Secondary School Athletic Trainers' Experiences With Organizational Conflict: A Comparison Across Employment Models

Athletic training is a multifaceted profession characterized by interpersonal relationships and a team approach to care. Collaborative relationships, by nature, open the door to conflict, which has been reported frequently in the collegiate athletic setting. However, secondary school athletic traine...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of athletic training 2022-11, Vol.57 (11-12), p.1085-1093
Hauptverfasser: Pike Lacy, Alicia M, Bowman, Thomas G, Huggins, Robert A, Lininger, Monica R, Denegar, Craig R, Casa, Douglas J, Singe, Stephanie M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1093
container_issue 11-12
container_start_page 1085
container_title Journal of athletic training
container_volume 57
creator Pike Lacy, Alicia M
Bowman, Thomas G
Huggins, Robert A
Lininger, Monica R
Denegar, Craig R
Casa, Douglas J
Singe, Stephanie M
description Athletic training is a multifaceted profession characterized by interpersonal relationships and a team approach to care. Collaborative relationships, by nature, open the door to conflict, which has been reported frequently in the collegiate athletic setting. However, secondary school athletic trainers' (ATs') experiences with conflict and pressure in their role are not readily understood. To measure the extent and sources of stress, pressure, and conflict within the secondary school athletic training setting and determine if differences exist across employment characteristics. Cross-sectional study. Secondary school athletics. Secondary school ATs (n = 725, age = 39.8 ± 10.5 years, years certified = 16.7 ± 9.7, years in current role = 10.6 ± 7.8). Participants were asked to reply to an online questionnaire with quantitative measures pertaining to organizational conflict and workplace dynamic. Employment type (school district employee, school district teacher, medical or university facility, independent contractor) and status (full time, part time) served as independent variables. Likert-scale scores (1 = strongly agree to 5 = strongly disagree; 1 = always to 5 = never) and perceived sources of stress, pressure, and conflict were the dependent variables. Analyses consisted of Kruskal-Wallis tests with Mann-Whitney U post hoc tests and odds ratios to assess associations between variables of interest. We obtained a 15.3% response rate (725/4745). Although the ATs reported experiencing conflict and pressure, these experiences were relatively infrequent and not universal. Compared with part-time ATs, full-time ATs described higher ratings of strong relationships with coaches (P = .003) and principals (P = .002). The most frequently identified sources of conflict were parents (59%) and coaches (53.9%), followed by athletes (32.6%). Full-time ATs were 1.6 times more likely to report experiencing conflict with a coach than part-time ATs (odds ratio = 1.550, 95% CI = 1.037, 2.317; P = .040). Secondary school ATs' experiences regarding organizational conflict were relatively positive. Instances of pressure and conflict were noted, though relatively infrequently, and these experiences were largely uninfluenced by employment type.
doi_str_mv 10.4085/1062-6050-0422.21
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9875699</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2766919024</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3701-65f2787850560cc3329caf3f27c0370a5db003f0caf861077b72d603ad7bf9053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1vFDEMhiMEoqXwA7igSBzgMsVJJsmEA9JqtXxIRT20CG5RNpPppsok02QWUX49Gfoh4MDJlv34le0XoecEjlvo-BsCgjYCODTQUnpMyQN0SBTrGiLot4c1v-sfoCelXAIQypV4jA4YZx0IxQ5ROXM2xd7ka3xmdykFvJp3wc3e4vNsfHS5vMKbH5PL3kXrCv7q5x0-zRcm-p9m9imagNcpDsHb-S1e1XycTPYlRbyyOZWCN-MU0vXo4ow_p96F8hQ9Gkwo7tltPEJf3m_O1x-bk9MPn9ark8YyCaQRfKCykx0HLsBaxqiyZmC1aKEChvdbADZALXaCgJRbSXsBzPRyOyjg7Ai9u9Gd9tvR9bZukE3QU_ZjvVcn4_Xfneh3-iJ916qTXChVBV7fCuR0tXdl1qMv1oVgokv7oqloJSVE0gV9-Q96mfa5PqdSUghFFND2v1TVAiFkC5UiN9Tv_2U33K9MQC_G68VYvRirF-M1JXXmxZ-33k_cOc1-AccUqKI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2647066740</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Secondary School Athletic Trainers' Experiences With Organizational Conflict: A Comparison Across Employment Models</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Open Access: Freely Accessible Journals by multiple vendors</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Pike Lacy, Alicia M ; Bowman, Thomas G ; Huggins, Robert A ; Lininger, Monica R ; Denegar, Craig R ; Casa, Douglas J ; Singe, Stephanie M</creator><creatorcontrib>Pike Lacy, Alicia M ; Bowman, Thomas G ; Huggins, Robert A ; Lininger, Monica R ; Denegar, Craig R ; Casa, Douglas J ; Singe, Stephanie M</creatorcontrib><description>Athletic training is a multifaceted profession characterized by interpersonal relationships and a team approach to care. Collaborative relationships, by nature, open the door to conflict, which has been reported frequently in the collegiate athletic setting. However, secondary school athletic trainers' (ATs') experiences