The impacts of linear infrastructure on terrestrial vertebrate populations: A trait‐based approach

While linear infrastructures, such as roads and power lines, are vital to human development, they may also have negative impacts on wildlife populations up to several kilometres into the surrounding environment (infrastructure‐effect zones, IEZs). However, species‐specific IEZs are not available for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global change biology 2022-12, Vol.28 (24), p.7217-7233
Hauptverfasser: Jonge, Melinda M. J., Gallego‐Zamorano, Juan, Huijbregts, Mark A. J., Schipper, Aafke M., Benítez‐López, Ana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7233
container_issue 24
container_start_page 7217
container_title Global change biology
container_volume 28
creator Jonge, Melinda M. J.
Gallego‐Zamorano, Juan
Huijbregts, Mark A. J.
Schipper, Aafke M.
Benítez‐López, Ana
description While linear infrastructures, such as roads and power lines, are vital to human development, they may also have negative impacts on wildlife populations up to several kilometres into the surrounding environment (infrastructure‐effect zones, IEZs). However, species‐specific IEZs are not available for the vast majority of species, hampering global assessments of infrastructure impacts on wildlife. Here, we synthesized 253 studies worldwide to quantify the magnitude and spatial extent of infrastructure impacts on the abundance of 792 vertebrate species. We also identified the extent to which species traits, infrastructure type and habitat modulate IEZs for vertebrate species. Our results reveal contrasting responses across taxa based on the local context and species traits. Carnivorous mammals were generally more abundant in the proximity of infrastructure. In turn, medium‐ to large‐sized non‐carnivorous mammals (>1 kg) were less abundant near infrastructure across habitats, while their smaller counterparts were more abundant close to infrastructure in open habitats. Bird abundance was reduced near infrastructure with larger IEZs for non‐carnivorous than for carnivorous species. Furthermore, birds experienced larger IEZs in closed (carnivores: ≈130 m, non‐carnivores: >1 km) compared to open habitats (carnivores: ≈70 m, non‐carnivores: ≈470 m). Reptiles were more abundant near infrastructure in closed habitats but not in open habitats where abundances were reduced within an IEZ of ≈90 m. Finally, IEZs were relatively small in amphibians (
doi_str_mv 10.1111/gcb.16450
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9827953</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2718634129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-822874d70f7928332ec626a5c7fc6ff769fd4383321a28ed954d0f659219bef73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9qFTEUxoNYbK0ufAEJuNHFtPk_ExeFetG2UHBT1yGTOelNmTsZk0ylOx_BZ_RJzPW2RQUPgXPI-fHxHT6EXlFyRGsdX7v-iCohyRN0QLmSDROderqdpWgooXwfPc_5hhDCGVHP0D5XVClO9QEartaAw2a2rmQcPR7DBDbhMPlkc0mLK0sCHCdcICWoP8GO-BZSgT7ZAniO8zLaEuKU3-NTXJIN5ef3H73NMGA7zylat36B9rwdM7y874foy6ePV6vz5vLz2cXq9LJxQnDSdIx1rRha4lvNOs4ZOMWUla71TnnfKu0HwbcLalkHg5ZiIF5Jzajuwbf8EJ3sdOel38DgYKp-RjOnsLHpzkQbzN-bKazNdbw1umOtlrwKvL0XSPHrUs81m5AdjKOdIC7ZsJZ2igvKdEXf_IPexCVN9bxKcVmf5Fvq3Y5yKeacwD-aocRsszM1O_M7u8q-_tP9I_kQVgWOd8C3MMLd_5XM2erDTvIXkNulKw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2735735539</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impacts of linear infrastructure on terrestrial vertebrate populations: A trait‐based approach</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Jonge, Melinda M. J. ; Gallego‐Zamorano, Juan ; Huijbregts, Mark A. J. ; Schipper, Aafke M. ; Benítez‐López, Ana</creator><creatorcontrib>Jonge, Melinda M. J. ; Gallego‐Zamorano, Juan ; Huijbregts, Mark A. J. ; Schipper, Aafke M. ; Benítez‐López, Ana</creatorcontrib><description>While linear infrastructures, such as roads and power lines, are vital to human development, they may also have negative impacts on wildlife populations up to several kilometres into the surrounding environment (infrastructure‐effect zones, IEZs). However, species‐specific IEZs are not available for the vast majority of species, hampering global assessments of infrastructure impacts on wildlife. Here, we synthesized 253 studies worldwide to quantify the magnitude and spatial extent of infrastructure impacts on the abundance of 792 vertebrate species. We also identified the extent to which species traits, infrastructure type and habitat modulate IEZs for vertebrate species. Our results reveal contrasting responses across taxa based on the local context and species traits. Carnivorous mammals were generally more abundant in the proximity of infrastructure. In turn, medium‐ to large‐sized non‐carnivorous mammals (&gt;1 kg) were less abundant near infrastructure across habitats, while their smaller counterparts were more abundant close to infrastructure in open habitats. Bird abundance was reduced near infrastructure with larger IEZs for non‐carnivorous than for carnivorous species. Furthermore, birds