Implementing a user‐friendly format to analyze PRRSV next‐generation sequencing results and associating breeding herd production performance with number of PRRSV strains and recombination events
The open reading frames (ORF)5 represents approximately 4% of the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)‐2 genome (whole‐PRRSV) and is often determined by the Sanger technique, which rarely detects >1 PRRSV strain if present in the sample. Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) may...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transboundary and emerging diseases 2022-09, Vol.69 (5), p.e2214-e2229 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e2229 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e2214 |
container_title | Transboundary and emerging diseases |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | Trevisan, Giovani Zeller, Michael Li, Ganwu Zhang, Jianqiang Gauger, Phillip Linhares, Daniel C.L. |
description | The open reading frames (ORF)5 represents approximately 4% of the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)‐2 genome (whole‐PRRSV) and is often determined by the Sanger technique, which rarely detects >1 PRRSV strain if present in the sample. Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) may provide a more appropriate method of detecting multiple PRRSV strains in one sample. This work assessed the effect of PRRSV genetic variability and recombination events, using NGS, on the time‐to‐low prevalence (TTLP) and total losses in breeding herds (n 20) that detected a PRRSV outbreak and adopted measures to eliminate PRRSV. Serum, lung or live virus inoculation material collected within 3‐weeks of outbreak, and subsequently, processing fluids (PFs) were tested for PRRSV by RT‐qPCR and NGS. Recovered whole‐PRRSV or partial sequences were used to characterize within and between herd PRRSV genetic variability. Whole‐PRRSV was recovered in five out of six (83.3%) lung, 16 out of 22 (72.73%) serum and in five out of 95 (5.26%) PF. Whole‐PRRSV recovered from serum or lung were used as farm referent strains in 16 out of 20 (80%) farms. In four farms, only partial genome sequences were recovered and used as farm referent strains. At least two wild‐type PRRSV strains (wt‐PRRSV) were circulating simultaneously in 18 out of 20 (90%) and at least one vaccine‐like strain co‐circulating in eight out of 20 (40%) farms. PRRSV recombination events were detected in 12 farms (59%), been 10 out of 12 between wt‐PRRSV and two out of 12 between wt‐PRRSV and vaccine‐like strains. Farms having ≥3 strains had a 12‐week increase TTLP versus herds ≤2 strains detected. Farms with ≤2 strains (n 10) had 1837 and farms with no recombination events detected (n 8) had 1827 fewer piglet losses per 1000 sows versus farms with ≥3 PRRSV strains (n 8) or detected recombination (n 10), respectively. NGS outcomes and novel visualization methods provided more thorough insight into PRRSV dynamics, genetic variability, detection of multiple strains co‐circulating in breeding herds and helped establish practical guidelines for using PRRSV NGS outputs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/tbed.14560 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9790532</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2717599956</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3780-151634cfaaa5d0b31cfdc1c8e3fd969ac4ea1bb087a441c8baff9307cb7aa50a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ksFu1DAQhiMEoqVw4QGQJS4IaYu9SZzkggSlQKVKoFK4WmN7vOsqsRfbaVlOPAJPxYPwJHg3ywo44ItH9jf_P7L_onjI6DHL61mSqI9ZVXN6qzhkLa9njLfz2_u6qQ6KezFeUcppx-u7xUFZV4xXc35Y_DgbVj0O6JJ1CwJkjBh-fvtugkWn-zUxPgyQSPIEHPTrr0jeX1x8-EQcfkmZW6DDAMl6RyJ-HtGpjUzAOPYp5hZNIEavLGzlZUDUm2KJQZNV8HpU294Vhq2RU0hubFoSNw4SA_FmZxdTAOsmxYDKD9K6yRav8-zxfnHHQB_xwW4_Kj6-Pr08eTs7f_fm7OTF-UyVTUtnrGa8rJQBgFpTWTJltGKqxdLojnegKgQmJW0bqKp8LsGYrqSNkk3uoFAeFc8n3dUoB9QqewfoxSrYAcJaeLDi7xtnl2Lhr0XXdLQu51ngyU4g-PxeMYnBRoV9Dw79GMWcV13XtVXNMvr4H_TKjyH_QqYa1tSZq3mmnk6UCj7GgGY_DKNiEw-xiYfYxiPDj_4cf4_-zkMG2ATc2B7X_5ESly9PX02ivwC3vM8L</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2717599956</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementing a user‐friendly format to analyze PRRSV next‐generation sequencing results and associating breeding herd production performance with number of PRRSV strains and recombination events</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Trevisan, Giovani ; Zeller, Michael ; Li, Ganwu ; Zhang, Jianqiang ; Gauger, Phillip ; Linhares, Daniel C.