The impacts of linear infrastructure on terrestrial vertebrate populations: A trait‐based approach
While linear infrastructures, such as roads and power lines, are vital to human development, they may also have negative impacts on wildlife populations up to several kilometres into the surrounding environment (infrastructure‐effect zones, IEZs). However, species‐specific IEZs are not available for...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Global change biology 2022-12, Vol.28 (24), p.7217-7233 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 7233 |
---|---|
container_issue | 24 |
container_start_page | 7217 |
container_title | Global change biology |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Jonge, Melinda M. J. Gallego‐Zamorano, Juan Huijbregts, Mark A. J. Schipper, Aafke M. Benítez‐López, Ana |
description | While linear infrastructures, such as roads and power lines, are vital to human development, they may also have negative impacts on wildlife populations up to several kilometres into the surrounding environment (infrastructure‐effect zones, IEZs). However, species‐specific IEZs are not available for the vast majority of species, hampering global assessments of infrastructure impacts on wildlife. Here, we synthesized 253 studies worldwide to quantify the magnitude and spatial extent of infrastructure impacts on the abundance of 792 vertebrate species. We also identified the extent to which species traits, infrastructure type and habitat modulate IEZs for vertebrate species. Our results reveal contrasting responses across taxa based on the local context and species traits. Carnivorous mammals were generally more abundant in the proximity of infrastructure. In turn, medium‐ to large‐sized non‐carnivorous mammals (>1 kg) were less abundant near infrastructure across habitats, while their smaller counterparts were more abundant close to infrastructure in open habitats. Bird abundance was reduced near infrastructure with larger IEZs for non‐carnivorous than for carnivorous species. Furthermore, birds experienced larger IEZs in closed (carnivores: ≈130 m, non‐carnivores: >1 km) compared to open habitats (carnivores: ≈70 m, non‐carnivores: ≈470 m). Reptiles were more abundant near infrastructure in closed habitats but not in open habitats where abundances were reduced within an IEZ of ≈90 m. Finally, IEZs were relatively small in amphibians ( |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/gcb.16450 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9827953</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2718634129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-822874d70f7928332ec626a5c7fc6ff769fd4383321a28ed954d0f659219bef73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9qFTEUxoNYbK0ufAEJuNHFtPk_ExeFetG2UHBT1yGTOelNmTsZk0ylOx_BZ_RJzPW2RQUPgXPI-fHxHT6EXlFyRGsdX7v-iCohyRN0QLmSDROderqdpWgooXwfPc_5hhDCGVHP0D5XVClO9QEartaAw2a2rmQcPR7DBDbhMPlkc0mLK0sCHCdcICWoP8GO-BZSgT7ZAniO8zLaEuKU3-NTXJIN5ef3H73NMGA7zylat36B9rwdM7y874foy6ePV6vz5vLz2cXq9LJxQnDSdIx1rRha4lvNOs4ZOMWUla71TnnfKu0HwbcLalkHg5ZiIF5Jzajuwbf8EJ3sdOel38DgYKp-RjOnsLHpzkQbzN-bKazNdbw1umOtlrwKvL0XSPHrUs81m5AdjKOdIC7ZsJZ2igvKdEXf_IPexCVN9bxKcVmf5Fvq3Y5yKeacwD-aocRsszM1O_M7u8q-_tP9I_kQVgWOd8C3MMLd_5XM2erDTvIXkNulKw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2735735539</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impacts of linear infrastructure on terrestrial vertebrate populations: A trait‐based approach</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Jonge, Melinda M. J. ; Gallego‐Zamorano, Juan ; Huijbregts, Mark A. J. ; Schipper, Aafke M. ; Benítez‐López, Ana</creator><creatorcontrib>Jonge, Melinda M. J. ; Gallego‐Zamorano, Juan ; Huijbregts, Mark A. J. ; Schipper, Aafke M. ; Benítez‐López, Ana</creatorcontrib><description>While linear infrastructures, such as roads and power lines, are vital to human development, they may also have negative impacts on wildlife populations up to several kilometres into the surrounding environment (infrastructure‐effect zones, IEZs). However, species‐specific IEZs are not available for the vast majority of species, hampering global assessments of infrastructure impacts on wildlife. Here, we synthesized 253 studies worldwide to quantify the magnitude and spatial extent of infrastructure impacts on the abundance of 792 vertebrate species. We also identified the extent to which species traits, infrastructure type and habitat modulate IEZs for vertebrate species. Our results reveal contrasting responses across taxa based on the local context and species traits. Carnivorous mammals were generally more abundant in the proximity of infrastructure. In turn, medium‐ to large‐sized non‐carnivorous mammals (>1 kg) were less abundant near infrastructure across habitats, while their smaller counterparts were more abundant close to infrastructure in open habitats. Bird abundance was reduced near infrastructure with larger IEZs for non‐carnivorous than for carnivorous species. Furthermore, birds experienced larger IEZs in closed (carnivores: ≈130 m, non‐carnivores: >1 km) compared to open habitats (carnivores: ≈70 m, non‐carnivores: ≈470 m). Reptiles were more abundant near infrastructure in closed habitats but not in open habitats where abundances were reduced within an IEZ of ≈90 m. Finally, IEZs were relatively small in amphibians (<30 m). These results indicate that infrastructure impact assessments should differentiate IEZs across species and local contexts in order to capture the variety of responses to infrastructure. Our trait‐based synthetic approach can be applied in large‐scale assessments of the impacts of current and future infrastructure developments across multiple species, including those for which infrastructure responses are not known from empirical data.
