The AUGIS Survival Predictor: Prediction of Long-Term and Conditional Survival After Esophagectomy Using Random Survival Forests
The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model for overall survival after esophagectomy using pre/postoperative clinical data and machine learning. For patients with esophageal cancer, accurately predicting long-term survival after esophagectomy is challenging. This study investigated survi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of surgery 2023-02, Vol.277 (2), p.267-274 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 274 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 267 |
container_title | Annals of surgery |
container_volume | 277 |
creator | Rahman, Saqib A Walker, Robert C Maynard, Nick Trudgill, Nigel Crosby, Tom Cromwell, David A Underwood, Timothy J |
description | The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model for overall survival after esophagectomy using pre/postoperative clinical data and machine learning.
For patients with esophageal cancer, accurately predicting long-term survival after esophagectomy is challenging. This study investigated survival prediction after esophagectomy using a RandomSurvival Forest (RSF) model derived from routine data from a large, well-curated, national dataset.
Patients diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma between 2012 and 2018 in England and Wales who underwent an esophagectomy were included. Prediction models for overall survival were developed using the RSF method and Cox regression from 41 patient and disease characteristics. Calibration and discrimination (time-dependent area under the curve) were validated internally using bootstrap resampling.
The study analyzed 6399 patients, with 2625 deaths during follow-up. Median follow-up was 41 months. Overall survival was 47.1% at 5 years. The final RSF model included 14 variables and had excellent discrimination with a 5-year time-dependent area under the receiver operator curve of 83.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 82.6%-84.9%], compared to 82.3% (95% CI 81.1%-83.3%) for the Cox model. The most important variables were lymph node involvement, pT stage, circumferential resection margin involvement (tumor at < 1 mm from cut edge) and age. There was a wide range of survival estimates even within TNM staging groups, with quintiles of prediction within Stage 3b ranging from 12.2% to 44.7% survival at 5 years.
An RSF model for long-term survival after esophagectomy exhibited excellent discrimination and well-calibrated predictions. At a patient level, it provides more accuracy than TNM staging alone and could help in the delivery of tailored treatment and follow-up. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004794 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9831040</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2493459796</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-8de15662e1a3d8bccd2fac2248c13039b286c9094e6dcdf899509b8ddf9b7f9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1OAyEUhYnRaP15A2NYupkKA50BFyZNU7VJE41t14QBpsXMDBWmTbrz0aXR1iqbS7jnO9zcA8A1Rl2MeH43Gfe76ODQnNMj0MG9lCUYU3QMOvGVJJST9Aych_COEKYM5afgjJCMIEpoB3xOFwb2Z0-jCZys_NquZQVfvdFWtc7f767WNdCVcOyaeTI1voay0XDgGm23rYjs2X7ZGg-HwS0Xcm6iSb2Bs2CbOXyLjKt_lY_Om9CGS3BSyiqYq596AWaPw-ngORm_PI0G_XGiaE7bhGmDe1mWGiyJZoVSOi2lSlPKFCaI8CJlmeKIU5NppUvGeQ_xgmld8iIvuSYX4OHbd7kqaqOVaVovK7H0tpZ-I5y04m-nsQsxd2vBGcGIomhw-2Pg3ccqji5qG5SpKtkYtwoijYumPZ7zLErpt1R5F4I35f4bjMQ2PBHDE__Di9jN4Yh7aJcW-QKmQZgP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2493459796</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The AUGIS Survival Predictor: Prediction of Long-Term and Conditional Survival After Esophagectomy Using Random Survival Forests</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Rahman, Saqib A ; Walker, Robert C ; Maynard, Nick ; Trudgill, Nigel ; Crosby, Tom ; Cromwell, David A ; Underwood, Timothy J</creator><creatorcontrib>Rahman, Saqib A ; Walker, Robert C ; Maynard, Nick ; Trudgill, Nigel ; Crosby, Tom ; Cromwell, David A ; Underwood, Timothy J ; NOGCA project team AUGIS ; on behalf of the NOGCA project team AUGIS</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model for overall survival after esophagectomy using pre/postoperative clinical data and machine learning.
For patients with esophageal cancer, accurately predicting long-term survival after esophagectomy is challenging. This study investigated survival prediction after esophagectomy using a RandomSurvival Forest (RSF) model derived from routine data from a large, well-curated, national dataset.