experienced larger IEZs in closed (carnivores: ≈130 m, non‐carnivores: &gt;1 km) compared to open habitats (carnivores: ≈70 m, non‐carnivores: ≈470 m). Reptiles were more abundant near infrastructure in closed habitats but not in open habitats where abundances were reduced within an IEZ of ≈90 m. Finally, IEZs were relatively small in amphibians (&lt;30 m). These results indicate that infrastructure impact assessments should differentiate IEZs across species and local contexts in order to capture the variety of responses to infrastructure. Our trait‐based synthetic approach can be applied in large‐scale assessments of the impacts of current and future infrastructure developments across multiple species, including those for which infrastructure responses are not known from empirical data. Linear infrastructures are vital to human development, but they may also have negative impacts on wildlife populations up to several kilometres into the surrounding environment (infrastructure‐effect zones, IEZs). Here, we synthesized 253 studies worldwide to quantify the magnitude and spatial extent of infrastructure impacts on the abundance of 792 vertebrate species. Impacts of infrastructure in mammals were mediated by body size and diet, and depended on the local context (closed vs. open habitat) in mammals, birds and reptiles, yielding IEZs that ranged between 30 and 600 m on average. These differing responses can confound the impact of infrastructure on vertebrate populations when assessments do not account for species traits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-1013</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1365-2486</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16450</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36166319</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Amphibians ; Animals ; Animals, Wild ; Aquatic reptiles ; Assessments ; Birds ; Birds - physiology ; body mass ; Carnivores ; Carnivorous animals ; Ecosystem ; Electricity ; habitat ; Habitats ; herpetofauna ; Humans ; Impact assessment ; Infrastructure ; infrastructure‐effect zone ; Mammals ; Mammals - physiology ; mammals, birds ; Meta-analysis ; Populations ; Power lines ; Reptiles ; Reptiles &amp; amphibians ; road ecology ; Species ; Vertebrates ; Wildlife ; Wildlife habitats</subject><ispartof>Global change biology, 2022-12, Vol.28 (24), p.7217-7233</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-822874d70f7928332ec626a5c7fc6ff769fd4383321a28ed954d0f659219bef73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-822874d70f7928332ec626a5c7fc6ff769fd4383321a28ed954d0f659219bef73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5667-0893 ; 0000-0003-4760-8155 ; 0000-0002-7037-680X ; 0000-0003-2317-5148 ; 0000-0002-6432-1837</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fgcb.16450$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fgcb.16450$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36166319$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jonge, Melinda M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallego‐Zamorano, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huijbregts, Mark A. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schipper, Aafke M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benítez‐López, Ana</creatorcontrib><title>The impacts of linear infrastructure on terrestrial vertebrate populations: A trait‐based approach</title><title>Global change biology</title><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><description>While linear infrastructures, such as roads and power lines, are vital to human development, they may also have negative impacts on wildlife populations up to several kilometres into the surrounding environment (infrastructure‐effect zones, IEZs). However, species‐specific IEZs are not available for the vast majority of species, hampering global assessments of infrastructure impacts on wildlife. Here, we synthesized 253 studies worldwide to quantify the magnitude and spatial extent of infrastructure impacts on the abundance of 792 vertebrate species. We also identified the extent to which species traits, infrastructure type and habitat modulate IEZs for vertebrate species. Our results reveal contrasting responses across taxa based on the local context and species traits. Carnivorous mammals were generally more abundant in the proximity of infrastructure. In turn, medium‐ to large‐sized non‐carnivorous mammals (&gt;1 kg) were less abundant near infrastructure across habitats, while their smaller counterparts were more abundant close to infrastructure in open habitats. Bird abundance was reduced near infrastructure with larger IEZs for non‐carnivorous than for carnivorous species. Furthermore, birds experienced larger IEZs in closed (carnivores: ≈130 m, non‐carnivores: &gt;1 km) compared to open habitats (carnivores: ≈70 m, non‐carnivores: ≈470 m). Reptiles were more abundant near infrastructure in closed habitats but not in open habitats where abundances were reduced within