Assessment of the Components of the Electrostatic Potential of Proteins in Solution: Comparing Experiment and Theory
In this work, the components of the protein electrostatic potentials in solution are analyzed with NMR paramagnetic relaxation enhancement experiments and compared with continuum solution theory, and multiscale simulations. To determine the contributions of the solution components, we analyze them a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of physical chemistry. B 2022-06, Vol.126 (24), p.4543-4554 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4554 |
---|---|
container_issue | 24 |
container_start_page | 4543 |
container_title | The journal of physical chemistry. B |
container_volume | 126 |
creator | Chen, Chuanying Yu, Binhan Yousefi, Razie Iwahara, Junji Pettitt, B. Montgomery |
description | In this work, the components of the protein electrostatic potentials in solution are analyzed with NMR paramagnetic relaxation enhancement experiments and compared with continuum solution theory, and multiscale simulations. To determine the contributions of the solution components, we analyze them at different ionic strengths from 0 to 745 mM. A theoretical approximation allows the determination of the electrostatic potential at a given proton without reference to the protein structure given the ratio of paramagnetic relaxation enhancements rates between a cationic and an anionic probe. The results derived from simulations show good agreement with experiment and simple continuum solvent theory for many of the residues. A discrepancy including a switch of sign of the electrostatic potential was observed for particular residues. By considering the components of the potential, we found the discrepancy is mainly caused by angular correlations of the probe molecules with these residues. The correction for the correlations allows a more accurate analysis of the experiments determining the electrostatic potential of proteins in solution. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c01611 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9832648</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2675982681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-aa83e78da14e530fe88a718370286af6e4125967f10ec5d0a677001a9ecb9ccc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UU1PxCAUJEbj992T6dGDuwJtKfVgYjbrR2KiiXomb9lXF9OFCtTov5f90OjBAwHemxmGN4QcMTpklLMz0GH42unJkGvKBGMbZJeVnA7SqjbXZ8Go2CF7IbxSyksuxTbZyUtRi6KQuyRehoAhzNHGzDVZnGE2cvPO2VQI35Vxizp6FyJEo7MHF1PTQLtoP_h0MzZkxmaPru2jcfZ8KQHe2Jds_NGhN0t5sNPsaYbOfx6QrQbagIfrfZ88X42fRjeDu_vr29Hl3QCKPI8DAJljJafACixz2qCUUDGZVzT9AhqBBeNlLaqGUdTllIKoKkoZ1KgntdY63ycXK92un8xxqpMLD63qkiHwn8qBUX871szUi3tXtcy5KGQSOFkLePfWY4hqboLGtgWLrg-Ki6qsJReSJShdQXUaVPDY_DzDqFqEpVJYahGWWoeVKMe_7f0QvtNJgNMVYEl1vbdpWv_rfQFTBKOn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2675982681</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of the Components of the Electrostatic Potential of Proteins in Solution: Comparing Experiment and Theory</title><source>ACS Publications</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Chen, Chuanying ; Yu, Binhan ; Yousefi, Razie ; Iwahara, Junji ; Pettitt, B. Montgomery</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chuanying ; Yu, Binhan ; Yousefi, Razie ; Iwahara, Junji ; Pettitt, B. Montgomery</creatorcontrib><description>In this work, the components of the protein electrostatic potentials in solution are analyzed with NMR paramagnetic relaxation enhancement experiments and compared with continuum solution theory, and multiscale simulations. To determine the contributions of the solution components, we analyze them at different ionic strengths from 0 to 745 mM. A theoretical approximation allows the determination of the electrostatic potential at a given proton without reference to the protein structure given the ratio of paramagnetic relaxation enhancements rates between a cationic and an anionic probe. The results derived from simulations show good agreement with experiment and simple continuum solvent theory for many of the residues. A discrepancy including a switch of sign of the electrostatic potential was observed for particular residues. By considering the components of the potential, we found the discrepancy is mainly caused by angular correlations of the probe molecules with these residues. The correction for the correlations allows a more accurate analysis of the experiments determining the electrostatic potential of proteins in solution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1520-6106</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5207</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c01611</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35696448</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>B: Liquids; Chemical and Dynamical Processes in Solution ; Proteins - chemistry ; Solvents - chemistry ; Static Electricity</subject><ispartof>The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2022-06, Vol.126 (24), p.4543-4554</ispartof><rights>2022 American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-aa83e78da14e530fe88a718370286af6e4125967f10ec5d0a677001a9ecb9ccc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-aa83e78da14e530fe88a718370286af6e4125967f10ec5d0a677001a9ecb9ccc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4902-3046</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c01611$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c01611$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35696448$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chuanying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Binhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yousefi, Razie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwahara, Junji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettitt, B. Montgomery</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of the Components of the Electrostatic Potential of Proteins in Solution: Comparing Experiment and Theory</title><title>The journal of physical chemistry. B</title><addtitle>J. Phys. Chem. B</addtitle><description>In this work, the components of the protein electrostatic potentials in solution are analyzed with NMR paramagnetic relaxation enhancement experiments and