Diabetes Mellitus Family Assessment Instruments: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
Although many instruments are used to assess the families of people with diabetes, their measurement properties have not been systematically reviewed. We aimed to identify and evaluate the psychometric properties of the instruments used to assess family functioning in adults with diabetes. Methods:...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of environmental research and public health 2023-01, Vol.20 (2), p.1325 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 1325 |
| container_title | International journal of environmental research and public health |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | Soares, Vânia Lídia Lemos, Sara Barbieri-Figueiredo, MC Morais, Maria Carminda Soares Cruz Sequeira, Carlos Alberto |
| description | Although many instruments are used to assess the families of people with diabetes, their measurement properties have not been systematically reviewed. We aimed to identify and evaluate the psychometric properties of the instruments used to assess family functioning in adults with diabetes. Methods: A systematic literature review, according to the JBI systematic reviews of measurement properties, was conducted using different databases, including gray literature. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021239733. Two independent reviewers searched, screened, and assessed the risk of bias among the articles according to the COSMIN methodology. The quality of each included instrument was assessed using the updated criteria for good measurement properties. Results: Eighty-one studies were included, and thirty-one eligible instruments were identified. The psychometric properties frequently assessed were structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity. Conclusions: Although 31 instruments were included, none of their psychometric properties were scored as “very good”. From the instruments scored as adequate on development and content validity, five stood out for their quality appraisal.. The development of new instruments is not recommended. More studies should be conducted on the existing instruments to assess the less commonly evaluated psychometric properties. Using valid instruments to develop and evaluate interventions is essential to promote health literacy and the effectiveness of diabetes management. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ijerph20021325 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9859216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2768235796</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-5ec16ad473be7c9c1d962c0f20b23a346a107a9dc24dfd4e2c19705ae324a6133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkctrFEEQxhtRTIxePcqAOXjZpF_TM-1BWPLQQILi42pT21NjepmXXT0J-9_b68aQeKqC-tVHffUx9lrwI6UsPw5rjNO15FwKJcsnbF8YwxfacPH0Qb_HXhCtOVe1NvY521PGVJrXYp_9PA2wwoRUXGHXhTRTcQ596DbFkgiJehxScTFQivO2pffFsvi2oYQ9pOCLr3gT8LYY27wONEf8y3-J44QxBaSX7FkLHeGru3rAfpyffT_5tLj8_PHiZHm58FpXaVGiFwYaXakVVt560VgjPW8lX0kFShsQvALbeKmbttEovbAVLwGV1GCEUgfsw053mlc9Nj5fEaFzUww9xI0bIbjHkyFcu1_jjbN1aaUwWeDdnUAcf89IyfWBfH4JDDjO5GRlaqnKym7Rt_-h63GOQ7a3pSopy5rbTB3tKB9Hoojt_TGCu2107nF0eeHNQwv3-L-sMnC4A6IHmFzMr6cElPU0504ap7VUWv0BIE2ipw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2767225809</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diabetes Mellitus Family Assessment Instruments: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Soares, Vânia Lídia ; Lemos, Sara ; Barbieri-Figueiredo, MC ; Morais, Maria Carminda Soares ; Cruz Sequeira, Carlos Alberto</creator><creatorcontrib>Soares, Vânia Lídia ; Lemos, Sara ; Barbieri-Figueiredo, MC ; Morais, Maria Carminda Soares ; Cruz Sequeira, Carlos Alberto</creatorcontrib><description>Although many instruments are used to assess the families of people with diabetes, their measurement properties have not been systematically reviewed. We aimed to identify and evaluate the psychometric properties of the instruments used to assess family functioning in adults with diabetes. Methods: A systematic literature review, according to the JBI systematic reviews of measurement properties, was conducted using different databases, including gray literature. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021239733. Two independent reviewers searched, screened, and assessed the risk of bias among the articles according to the COSMIN methodology. The quality of each included instrument was assessed using the updated criteria for good measurement properties. Results: Eighty-one studies were included, and thirty-one eligible instruments were identified. The psychometric properties frequently assessed were structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity. Conclusions: Although 31 instruments were included, none of their psychometric properties were scored as “very good”. From the instruments scored as adequate on development and content validity, five stood out for their quality appraisal.. The development of new instruments is not recommended. More studies should be conducted on the existing instruments to assess the less commonly evaluated psychometric properties. Using valid instruments to develop and evaluate interventions