Patients diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma between 2012 and 2018 in England and Wales who underwent an esophagectomy were included. Prediction models for overall survival were developed using the RSF method and Cox regression from 41 patient and disease characteristics. Calibration and discrimination (time-dependent area under the curve) were validated internally using bootstrap resampling.
The study analyzed 6399 patients, with 2625 deaths during follow-up. Median follow-up was 41 months. Overall survival was 47.1% at 5 years. The final RSF model included 14 variables and had excellent discrimination with a 5-year time-dependent area under the receiver operator curve of 83.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 82.6%-84.9%], compared to 82.3% (95% CI 81.1%-83.3%) for the Cox model. The most important variables were lymph node involvement, pT stage, circumferential resection margin involvement (tumor at < 1 mm from cut edge) and age. There was a wide range of survival estimates even within TNM staging groups, with quintiles of prediction within Stage 3b ranging from 12.2% to 44.7% survival at 5 years.
An RSF model for long-term survival after esophagectomy exhibited excellent discrimination and well-calibrated predictions. At a patient level, it provides more accuracy than TNM staging alone and could help in the delivery of tailored treatment and follow-up.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4932</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1528-1140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004794</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33630434</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; Esophagectomy - methods ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision - methods ; Neoplasm Staging ; Original</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgery, 2023-02, Vol.277 (2), p.267-274</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-8de15662e1a3d8bccd2fac2248c13039b286c9094e6dcdf899509b8ddf9b7f9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-8de15662e1a3d8bccd2fac2248c13039b286c9094e6dcdf899509b8ddf9b7f9d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9831040/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9831040/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33630434$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rahman, Saqib A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Robert C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maynard, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trudgill, Nigel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crosby, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cromwell, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Underwood, Timothy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NOGCA project team AUGIS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the NOGCA project team AUGIS</creatorcontrib><title>The AUGIS Survival Predictor: Prediction of Long-Term and Conditional Survival After Esophagectomy Using Random Survival Forests</title><title>Annals of surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model for overall survival after esophagectomy using pre/postoperative clinical data and machine learning.
For patients with esophageal cancer, accurately predicting long-term survival after esophagectomy is challenging. This study investigated survival prediction after esophagectomy using a RandomSurvival Forest (RSF) model derived from routine data from a large, well-curated, national dataset.
Patients diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma between 2012 and 2018 in England and Wales who underwent an esophagectomy were included. Prediction models for overall survival were developed using the RSF method and Cox regression from 41 patient and disease characteristics. Calibration and discrimination (time-dependent area under the curve) were validated internally using bootstrap resampling.
The study analyzed 6399 patients, with 2625 deaths during follow-up. Median follow-up was 41 months. Overall survival was 47.1% at 5 years. The final RSF model included 14 variables and had excellent discrimination with a 5-year time-dependent area under the receiver operator curve of 83.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 82.6%-84.9%], compared to 82.3% (95% CI 81.1%-83.3%) for the Cox model. The most important variables were lymph node involvement, pT stage, circumferential resection margin involvement (tumor at < 1 mm from cut edge) and age. There was a wide range of survival estimates even within TNM staging groups, with quintiles of prediction within Stage 3b ranging from 12.2% to 44.7% survival at 5 years.
An RSF model for long-term survival after esophagectomy exhibited excellent discrimination and well-calibrated predictions. At a patient level, it provides more accuracy than TNM staging alone and could help in the delivery of tailored treatment and follow-up.