Evaluation of Telehealth Visit Attendance After Implementation of a Patient Navigator Program
The dramatic rise in use of telehealth accelerated by COVID-19 created new telehealth-specific challenges as patients and clinicians adapted to technical aspects of video visits. To evaluate a telehealth patient navigator pilot program to assist patients in overcoming barriers to video visit access....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA network open 2022-12, Vol.5 (12), p.e2245615-e2245615 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e2245615 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e2245615 |
container_title | JAMA network open |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Mechanic, Oren J Lee, Emma M Sheehan, Heidi M Dechen, Tenzin O'Donoghue, Ashley L Anderson, Timothy S Annas, Catherine Harvey, Leanne B Perkins, Allison A Severo, Michael A Stevens, Jennifer P Kimball, Alexa B |
description | The dramatic rise in use of telehealth accelerated by COVID-19 created new telehealth-specific challenges as patients and clinicians adapted to technical aspects of video visits.
To evaluate a telehealth patient navigator pilot program to assist patients in overcoming barriers to video visit access.
This quality improvement study investigated visit attendance outcomes among those who received navigator outreach (intervention group) compared with those who did not (comparator group) at 2 US academic primary care clinics during a 12-week study period from April to July 2021. Eligible participants had a scheduled video visit without previous successful telehealth visits.
The navigator contacted patients with next-day scheduled video appointments by phone to offer technical assistance and answer questions on accessing the appointment.
The primary outcome was appointment attendance following the intervention. Return on investment (ROI) accounting for increased clinic adherence and costs of implementation was examined as a secondary outcome.
A total 4066 patients had video appointments scheduled (2553 [62.8%] women; median [IQR] age: intervention, 55 years [38-66 years] vs comparator, 52 years [36-66 years]; P = .02). Patients who received the navigator intervention had significantly increased odds of attending their appointments (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.6-2.6) when compared with the comparator group, with an absolute increase of 9% in appointment attendance for the navigator group (949 of 1035 patients [91.6%] vs 2511 of 3031 patients [82.8%]). The program's ROI was $11 387 over the 12-week period.
In this quality improvement study, we found that a telehealth navigator program was associated with significant improvement in video visit adherence with a net financial gain. Our findings have relevance for efforts to reduce barriers to telehealth-based health care and increase equity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.45615 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9856233</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2753303420</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-681d161793388df829ebb74ee8aad6d60f375610aa459205822c87c3e182cc033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUU1PGzEUtBAVIMpfqKxy4ZLUn7teDpUiRFskVDgAt8p68b5NNt1dp7Y3Ff8ep9AIOL0Pz4zeeAj5zNmUM8a_rKCHAdNfH377NQ5TwYSYKl1wvUeOhC7VRBqm91_1h-QkxhVjTDAuq0IfkENZKJNHcUR-XW6gGyG1fqC-oXfY4RKhS0v60MY20VlKONQwOKSzJmGgV_26wx6HtOMAvc193tCfsGkXkHygt8EvAvQfyYcGuognL_WY3H-7vLv4Mbm--X51MbueOKVVmhSG17zgZSWlMXVjRIXzeakQDUBd1AVrZJkdMgClK8G0EcKZ0knkRjjHpDwmX5911-O8x9rlYwJ0dh3aHsKj9dDaty9Du7QLv7GV0YWQW4GzF4Hg_4wYk-3b6LDr8l_7MVpRaimZVIJl6Ok76MqPYcj2tqhKcMOlyqjzZ5QLPsaAze4Yzuw2SPsuSLsN0v4LMpM_vbazo_6PTT4BWI-fTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2759218134</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Telehealth Visit Attendance After Implementation of a Patient Navigator Program</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mechanic, Oren J ; Lee, Emma M ; Sheehan, Heidi M ; Dechen, Tenzin ; O'Donoghue, Ashley L ; Anderson, Timothy S ; Annas, Catherine ; Harvey, Leanne B ; Perkins, Allison A ; Severo, Michael A ; Stevens, Jennifer P ; Kimball, Alexa B</creator><creatorcontrib>Mechanic, Oren J ; Lee, Emma M ; Sheehan, Heidi M ; Dechen, Tenzin ; O'Donoghue, Ashley L ; Anderson, Timothy S ; Annas, Catherine ; Harvey, Leanne B ; Perkins, Allison A ; Severo, Michael A ; Stevens, Jennifer P ; Kimball, Alexa B</creatorcontrib><description>The dramatic rise in use of telehealth accelerated by COVID-19 created new telehealth-specific challenges as patients and clinicians adapted to technical aspects of video visits.
To evaluate a telehealth patient navigator pilot program to assist patients in overcoming barriers to video visit access.
