In vivo peripheral nerve activation using sinusoidal low‐frequency alternating currents
Background The sinusoidal low‐frequency alternating current (LFAC) waveform was explored recently as a novel means to evoke nerve conduction block. In the present work, we explored whether increasing the amplitude of the LFAC waveform results in nerve fiber activation in autonomic nerves. In‐silico...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Artificial organs 2022-10, Vol.46 (10), p.2055-2065 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2065 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2055 |
container_title | Artificial organs |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Alhawwash, Awadh Muzquiz, M. Ivette Richardson, Lindsay Vetter, Christian Smolik, Macallister Goodwill, Adam Yoshida, Ken |
description | Background
The sinusoidal low‐frequency alternating current (LFAC) waveform was explored recently as a novel means to evoke nerve conduction block. In the present work, we explored whether increasing the amplitude of the LFAC waveform results in nerve fiber activation in autonomic nerves. In‐silico methods and preliminary work in somatic nerves indicated a potential frequency dependency on the threshold of activation. The Hering‐Breuer (HB) reflex was used as a biomarker to detect cervical vagus nerve activation.
Methods
Experiments were conducted in isoflurane‐anesthetized swine (n = 5). Two stimulating bipolar cuff electrodes and a tripolar recording cuff electrode were implanted on the left vagus nerve. To ensure the electrical stimulation affects only the afferent pathways, the nerve was crushed caudal to the electrodes to eliminate cardiac effects. (1) Standard pulse stimulation (Vstim) using a monophasic train of pulses was applied through the caudal electrode to elicit HB reflex and to identify the activated nerve fiber type. (2) Continuous sinusoidal LFAC waveform with a frequency ranging from 5 through 20 Hz was applied to the rostral electrode without Vstim to explore the activation thresholds at each LFAC frequency. In both cases, the activation of nerve fibers was detected by a HB reflex‐induced reduction in the breathing rate.
Results
LFAC was found to be capable of eliciting an HB response. The LFAC activation thresholds were found to be frequency‐dependent. The HB threshold was 1.02 ± 0.3 mAp at 5 Hz, 0.66 ± 0.3 mAp at 10 Hz, and 0.44 ± 0.2 mAp at 20 Hz. In comparison, it was 0.7 ± 0.47 mA for a 100 μs pulse. The LFAC amplitude was within the linear limits of the electrode interface. Damage to the cuff electrodes or the nerve tissues was not observed. Analysis of Vstim‐based compound nerve action potentials (CNAP) indicated that the decrease in breathing rate was found to be correlated with the activation of slower components of the CNAP suggesting that LFAC reached and elicited responses from these slower fibers associated with afferents projecting to the HB response.
Conclusions
These results suggest the feasibility of the LFAC waveform at 5, 10, and 20 Hz to activate autonomic nerve fibers and potentially provide a new modality to the neurorehabilitation field.
