Palovarotene for Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP): Results of a Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled, Double‐Blind Phase 2 Trial

ABSTRACT Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an ultra‐rare genetic disorder characterized by progressive heterotopic ossification (HO), often heralded by flare‐ups, leading to reduced movement and life expectancy. This placebo‐controlled, double‐blind trial (NCT02190747) evaluated palovar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bone and mineral research 2022-10, Vol.37 (10), p.1891-1902
Hauptverfasser: Pignolo, Robert J., Baujat, Geneviève, Hsiao, Edward C., Keen, Richard, Wilson, Amy, Packman, Jeff, Strahs, Andrew L., Grogan, Donna R., Kaplan, Frederick S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1902
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1891
container_title Journal of bone and mineral research
container_volume 37
creator Pignolo, Robert J.
Baujat, Geneviève
Hsiao, Edward C.
Keen, Richard
Wilson, Amy
Packman, Jeff
Strahs, Andrew L.
Grogan, Donna R.
Kaplan, Frederick S.
description ABSTRACT Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an ultra‐rare genetic disorder characterized by progressive heterotopic ossification (HO), often heralded by flare‐ups, leading to reduced movement and life expectancy. This placebo‐controlled, double‐blind trial (NCT02190747) evaluated palovarotene, an orally bioavailable selective retinoic acid receptor gamma agonist, for prevention of HO in patients with FOP. Patients experiencing a flare‐up were enrolled in two cohorts: (1) patients ≥15 years were randomized 3:1 to palovarotene 10/5 mg (weeks 1–2/3–6) or placebo; (2) patients ≥6 years were randomized 3:3:2 to palovarotene 10/5 mg, palovarotene 5/2.5 mg (weeks 1–2/3–6), or placebo. Cohort data were pooled. The primary endpoint was the proportion of responders (no/minimal new HO at flare‐up body region by plain radiograph) at week 6. Change from baseline in HO volume and new HO incidence were assessed by computed tomography (CT) at week 12. Tissue edema was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound. Forty patients (aged 7–53 years) were enrolled (placebo: n = 10; palovarotene 5/2.5 mg: n = 9; palovarotene 10/5 mg: n = 21). Disease history was similar between groups. In the per‐protocol population, the proportion of responders at week 6 by plain radiograph was 100% with palovarotene 10/5 mg; 88.9% with palovarotene 5/2.5 mg; 88.9% with placebo (Cochran‐Armitage trend test: p = 0.17). At week 12, the proportions were 95.0% with palovarotene 10/5 mg; 88.9% with palovarotene 5/2.5 mg; 77.8% with placebo (Cochran‐Armitage trend test: p = 0.15). Week 12 least‐squares mean (LSmean) new HO volume, assessed by CT, was 3.8 × 103 mm3 with palovarotene 10/5 mg; 1.3 × 103 mm3 with palovarotene 5/2.5 mg; 18.0 × 103 mm3 with placebo (pairwise tests versus placebo: p ≤ 0.12). Palovarotene was well‐tolerated. No patients discontinued treatment or required dose reduction; one patient had dose interruption due to elevated lipase. Although these findings were not statistically significant, they support further evaluation of palovarotene for prevention of HO in FOP in larger studies. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jbmr.4655
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9804935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2692073169</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-e4e9c8df9282d71c5df37d02371fa297e713850e294a2b16e59a9b14b2c8bf6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhiMEokNhwQsgS2xaibS-x2aBRKcMFxVNNCpry0lOWo-ceLAng6Yrtux4Rp6EDFMqQGJ1dI4_ffqtP8ueEnxCMKany6qLJ1wKcS-bEEFZzqUi97MJVornmDNykD1KaYkxlkLKh9kBE0pwydQk-1ZaHzY2hjX0gNoQ0cxVMTTbtPI2OYvmKbnW1bZPqIzhKsK4byw6ms3L45doAWnw64RCiyxa2L4JnbuB5gUqva2hCj--fp-Gfh2D97vreRgqD-PxzLu-QeW1TYAouozO-sfZg9b6BE9u52H2afbmcvouv5i_fT99fZHXnDORAwddq6bVVNGmILVoWlY0mLKCtJbqAgrClMBANbe0IhKEtroivKK1qlrZsMPs1d67GqoOmhrGeNabVXSdjVsTrDN_v_Tu2lyFjdEKc83EKDi6FcTweYC0Np1LNXhvewhDMlRqigtGpB7R5_-gyzDEfvyeoQVVrNBSFSN1vKfqGFKK0N6FIdjsCja7gs2u4JF99mf6O_J3oyNwuge-OA_b_5vMh7OPi1_Kn_VJs5M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2728379687</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Palovarotene for Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP): Results of a Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled, Double‐Blind Phase 2 Trial</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Pignolo, Robert J. ; Baujat, Geneviève ; Hsiao, Edward C. ; Keen, Richard ; Wilson, Amy ; Packman, Jeff ; Strahs, Andrew L. ; Grogan, Donna R. ; Kaplan, Frederick S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pignolo, Robert J. ; Baujat, Geneviève ; Hsiao, Edward C. ; Keen, Richard ; Wilson, Amy ; Packman, Jeff ; Strahs, Andrew L. ; Grogan, Donna R. ; Kaplan, Frederick S.