is essential to promote health literacy and the effectiveness of diabetes management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20021325</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36674081</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI</publisher><subject>Adult ; Citation management software ; Diabetes ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Disease management ; Evaluation ; Families & family life ; Family ; Health education ; Health Literacy ; Health Promotion ; Humans ; Keywords ; Literature reviews ; Nursing ; Psychometrics ; Quality of life ; Quantitative psychology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk assessment ; Search strategies ; Social support ; Systematic Review ; Validation studies</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023-01, Vol.20 (2), p.1325</ispartof><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-5ec16ad473be7c9c1d962c0f20b23a346a107a9dc24dfd4e2c19705ae324a6133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-5ec16ad473be7c9c1d962c0f20b23a346a107a9dc24dfd4e2c19705ae324a6133</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0329-0325 ; 0000-0002-5620-3478 ; 0000-0001-8995-9012 ; 0000-0003-4301-3277 ; 0000-0001-6156-7869</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9859216/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9859216/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36674081$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soares, Vânia Lídia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemos, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbieri-Figueiredo, MC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morais, Maria Carminda Soares</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruz Sequeira, Carlos Alberto</creatorcontrib><title>Diabetes Mellitus Family Assessment Instruments: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>Although many instruments are used to assess the families of people with diabetes, their measurement properties have not been systematically reviewed. We aimed to identify and evaluate the psychometric properties of the instruments used to assess family functioning in adults with diabetes. Methods: A systematic literature review, according to the JBI systematic reviews of measurement properties, was conducted using different databases, including gray literature. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021239733. Two independent reviewers searched, screened, and assessed the risk of bias among the articles according to the COSMIN methodology. The quality of each included instrument was assessed using the updated criteria for good measurement properties. Results: Eighty-one studies were included, and thirty-one eligible instruments were identified. The psychometric properties frequently assessed were structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity. Conclusions: Although 31 instruments were included, none of their psychometric properties were scored as “very good”. From the instruments scored as adequate on development and content validity, five stood out for their quality appraisal.. The development of new instruments is not recommended. More studies should be conducted on the existing instruments to assess the less commonly evaluated psychometric properties. Using valid instruments to develop and evaluate interventions is essential to promote health literacy and the effectiveness of diabetes management.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Citation management software</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus</subject><subject>Disease management</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Health Literacy</subject><subject>Health Promotion</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Keywords</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Search strategies</subject><subject>Social support</subject><subject>Systematic Review</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkctrFEEQxhtRTIxePcqAOXjZpF_TM-1BWPLQQILi42pT21NjepmXXT0J-9_b68aQeKqC-tVHffUx9lrwI6UsPw5rjNO15FwKJcsnbF8YwxfacPH0Qb_HXhCtOVe1NvY521PGVJrXYp_9PA2wwoRUXGHXhTRTcQ596DbFkgiJehxScTFQivO2pffFsvi2oYQ9pOCLr3gT8LYY27wONEf8y3-J44QxBaSX7FkLHeGru3rAfpyffT_5tLj8_PHiZHm58FpXaVGiFwYaXakVVt560VgjPW8lX0kFShsQvALbeKmbttEovbAVLwGV1GCEUgfsw053mlc9Nj5fEaFzUww9xI0bIbjHkyFcu1_jjbN1aaUwWeDdnUAcf89IyfWBfH4JDDjO5GRlaqnKym7Rt_-h63GOQ7a3pSopy5rbTB3tKB9Hoojt_TGCu2107nF0eeHNQwv3-L-sMnC4A6IHmFzMr6cElPU0504ap7VUWv0BIE2ipw</recordid><startdate>20230111</startdate><enddate>20230111</enddate><creator>Soares, Vânia Lídia</creator><creator>Lemos, Sara</creator><creator>Barbieri-Figueiredo, MC</creator><creator>Morais, Maria Carminda Soares</creator><creator>Cruz Sequeira, Carlos Alberto</creator><general>MDPI</general><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>RCLKO</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0329-0325</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5620-3478</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8995-9012</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4301-3277</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6156-7869</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230111</creationdate><title>Diabetes