This work explored the ability of a novel sinusoidal low‐frequency alternating current (LFAC) waveform to excite the cervical vagus nerve fibers in the anesthetized swine model. LF |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/aor.14347 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9795871</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2679698637</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4437-f28483667ab8ca4f6a02fc39d0e3617770cfb26de0f79c28c26176e05d3472693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1qFTEYhoMo9lhdeAMy4EYX0-Y_k41Qij-FQkEUdBVyMt-0KXOSYzIz5ey8BK_RK_HTU4sKZpFA8vDke3kJecroEcN17HM5YlJIc4-smOKqZcrK-2RFmaat0vLTAXlU6zWl1EiqH5IDoYygVqkV-XyWmiUuudlCidsrKH5sEpQFGh-muPgp5tTMNabLBre55tgjMeab71-_DQW-zJDCrvHjBCUhjFiYS4E01cfkweDHCk9uz0Py8c3rD6fv2vOLt2enJ-dtkFKYduCd7ITWxq-74OWgPeVDELanIDQzxtAwrLnugQ7GBt4FjrcaqOoxL9dWHJJXe-92Xm-gD_g3hnDbEje-7Fz20f39kuKVu8yLs8aqzjAUvLgVlIx56uQ2sQYYR58gz9Vxbay2nRYG0ef_oNd5xuAjUoZ1nButBVIv91QoudYCw90wjLqfhTkszP0qDNlnf05_R_5uCIHjPXATR9j93-ROLt7vlT8AOgOiZQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2718227663</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vivo peripheral nerve activation using sinusoidal low‐frequency alternating currents</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Alhawwash, Awadh ; Muzquiz, M. Ivette ; Richardson, Lindsay ; Vetter, Christian ; Smolik, Macallister ; Goodwill, Adam ; Yoshida, Ken</creator><creatorcontrib>Alhawwash, Awadh ; Muzquiz, M. Ivette ; Richardson, Lindsay ; Vetter, Christian ; Smolik, Macallister ; Goodwill, Adam ; Yoshida, Ken</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The sinusoidal low‐frequency alternating current (LFAC) waveform was explored recently as a novel means to evoke nerve conduction block. In the present work, we explored whether increasing the amplitude of the LFAC waveform results in nerve fiber activation in autonomic nerves. In‐silico methods and preliminary work in somatic nerves indicated a potential frequency dependency on the threshold of activation. The Hering‐Breuer (HB) reflex was used as a biomarker to detect cervical vagus nerve activation.
Methods
Experiments were conducted in isoflurane‐anesthetized swine (n = 5). Two stimulating bipolar cuff electrodes and a tripolar recording cuff electrode were implanted on the left vagus nerve. To ensure the electrical stimulation affects only the afferent pathways, the nerve was crushed caudal to the electrodes to eliminate cardiac effects. (1) Standard pulse stimulation (Vstim) using a monophasic train of pulses was applied through the caudal electrode to elicit HB reflex and to identify the activated nerve fiber type. (2) Continuous sinusoidal LFAC waveform with a frequency ranging from 5 through 20 Hz was applied to the rostral electrode without Vstim to explore the activation thresholds at each LFAC frequency. In both cases, the activation of nerve fibers was detected by a HB reflex‐induced reduction in the breathing rate.
Results
LFAC was found to be capable of eliciting an HB response. The LFAC activation thresholds were found to be frequency‐dependent. The HB threshold was 1.02 ± 0.3 mAp at 5 Hz, 0.66 ± 0.3 mAp at 10 Hz, and 0.44 ± 0.2 mAp at 20 Hz. In comparison, it was 0.7 ± 0.47 mA for a 100 μs pulse. The LFAC amplitude was within the linear limits of the electrode interface. Damage to the cuff electrodes or the nerve tissues was not observed. Analysis of Vstim‐based compound nerve action potentials (CNAP) indicated that the decrease in breathing rate was found to be correlated with the activation of slower components of the CNAP suggesting that LFAC reached and elicited responses from these slower fibers associated with afferents projecting to the HB response.
Conclusions
These results suggest the feasibility of the LFAC waveform at 5, 10, and 20 Hz to activate autonomic nerve fibers and potentially provide a new modality to the neurorehabilitation field.
