the gradual accumulation of neurological dysfunction. Azathioprine (AZA) is an empirical attack -preventive immunotherapies drug to prevent the relapse of NMOSD, and tocilizumab (TCZ) has been also reported reduce the activity of NMOSD. Therefore, we designed this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy between TCZ and AZA in the treatment of NMOSD patients. This study followed the PRISMA guidelines. We searched the English literature between 2000 and 2022 by using relevant medical subject heading and entry terms in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL databases. A meta-analysis of drug efficacy was performed using expanded disability status scale score and annualized relapse rate (ARR) as the primary outcome indicators. The literature search found a total of 1546 articles about TCZ and AZA in the treatment of NMOSD, 27 of which were included in this study after a series of screening. 930 and 148 patients with NMOSD were enrolled, who had been treated with AZA and TCZ, respectively. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) of expanded disability status scale score before and after AZA treated was -0.40 (95%CI: -0.50, -0.30) (I2 = 65.4%, P &lt; .001), before and after TCZ treated was -0.84 (95%CI: -1.08, -0.60) (I2 = 45.6%, P = .076). The SMD of ARR before and after AZA treated was -1.01 (95%CI: -1.12, -0.90) (I2 = 83.4%, P &lt; .001), before and after TCZ treated was -1.27 (95%CI: -1.52, -1.03) (I2 = 52.7%, P = .039). In addition, TCZ reduce ARR more significantly compared with AZA (P = .031). The results of this study showed that the treatment of NMOSD patients with AZA and TCZ are associated with decreased number of relapses and disability improvement as well. In addition, compared with AZA, TCZ more significantly reduce ARR.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>36705346</pmid><doi>10.1097/MD.0000000000032748</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7981-8435</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1419-7011</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-7974
ispartof Medicine (Baltimore), 2023-01, Vol.102 (4), p.e32748-e32748
issn 0025-7974
1536-5964
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9876016
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wolters Kluwer Open Health; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Azathioprine - therapeutic use
Humans
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Neuromyelitis Optica - drug therapy
Recurrence
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Systematic Reviews as Topic
title A comparison of the efficacy of tocilizumab versus azathioprine for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A study protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T07%3A52%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20the%20efficacy%20of%20tocilizumab%20versus%20azathioprine%20for%20neuromyelitis%20optica%20spectrum%20disorder:%20A%20study%20protocol%20for%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20(Baltimore)&rft.au=Tang,%20Qi&rft.date=2023-01-27&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e32748&rft.epage=e32748&rft.pages=e32748-e32748&rft.issn=0025-7974&rft.eissn=1536-5964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MD.0000000000032748&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2770119249%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2770119249&rft_id=info:pmid/36705346&rfr_iscdi=true