compared with continuum solution theory, and multiscale simulations. To determine the contributions of the solution components, we analyze them at different ionic strengths from 0 to 745 mM. A theoretical approximation allows the determination of the electrostatic potential at a given proton without reference to the protein structure given the ratio of paramagnetic relaxation enhancements rates between a cationic and an anionic probe. The results derived from simulations show good agreement with experiment and simple continuum solvent theory for many of the residues. A discrepancy including a switch of sign of the electrostatic potential was observed for particular residues. By considering the components of the potential, we found the discrepancy is mainly caused by angular correlations of the probe molecules with these residues. The correction for the correlations allows a more accurate analysis of the experiments determining the electrostatic potential of proteins in solution.</description><subject>B: Liquids; Chemical and Dynamical Processes in Solution</subject><subject>Proteins - chemistry</subject><subject>Solvents - chemistry</subject><subject>Static Electricity</subject><issn>1520-6106</issn><issn>1520-5207</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UU1PxCAUJEbj992T6dGDuwJtKfVgYjbrR2KiiXomb9lXF9OFCtTov5f90OjBAwHemxmGN4QcMTpklLMz0GH42unJkGvKBGMbZJeVnA7SqjbXZ8Go2CF7IbxSyksuxTbZyUtRi6KQuyRehoAhzNHGzDVZnGE2cvPO2VQI35Vxizp6FyJEo7MHF1PTQLtoP_h0MzZkxmaPru2jcfZ8KQHe2Jds_NGhN0t5sNPsaYbOfx6QrQbagIfrfZ88X42fRjeDu_vr29Hl3QCKPI8DAJljJafACixz2qCUUDGZVzT9AhqBBeNlLaqGUdTllIKoKkoZ1KgntdY63ycXK92un8xxqpMLD63qkiHwn8qBUX871szUi3tXtcy5KGQSOFkLePfWY4hqboLGtgWLrg-Ki6qsJReSJShdQXUaVPDY_DzDqFqEpVJYahGWWoeVKMe_7f0QvtNJgNMVYEl1vbdpWv_rfQFTBKOn</recordid><startdate>20220623</startdate><enddate>20220623</enddate><creator>Chen, Chuanying</creator><creator>Yu, Binhan</creator><creator>Yousefi, Razie</creator><creator>Iwahara, Junji</creator><creator>Pettitt, B. Montgomery</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4902-3046</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220623</creationdate><title>Assessment of the Components of the Electrostatic Potential of Proteins in Solution: Comparing Experiment and Theory</title><author>Chen, Chuanying ; Yu, Binhan ; Yousefi, Razie ; Iwahara, Junji ; Pettitt, B. Montgomery</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-aa83e78da14e530fe88a718370286af6e4125967f10ec5d0a677001a9ecb9ccc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>B: Liquids; Chemical and Dynamical Processes in Solution</topic><topic>Proteins - chemistry</topic><topic>Solvents - chemistry</topic><topic>Static Electricity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chuanying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Binhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yousefi, Razie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwahara, Junji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettitt, B. Montgomery</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The journal of physical chemistry. B</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Chuanying</au><au>Yu, Binhan</au><au>Yousefi, Razie</au><au>Iwahara, Junji</au><au>Pettitt, B. Montgomery</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of the Components of the Electrostatic Potential of Proteins in Solution: Comparing Experiment and Theory</atitle><jtitle>The journal of physical chemistry. B</jtitle><addtitle>J. Phys. Chem. B</addtitle><date>2022-06-23</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>4543</spage><epage>4554</epage><pages>4543-4554</pages><issn>1520-6106</issn><eissn>1520-5207</eissn><abstract>In this work, the components of the protein electrostatic potentials in solution are analyzed with NMR paramagnetic relaxation enhancement experiments and compared with continuum solution theory, and multiscale simulations. To determine the contributions of the solution components, we analyze them at different ionic strengths from 0 to 745 mM. A theoretical approximation allows the determination of the electrostatic potential at a given proton without reference to the protein structure given the ratio of paramagnetic relaxation enhancements rates between a cationic and an anionic probe. The results derived from simulations show good agreement with experiment and simple continuum solvent theory for many of the residues. A discrepancy including a switch of sign of the electrostatic potential was observed for particular residues. By considering the components of the potential, we found the discrepancy is mainly caused by angular correlations of the probe molecules with these residues. The correction for the correlations allows a more accurate analysis of the experiments determining the electrostatic potential of proteins in solution.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>35696448</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c01611</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4902-3046</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1520-6106 |
ispartof | The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2022-06, Vol.126 (24), p.4543-4554 |
issn | 1520-6106 1520-5207 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9832648 |
source | ACS Publications; MEDLINE |
subjects | B: Liquids Chemical and Dynamical Processes in Solution Proteins - chemistry Solvents - chemistry Static Electricity |
title | Assessment of the Components of the Electrostatic Potential of Proteins in Solution: Comparing Experiment and Theory |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T06%3A02%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20the%20Components%20of%20the%20Electrostatic%20Potential%20of%20Proteins%20in%20Solution:%20Comparing%20Experiment%20and%20Theory&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20physical%20chemistry.%20B&rft.au=Chen,%20Chuanying&rft.date=2022-06-23&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=4543&rft.epage=4554&rft.pages=4543-4554&rft.issn=1520-6106&rft.eissn=1520-5207&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c01611&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2675982681%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2675982681&rft_id=info:pmid/35696448&rfr_iscdi=true |