Optimization of quasi‐diffusion magnetic resonance imaging for quantitative accuracy and time‐efficient acquisition

Purpose Quasi‐diffusion MRI (QDI) is a novel quantitative technique based on the continuous time random walk model of diffusion dynamics. QDI provides estimates of the diffusion coefficient,D1,2$$ {D}_{1,2} $$ in mm2 s−1 and a fractional exponent, α$$ \upalpha $$, defining the non‐Gaussianity of the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Magnetic resonance in medicine 2022-12, Vol.88 (6), p.2532-2547
Hauptverfasser: Spilling, Catherine A., Howe, Franklyn A., Barrick, Thomas R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Quasi‐diffusion MRI (QDI) is a novel quantitative technique based on the continuous time random walk model of diffusion dynamics. QDI provides estimates of the diffusion coefficient,D1,2$$ {D}_{1,2} $$ in mm2 s−1 and a fractional exponent, α$$ \upalpha $$, defining the non‐Gaussianity of the diffusion signal decay. Here, the b‐value selection for rapid clinical acquisition of QDI tensor imaging (QDTI) data is optimized. Methods Clinically appropriate QDTI acquisitions were optimized in healthy volunteers with respect to a multi‐b‐value reference (MbR) dataset comprising 29 diffusion‐sensitized images arrayed between b=0$$ b=0 $$ and 5000 s mm−2. The effects of varying maximum b‐value (bmax$$ {b}_{\mathrm{max}} $$), number of b‐value shells, and the effects of Rician noise were investigated. Results QDTI measures showed bmax$$ {b}_{\mathrm{max}} $$ dependence, most significantly for α$$ \upalpha $$ in white matter, which monotonically decreased with higher bmax$$ {b}_{\mathrm{max}} $$ leading to improved tissue contrast. Optimized 2 b‐value shell acquisitions showed small systematic differences in QDTI measures relative to MbR values, with overestimation ofD1,2$$ \kern0.50em {D}_{1,2} $$ and underestimation of α$$ \upalpha $$ in white matter, and overestimation of D1,2$$ {D}_{1,2} $$ and α$$ \upalpha $$ anisotropies in gray and white matter. Additional shells improved the accuracy, precision, and reliability of QDTI estimates with 3 and 4 shells at bmax=5000$$ {b}_{\mathrm{max}}=5000 $$ s mm−2, and 4 b‐value shells at bmax=3960$$ {b}_{\mathrm{max}}=3960 $$ s mm−2, providing minimal bias in D1,2$$ {D}_{1,2} $$ and α$$ \upalpha $$ compared to the MbR. Conclusion A highly detailed optimization of non‐Gaussian dMRI for in vivo brain imaging was performed. QDI provided robust parameterization of non‐Gaussian diffusion signal decay in clinically feasible imaging times with high reliability, accuracy, and precision of QDTI measures.
ISSN:0740-3194
1522-2594
DOI:10.1002/mrm.29420