This work explored the ability of a novel sinusoidal low‐frequency alternating current (LFAC) waveform to excite the cervical vagus nerve fibers in the anesthetized swine model. LFAC stimulation presented at 5, 10, and 20 Hz through bipolar cuff electrodes was able to elicit the Hering‐Breuer reflex indicating afferent nerve fiber activation in autonomic peripheral nerves. The peak current threshold for LFAC activation was frequency‐dependent with thresholds decreasing with increasing LFAC frequency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-564X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-1594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aor.14347</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35730955</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Amplitudes ; Animals ; Autonomic nervous system ; Biomarkers ; Continuous fibers ; Electric Stimulation ; electrical stimulation ; Electrical stimuli ; Electrodes ; Fibers ; Heart Rate ; Hering–Breuer reflex ; Isoflurane ; low‐frequency alternating current ; Main Text ; nerve activation ; Nerve conduction ; Nervous tissues ; Neurology ; neuromodulation ; Peripheral Nerves ; Rehabilitation ; Sensory neurons ; Sine waves ; Stimulation ; Swine ; Thresholds ; Vagus nerve ; Vagus Nerve - physiology ; vagus nerve stimulation ; Waveforms</subject><ispartof>Artificial organs, 2022-10, Vol.46 (10), p.2055-2065</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by International Center for Artificial Organ and Transplantation (ICAOT) and Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Artificial Organs published by International Center for Artificial Organ and Transplantation (ICAOT) and Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4437-f28483667ab8ca4f6a02fc39d0e3617770cfb26de0f79c28c26176e05d3472693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4437-f28483667ab8ca4f6a02fc39d0e3617770cfb26de0f79c28c26176e05d3472693</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3701-3713 ; 0000-0002-8657-6101 ; 0000-0003-4566-580X ; 0000-0003-0044-5416</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Faor.14347$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Faor.14347$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1416,27915,27916,45565,45566</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35730955$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alhawwash, Awadh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muzquiz, M. Ivette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Lindsay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vetter, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smolik, Macallister</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodwill, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Ken</creatorcontrib><title>In vivo peripheral nerve activation using sinusoidal low‐frequency alternating currents</title><title>Artificial organs</title><addtitle>Artif Organs</addtitle><description>Background
The sinusoidal low‐frequency alternating current (LFAC) waveform was explored recently as a novel means to evoke nerve conduction block. In the present work, we explored whether increasing the amplitude of the LFAC waveform results in nerve fiber activation in autonomic nerves. In‐silico methods and preliminary work in somatic nerves indicated a potential frequency dependency on the threshold of activation. The Hering‐Breuer (HB) reflex was used as a biomarker to detect cervical vagus nerve activation.
Methods
Experiments were conducted in isoflurane‐anesthetized swine (n = 5). Two stimulating bipolar cuff electrodes and a tripolar recording cuff electrode were implanted on the left vagus nerve. To ensure the electrical stimulation affects only the afferent pathways, the nerve was crushed caudal to the electrodes to eliminate cardiac effects. (1) Standard pulse stimulation (Vstim) using a monophasic train of pulses was applied through the caudal electrode to elicit HB reflex and to identify the activated nerve fiber type. (2) Continuous sinusoidal LFAC waveform with a frequency ranging from 5 through 20 Hz was applied to the rostral electrode without Vstim to explore the activation thresholds at each LFAC frequency. In both cases, the activation of nerve fibers was detected by a HB reflex‐induced reduction in the breathing rate.
Results
LFAC was found to be capable of eliciting an HB response. The LFAC activation thresholds were found to be frequency‐dependent. The HB threshold was 1.02 ± 0.3 mAp at 5 Hz, 0.66 ± 0.3 mAp at 10 Hz, and 0.44 ± 0.2 mAp at 20 Hz. In comparison, it was 0.7 ± 0.47 mA for a 100 μs pulse. The LFAC amplitude was within the linear limits of the electrode interface. Damage to the cuff electrodes or the nerve tissues was not observed. Analysis of Vstim‐based compound nerve action potentials (CNAP) indicated that the decrease in breathing rate was found to be correlated with the activation of slower components of the CNAP suggesting that LFAC reached and elicited responses from these slower fibers associated with afferents projecting to the HB response.
Conclusions
These results suggest the feasibility of the LFAC waveform at 5, 10, and 20 Hz to activate autonomic nerve fibers and potentially provide a new modality to the neurorehabilitation field.