with conflict and pressure in their role are not readily understood. To measure the extent and sources of stress, pressure, and conflict within the secondary school athletic training setting and determine if differences exist across employment characteristics. Cross-sectional study. Secondary school athletics. Secondary school ATs (n = 725, age = 39.8 ± 10.5 years, years certified = 16.7 ± 9.7, years in current role = 10.6 ± 7.8). Participants were asked to reply to an online questionnaire with quantitative measures pertaining to organizational conflict and workplace dynamic. Employment type (school district employee, school district teacher, medical or university facility, independent contractor) and status (full time, part time) served as independent variables. Likert-scale scores (1 = strongly agree to 5 = strongly disagree; 1 = always to 5 = never) and perceived sources of stress, pressure, and conflict were the dependent variables. Analyses consisted of Kruskal-Wallis tests with Mann-Whitney U post hoc tests and odds ratios to assess associations between variables of interest. We obtained a 15.3% response rate (725/4745). Although the ATs reported experiencing conflict and pressure, these experiences were relatively infrequent and not universal. Compared with part-time ATs, full-time ATs described higher ratings of strong relationships with coaches (P = .003) and principals (P = .002). The most frequently identified sources of conflict were parents (59%) and coaches (53.9%), followed by athletes (32.6%). Full-time ATs were 1.6 times more likely to report experiencing conflict with a coach than part-time ATs (odds ratio = 1.550, 95% CI = 1.037, 2.317; P = .040). Secondary school ATs' experiences regarding organizational conflict were relatively positive. Instances of pressure and conflict were noted, though relatively infrequently, and these experiences were largely uninfluenced by employment type.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1062-6050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-162X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-0422.21</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35380693</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Athletic Trainers Association</publisher><subject>Administrator Surveys ; Adult ; Athletic Coaches ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Data Analysis ; Effect Size ; Employment ; Employment Level ; Factor Analysis ; Humans ; Independent contractors ; Interpersonal Relationship ; Likert scale ; Likert Scales ; Mann-Whitney U test ; Medical Services ; Middle Aged ; Online Surveys ; Outcome Measures ; Professional Concerns ; Sample Size ; School districts ; Schools ; Secondary schools ; Social Support Groups ; Sports - education ; Sports Medicine ; Sports training ; Stakeholders ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of athletic training, 2022-11, Vol.57 (11-12), p.1085-1093</ispartof><rights>by the National Athletic Trainers' Association, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright National Athletic Trainers Association Apr 2022</rights><rights>Copyright National Athletic Trainers Association Nov 2022</rights><rights>by the National Athletic Trainers' Association, Inc 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3701-65f2787850560cc3329caf3f27c0370a5db003f0caf861077b72d603ad7bf9053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3701-65f2787850560cc3329caf3f27c0370a5db003f0caf861077b72d603ad7bf9053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875699/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875699/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35380693$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pike Lacy, Alicia M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowman, Thomas G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huggins, Robert A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lininger, Monica R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denegar, Craig R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casa, Douglas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singe, Stephanie M</creatorcontrib><title>Secondary School Athletic Trainers' Experiences With Organizational Conflict: A Comparison Across Employment Models</title><title>Journal of athletic training</title><addtitle>J Athl Train</addtitle><description>Athletic training is a multifaceted profession characterized by interpersonal relationships and a team approach to care. Collaborative relationships, by nature, open the door to conflict, which has been reported frequently in the collegiate athletic setting. However, secondary school athletic trainers' (ATs') experiences with conflict and pressure in their role are not readily understood. To measure the extent and sources of stress, pressure, and conflict within the secondary school athletic training setting and determine if differences exist across employment characteristics. Cross-sectional study. Secondary school athletics. Secondary school ATs (n = 725, age = 39.8 ± 10.5 years, years certified = 16.7 ± 9.7, years in