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an ultra‐rare genetic disorder characterized by progressive heterotopic ossification (HO), often heralded by flare‐ups, leading to reduced movement and life expectancy. This placebo‐controlled, double‐blind trial (NCT02190747) evaluated palovarotene, an orally bioavailable selective retinoic acid receptor gamma agonist, for prevention of HO in patients with FOP. Patients experiencing a flare‐up were enrolled in two cohorts: (1) patients ≥15 years were randomized 3:1 to palovarotene 10/5 mg (weeks 1–2/3–6) or placebo; (2) patients ≥6 years were randomized 3:3:2 to palovarotene 10/5 mg, palovarotene 5/2.5 mg (weeks 1–2/3–6), or placebo. Cohort data were pooled. The primary endpoint was the proportion of responders (no/minimal new HO at flare‐up body region by plain radiograph) at week 6. Change from baseline in HO volume and new HO incidence were assessed by computed tomography (CT) at week 12. Tissue edema was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound. Forty patients (aged 7–53 years) were enrolled (placebo: n = 10; palovarotene 5/2.5 mg: n = 9; palovarotene 10/5 mg: n = 21). Disease history was similar between groups. In the per‐protocol population, the proportion of responders at week 6 by plain radiograph was 100% with palovarotene 10/5 mg; 88.9% with palovarotene 5/2.5 mg; 88.9% with placebo (Cochran‐Armitage trend test: p = 0.17). At week 12, the proportions were 95.0% with palovarotene 10/5 mg; 88.9% with palovarotene 5/2.5 mg; 77.8% with placebo (Cochran‐Armitage trend test: p = 0.15). Week 12 least‐squares mean (LSmean) new HO volume, assessed by CT, was 3.8 × 103 mm3 with palovarotene 10/5 mg; 1.3 × 103 mm3 with palovarotene 5/2.5 mg; 18.0 × 103 mm3 with placebo (pairwise tests versus placebo: p ≤ 0.12). Palovarotene was well‐tolerated. No patients discontinued treatment or required dose reduction; one patient had dose interruption due to elevated lipase. Although these findings were not statistically significant, they support further evaluation of palovarotene for prevention of HO in FOP in larger studies. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0884-0431</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4655</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35854638</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>CELL/TISSUE SIGNALING ; Clinical Trial ; CLINICAL TRIALS ; Computed tomography ; Double-blind studies ; Edema ; FIBRODYSPLASIA OSSIFICANS PROGRESSIVA ; Genetic disorders ; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION ; Humans ; Life span ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Myositis ossificans ; Myositis Ossificans - drug therapy ; Ossification (ectopic) ; Ossification, Heterotopic - diagnostic imaging ; Ossification, Heterotopic - drug therapy ; Patients ; Placebos ; Pyrazoles - therapeutic use ; Radiography ; RADIOLOGY ; Statistical analysis ; Stilbenes - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and mineral research, 2022-10, Vol.37 (10), p.1891-1902</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-e4e9c8df9282d71c5df37d02371fa297e713850e294a2b16e59a9b14b2c8bf6d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-e4e9c8df9282d71c5df37d02371fa297e713850e294a2b16e59a9b14b2c8bf6d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8533-9438</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjbmr.4655$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjbmr.4655$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35854638$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pignolo, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baujat, Geneviève</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsiao, Edward C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keen, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Packman, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strahs, Andrew L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grogan, Donna R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Frederick S.</creatorcontrib><title>Palovarotene for Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP): Results of a Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled, Double‐Blind Phase 2 Trial</title><title>Journal of bone and mineral research</title><addtitle>J Bone Miner Res</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an ultra‐rare genetic disorder characterized by progressive heterotopic ossification (HO), often heralded by flare‐ups, leading to reduced movement and life expectancy. This placebo‐controlled, double‐blind trial (NCT02190747) evaluated palovarotene, an orally bioavailable selective retinoic acid receptor gamma agonist, for prevention of HO in patients with FOP. Patients experiencing a flare‐up were enrolled in two cohorts: (1) patients ≥15 years were randomized 3:1 to palovarotene 10/5 mg (weeks 1–2/3–6) or placebo; (2) patients ≥6 years were randomized 3:3:2 to palovarotene 10/5 mg, palovarotene 5/2.5 mg (weeks 1–2/3–6), or placebo. Cohort data were pooled. The primary endpoint was the proportion of responders (no/minimal new HO at flare‐up