Linear infrastructures are vital to human development, but they may also have negative impacts on wildlife populations up to several kilometres into the surrounding environment (infrastructure‐effect zones, IEZs). Here, we synthesized 253 studies worldwide to quantify the magnitude and spatial extent of infrastructure impacts on the abundance of 792 vertebrate species. Impacts of infrastructure in mammals were mediated by body size and diet, and depended on the local context (closed vs. open habitat) in mammals, birds and reptiles, yielding IEZs that ranged between 30 and 600 m on average. These differing responses can confound the impact of infrastructure on vertebrate populations when assessments do not account for species traits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-1013</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1365-2486</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16450</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36166319</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Amphibians ; Animals ; Animals, Wild ; Aquatic reptiles ; Assessments ; Birds ; Birds - physiology ; body mass ; Carnivores ; Carnivorous animals ; Ecosystem ; Electricity ; habitat ; Habitats ; herpetofauna ; Humans ; Impact assessment ; Infrastructure ; infrastructure‐effect zone ; Mammals ; Mammals - physiology ; mammals, birds ; Meta-analysis ; Populations ; Power lines ; Reptiles ; Reptiles & amphibians ; road ecology ; Species ; Vertebrates ; Wildlife ; Wildlife habitats</subject><ispartof>Global change biology, 2022-12, Vol.28 (24), p.7217-7233</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-822874d70f7928332ec626a5c7fc6ff769fd4383321a28ed954d0f659219bef73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-822874d70f7928332ec626a5c7fc6ff769fd4383321a28ed954d0f659219bef73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5667-0893 ; 0000-0003-4760-8155 ; 0000-0002-7037-680X ; 0000-0003-2317-5148 ; 0000-0002-6432-1837</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fgcb.16450$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fgcb.16450$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36166319$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jonge, Melinda M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallego‐Zamorano, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huijbregts, Mark A. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schipper, Aafke M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benítez‐López, Ana</creatorcontrib><title>The impacts of linear infrastructure on terrestrial vertebrate populations: A trait‐based approach</title><title>Global change biology</title><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><description>While linear infrastructures, such as roads and power lines, are vital to human development, they may also have negative impacts on wildlife populations up to several kilometres into the surrounding environment (infrastructure‐effect zones, IEZs). However, species‐specific IEZs are not available for the vast majority of species, hampering global assessments of infrastructure impacts on wildlife. Here, we synthesized 253 studies worldwide to quantify the magnitude and spatial extent of infrastructure impacts on the abundance of 792 vertebrate species. We also identified the extent to which species traits, infrastructure type and habitat modulate IEZs for vertebrate species. Our results reveal contrasting responses across taxa based on the local context and species traits. Carnivorous mammals were generally more abundant in the proximity of infrastructure. In turn, medium‐ to large‐sized non‐carnivorous mammals (>1 kg) were less abundant near infrastructure across habitats, while their smaller counterparts were more abundant close to infrastructure in open habitats. Bird abundance was reduced near infrastructure with larger IEZs for non‐carnivorous than for carnivorous species. Furthermore, birds experienced larger IEZs in closed (carnivores: ≈130 m, non‐carnivores: >1 km) compared to open habitats (carnivores: ≈70 m, non‐carnivores: ≈470 m). Reptiles were more abundant near infrastructure in closed habitats but not in open habitats where abundances were reduced within an IEZ of ≈90 m. Finally, IEZs were relatively small in amphibians (<30 m). These results indicate that infrastructure impact assessments should differentiate IEZs across species and local contexts in order to capture the variety of responses to infrastructure. Our trait‐based synthetic approach can be applied in large‐scale assessments of the impacts of current and future infrastructure developments across multiple species, including those for which infrastructure responses are not known from empirical data.