an IEZ of ≈90 m. Finally, IEZs were relatively small in amphibians (&lt;30 m). These results indicate that infrastructure impact assessments should differentiate IEZs across species and local contexts in order to capture the variety of responses to infrastructure. Our trait‐based synthetic approach can be applied in large‐scale assessments of the impacts of current and future infrastructure developments across multiple species, including those for which infrastructure responses are not known from empirical data. Linear infrastructures are vital to human development, but they may also have negative impacts on wildlife populations up to several kilometres into the surrounding environment (infrastructure‐effect zones, IEZs). Here, we synthesized 253 studies worldwide to quantify the magnitude and spatial extent of infrastructure impacts on the abundance of 792 vertebrate species. Impacts of infrastructure in mammals were mediated by body size and diet, and depended on the local context (closed vs. open habitat) in mammals, birds and reptiles, yielding IEZs that ranged between 30 and 600 m on average. These differing responses can confound the impact of infrastructure on vertebrate populations when assessments do not account for species traits.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Amphibians</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Wild</subject><subject>Aquatic reptiles</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Birds - physiology</subject><subject>body mass</subject><subject>Carnivores</subject><subject>Carnivorous animals</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>habitat</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>herpetofauna</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impact assessment</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>infrastructure‐effect zone</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Mammals - physiology</subject><subject>mammals, birds</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Power lines</subject><subject>Reptiles</subject><subject>Reptiles &amp; amphibians</subject><subject>road ecology</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><issn>1354-1013</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9qFTEUxoNYbK0ufAEJuNHFtPk_ExeFetG2UHBT1yGTOelNmTsZk0ylOx_BZ_RJzPW2RQUPgXPI-fHxHT6EXlFyRGsdX7v-iCohyRN0QLmSDROderqdpWgooXwfPc_5hhDCGVHP0D5XVClO9QEartaAw2a2rmQcPR7DBDbhMPlkc0mLK0sCHCdcICWoP8GO-BZSgT7ZAniO8zLaEuKU3-NTXJIN5ef3H73NMGA7zylat36B9rwdM7y874foy6ePV6vz5vLz2cXq9LJxQnDSdIx1rRha4lvNOs4ZOMWUla71TnnfKu0HwbcLalkHg5ZiIF5Jzajuwbf8EJ3sdOel38DgYKp-RjOnsLHpzkQbzN-bKazNdbw1umOtlrwKvL0XSPHrUs81m5AdjKOdIC7ZsJZ2igvKdEXf_IPexCVN9bxKcVmf5Fvq3Y5yKeacwD-aocRsszM1O_M7u8q-_tP9I_kQVgWOd8C3MMLd_5XM2erDTvIXkNulKw</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Jonge, Melinda M. J.</creator><creator>Gallego‐Zamorano, Juan</creator><creator>Huijbregts, Mark A. J.</creator><creator>Schipper, Aafke M.</creator><creator>Benítez‐López, Ana</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5667-0893</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4760-8155</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7037-680X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2317-5148</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6432-1837</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>The impacts of linear infrastructure on terrestrial vertebrate populations: A trait‐based approach</title><author>Jonge, Melinda M. J. ; Gallego‐Zamorano, Juan ; Huijbregts, Mark A. J. ; Schipper, Aafke M. ; Benítez‐López, Ana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-822874d70f7928332ec626a5c7fc6ff769fd4383321a28ed954d0f659219bef73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Amphibians</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Wild</topic><topic>Aquatic reptiles</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Birds - physiology</topic><topic>body mass</topic><topic>Carnivores</topic><topic>Carnivorous animals</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>habitat</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>herpetofauna</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impact assessment</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>infrastructure‐effect zone</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Mammals - physiology</topic><topic>mammals, birds</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Power lines</topic><topic>Reptiles</topic><topic>Reptiles &amp; amphibians</topic><topic>road ecology</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jonge, Melinda M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallego‐Zamorano, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huijbregts, Mark A. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schipper, Aafke M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benítez‐López, Ana</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jonge, Melinda M. J.</au><au>Gallego‐Zamorano, Juan</au><au>Huijbregts, Mark A. J.