This work explored the ability of a novel sinusoidal low‐frequency alternating current (LFAC) waveform to excite the cervical vagus nerve fibers in the anesthetized swine model. LFAC stimulation presented at 5, 10, and 20 Hz through bipolar cuff electrodes was able to elicit the Hering‐Breuer reflex indicating afferent nerve fiber activation in autonomic peripheral nerves. The peak current threshold for LFAC activation was frequency‐dependent with thresholds decreasing with increasing LFAC frequency.</description><subject>Amplitudes</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Autonomic nervous system</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Continuous fibers</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation</subject><subject>electrical stimulation</subject><subject>Electrical stimuli</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Fibers</subject><subject>Heart Rate</subject><subject>Hering–Breuer reflex</subject><subject>Isoflurane</subject><subject>low‐frequency alternating current</subject><subject>Main Text</subject><subject>nerve activation</subject><subject>Nerve conduction</subject><subject>Nervous tissues</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>neuromodulation</subject><subject>Peripheral Nerves</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Sensory neurons</subject><subject>Sine waves</subject><subject>Stimulation</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Thresholds</subject><subject>Vagus nerve</subject><subject>Vagus Nerve - physiology</subject><subject>vagus nerve stimulation</subject><subject>Waveforms</subject><issn>0160-564X</issn><issn>1525-1594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1qFTEYhoMo9lhdeAMy4EYX0-Y_k41Qij-FQkEUdBVyMt-0KXOSYzIz5ey8BK_RK_HTU4sKZpFA8vDke3kJecroEcN17HM5YlJIc4-smOKqZcrK-2RFmaat0vLTAXlU6zWl1EiqH5IDoYygVqkV-XyWmiUuudlCidsrKH5sEpQFGh-muPgp5tTMNabLBre55tgjMeab71-_DQW-zJDCrvHjBCUhjFiYS4E01cfkweDHCk9uz0Py8c3rD6fv2vOLt2enJ-dtkFKYduCd7ITWxq-74OWgPeVDELanIDQzxtAwrLnugQ7GBt4FjrcaqOoxL9dWHJJXe-92Xm-gD_g3hnDbEje-7Fz20f39kuKVu8yLs8aqzjAUvLgVlIx56uQ2sQYYR58gz9Vxbay2nRYG0ef_oNd5xuAjUoZ1nButBVIv91QoudYCw90wjLqfhTkszP0qDNlnf05_R_5uCIHjPXATR9j93-ROLt7vlT8AOgOiZQ</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Alhawwash, Awadh</creator><creator>Muzquiz, M. Ivette</creator><creator>Richardson, Lindsay</creator><creator>Vetter, Christian</creator><creator>Smolik, Macallister</creator><creator>Goodwill, Adam</creator><creator>Yoshida, Ken</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3701-3713</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8657-6101</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4566-580X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0044-5416</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>In vivo peripheral nerve activation using sinusoidal low‐frequency alternating currents</title><author>Alhawwash, Awadh ; Muzquiz, M. Ivette ; Richardson, Lindsay ; Vetter, Christian ; Smolik, Macallister ; Goodwill, Adam ; Yoshida, Ken</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4437-f28483667ab8ca4f6a02fc39d0e3617770cfb26de0f79c28c26176e05d3472693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Amplitudes</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Autonomic nervous system</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Continuous fibers</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation</topic><topic>electrical stimulation</topic><topic>Electrical stimuli</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Fibers</topic><topic>Heart Rate</topic><topic>Hering–Breuer reflex</topic><topic>Isoflurane</topic><topic>low‐frequency alternating current</topic><topic>Main Text</topic><topic>nerve activation</topic><topic>Nerve conduction</topic><topic>Nervous tissues</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>neuromodulation</topic><topic>Peripheral Nerves</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Sensory neurons</topic><topic>Sine waves</topic><topic>Stimulation</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Thresholds</topic><topic>Vagus nerve</topic><topic>Vagus Nerve - physiology</topic><topic>vagus nerve stimulation</topic><topic>Waveforms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alhawwash, Awadh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muzquiz, M. Ivette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Lindsay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vetter, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smolik, Macallister</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodwill, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Ken</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Artificial organs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alhawwash, Awadh</au><au>Muzquiz, M. Ivette</au><au>Richardson, Lindsay</au><au>Vetter, Christian</au><au>Smolik, Macallister</au><au>Goodwill, Adam</au><au>Yoshida, Ken</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vivo peripheral nerve activation using sinusoidal low‐frequency alternating currents</atitle><jtitle>Artificial organs</jtitle><addtitle>Artif Organs</addtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2055</spage><epage>2065</epage><pages>2055-2065</pages><issn>0160-564X</issn><eissn>1525-1594</eissn><abstract>Background
The sinusoidal low‐frequency alternating current (LFAC) waveform was explored recently as a novel means to evoke nerve conduction block. In the present work, we explored whether increasing the amplitude of the LFAC waveform results in nerve fiber activation in autonomic nerves. In‐silico methods and preliminary work in somatic nerves indicated a potential frequency dependency on the threshold of activation. The Hering‐Breuer (HB) reflex was used as a biomarker to detect cervical vagus nerve activation.
