Assessment of the Components of the Electrostatic Potential of Proteins in Solution: Comparing Experiment and Theory

In this work, the components of the protein electrostatic potentials in solution are analyzed with NMR paramagnetic relaxation enhancement experiments and compared with continuum solution theory, and multiscale simulations. To determine the contributions of the solution components, we analyze them a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of physical chemistry. B 2022-06, Vol.126 (24), p.4543-4554
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Chuanying, Yu, Binhan, Yousefi, Razie, Iwahara, Junji, Pettitt, B. Montgomery
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4554
container_issue 24
container_start_page 4543
container_title The journal of physical chemistry. B
container_volume 126
creator Chen, Chuanying
Yu, Binhan
Yousefi, Razie
Iwahara, Junji
Pettitt, B. Montgomery
description In this work, the components of the protein electrostatic potentials in solution are analyzed with NMR paramagnetic relaxation enhancement experiments and compared with continuum solution theory, and multiscale simulations. To determine the contributions of the solution components, we analyze them at different ionic strengths from 0 to 745 mM. A theoretical approximation allows the determination of the electrostatic potential at a given proton without reference to the protein structure given the ratio of paramagnetic relaxation enhancements rates between a cationic and an anionic probe. The results derived from simulations show good agreement with experiment and simple continuum solvent theory for many of the residues. A discrepancy including a switch of sign of the electrostatic potential was observed for particular residues. By considering the components of the potential, we found the discrepancy is mainly caused by angular correlations of the probe molecules with these residues. The correction for the correlations allows a more accurate analysis of the experiments determining the electrostatic potential of proteins in solution.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c01611
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9832648</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2675982681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-aa83e78da14e530fe88a718370286af6e4125967f10ec5d0a677001a9ecb9ccc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UU1PxCAUJEbj992T6dGDuwJtKfVgYjbrR2KiiXomb9lXF9OFCtTov5f90OjBAwHemxmGN4QcMTpklLMz0GH42unJkGvKBGMbZJeVnA7SqjbXZ8Go2CF7IbxSyksuxTbZyUtRi6KQuyRehoAhzNHGzDVZnGE2cvPO2VQI35Vxizp6FyJEo7MHF1PTQLtoP_h0MzZkxmaPru2jcfZ8KQHe2Jds_NGhN0t5sNPsaYbOfx6QrQbagIfrfZ88X42fRjeDu_vr29Hl3QCKPI8DAJljJafACixz2qCUUDGZVzT9AhqBBeNlLaqGUdTllIKoKkoZ1KgntdY63ycXK92un8xxqpMLD63qkiHwn8qBUX871szUi3tXtcy5KGQSOFkLePfWY4hqboLGtgWLrg-Ki6qsJReSJShdQXUaVPDY_DzDqFqEpVJYahGWWoeVKMe_7f0QvtNJgNMVYEl1vbdpWv_rfQFTBKOn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2675982681</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of the Components of the Electrostatic Potential of Proteins in Solution: Comparing Experiment and Theory</title><source>ACS Publications</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Chen, Chuanying ; Yu, Binhan ; Yousefi, Razie ; Iwahara, Junji ; Pettitt, B. Montgomery</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chuanying ; Yu, Binhan ; Yousefi, Razie ; Iwahara, Junji ; Pettitt, B. Montgomery</creatorcontrib><description>In this work, the components of the protein electrostatic potentials in solution are analyzed with NMR paramagnetic relaxation enhancement experiments and compared with continuum solution theory, and multiscale simulations. To determine the contributions of the solution components, we analyze them at different ionic strengths from 0 to 745 mM. A theoretical approximation allows the determination of the electrostatic potential at a given proton without reference to the protein structure given the ratio of paramagnetic relaxation enhancements rates between a cationic and an anionic probe. The results derived from simulations show good agreement with experiment and simple continuum solvent theory for many of the residues. A discrepancy including a switch of sign of the electrostatic potential was observed for particular residues. By considering the components of the potential, we found the discrepancy is mainly caused by angular correlations of the probe molecules with these residues. The correction for the correlations allows a more accurate analysis of the experiments determining the electrostatic potential of proteins in solution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1520-6106</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5207</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c01611</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35696448</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>B: Liquids; Chemical and Dynamical Processes in Solution ; Proteins - chemistry ; Solvents - chemistry ; Static Electricity</subject><ispartof>The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2022-06, Vol.126 (24), p.4543-4554</ispartof><rights>2022 American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-aa83e78da14e530fe88a718370286af6e4125967f10ec5d0a677001a9ecb9ccc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-aa83e78da14e530fe88a718370286af6e4125967f10ec5d0a677001a9ecb9ccc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4902-3046</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c01611$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c01611$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35696448$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chuanying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Binhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yousefi, Razie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwahara, Junji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettitt, B. Montgomery</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of the Components of the Electrostatic Potential of Proteins in Solution: Comparing Experiment and Theory</title><title>The journal of physical chemistry. B</title><addtitle>J. Phys. Chem. B</addtitle><description>In this work, the components of the protein electrostatic potentials in solution are analyzed with