Implementing a user‐friendly format to analyze PRRSV next‐generation sequencing results and associating breeding herd production performance with number of PRRSV strains and recombination events

The open reading frames (ORF)5 represents approximately 4% of the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)‐2 genome (whole‐PRRSV) and is often determined by the Sanger technique, which rarely detects >1 PRRSV strain if present in the sample. Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) may...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transboundary and emerging diseases 2022-09, Vol.69 (5), p.e2214-e2229
Hauptverfasser: Trevisan, Giovani, Zeller, Michael, Li, Ganwu, Zhang, Jianqiang, Gauger, Phillip, Linhares, Daniel C.L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e2229
container_issue 5
container_start_page e2214
container_title Transboundary and emerging diseases
container_volume 69
creator Trevisan, Giovani
Zeller, Michael
Li, Ganwu
Zhang, Jianqiang
Gauger, Phillip
Linhares, Daniel C.L.
description The open reading frames (ORF)5 represents approximately 4% of the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)‐2 genome (whole‐PRRSV) and is often determined by the Sanger technique, which rarely detects >1 PRRSV strain if present in the sample. Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) may provide a more appropriate method of detecting multiple PRRSV strains in one sample. This work assessed the effect of PRRSV genetic variability and recombination events, using NGS, on the time‐to‐low prevalence (TTLP) and total losses in breeding herds (n 20) that detected a PRRSV outbreak and adopted measures to eliminate PRRSV. Serum, lung or live virus inoculation material collected within 3‐weeks of outbreak, and subsequently, processing fluids (PFs) were tested for PRRSV by RT‐qPCR and NGS. Recovered whole‐PRRSV or partial sequences were used to characterize within and between herd PRRSV genetic variability. Whole‐PRRSV was recovered in five out of six (83.3%) lung, 16 out of 22 (72.73%) serum and in five out of 95 (5.26%) PF. Whole‐PRRSV recovered from serum or lung were used as farm referent strains in 16 out of 20 (80%) farms. In four farms, only partial genome sequences were recovered and used as farm referent strains. At least two wild‐type PRRSV strains (wt‐PRRSV) were circulating simultaneously in 18 out of 20 (90%) and at least one vaccine‐like strain co‐circulating in eight out of 20 (40%) farms. PRRSV recombination events were detected in 12 farms (59%), been 10 out of 12 between wt‐PRRSV and two out of 12 between wt‐PRRSV and vaccine‐like strains. Farms having ≥3 strains had a 12‐week increase TTLP versus herds ≤2 strains detected. Farms with ≤2 strains (n 10) had 1837 and farms with no recombination events detected (n 8) had 1827 fewer piglet losses per 1000 sows versus farms with ≥3 PRRSV strains (n 8) or detected recombination (n 10), respectively. NGS outcomes and novel visualization methods provided more thorough insight into PRRSV dynamics, genetic variability, detection of multiple strains co‐circulating in breeding herds and helped establish practical guidelines for using PRRSV NGS outputs.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/tbed.14560
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9790532</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2717599956</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3780-151634cfaaa5d0b31cfdc1c8e3fd969ac4ea1bb087a441c8baff9307cb7aa50a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ksFu1DAQhiMEoqVw4QGQJS4IaYu9SZzkggSlQKVKoFK4WmN7vOsqsRfbaVlOPAJPxYPwJHg3ywo44ItH9jf_P7L_onjI6DHL61mSqI9ZVXN6qzhkLa9njLfz2_u6qQ6KezFeUcppx-u7xUFZV4xXc35Y_DgbVj0O6JJ1CwJkjBh-fvtugkWn-zUxPgyQSPIEHPTrr0jeX1x8-EQcfkmZW6DDAMl6RyJ-HtGpjUzAOPYp5hZNIEavLGzlZUDUm2KJQZNV8HpU294Vhq2RU0hubFoSNw4SA_FmZxdTAOsmxYDKD9K6yRav8-zxfnHHQB_xwW4_Kj6-Pr08eTs7f_fm7OTF-UyVTUtnrGa8rJQBgFpTWTJltGKqxdLojnegKgQmJW0bqKp8LsGYrqSNkk3uoFAeFc8n3dUoB9QqewfoxSrYAcJaeLDi7xtnl2Lhr0XXdLQu51ngyU4g-PxeMYnBRoV9Dw79GMWcV13XtVXNMvr4H_TKjyH_QqYa1tSZq3mmnk6UCj7GgGY_DKNiEw-xiYfYxiPDj_4cf4_-zkMG2ATc2B7X_5ESly9PX02ivwC3vM8L</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2717599956</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementing a user‐friendly format to analyze PRRSV next‐generation sequencing results and associating breeding herd production performance with number of PRRSV strains and recombination events</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Trevisan, Giovani ; Zeller, Michael ; Li, Ganwu ; Zhang, Jianqiang ; Gauger, Phillip ; Linhares, Daniel C.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Trevisan, Giovani ; Zeller, Michael ; Li, Ganwu ; Zhang, Jianqiang ; Gauger, Phillip ; Linhares, Daniel C.L.</creatorcontrib><description>The open reading frames (ORF)5 represents approximately 4% of the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)‐2 genome (whole‐PRRSV) and is often determined by the Sanger technique, which rarely detects &gt;1 PRRSV strain if present in the sample. Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) may provide a more appropriate method of detecting multiple PRRSV strains in one sample. This work assessed the effect of PRRSV genetic variability and recombination events, using NGS, on the time‐to‐low prevalence (TTLP) and total losses in breeding herds (n 20) that detected a PRRSV outbreak and adopted measures to eliminate PRRSV. Serum, lung or live virus inoculation material collected within 3‐weeks of outbreak, and subsequently, processing fluids (PFs) were tested for PRRSV by RT‐qPCR and NGS. Recovered whole‐PRRSV or partial sequences were used to characterize within and between herd PRRSV genetic variability. Whole‐PRRSV was recovered in five out of six (83.3%) lung, 16 out of 22 (72.73%) serum and in five out of 95 (5.26%) PF. Whole‐PRRSV recovered from serum or lung were used as farm referent strains in 16 out of 20 (80%) farms. In four farms, only partial genome sequences were recovered and used as farm referent strains. At least two wild‐type PRRSV strains (wt‐PRRSV) were circulating simultaneously in 18 out of 20 (90%) and at least one vaccine‐like strain co‐circulating in eight out of 20 (40%) farms. PRRSV recombination events were detected in 12 farms (59%), been 10 out of 12 between wt‐PRRSV and two out of 12 between wt‐PRRSV and vaccine‐like strains. Farms having ≥3 strains had a 12‐week increase TTLP versus herds ≤2 strains detected. Farms with ≤2 strains (n 10) had 1837 and farms with no recombination events detected (n 8) had 1827 fewer piglet losses per 1000 sows versus farms with ≥3 PRRSV strains (n 8) or detected recombination (n 10), respectively. NGS outcomes and novel visualization methods provided more thorough insight into PRRSV dynamics, genetic variability, detection of multiple strains co‐circulating in breeding herds and helped establish practical guidelines for using PRRSV NGS outputs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1865-1674</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1865-1682</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/tbed.14560</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35416426</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>Animal diseases ; Animals ; Breeding ; Farms ; Female ; Gene sequencing ; Genetic variability ; Genomes ; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing - veterinary ; Immunization ; Inoculation ; Lungs ; NGS ; Open Reading Frames ; Original ; Outbreaks ; Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome - epidemiology ; Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome - prevention &amp; control ; Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus - genetics ; production outcomes ; PRRSV ; Recombination ; Strains (organisms) ; Swine ; Swine Diseases ; Vaccines ; Viral diseases ; Viral Vaccines ; Viruses</subject><ispartof>Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2022-09, Vol.69 (5), p.e2214-e2229</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3780-151634cfaaa5d0b31cfdc1c8e3fd969ac4ea1bb087a441c8baff9307cb7aa50a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3780-151634cfaaa5d0b31cfdc1c8e3fd969ac4ea1bb087a441c8baff9307cb7aa50a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6370-9573 ; 0000-0001-7228-6202 ; 0000-0002-4980-526X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ftbed.14560$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ftbed.14560$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35416426$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trevisan, Giovani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeller, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ganwu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jianqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gauger, Phillip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linhares, Daniel C.L.</creatorcontrib><title>Implementing a user‐friendly format to analyze PRRSV next‐generation sequencing results and associating breeding herd production performance with number of PRRSV strains and recombination events</title><title>Transboundary and emerging diseases</title><addtitle>Transbound Emerg Dis</addtitle><description>The open reading frames (ORF)5 represents approximately 4% of the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)‐2 genome (whole‐PRRSV) and is often determined by the Sanger technique, which rarely detects &gt;1 PRRSV strain if present in the sample. Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) may provide a more appropriate method of detecting multiple PRRSV strains in one sample. This work assessed the effect of PRRSV genetic variability and recombination events, using NGS, on the time‐to‐low prevalence (TTLP) and total losses in breeding herds (n 20) that detected a PRRSV outbreak and adopted measures to eliminate PRRSV. Serum, lung or live virus inoculation material collected within 3‐weeks of outbreak, and subsequently, processing fluids (PFs) were tested for PRRSV by RT‐qPCR and NGS. Recovered whole‐PRRSV or partial sequences were used to characterize within and between herd PRRSV genetic variability. Whole‐PRRSV was recovered in five out of six (83.3%) lung, 16 out of 22 (72.73%) serum and in five out of 95 (5.26%) PF. Whole‐PRRSV recovered from serum or lung were used as farm referent strains in 16 out of 20 (80%) farms. In four farms, only partial genome sequences were recovered and used as farm referent strains. At least two wild‐type PRRSV strains (wt‐PRRSV) were circulating simultaneously in 18 out of 20 (90%) and at least one vaccine‐like strain co‐circulating in eight out of 20 (40%) farms. PRRSV recombination events were detected in 12 farms (59%), been 10 out of 12 between wt‐PRRSV and two out of 12 between wt‐PRRSV and vaccine‐like strains. Farms having ≥3 strains had a 12‐week increase TTLP versus herds ≤2 strains detected. Farms with ≤2 strains (n 10) had 1837 and farms with no recombination events detected (n 8) had 1827 fewer piglet losses per 1000 sows versus farms with ≥3 PRRSV strains (n 8) or detected recombination (n 10), respectively. NGS outcomes and novel visualization methods provided more thorough insight into PRRSV dynamics, genetic variability, detection of multiple strains co‐circulating in breeding herds and helped establish practical guidelines for using PRRSV NGS outputs.</description><subject>Animal diseases</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gene sequencing</subject><subject>Genetic variability</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing - veterinary</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Inoculation</subject><subject>Lungs</subject><subject>NGS</subject><subject>Open Reading Frames</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Outbreaks</subject><subject>Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome - epidemiology</subject><subject>Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus - genetics</subject><subject>production outcomes</subject><subject>PRRSV</subject><subject>Recombination</subject><subject>Strains (organisms)</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Swine Diseases</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Viral Vaccines</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><issn>1865-1674</issn><issn>1865-1682</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ksFu1DAQhiMEoqVw4QGQJS4IaYu9SZzkggSlQKVKoFK4WmN7vOsqsRfbaVlOPAJPxYPwJHg3ywo44ItH9jf_P7L_onjI6DHL61mSqI9ZVXN6qzhkLa9njLfz2_u6qQ6KezFeUcppx-u7xUFZV4xXc35Y_DgbVj0O6JJ1CwJkjBh-fvtugkWn-zUxPgyQSPIEHPTrr0jeX1x8-EQcfkmZW6DDAMl6RyJ-HtGpjUzAOPYp5hZNIEavLGzlZUDUm2KJQZNV8HpU294Vhq2RU0hubFoSNw4SA_FmZxdTAOsmxYDKD9K6yRav8-zxfnHHQB_xwW4_Kj6-Pr08eTs7f_fm7OTF-UyVTUtnrGa8rJQBgFpTWTJltGKqxdLojnegKgQmJW0bqKp8LsGYrqSNkk3uoFAeFc8n3dUoB9QqewfoxSrYAcJaeLDi7xtnl2Lhr0XXdLQu51ngyU4g-PxeMYnBRoV9Dw79GMWcV13XtVXNMvr4H_TKjyH_QqYa1tSZq3mmnk6UCj7GgGY_DKNiEw-xiYfYxiPDj_4cf4_-zkMG2ATc2B7X_5ESly9PX02ivwC3vM8L</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Trevisan, Giovani</creator><creator>Zeller, Michael</creator><creator>Li, Ganwu</creator><creator>Zhang, Jianqiang</creator><creator>Gauger, Phillip</creator><creator>Linhares, Daniel C.L.</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6370-9573</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7228-6202</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4980-526X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>Implementing a user‐friendly format to analyze PRRSV next‐generation sequencing results and associating breeding herd production performance with number of PRRSV strains and recombination events</title><author>Trevisan, Giovani ; Zeller, Michael ; Li, Ganwu ; Zhang, Jianqiang ; Gauger, Phillip ; Linhares, Daniel C.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3780-151634cfaaa5d0b31cfdc1c8e3fd969ac4ea1bb087a441c8baff9307cb7aa50a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animal diseases</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gene sequencing</topic><topic>Genetic variability</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing - veterinary</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Inoculation</topic><topic>Lungs</topic><topic>NGS</topic><topic>Open Reading Frames</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Outbreaks</topic><topic>Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome - epidemiology</topic><topic>Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus - genetics</topic><topic>production outcomes</topic><topic>PRRSV</topic><topic>Recombination</topic><topic>Strains (organisms)</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Swine Diseases</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Viral Vaccines</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trevisan, Giovani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeller, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ganwu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jianqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gauger, Phillip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linhares, Daniel C.