Linear infrastructures are vital to human development, but they may also have negative impacts on wildlife populations up to several kilometres into the surrounding environment (infrastructure‐effect zones, IEZs). Here, we synthesized 253 studies worldwide to quantify the magnitude and spatial extent of infrastructure impacts on the abundance of 792 vertebrate species. Impacts of infrastructure in mammals were mediated by body size and diet, and depended on the local context (closed vs. open habitat) in mammals, birds and reptiles, yielding IEZs that ranged between 30 and 600 m on average. These differing responses can confound the impact of infrastructure on vertebrate populations when assessments do not account for species traits.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Amphibians</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Wild</subject><subject>Aquatic reptiles</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Birds - physiology</subject><subject>body mass</subject><subject>Carnivores</subject><subject>Carnivorous animals</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>habitat</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>herpetofauna</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impact assessment</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>infrastructure‐effect zone</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Mammals - physiology</subject><subject>mammals, birds</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Power lines</subject><subject>Reptiles</subject><subject>Reptiles & amphibians</subject><subject>road ecology</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><issn>1354-1013</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9qFTEUxoNYbK0ufAEJuNHFtPk_ExeFetG2UHBT1yGTOelNmTsZk0ylOx_BZ_RJzPW2RQUPgXPI-fHxHT6EXlFyRGsdX7v-iCohyRN0QLmSDROderqdpWgooXwfPc_5hhDCGVHP0D5XVClO9QEartaAw2a2rmQcPR7DBDbhMPlkc0mLK0sCHCdcICWoP8GO-BZSgT7ZAniO8zLaEuKU3-NTXJIN5ef3H73NMGA7zylat36B9rwdM7y874foy6ePV6vz5vLz2cXq9LJxQnDSdIx1rRha4lvNOs4ZOMWUla71TnnfKu0HwbcLalkHg5ZiIF5Jzajuwbf8EJ3sdOel38DgYKp-RjOnsLHpzkQbzN-bKazNdbw1umOtlrwKvL0XSPHrUs81m5AdjKOdIC7ZsJZ2igvKdEXf_IPexCVN9bxKcVmf5Fvq3Y5yKeacwD-aocRsszM1O_M7u8q-_tP9I_kQVgWOd8C3MMLd_5XM2erDTvIXkNulKw</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Jonge, Melinda M. J.</creator><creator>Gallego‐Zamorano, Juan</creator><creator>Huijbregts, Mark A. J.</creator><creator>Schipper, Aafke M.</creator><creator>Benítez‐López, Ana</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5667-0893</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4760-8155</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7037-680X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2317-5148</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6432-1837</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>The impacts of linear infrastructure on terrestrial vertebrate populations: A trait‐based approach</title><author>Jonge, Melinda M. J. ; Gallego‐Zamorano, Juan ; Huijbregts, Mark A. J. ; Schipper, Aafke M. ; Benítez‐López, Ana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-822874d70f7928332ec626a5c7fc6ff769fd4383321a28ed954d0f659219bef73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Amphibians</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Wild</topic><topic>Aquatic reptiles</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Birds - physiology</topic><topic>body mass</topic><topic>Carnivores</topic><topic>Carnivorous animals</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>habitat</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>herpetofauna</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impact assessment</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>infrastructure‐effect zone</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Mammals - physiology</topic><topic>mammals, birds</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Power lines</topic><topic>Reptiles</topic><topic>Reptiles & amphibians</topic><topic>road ecology</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jonge, Melinda M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallego‐Zamorano, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huijbregts, Mark A. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schipper, Aafke M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benítez‐López, Ana</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jonge, Melinda M. J.</au><au>Gallego‐Zamorano, Juan</au><au>Huijbregts, Mark A. J.</au><au>Schipper, Aafke M.