NMR paramagnetic relaxation enhancement experiments and compared with continuum solution theory, and multiscale simulations. To determine the contributions of the solution components, we analyze them at different ionic strengths from 0 to 745 mM. A theoretical approximation allows the determination of the electrostatic potential at a given proton without reference to the protein structure given the ratio of paramagnetic relaxation enhancements rates between a cationic and an anionic probe. The results derived from simulations show good agreement with experiment and simple continuum solvent theory for many of the residues. A discrepancy including a switch of sign of the electrostatic potential was observed for particular residues. By considering the components of the potential, we found the discrepancy is mainly caused by angular correlations of the probe molecules with these residues. The correction for the correlations allows a more accurate analysis of the experiments determining the electrostatic potential of proteins in solution.</description><subject>B: Liquids; Chemical and Dynamical Processes in Solution</subject><subject>Proteins - chemistry</subject><subject>Solvents - chemistry</subject><subject>Static Electricity</subject><issn>1520-6106</issn><issn>1520-5207</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UU1PxCAUJEbj992T6dGDuwJtKfVgYjbrR2KiiXomb9lXF9OFCtTov5f90OjBAwHemxmGN4QcMTpklLMz0GH42unJkGvKBGMbZJeVnA7SqjbXZ8Go2CF7IbxSyksuxTbZyUtRi6KQuyRehoAhzNHGzDVZnGE2cvPO2VQI35Vxizp6FyJEo7MHF1PTQLtoP_h0MzZkxmaPru2jcfZ8KQHe2Jds_NGhN0t5sNPsaYbOfx6QrQbagIfrfZ88X42fRjeDu_vr29Hl3QCKPI8DAJljJafACixz2qCUUDGZVzT9AhqBBeNlLaqGUdTllIKoKkoZ1KgntdY63ycXK92un8xxqpMLD63qkiHwn8qBUX871szUi3tXtcy5KGQSOFkLePfWY4hqboLGtgWLrg-Ki6qsJReSJShdQXUaVPDY_DzDqFqEpVJYahGWWoeVKMe_7f0QvtNJgNMVYEl1vbdpWv_rfQFTBKOn</recordid><startdate>20220623</startdate><enddate>20220623</enddate><creator>Chen, Chuanying</creator><creator>Yu, Binhan</creator><creator>Yousefi, Razie</creator><creator>Iwahara, Junji</creator><creator>Pettitt, B. Montgomery</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4902-3046</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220623</creationdate><title>Assessment of the Components of the Electrostatic Potential of Proteins in Solution: Comparing Experiment and Theory</title><author>Chen, Chuanying ; Yu, Binhan ; Yousefi, Razie ; Iwahara, Junji ; Pettitt, B. Montgomery</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-aa83e78da14e530fe88a718370286af6e4125967f10ec5d0a677001a9ecb9ccc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>B: Liquids; Chemical and Dynamical Processes in Solution</topic><topic>Proteins - chemistry</topic><topic>Solvents - chemistry</topic><topic>Static Electricity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chuanying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Binhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yousefi, Razie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwahara, Junji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettitt, B. Montgomery</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The journal of physical chemistry. B</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Chuanying</au><au>Yu, Binhan</au><au>Yousefi, Razie</au><au>Iwahara, Junji</au><au>Pettitt, B. Montgomery</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of the Components of the Electrostatic Potential of Proteins in Solution: Comparing Experiment and Theory</atitle><jtitle>The journal of physical chemistry. B</jtitle><addtitle>J. Phys. Chem. B</addtitle><date>2022-06-23</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>4543</spage><epage>4554</epage><pages>4543-4554</pages><issn>1520-6106</issn><eissn>1520-5207</eissn><abstract>In this work, the components of the protein electrostatic potentials in solution are analyzed with NMR paramagnetic relaxation enhancement experiments and compared with continuum solution theory, and multiscale simulations. To determine the contributions of the solution components, we analyze them at different ionic strengths from 0 to 745 mM. A theoretical approximation allows the determination of the electrostatic potential at a given proton without reference to the protein structure given the ratio of paramagnetic relaxation enhancements rates between a cationic and an anionic probe. The results derived from simulations show good agreement with experiment and simple continuum solvent theory for many of the residues. A discrepancy including a switch of sign of the electrostatic potential was observed for particular residues. By considering the components of the potential, we found the discrepancy is mainly caused by angular correlations of the probe molecules with these residues. The correction for the correlations allows a more accurate analysis of the experiments determining the electrostatic potential of proteins in solution.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>35696448</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c01611</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4902-3046</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1520-6106
ispartof The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2022-06, Vol.126 (24), p.4543-4554
issn 1520-6106
1520-5207
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9832648
source ACS Publications; MEDLINE
subjects B: Liquids
Chemical and Dynamical Processes in Solution
Proteins - chemistry
Solvents - chemistry
Static Electricity
title Assessment of the Components of the Electrostatic Potential of Proteins in Solution: Comparing Experiment and Theory
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T06%3A02%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20the%20Components%20of%20the%20Electrostatic%20Potential%20of%20Proteins%20in%20Solution:%20Comparing%20Experiment%20and%20Theory&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20physical%20chemistry.%20B&rft.au=Chen,%20Chuanying&rft.date=2022-06-23&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=4543&rft.epage=4554&rft.pages=4543-4554&rft.issn=1520-6106&rft.eissn=1520-5207&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c01611&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2675982681%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2675982681&rft_id=info:pmid/35696448&rfr_iscdi=true