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Transboundary and emerging diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trevisan, Giovani</au><au>Zeller, Michael</au><au>Li, Ganwu</au><au>Zhang, Jianqiang</au><au>Gauger, Phillip</au><au>Linhares, Daniel C.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementing a user‐friendly format to analyze PRRSV next‐generation sequencing results and associating breeding herd production performance with number of PRRSV strains and recombination events</atitle><jtitle>Transboundary and emerging diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Transbound Emerg Dis</addtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e2214</spage><epage>e2229</epage><pages>e2214-e2229</pages><issn>1865-1674</issn><eissn>1865-1682</eissn><abstract>The open reading frames (ORF)5 represents approximately 4% of the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)‐2 genome (whole‐PRRSV) and is often determined by the Sanger technique, which rarely detects &gt;1 PRRSV strain if present in the sample. Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) may provide a more appropriate method of detecting multiple PRRSV strains in one sample. This work assessed the effect of PRRSV genetic variability and recombination events, using NGS, on the time‐to‐low prevalence (TTLP) and total losses in breeding herds (n 20) that detected a PRRSV outbreak and adopted measures to eliminate PRRSV. Serum, lung or live virus inoculation material collected within 3‐weeks of outbreak, and subsequently, processing fluids (PFs) were tested for PRRSV by RT‐qPCR and NGS. Recovered whole‐PRRSV or partial sequences were used to characterize within and between herd PRRSV genetic variability. Whole‐PRRSV was recovered in five out of six (83.3%) lung, 16 out of 22 (72.73%) serum and in five out of 95 (5.26%) PF. Whole‐PRRSV recovered from serum or lung were used as farm referent strains in 16 out of 20 (80%) farms. In four farms, only partial genome sequences were recovered and used as farm referent strains. At least two wild‐type PRRSV strains (wt‐PRRSV) were circulating simultaneously in 18 out of 20 (90%) and at least one vaccine‐like strain co‐circulating in eight out of 20 (40%) farms. PRRSV recombination events were detected in 12 farms (59%), been 10 out of 12 between wt‐PRRSV and two out of 12 between wt‐PRRSV and vaccine‐like strains. Farms having ≥3 strains had a 12‐week increase TTLP versus herds ≤2 strains detected. Farms with ≤2 strains (n 10) had 1837 and farms with no recombination events detected (n 8) had 1827 fewer piglet losses per 1000 sows versus farms with ≥3 PRRSV strains (n 8) or detected recombination (n 10), respectively. NGS outcomes and novel visualization methods provided more thorough insight into PRRSV dynamics, genetic variability, detection of multiple strains co‐circulating in breeding herds and helped establish practical guidelines for using PRRSV NGS outputs.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><pmid>35416426</pmid><doi>10.1111/tbed.14560</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6370-9573</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7228-6202</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4980-526X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1865-1674
ispartof Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2022-09, Vol.69 (5), p.e2214-e2229
issn 1865-1674
1865-1682
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9790532
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animal diseases
Animals
Breeding
Farms
Female
Gene sequencing
Genetic variability
Genomes
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing - veterinary
Immunization
Inoculation
Lungs
NGS
Open Reading Frames
Original
Outbreaks
Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome - epidemiology
Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome - prevention & control
Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus - genetics
production outcomes
PRRSV
Recombination
Strains (organisms)
Swine
Swine Diseases
Vaccines
Viral diseases
Viral Vaccines
Viruses
title Implementing a user‐friendly format to analyze PRRSV next‐generation sequencing results and associating breeding herd production performance with number of PRRSV strains and recombination events
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T13%3A49%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementing%20a%20user%E2%80%90friendly%20format%20to%20analyze%20PRRSV%20next%E2%80%90generation%20sequencing%20results%20and%20associating%20breeding%20herd%20production%20performance%20with%20number%20of%20PRRSV%20strains%20and%20recombination%20events&rft.jtitle=Transboundary%20and%20emerging%20diseases&rft.au=Trevisan,%20Giovani&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e2214&rft.epage=e2229&rft.pages=e2214-e2229&rft.issn=1865-1674&rft.eissn=1865-1682&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/tbed.14560&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2717599956%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2717599956&rft_id=info:pmid/35416426&rfr_iscdi=true