body region by plain radiograph) at week 6. Change from baseline in HO volume and new HO incidence were assessed by computed tomography (CT) at week 12. Tissue edema was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound. Forty patients (aged 7–53 years) were enrolled (placebo: n = 10; palovarotene 5/2.5 mg: n = 9; palovarotene 10/5 mg: n = 21). Disease history was similar between groups. In the per‐protocol population, the proportion of responders at week 6 by plain radiograph was 100% with palovarotene 10/5 mg; 88.9% with palovarotene 5/2.5 mg; 88.9% with placebo (Cochran‐Armitage trend test: p = 0.17). At week 12, the proportions were 95.0% with palovarotene 10/5 mg; 88.9% with palovarotene 5/2.5 mg; 77.8% with placebo (Cochran‐Armitage trend test: p = 0.15). Week 12 least‐squares mean (LSmean) new HO volume, assessed by CT, was 3.8 × 103 mm3 with palovarotene 10/5 mg; 1.3 × 103 mm3 with palovarotene 5/2.5 mg; 18.0 × 103 mm3 with placebo (pairwise tests versus placebo: p ≤ 0.12). Palovarotene was well‐tolerated. No patients discontinued treatment or required dose reduction; one patient had dose interruption due to elevated lipase. Although these findings were not statistically significant, they support further evaluation of palovarotene for prevention of HO in FOP in larger studies. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).</description><subject>CELL/TISSUE SIGNALING</subject><subject>Clinical Trial</subject><subject>CLINICAL TRIALS</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Double-blind studies</subject><subject>Edema</subject><subject>FIBRODYSPLASIA OSSIFICANS PROGRESSIVA</subject><subject>Genetic disorders</subject><subject>HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life span</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Myositis ossificans</subject><subject>Myositis Ossificans - drug therapy</subject><subject>Ossification (ectopic)</subject><subject>Ossification, Heterotopic - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ossification, Heterotopic - drug therapy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Placebos</subject><subject>Pyrazoles - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stilbenes - therapeutic use</subject><issn>0884-0431</issn><issn>1523-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhiMEokNhwQsgS2xaibS-x2aBRKcMFxVNNCpry0lOWo-ceLAng6Yrtux4Rp6EDFMqQGJ1dI4_ffqtP8ueEnxCMKany6qLJ1wKcS-bEEFZzqUi97MJVornmDNykD1KaYkxlkLKh9kBE0pwydQk-1ZaHzY2hjX0gNoQ0cxVMTTbtPI2OYvmKbnW1bZPqIzhKsK4byw6ms3L45doAWnw64RCiyxa2L4JnbuB5gUqva2hCj--fp-Gfh2D97vreRgqD-PxzLu-QeW1TYAouozO-sfZg9b6BE9u52H2afbmcvouv5i_fT99fZHXnDORAwddq6bVVNGmILVoWlY0mLKCtJbqAgrClMBANbe0IhKEtroivKK1qlrZsMPs1d67GqoOmhrGeNabVXSdjVsTrDN_v_Tu2lyFjdEKc83EKDi6FcTweYC0Np1LNXhvewhDMlRqigtGpB7R5_-gyzDEfvyeoQVVrNBSFSN1vKfqGFKK0N6FIdjsCja7gs2u4JF99mf6O_J3oyNwuge-OA_b_5vMh7OPi1_Kn_VJs5M</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Pignolo, Robert J.</creator><creator>Baujat, Geneviève</creator><creator>Hsiao, Edward C.</creator><creator>Keen, Richard</creator><creator>Wilson, Amy</creator><creator>Packman, Jeff</creator><creator>Strahs, Andrew L.</creator><creator>Grogan, Donna R.</creator><creator>Kaplan, Frederick S.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8533-9438</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Palovarotene for Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP): Results of a Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled, Double‐Blind Phase 2 Trial</title><author>Pignolo, Robert J. ; Baujat, Geneviève ; Hsiao, Edward C. ; Keen, Richard ; Wilson, Amy ; Packman, Jeff ; Strahs, Andrew L. ; Grogan, Donna R. ; Kaplan, Frederick S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-e4e9c8df9282d71c5df37d02371fa297e713850e294a2b16e59a9b14b2c8bf6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>CELL/TISSUE SIGNALING</topic><topic>Clinical Trial</topic><topic>CLINICAL TRIALS</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Double-blind studies</topic><topic>Edema</topic><topic>FIBRODYSPLASIA OSSIFICANS PROGRESSIVA</topic><topic>Genetic disorders</topic><topic>HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life span</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Myositis ossificans</topic><topic>Myositis Ossificans - drug therapy</topic><topic>Ossification (ectopic)</topic><topic>Ossification, Heterotopic - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ossification, Heterotopic - drug therapy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Placebos</topic><topic>Pyrazoles - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stilbenes - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pignolo, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baujat, Geneviève</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsiao, Edward C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keen, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Packman, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strahs, Andrew L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grogan, Donna R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Frederick S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and mineral research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pignolo, Robert J.