Mellitus Family Assessment Instruments: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties</title><author>Soares, Vânia Lídia ; Lemos, Sara ; Barbieri-Figueiredo, MC ; Morais, Maria Carminda Soares ; Cruz Sequeira, Carlos Alberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-5ec16ad473be7c9c1d962c0f20b23a346a107a9dc24dfd4e2c19705ae324a6133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Citation management software</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus</topic><topic>Disease management</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Health Literacy</topic><topic>Health Promotion</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Keywords</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Search strategies</topic><topic>Social support</topic><topic>Systematic Review</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soares, Vânia Lídia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemos, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbieri-Figueiredo, MC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morais, Maria Carminda Soares</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruz Sequeira, Carlos Alberto</creatorcontrib><collection>RCAAP open access repository</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soares, Vânia Lídia</au><au>Lemos, Sara</au><au>Barbieri-Figueiredo, MC</au><au>Morais, Maria Carminda Soares</au><au>Cruz Sequeira, Carlos Alberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diabetes Mellitus Family Assessment Instruments: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2023-01-11</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1325</spage><pages>1325-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>Although many instruments are used to assess the families of people with diabetes, their measurement properties have not been systematically reviewed. We aimed to identify and evaluate the psychometric properties of the instruments used to assess family functioning in adults with diabetes. Methods: A systematic literature review, according to the JBI systematic reviews of measurement properties, was conducted using different databases, including gray literature. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021239733. Two independent reviewers searched, screened, and assessed the risk of bias among the articles according to the COSMIN methodology. The quality of each included instrument was assessed using the updated criteria for good measurement properties. Results: Eighty-one studies were included, and thirty-one eligible instruments were identified. The psychometric properties frequently assessed were structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity. Conclusions: Although 31 instruments were included, none of their psychometric properties were scored as “very good”. From the instruments scored as adequate on development and content validity, five stood out for their quality appraisal.. The development of new instruments is not recommended. More studies should be conducted on the existing instruments to assess the less commonly evaluated psychometric properties. Using valid instruments to develop and evaluate interventions is essential to promote health literacy and the effectiveness of diabetes management.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI</pub><pmid>36674081</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph20021325</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0329-0325</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5620-3478</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8995-9012</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4301-3277</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6156-7869</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| ispartof | International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023-01, Vol.20 (2), p.1325 |
| issn | 1660-4601 1661-7827 1660-4601 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9859216 |
| source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; PubMed Central Open Access |
| subjects | Adult Citation management software Diabetes Diabetes Mellitus Disease management Evaluation Families & family life Family Health education Health Literacy Health Promotion Humans Keywords Literature reviews Nursing Psychometrics Quality of life Quantitative psychology Reproducibility of Results Risk assessment Search strategies Social support Systematic Review Validation studies |
| title | Diabetes Mellitus Family Assessment Instruments: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T13%3A51%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diabetes%20Mellitus%20Family%20Assessment%20Instruments:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20of%20Measurement%20Properties&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Soares,%20V%C3%A2nia%20L%C3%ADdia&rft.date=2023-01-11&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1325&rft.pages=1325-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph20021325&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2768235796%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2767225809&rft_id=info:pmid/36674081&rfr_iscdi=true |