current role = 10.6 ± 7.8). Participants were asked to reply to an online questionnaire with quantitative measures pertaining to organizational conflict and workplace dynamic. Employment type (school district employee, school district teacher, medical or university facility, independent contractor) and status (full time, part time) served as independent variables. Likert-scale scores (1 = strongly agree to 5 = strongly disagree; 1 = always to 5 = never) and perceived sources of stress, pressure, and conflict were the dependent variables. Analyses consisted of Kruskal-Wallis tests with Mann-Whitney U post hoc tests and odds ratios to assess associations between variables of interest. We obtained a 15.3% response rate (725/4745). Although the ATs reported experiencing conflict and pressure, these experiences were relatively infrequent and not universal. Compared with part-time ATs, full-time ATs described higher ratings of strong relationships with coaches (P = .003) and principals (P = .002). The most frequently identified sources of conflict were parents (59%) and coaches (53.9%), followed by athletes (32.6%). Full-time ATs were 1.6 times more likely to report experiencing conflict with a coach than part-time ATs (odds ratio = 1.550, 95% CI = 1.037, 2.317; P = .040). Secondary school ATs' experiences regarding organizational conflict were relatively positive. Instances of pressure and conflict were noted, though relatively infrequently, and these experiences were largely uninfluenced by employment type.</description><subject>Administrator Surveys</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Athletic Coaches</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Effect Size</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Employment Level</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Independent contractors</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relationship</subject><subject>Likert scale</subject><subject>Likert Scales</subject><subject>Mann-Whitney U test</subject><subject>Medical Services</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Online Surveys</subject><subject>Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Professional Concerns</subject><subject>Sample Size</subject><subject>School districts</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Secondary schools</subject><subject>Social Support Groups</subject><subject>Sports - education</subject><subject>Sports Medicine</subject><subject>Sports training</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1062-6050</issn><issn>1938-162X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1vFDEMhiMEoqXwA7igSBzgMsVJJsmEA9JqtXxIRT20CG5RNpPppsok02QWUX49Gfoh4MDJlv34le0XoecEjlvo-BsCgjYCODTQUnpMyQN0SBTrGiLot4c1v-sfoCelXAIQypV4jA4YZx0IxQ5ROXM2xd7ka3xmdykFvJp3wc3e4vNsfHS5vMKbH5PL3kXrCv7q5x0-zRcm-p9m9imagNcpDsHb-S1e1XycTPYlRbyyOZWCN-MU0vXo4ow_p96F8hQ9Gkwo7tltPEJf3m_O1x-bk9MPn9ark8YyCaQRfKCykx0HLsBaxqiyZmC1aKEChvdbADZALXaCgJRbSXsBzPRyOyjg7Ai9u9Gd9tvR9bZukE3QU_ZjvVcn4_Xfneh3-iJ916qTXChVBV7fCuR0tXdl1qMv1oVgokv7oqloJSVE0gV9-Q96mfa5PqdSUghFFND2v1TVAiFkC5UiN9Tv_2U33K9MQC_G68VYvRirF-M1JXXmxZ-33k_cOc1-AccUqKI</recordid><startdate>20221101</startdate><enddate>20221101</enddate><creator>Pike Lacy, Alicia M</creator><creator>Bowman, Thomas G</creator><creator>Huggins, Robert A</creator><creator>Lininger, Monica R</creator><creator>Denegar, Craig R</creator><creator>Casa, Douglas J</creator><creator>Singe, Stephanie M</creator><general>National Athletic Trainers Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221101</creationdate><title>Secondary School Athletic Trainers' Experiences With Organizational Conflict: A Comparison Across Employment Models</title><author>Pike Lacy, Alicia M ; Bowman, Thomas G ; Huggins, Robert A ; Lininger, Monica R ; Denegar, Craig R ; Casa, Douglas J ; Singe, Stephanie M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3701-65f2787850560cc3329caf3f27c0370a5db003f0caf861077b72d603ad7bf9053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Administrator Surveys</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Athletic Coaches</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Effect Size</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Employment Level</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Independent contractors</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relationship</topic><topic>Likert scale</topic><topic>Likert Scales</topic><topic>Mann-Whitney U test</topic><topic>Medical Services</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Online Surveys</topic><topic>Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Professional Concerns</topic><topic>Sample Size</topic><topic>School districts</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Secondary schools</topic><topic>Social Support Groups</topic><topic>Sports - education</topic><topic>Sports Medicine</topic><topic>Sports training</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pike Lacy, Alicia M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowman, Thomas G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huggins, Robert