</description><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms</subject><subject>Esophagectomy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision - methods</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Original</subject><issn>0003-4932</issn><issn>1528-1140</issn><issn>1528-1140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1OAyEUhYnRaP15A2NYupkKA50BFyZNU7VJE41t14QBpsXMDBWmTbrz0aXR1iqbS7jnO9zcA8A1Rl2MeH43Gfe76ODQnNMj0MG9lCUYU3QMOvGVJJST9Aych_COEKYM5afgjJCMIEpoB3xOFwb2Z0-jCZys_NquZQVfvdFWtc7f767WNdCVcOyaeTI1voay0XDgGm23rYjs2X7ZGg-HwS0Xcm6iSb2Bs2CbOXyLjKt_lY_Om9CGS3BSyiqYq596AWaPw-ngORm_PI0G_XGiaE7bhGmDe1mWGiyJZoVSOi2lSlPKFCaI8CJlmeKIU5NppUvGeQ_xgmld8iIvuSYX4OHbd7kqaqOVaVovK7H0tpZ-I5y04m-nsQsxd2vBGcGIomhw-2Pg3ccqji5qG5SpKtkYtwoijYumPZ7zLErpt1R5F4I35f4bjMQ2PBHDE__Di9jN4Yh7aJcW-QKmQZgP</recordid><startdate>20230201</startdate><enddate>20230201</enddate><creator>Rahman, Saqib A</creator><creator>Walker, Robert C</creator><creator>Maynard, Nick</creator><creator>Trudgill, Nigel</creator><creator>Crosby, Tom</creator><creator>Cromwell, David A</creator><creator>Underwood, Timothy J</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230201</creationdate><title>The AUGIS Survival Predictor: Prediction of Long-Term and Conditional Survival After Esophagectomy Using Random Survival Forests</title><author>Rahman, Saqib A ; Walker, Robert C ; Maynard, Nick ; Trudgill, Nigel ; Crosby, Tom ; Cromwell, David A ; Underwood, Timothy J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-8de15662e1a3d8bccd2fac2248c13039b286c9094e6dcdf899509b8ddf9b7f9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms</topic><topic>Esophagectomy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision - methods</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rahman, Saqib A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Robert C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maynard, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trudgill, Nigel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crosby, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cromwell, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Underwood, Timothy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NOGCA project team AUGIS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the NOGCA project team AUGIS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rahman, Saqib A</au><au>Walker, Robert C</au><au>Maynard, Nick</au><au>Trudgill, Nigel</au><au>Crosby, Tom</au><au>Cromwell, David A</au><au>Underwood, Timothy J</au><aucorp>NOGCA project team AUGIS</aucorp><aucorp>on behalf of the NOGCA project team AUGIS</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The AUGIS Survival Predictor: Prediction of Long-Term and Conditional Survival After Esophagectomy Using Random Survival Forests</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><date>2023-02-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>277</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>267</spage><epage>274</epage><pages>267-274</pages><issn>0003-4932</issn><issn>1528-1140</issn><eissn>1528-1140</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model for overall survival after esophagectomy using pre/postoperative clinical data and machine learning.
For patients with esophageal cancer, accurately predicting long-term survival after esophagectomy is challenging. This study investigated survival prediction after esophagectomy using a RandomSurvival Forest (RSF) model derived from routine data from a large, well-curated, national dataset.
Patients diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma between 2012 and 2018 in England and Wales who underwent an esophagectomy were included. Prediction models for overall survival were developed using the RSF method and Cox regression from 41 patient and disease characteristics. Calibration and discrimination (time-dependent area under the curve) were validated internally using bootstrap resampling.
The study analyzed 6399 patients, with 2625 deaths during follow-up. Median follow-up was 41 months. Overall survival was 47.1% at 5 years. The final RSF model included 14 variables and had excellent discrimination with a 5-year time-dependent area under the receiver operator curve of 83.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 82.6%-84.9%], compared to 82.3% (95% CI 81.1%-83.3%) for the Cox model. The most important variables were lymph node involvement, pT stage, circumferential resection margin involvement (tumor at < 1 mm from cut edge) and age. There was a wide range of survival estimates even within TNM staging groups, with quintiles of prediction within Stage 3b ranging from 12.2% to 44.7% survival at 5 years.
An RSF model for long-term survival after esophagectomy exhibited excellent discrimination and well-calibrated predictions. At a patient level, it provides more accuracy than TNM staging alone and could help in the delivery of tailored treatment and follow-up.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>33630434</pmid><doi>10.1097/SLA.0000000000004794</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-4932 |
ispartof | Annals of surgery, 2023-02, Vol.277 (2), p.267-274 |
issn | 0003-4932 1528-1140 1528-1140 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9831040 |
source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery Esophageal Neoplasms Esophagectomy - methods Humans Lymph Node Excision - methods Neoplasm Staging Original |
title | The AUGIS Survival Predictor: Prediction of Long-Term and Conditional Survival After Esophagectomy Using Random Survival Forests |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T10%3A04%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20AUGIS%20Survival%20Predictor:%20Prediction%20of%20Long-Term%20and%20Conditional%20Survival%20After%20Esophagectomy%20Using%20Random%20Survival%20Forests&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Rahman,%20Saqib%20A&rft.aucorp=NOGCA%20project%20team%20AUGIS&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.volume=277&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=267&rft.epage=274&rft.pages=267-274&rft.issn=0003-4932&rft.eissn=1528-1140&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004794&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2493459796%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2493459796&rft_id=info:pmid/33630434&rfr_iscdi=true |