Ethical leadership supports safety voice by increasing risk perception and reducing ethical ambiguity: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic
Misconduct by business and political leaders during the pandemic is feared to have impacted people's adherence to protective measures that would help to safeguard against the spread of COVID-19. Addressing this concern, this article theorizes and tests a model linking ethical leadership with wo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Risk analysis 2023-09, Vol.43 (9), p.1902-1916 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1916 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1902 |
container_title | Risk analysis |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Cakir, M Selim Wardman, Jamie K Trautrims, Alexander |
description | Misconduct by business and political leaders during the pandemic is feared to have impacted people's adherence to protective measures that would help to safeguard against the spread of COVID-19. Addressing this concern, this article theorizes and tests a model linking ethical leadership with workplace risk communication-a practice referred to as 'safety voice' in the research literature. Our study, conducted with 511 employees from UK companies, revealed that ethical leadership is positively associated with greater intention to engage in safety voice regarding COVID-19. We also find that this association is mediated by relations with the perceived health risk of COVID-19 and ambiguity about ethical decision making in the workplace. These findings therefore underscore the importance of good ethical conduct by leaders for ensuring that health and safety risks are well understood and communicated effectively by organizational members particularly during crises. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our study and highlight further opportunities for future research to address the ethical dimensions of leadership, risk management, and organizational risk communication. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/risa.14053 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9874882</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2863585399</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-658788d99a536148d2e850bf4b9de939765a5ce94dcc8b8f0a7215dc83fafe4b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc9u1DAQhy0EokvhwgMgS1wQUor_xInNAQktW6hUqRfgajn2ZNcliYPtrLSvwFPjbZcK8MWH-fzzzHwIvaTkgpbzLvpkLmhNBH-EVlRwVTWK1Y_RirCWVTXn7Aw9S-mWEEqIaJ-iM96whnLVrtCvTd55awY8gHEQ087POC3zHGJOOJke8gHvg7eAuwP2k41gkp-2uPz5A88QLczZhwmbyeEIbrHHIpwyzdj57eLz4T3e7L2DqcT0MYw47wCvb75ffaqownN5C6O3z9GT3gwJXpzuc_TtcvN1_aW6vvl8tf54XdmaNLlqhGyldEoZwRtaS8dACtL1daccqDJUI4ywoGpnrexkT0zLqHBW8r6MU3f8HH24z52XbgRnYcrRDHqOfjTxoIPx-t_K5Hd6G_ZaybaWkpWAN6eAGH4ukLIefbIwDGaCsCRdtl4EENmSgr7-D70NS5zKeJrJhgtZbKlCvb2nbAwpRegfmqFEHxXro2J9p7jAr_5u_wH945T_BmXGpN8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2863585399</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ethical leadership supports safety voice by increasing risk perception and reducing ethical ambiguity: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Cakir, M Selim ; Wardman, Jamie K ; Trautrims, Alexander</creator><creatorcontrib>Cakir, M Selim ; Wardman, Jamie K ; Trautrims, Alexander</creatorcontrib><description>Misconduct by business and political leaders during the pandemic is feared to have impacted people's adherence to protective measures that would help to safeguard against the spread of COVID-19. Addressing this concern, this article theorizes and tests a model linking ethical leadership with workplace risk communication-a practice referred to as 'safety voice' in the research literature. Our study, conducted with 511 employees from UK companies, revealed that ethical leadership is positively associated with greater intention to engage in safety voice regarding COVID-19. We also find that this association is mediated by relations with the perceived health risk of COVID-19 and ambiguity about ethical decision making in the workplace. These findings therefore underscore the importance of good ethical conduct by leaders for ensuring that health and safety risks are well understood and communicated effectively by organizational members particularly during crises. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our study and highlight further opportunities for future research to address the ethical dimensions of leadership, risk management, and organizational risk communication.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-4332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-6924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/risa.14053</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36261397</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Ambiguity ; COVID-19 ; Decision making ; Ethical conduct ; Ethics ; Health risks ; Leadership ; Misconduct ; Original ; Pandemics ; Risk assessment ; Risk communication ; Risk management ; Risk perception ; Safety ; Voice communication ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Risk analysis, 2023-09, Vol.43 (9), p.1902-1916</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. Risk Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Risk Analysis.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-658788d99a536148d2e850bf4b9de939765a5ce94dcc8b8f0a7215dc83fafe4b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-658788d99a536148d2e850bf4b9de939765a5ce94dcc8b8f0a7215dc83fafe4b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3609-7591 ; 0000-0001-8081-6058</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36261397$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cakir, M Selim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wardman, Jamie K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trautrims, Alexander</creatorcontrib><title>Ethical leadership supports safety voice by increasing risk perception and reducing ethical ambiguity: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic</title><title>Risk analysis</title><addtitle>Risk Anal</addtitle><description>Misconduct by business and political leaders during the pandemic is feared to have impacted people's adherence to protective measures that would help to safeguard against the spread of COVID-19. Addressing this concern, this article theorizes and tests a model linking ethical leadership with workplace risk communication-a practice referred to as 'safety voice' in the research literature. Our study, conducted with 511 employees from UK companies, revealed that ethical leadership is positively associated with greater intention to engage in safety voice regarding COVID-19. We also find that this association is mediated by relations with the perceived health risk of COVID-19 and ambiguity about ethical decision making in the workplace. These findings therefore underscore the importance of good ethical conduct by leaders for ensuring that health and safety risks are well understood and communicated effectively by organizational members particularly during crises. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our study and highlight further opportunities for future research to address the ethical dimensions of leadership, risk management, and organizational risk communication.</description><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Ethical conduct</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Misconduct</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk communication</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Risk perception</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Voice communication</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>0272-4332</issn><issn>1539-6924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkc9u1DAQhy0EokvhwgMgS1wQUor_xInNAQktW6hUqRfgajn2ZNcliYPtrLSvwFPjbZcK8MWH-fzzzHwIvaTkgpbzLvpkLmhNBH-EVlRwVTWK1Y_RirCWVTXn7Aw9S-mWEEqIaJ-iM96whnLVrtCvTd55awY8gHEQ087POC3zHGJOOJke8gHvg7eAuwP2k41gkp-2uPz5A88QLczZhwmbyeEIbrHHIpwyzdj57eLz4T3e7L2DqcT0MYw47wCvb75ffaqownN5C6O3z9GT3gwJXpzuc_TtcvN1_aW6vvl8tf54XdmaNLlqhGyldEoZwRtaS8dACtL1daccqDJUI4ywoGpnrexkT0zLqHBW8r6MU3f8HH24z52XbgRnYcrRDHqOfjTxoIPx-t_K5Hd6G_ZaybaWkpWAN6eAGH4ukLIefbIwDGaCsCRdtl4EENmSgr7-D70NS5zKeJrJhgtZbKlCvb2nbAwpRegfmqFEHxXro2J9p7jAr_5u_wH945T_BmXGpN8</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Cakir, M Selim</creator><creator>Wardman, Jamie K</creator><creator>Trautrims, Alexander</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3609-7591</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8081-6058</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Ethical leadership supports safety voice by increasing risk perception and reducing ethical ambiguity: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic</title><author>Cakir, M Selim ; Wardman, Jamie K ; Trautrims, Alexander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-658788d99a536148d2e850bf4b9de939765a5ce94dcc8b8f0a7215dc83fafe4b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Ethical conduct</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Misconduct</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk communication</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Risk perception</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Voice communication</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cakir, M Selim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wardman, Jamie K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trautrims, Alexander</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Risk analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cakir, M Selim</au><au>Wardman, Jamie K</au><au>Trautrims, Alexander</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ethical leadership supports safety voice by increasing risk perception and reducing ethical ambiguity: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic</atitle><jtitle>Risk analysis</jtitle><addtitle>Risk Anal</addtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1902</spage><epage>1916</epage><pages>1902-1916</pages><issn>0272-4332</issn><eissn>1539-6924</eissn><abstract>Misconduct by business and political leaders during the pandemic is feared to have impacted people's adherence to protective measures that would help to safeguard against the spread of COVID-19. Addressing this concern, this article theorizes and tests a model linking ethical leadership with workplace risk communication-a practice referred to as 'safety voice' in the research literature. Our study, conducted with 511 employees from UK companies, revealed that ethical leadership is positively associated with greater intention to engage in safety voice regarding COVID-19. We also find that this association is mediated by relations with the perceived health risk of COVID-19 and ambiguity about ethical decision making in the workplace. These findings therefore underscore the importance of good ethical conduct by leaders for ensuring that health and safety risks are well understood and communicated effectively by organizational members particularly during crises. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our study and highlight further opportunities for future research to address the ethical dimensions of leadership, risk management, and organizational risk communication.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>36261397</pmid><doi>10.1111/risa.14053</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3609-7591</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8081-6058</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0272-4332 |
ispartof | Risk analysis, 2023-09, Vol.43 (9), p.1902-1916 |
issn | 0272-4332 1539-6924 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9874882 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Ambiguity COVID-19 Decision making Ethical conduct Ethics Health risks Leadership Misconduct Original Pandemics Risk assessment Risk communication Risk management Risk perception Safety Voice communication Workplaces |
title | Ethical leadership supports safety voice by increasing risk perception and reducing ethical ambiguity: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T00%3A59%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethical%20leadership%20supports%20safety%20voice%20by%20increasing%20risk%20perception%20and%20reducing%20ethical%20ambiguity:%20Evidence%20from%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic&rft.jtitle=Risk%20analysis&rft.au=Cakir,%20M%20Selim&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1902&rft.epage=1916&rft.pages=1902-1916&rft.issn=0272-4332&rft.eissn=1539-6924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/risa.14053&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2863585399%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2863585399&rft_id=info:pmid/36261397&rfr_iscdi=true |