A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lininger, Monica R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denegar, Craig R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casa, Douglas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singe, Stephanie M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of athletic training</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pike Lacy, Alicia M</au><au>Bowman, Thomas G</au><au>Huggins, Robert A</au><au>Lininger, Monica R</au><au>Denegar, Craig R</au><au>Casa, Douglas J</au><au>Singe, Stephanie M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Secondary School Athletic Trainers' Experiences With Organizational Conflict: A Comparison Across Employment Models</atitle><jtitle>Journal of athletic training</jtitle><addtitle>J Athl Train</addtitle><date>2022-11-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>11-12</issue><spage>1085</spage><epage>1093</epage><pages>1085-1093</pages><issn>1062-6050</issn><eissn>1938-162X</eissn><abstract>Athletic training is a multifaceted profession characterized by interpersonal relationships and a team approach to care. Collaborative relationships, by nature, open the door to conflict, which has been reported frequently in the collegiate athletic setting. However, secondary school athletic trainers' (ATs') experiences with conflict and pressure in their role are not readily understood. To measure the extent and sources of stress, pressure, and conflict within the secondary school athletic training setting and determine if differences exist across employment characteristics. Cross-sectional study. Secondary school athletics. Secondary school ATs (n = 725, age = 39.8 ± 10.5 years, years certified = 16.7 ± 9.7, years in current role = 10.6 ± 7.8). Participants were asked to reply to an online questionnaire with quantitative measures pertaining to organizational conflict and workplace dynamic. Employment type (school district employee, school district teacher, medical or university facility, independent contractor) and status (full time, part time) served as independent variables. Likert-scale scores (1 = strongly agree to 5 = strongly disagree; 1 = always to 5 = never) and perceived sources of stress, pressure, and conflict were the dependent variables. Analyses consisted of Kruskal-Wallis tests with Mann-Whitney U post hoc tests and odds ratios to assess associations between variables of interest. We obtained a 15.3% response rate (725/4745). Although the ATs reported experiencing conflict and pressure, these experiences were relatively infrequent and not universal. Compared with part-time ATs, full-time ATs described higher ratings of strong relationships with coaches (P = .003) and principals (P = .002). The most frequently identified sources of conflict were parents (59%) and coaches (53.9%), followed by athletes (32.6%). Full-time ATs were 1.6 times more likely to report experiencing conflict with a coach than part-time ATs (odds ratio = 1.550, 95% CI = 1.037, 2.317; P = .040). Secondary school ATs' experiences regarding organizational conflict were relatively positive. Instances of pressure and conflict were noted, though relatively infrequently, and these experiences were largely uninfluenced by employment type.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Athletic Trainers Association</pub><pmid>35380693</pmid><doi>10.4085/1062-6050-0422.21</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1062-6050
ispartof Journal of athletic training, 2022-11, Vol.57 (11-12), p.1085-1093
issn 1062-6050
1938-162X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9875699
source PubMed (Medline); MEDLINE; Open Access: Freely Accessible Journals by multiple vendors; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Administrator Surveys
Adult
Athletic Coaches
Cross-Sectional Studies
Data Analysis
Effect Size
Employment
Employment Level
Factor Analysis
Humans
Independent contractors
Interpersonal Relationship
Likert scale
Likert Scales
Mann-Whitney U test
Medical Services
Middle Aged
Online Surveys
Outcome Measures
Professional Concerns
Sample Size
School districts
Schools
Secondary schools
Social Support Groups
Sports - education
Sports Medicine
Sports training
Stakeholders
Surveys and Questionnaires
Validity
title Secondary School Athletic Trainers' Experiences With Organizational Conflict: A Comparison Across Employment Models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T23%3A26%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Secondary%20School%20Athletic%20Trainers'%20Experiences%20With%20Organizational%20Conflict:%20A%20Comparison%20Across%20Employment%20Models&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20athletic%20training&rft.au=Pike%20Lacy,%20Alicia%20M&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=11-12&rft.spage=1085&rft.epage=1093&rft.pages=1085-1093&rft.issn=1062-6050&rft.eissn=1938-162X&rft_id=info:doi/10.4085/1062-6050-0422.21&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2766919024%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2647066740&rft_id=info:pmid/35380693&rfr_iscdi=true