This quality improvement study investigated visit attendance outcomes among those who received navigator outreach (intervention group) compared with those who did not (comparator group) at 2 US academic primary care clinics during a 12-week study period from April to July 2021. Eligible participants had a scheduled video visit without previous successful telehealth visits.
The navigator contacted patients with next-day scheduled video appointments by phone to offer technical assistance and answer questions on accessing the appointment.
The primary outcome was appointment attendance following the intervention. Return on investment (ROI) accounting for increased clinic adherence and costs of implementation was examined as a secondary outcome.
A total 4066 patients had video appointments scheduled (2553 [62.8%] women; median [IQR] age: intervention, 55 years [38-66 years] vs comparator, 52 years [36-66 years]; P = .02). Patients who received the navigator intervention had significantly increased odds of attending their appointments (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.6-2.6) when compared with the comparator group, with an absolute increase of 9% in appointment attendance for the navigator group (949 of 1035 patients [91.6%] vs 2511 of 3031 patients [82.8%]). The program's ROI was $11 387 over the 12-week period.
In this quality improvement study, we found that a telehealth navigator program was associated with significant improvement in video visit adherence with a net financial gain. Our findings have relevance for efforts to reduce barriers to telehealth-based health care and increase equity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.45615</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36480202</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology ; Female ; Health Policy ; Humans ; Intervention ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Online Only ; Original Investigation ; Patient Navigation ; Patients ; Quality improvement ; Telemedicine</subject><ispartof>JAMA network open, 2022-12, Vol.5 (12), p.e2245615-e2245615</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright 2022 Mechanic OJ et al. .</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-681d161793388df829ebb74ee8aad6d60f375610aa459205822c87c3e182cc033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-681d161793388df829ebb74ee8aad6d60f375610aa459205822c87c3e182cc033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,860,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36480202$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mechanic, Oren J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Emma M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, Heidi M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dechen, Tenzin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Donoghue, Ashley L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Timothy S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Annas, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harvey, Leanne B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perkins, Allison A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Severo, Michael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Jennifer P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimball, Alexa B</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Telehealth Visit Attendance After Implementation of a Patient Navigator Program</title><title>JAMA network open</title><addtitle>JAMA Netw Open</addtitle><description>The dramatic rise in use of telehealth accelerated by COVID-19 created new telehealth-specific challenges as patients and clinicians adapted to technical aspects of video visits.
To evaluate a telehealth patient navigator pilot program to assist patients in overcoming barriers to video visit access.
This quality improvement study investigated visit attendance outcomes among those who received navigator outreach (intervention group) compared with those who did not (comparator group) at 2 US academic primary care clinics during a 12-week study period from April to July 2021. Eligible participants had a scheduled video visit without previous successful telehealth visits.
The navigator contacted patients with next-day scheduled video appointments by phone to offer technical assistance and answer questions on accessing the appointment.
The primary outcome was appointment attendance following the intervention. Return on investment (ROI) accounting for increased clinic adherence and costs of implementation was examined as a secondary outcome.
A total 4066 patients had video appointments scheduled (2553 [62.8%] women; median [IQR] age: intervention, 55 years [38-66 years] vs comparator, 52 years [36-66 years]; P = .02). Patients who received the navigator intervention had significantly increased odds of attending their appointments (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.6-2.6) when compared with the comparator group, with an absolute increase of 9% in appointment attendance for the navigator group (949 of 1035 patients [91.6%] vs 2511 of 3031 patients [82.8%]). The program's ROI was $11 387 over the 12-week period.