Methods
Experiments were conducted in isoflurane‐anesthetized swine (n = 5). Two stimulating bipolar cuff electrodes and a tripolar recording cuff electrode were implanted on the left vagus nerve. To ensure the electrical stimulation affects only the afferent pathways, the nerve was crushed caudal to the electrodes to eliminate cardiac effects. (1) Standard pulse stimulation (Vstim) using a monophasic train of pulses was applied through the caudal electrode to elicit HB reflex and to identify the activated nerve fiber type. (2) Continuous sinusoidal LFAC waveform with a frequency ranging from 5 through 20 Hz was applied to the rostral electrode without Vstim to explore the activation thresholds at each LFAC frequency. In both cases, the activation of nerve fibers was detected by a HB reflex‐induced reduction in the breathing rate.
Results
LFAC was found to be capable of eliciting an HB response. The LFAC activation thresholds were found to be frequency‐dependent. The HB threshold was 1.02 ± 0.3 mAp at 5 Hz, 0.66 ± 0.3 mAp at 10 Hz, and 0.44 ± 0.2 mAp at 20 Hz. In comparison, it was 0.7 ± 0.47 mA for a 100 μs pulse. The LFAC amplitude was within the linear limits of the electrode interface. Damage to the cuff electrodes or the nerve tissues was not observed. Analysis of Vstim‐based compound nerve action potentials (CNAP) indicated that the decrease in breathing rate was found to be correlated with the activation of slower components of the CNAP suggesting that LFAC reached and elicited responses from these slower fibers associated with afferents projecting to the HB response.
Conclusions
These results suggest the feasibility of the LFAC waveform at 5, 10, and 20 Hz to activate autonomic nerve fibers and potentially provide a new modality to the neurorehabilitation field.
This work explored the ability of a novel sinusoidal low‐frequency alternating current (LFAC) waveform to excite the cervical vagus nerve fibers in the anesthetized swine model. LFAC stimulation presented at 5, 10, and 20 Hz through bipolar cuff electrodes was able to elicit the Hering‐Breuer reflex indicating afferent nerve fiber activation in autonomic peripheral nerves. The peak current threshold for LFAC activation was frequency‐dependent with thresholds decreasing with increasing LFAC frequency.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>35730955</pmid><doi>10.1111/aor.14347</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3701-3713</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8657-6101</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4566-580X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0044-5416</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0160-564X |
ispartof | Artificial organs, 2022-10, Vol.46 (10), p.2055-2065 |
issn | 0160-564X 1525-1594 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9795871 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Amplitudes Animals Autonomic nervous system Biomarkers Continuous fibers Electric Stimulation electrical stimulation Electrical stimuli Electrodes Fibers Heart Rate Hering–Breuer reflex Isoflurane low‐frequency alternating current Main Text nerve activation Nerve conduction Nervous tissues Neurology neuromodulation Peripheral Nerves Rehabilitation Sensory neurons Sine waves Stimulation Swine Thresholds Vagus nerve Vagus Nerve - physiology vagus nerve stimulation Waveforms |
title | In vivo peripheral nerve activation using sinusoidal low‐frequency alternating currents |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T02%3A42%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vivo%20peripheral%20nerve%20activation%20using%20sinusoidal%20low%E2%80%90frequency%20alternating%20currents&rft.jtitle=Artificial%20organs&rft.au=Alhawwash,%20Awadh&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2055&rft.epage=2065&rft.pages=2055-2065&rft.issn=0160-564X&rft.eissn=1525-1594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aor.14347&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2679698637%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2718227663&rft_id=info:pmid/35730955&rfr_iscdi=true |