</au><au>Baujat, Geneviève</au><au>Hsiao, Edward C.</au><au>Keen, Richard</au><au>Wilson, Amy</au><au>Packman, Jeff</au><au>Strahs, Andrew L.</au><au>Grogan, Donna R.</au><au>Kaplan, Frederick S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Palovarotene for Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP): Results of a Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled, Double‐Blind Phase 2 Trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and mineral research</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Miner Res</addtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1891</spage><epage>1902</epage><pages>1891-1902</pages><issn>0884-0431</issn><eissn>1523-4681</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an ultra‐rare genetic disorder characterized by progressive heterotopic ossification (HO), often heralded by flare‐ups, leading to reduced movement and life expectancy. This placebo‐controlled, double‐blind trial (NCT02190747) evaluated palovarotene, an orally bioavailable selective retinoic acid receptor gamma agonist, for prevention of HO in patients with FOP. Patients experiencing a flare‐up were enrolled in two cohorts: (1) patients ≥15 years were randomized 3:1 to palovarotene 10/5 mg (weeks 1–2/3–6) or placebo; (2) patients ≥6 years were randomized 3:3:2 to palovarotene 10/5 mg, palovarotene 5/2.5 mg (weeks 1–2/3–6), or placebo. Cohort data were pooled. The primary endpoint was the proportion of responders (no/minimal new HO at flare‐up body region by plain radiograph) at week 6. Change from baseline in HO volume and new HO incidence were assessed by computed tomography (CT) at week 12. Tissue edema was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound. Forty patients (aged 7–53 years) were enrolled (placebo: n = 10; palovarotene 5/2.5 mg: n = 9; palovarotene 10/5 mg: n = 21). Disease history was similar between groups. In the per‐protocol population, the proportion of responders at week 6 by plain radiograph was 100% with palovarotene 10/5 mg; 88.9% with palovarotene 5/2.5 mg; 88.9% with placebo (Cochran‐Armitage trend test: p = 0.17). At week 12, the proportions were 95.0% with palovarotene 10/5 mg; 88.9% with palovarotene 5/2.5 mg; 77.8% with placebo (Cochran‐Armitage trend test: p = 0.15). Week 12 least‐squares mean (LSmean) new HO volume, assessed by CT, was 3.8 × 103 mm3 with palovarotene 10/5 mg; 1.3 × 103 mm3 with palovarotene 5/2.5 mg; 18.0 × 103 mm3 with placebo (pairwise tests versus placebo: p ≤ 0.12). Palovarotene was well‐tolerated. No patients discontinued treatment or required dose reduction; one patient had dose interruption due to elevated lipase. Although these findings were not statistically significant, they support further evaluation of palovarotene for prevention of HO in FOP in larger studies. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>35854638</pmid><doi>10.1002/jbmr.4655</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8533-9438</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0884-0431
ispartof Journal of bone and mineral research, 2022-10, Vol.37 (10), p.1891-1902
issn 0884-0431
1523-4681
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9804935
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects CELL/TISSUE SIGNALING
Clinical Trial
CLINICAL TRIALS
Computed tomography
Double-blind studies
Edema
FIBRODYSPLASIA OSSIFICANS PROGRESSIVA
Genetic disorders
HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION
Humans
Life span
Magnetic resonance imaging
Myositis ossificans
Myositis Ossificans - drug therapy
Ossification (ectopic)
Ossification, Heterotopic - diagnostic imaging
Ossification, Heterotopic - drug therapy
Patients
Placebos
Pyrazoles - therapeutic use
Radiography
RADIOLOGY
Statistical analysis
Stilbenes - therapeutic use
title Palovarotene for Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP): Results of a Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled, Double‐Blind Phase 2 Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T04%3A43%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Palovarotene%20for%20Fibrodysplasia%20Ossificans%20Progressiva%20(FOP):%20Results%20of%20a%20Randomized,%20Placebo%E2%80%90Controlled,%20Double%E2%80%90Blind%20Phase%202%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20mineral%20research&rft.au=Pignolo,%20Robert%20J.&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1891&rft.epage=1902&rft.pages=1891-1902&rft.issn=0884-0431&rft.eissn=1523-4681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jbmr.4655&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2692073169%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2728379687&rft_id=info:pmid/35854638&rfr_iscdi=true