In this quality improvement study, we found that a telehealth navigator program was associated with significant improvement in video visit adherence with a net financial gain. Our findings have relevance for efforts to reduce barriers to telehealth-based health care and increase equity.</description><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Policy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Online Only</subject><subject>Original Investigation</subject><subject>Patient Navigation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Quality improvement</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><issn>2574-3805</issn><issn>2574-3805</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUU1PGzEUtBAVIMpfqKxy4ZLUn7teDpUiRFskVDgAt8p68b5NNt1dp7Y3Ff8ep9AIOL0Pz4zeeAj5zNmUM8a_rKCHAdNfH377NQ5TwYSYKl1wvUeOhC7VRBqm91_1h-QkxhVjTDAuq0IfkENZKJNHcUR-XW6gGyG1fqC-oXfY4RKhS0v60MY20VlKONQwOKSzJmGgV_26wx6HtOMAvc193tCfsGkXkHygt8EvAvQfyYcGuognL_WY3H-7vLv4Mbm--X51MbueOKVVmhSG17zgZSWlMXVjRIXzeakQDUBd1AVrZJkdMgClK8G0EcKZ0knkRjjHpDwmX5911-O8x9rlYwJ0dh3aHsKj9dDaty9Du7QLv7GV0YWQW4GzF4Hg_4wYk-3b6LDr8l_7MVpRaimZVIJl6Ok76MqPYcj2tqhKcMOlyqjzZ5QLPsaAze4Yzuw2SPsuSLsN0v4LMpM_vbazo_6PTT4BWI-fTA</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Mechanic, Oren J</creator><creator>Lee, Emma M</creator><creator>Sheehan, Heidi M</creator><creator>Dechen, Tenzin</creator><creator>O'Donoghue, Ashley L</creator><creator>Anderson, Timothy S</creator><creator>Annas, Catherine</creator><creator>Harvey, Leanne B</creator><creator>Perkins, Allison A</creator><creator>Severo, Michael A</creator><creator>Stevens, Jennifer P</creator><creator>Kimball, Alexa B</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Telehealth Visit Attendance After Implementation of a Patient Navigator Program</title><author>Mechanic, Oren J ; Lee, Emma M ; Sheehan, Heidi M ; Dechen, Tenzin ; O'Donoghue, Ashley L ; Anderson, Timothy S ; Annas, Catherine ; Harvey, Leanne B ; Perkins, Allison A ; Severo, Michael A ; Stevens, Jennifer P ; Kimball, Alexa B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-681d161793388df829ebb74ee8aad6d60f375610aa459205822c87c3e182cc033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Policy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Online Only</topic><topic>Original Investigation</topic><topic>Patient Navigation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Quality improvement</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mechanic, Oren J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Emma M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, Heidi M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dechen, Tenzin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Donoghue, Ashley L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Timothy S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Annas, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harvey, Leanne B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perkins, Allison A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Severo, Michael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Jennifer P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimball, Alexa B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mechanic, Oren J</au><au>Lee, Emma M</au><au>Sheehan, Heidi M</au><au>Dechen, Tenzin</au><au>O'Donoghue, Ashley L</au><au>Anderson, Timothy S</au><au>Annas, Catherine</au><au>Harvey, Leanne B</au><au>Perkins, Allison A</au><au>Severo, Michael A</au><au>Stevens, Jennifer P</au><au>Kimball, Alexa B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Telehealth Visit Attendance After Implementation of a Patient Navigator Program</atitle><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Netw Open</addtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e2245615</spage><epage>e2245615</epage><pages>e2245615-e2245615</pages><issn>2574-3805</issn><eissn>2574-3805</eissn><abstract>The dramatic rise in use of telehealth accelerated by COVID-19 created new telehealth-specific challenges as patients and clinicians adapted to technical aspects of video visits.
To evaluate a telehealth patient navigator pilot program to assist patients in overcoming barriers to video visit access.
This quality improvement study investigated visit attendance outcomes among those who received navigator outreach (intervention group) compared with those who did not (comparator group) at 2 US academic primary care clinics during a 12-week study period from April to July 2021. Eligible participants had a scheduled video visit without previous successful telehealth visits.
The navigator contacted patients with next-day scheduled video appointments by phone to offer technical assistance and answer questions on accessing the appointment.
The primary outcome was appointment attendance following the intervention. Return on investment (ROI) accounting for increased clinic adherence and costs of implementation was examined as a secondary outcome.
A total 4066 patients had video appointments scheduled (2553 [62.8%] women; median [IQR] age: intervention, 55 years [38-66 years] vs comparator, 52 years [36-66 years]; P = .02). Patients who received the navigator intervention had significantly increased odds of attending their appointments (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.6-2.6) when compared with the comparator group, with an absolute increase of 9% in appointment attendance for the navigator group (949 of 1035 patients [91.6%] vs 2511 of 3031 patients [82.8%]). The program's ROI was $11 387 over the 12-week period.
In this quality improvement study, we found that a telehealth navigator program was associated with significant improvement in video visit adherence with a net financial gain. Our findings have relevance for efforts to reduce barriers to telehealth-based health care and increase equity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>36480202</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.45615</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2574-3805 |
ispartof | JAMA network open, 2022-12, Vol.5 (12), p.e2245615-e2245615 |
issn | 2574-3805 2574-3805 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9856233 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | COVID-19 - epidemiology Female Health Policy Humans Intervention Male Middle Aged Online Only Original Investigation Patient Navigation Patients Quality improvement Telemedicine |
title | Evaluation of Telehealth Visit Attendance After Implementation of a Patient Navigator Program |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T17%3A33%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Telehealth%20Visit%20Attendance%20After%20Implementation%20of%20a%20Patient%20Navigator%20Program&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20network%20open&rft.au=Mechanic,%20Oren%20J&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e2245615&rft.epage=e2245615&rft.pages=e2245615-e2245615&rft.issn=2574-3805&rft.eissn=2574-3805&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.45615&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2753303420%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2759218134&rft_id=info:pmid/36480202&rfr_iscdi=true |