</au><au>Benítez‐López, Ana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impacts of linear infrastructure on terrestrial vertebrate populations: A trait‐based approach</atitle><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>7217</spage><epage>7233</epage><pages>7217-7233</pages><issn>1354-1013</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><eissn>1365-2486</eissn><abstract>While linear infrastructures, such as roads and power lines, are vital to human development, they may also have negative impacts on wildlife populations up to several kilometres into the surrounding environment (infrastructure‐effect zones, IEZs). However, species‐specific IEZs are not available for the vast majority of species, hampering global assessments of infrastructure impacts on wildlife. Here, we synthesized 253 studies worldwide to quantify the magnitude and spatial extent of infrastructure impacts on the abundance of 792 vertebrate species. We also identified the extent to which species traits, infrastructure type and habitat modulate IEZs for vertebrate species. Our results reveal contrasting responses across taxa based on the local context and species traits. Carnivorous mammals were generally more abundant in the proximity of infrastructure. In turn, medium‐ to large‐sized non‐carnivorous mammals (>1 kg) were less abundant near infrastructure across habitats, while their smaller counterparts were more abundant close to infrastructure in open habitats. Bird abundance was reduced near infrastructure with larger IEZs for non‐carnivorous than for carnivorous species. Furthermore, birds experienced larger IEZs in closed (carnivores: ≈130 m, non‐carnivores: >1 km) compared to open habitats (carnivores: ≈70 m, non‐carnivores: ≈470 m). Reptiles were more abundant near infrastructure in closed habitats but not in open habitats where abundances were reduced within an IEZ of ≈90 m. Finally, IEZs were relatively small in amphibians (<30 m). These results indicate that infrastructure impact assessments should differentiate IEZs across species and local contexts in order to capture the variety of responses to infrastructure. Our trait‐based synthetic approach can be applied in large‐scale assessments of the impacts of current and future infrastructure developments across multiple species, including those for which infrastructure responses are not known from empirical data.
Linear infrastructures are vital to human development, but they may also have negative impacts on wildlife populations up to several kilometres into the surrounding environment (infrastructure‐effect zones, IEZs). Here, we synthesized 253 studies worldwide to quantify the magnitude and spatial extent of infrastructure impacts on the abundance of 792 vertebrate species. Impacts of infrastructure in mammals were mediated by body size and diet, and depended on the local context (closed vs. open habitat) in mammals, birds and reptiles, yielding IEZs that ranged between 30 and 600 m on average. These differing responses can confound the impact of infrastructure on vertebrate populations when assessments do not account for species traits.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>36166319</pmid><doi>10.1111/gcb.16450</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5667-0893</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4760-8155</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7037-680X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2317-5148</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6432-1837</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1354-1013 |
ispartof | Global change biology, 2022-12, Vol.28 (24), p.7217-7233 |
issn | 1354-1013 1365-2486 1365-2486 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9827953 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Abundance Amphibians Animals Animals, Wild Aquatic reptiles Assessments Birds Birds - physiology body mass Carnivores Carnivorous animals Ecosystem Electricity habitat Habitats herpetofauna Humans Impact assessment Infrastructure infrastructure‐effect zone Mammals Mammals - physiology mammals, birds Meta-analysis Populations Power lines Reptiles Reptiles & amphibians road ecology Species Vertebrates Wildlife Wildlife habitats |
title | The impacts of linear infrastructure on terrestrial vertebrate populations: A trait‐based approach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A58%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impacts%20of%20linear%20infrastructure%20on%20terrestrial%20vertebrate%20populations:%20A%20trait%E2%80%90based%20approach&rft.jtitle=Global%20change%20biology&rft.au=Jonge,%20Melinda%20M.%20J.&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=7217&rft.epage=7233&rft.pages=7217-7233&rft.issn=1354-1013&rft.eissn=1365-2486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gcb.16450&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2718634129%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2735735539&rft_id=info:pmid/36166319&rfr_iscdi=true |