</au><au>Schipper, Aafke M.</au><au>Benítez‐López, Ana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impacts of linear infrastructure on terrestrial vertebrate populations: A trait‐based approach</atitle><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>7217</spage><epage>7233</epage><pages>7217-7233</pages><issn>1354-1013</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><eissn>1365-2486</eissn><abstract>While linear infrastructures, such as roads and power lines, are vital to human development, they may also have negative impacts on wildlife populations up to several kilometres into the surrounding environment (infrastructure‐effect zones, IEZs). However, species‐specific IEZs are not available for the vast majority of species, hampering global assessments of infrastructure impacts on wildlife. Here, we synthesized 253 studies worldwide to quantify the magnitude and spatial extent of infrastructure impacts on the abundance of 792 vertebrate species. We also identified the extent to which species traits, infrastructure type and habitat modulate IEZs for vertebrate species. Our results reveal contrasting responses across taxa based on the local context and species traits. Carnivorous mammals were generally more abundant in the proximity of infrastructure. In turn, medium‐ to large‐sized non‐carnivorous mammals (&gt;1 kg) were less abundant near infrastructure across habitats, while their smaller counterparts were more abundant close to infrastructure in open habitats. Bird abundance was reduced near infrastructure with larger IEZs for non‐carnivorous than for carnivorous species. Furthermore, birds experienced larger IEZs in closed (carnivores: ≈130 m, non‐carnivores: &gt;1 km) compared to open habitats (carnivores: ≈70 m, non‐carnivores: ≈470 m). Reptiles were more abundant near infrastructure in closed habitats but not in open habitats where abundances were reduced within an IEZ of ≈90 m. Finally, IEZs were relatively small in amphibians (&lt;30 m). These results indicate that infrastructure impact assessments should differentiate IEZs across species and local contexts in order to capture the variety of responses to infrastructure. Our trait‐based synthetic approach can be applied in large‐scale assessments of the impacts of current and future infrastructure developments across multiple species, including those for which infrastructure responses are not known from empirical data. Linear infrastructures are vital to human development, but they may also have negative impacts on wildlife populations up to several kilometres into the surrounding environment (infrastructure‐effect zones, IEZs). Here, we synthesized 253 studies worldwide to quantify the magnitude and spatial extent of infrastructure impacts on the abundance of 792 vertebrate species. Impacts of infrastructure in mammals were mediated by body size and diet, and depended on the local context (closed vs. open habitat) in mammals, birds and reptiles, yielding IEZs that ranged between 30 and 600 m on average. These differing responses can confound the impact of infrastructure on vertebrate populations when assessments do not account for species traits.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>36166319</pmid><doi>10.1111/gcb.16450</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5667-0893</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4760-8155</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7037-680X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2317-5148</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6432-1837</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1354-1013
ispartof Global change biology, 2022-12, Vol.28 (24), p.7217-7233
issn 1354-1013
1365-2486
1365-2486
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9827953
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Abundance
Amphibians
Animals
Animals, Wild
Aquatic reptiles
Assessments
Birds
Birds - physiology
body mass
Carnivores
Carnivorous animals
Ecosystem
Electricity
habitat
Habitats
herpetofauna
Humans
Impact assessment
Infrastructure
infrastructure‐effect zone
Mammals
Mammals - physiology
mammals, birds
Meta-analysis
Populations
Power lines
Reptiles
Reptiles & amphibians
road ecology
Species
Vertebrates
Wildlife
Wildlife habitats
title The impacts of linear infrastructure on terrestrial vertebrate populations: A trait‐based approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A58%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impacts%20of%20linear%20infrastructure%20on%20terrestrial%20vertebrate%20populations:%20A%20trait%E2%80%90based%20approach&rft.jtitle=Global%20change%20biology&rft.au=Jonge,%20Melinda%20M.%20J.&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=7217&rft.epage=7233&rft.pages=7217-7233&rft.issn=1354-1013&rft.eissn=1365-2486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gcb.16450&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2718634129%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2735735539&rft_id=info:pmid/36166319&rfr_iscdi=true