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Trevisan, Giovani ; Zeller, Michael ; Li, Ganwu ; Zhang, Jianqiang ; Gauger, Phillip ; Linhares, Daniel C.L.</creatorcontrib><description>The open reading frames (ORF)5 represents approximately 4% of the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)‐2 genome (whole‐PRRSV) and is often determined by the Sanger technique, which rarely detects >1 PRRSV strain if present in the sample. Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) may provide a more appropriate method of detecting multiple PRRSV strains in one sample. This work assessed the effect of PRRSV genetic variability and recombination events, using NGS, on the time‐to‐low prevalence (TTLP) and total losses in breeding herds (n 20) that detected a PRRSV outbreak and adopted measures to eliminate PRRSV. Serum, lung or live virus inoculation material collected within 3‐weeks of outbreak, and subsequently, processing fluids (PFs) were tested for PRRSV by RT‐qPCR and NGS. Recovered whole‐PRRSV or partial sequences were used to characterize within and between herd PRRSV genetic variability. Whole‐PRRSV was recovered in five out of six (83.3%) lung, 16 out of 22 (72.73%) serum and in five out of 95 (5.26%) PF. Whole‐PRRSV recovered from serum or lung were used as farm referent strains in 16 out of 20 (80%) farms. In four farms, only partial genome sequences were recovered and used as farm referent strains. At least two wild‐type PRRSV strains (wt‐PRRSV) were circulating simultaneously in 18 out of 20 (90%) and at least one vaccine‐like strain co‐circulating in eight out of 20 (40%) farms. PRRSV recombination events were detected in 12 farms (59%), been 10 out of 12 between wt‐PRRSV and two out of 12 between wt‐PRRSV and vaccine‐like strains. Farms having ≥3 strains had a 12‐week increase TTLP versus herds ≤2 strains detected. Farms with ≤2 strains (n 10) had 1837 and farms with no recombination events detected (n 8) had 1827 fewer piglet losses per 1000 sows versus farms with ≥3 PRRSV strains (n 8) or detected recombination (n 10), respectively. NGS outcomes and novel visualization methods provided more thorough insight into PRRSV dynamics, genetic variability, detection of multiple strains co‐circulating in breeding herds and helped establish practical guidelines for using PRRSV NGS outputs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1865-1674</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1865-1682</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/tbed.14560</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35416426</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>Animal diseases ; Animals ; Breeding ; Farms ; Female ; Gene sequencing ; Genetic variability ; Genomes ; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing - veterinary ; Immunization ; Inoculation ; Lungs ; NGS ; Open Reading Frames ; Original ; Outbreaks ; Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome - epidemiology ; Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome - prevention & control ; Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus - genetics ; production outcomes ; PRRSV ; Recombination ; Strains (organisms) ; Swine ; Swine Diseases ; Vaccines ; Viral diseases ; Viral Vaccines ; Viruses</subject><ispartof>Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2022-09, Vol.69 (5), p.e2214-e2229</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3780-151634cfaaa5d0b31cfdc1c8e3fd969ac4ea1bb087a441c8baff9307cb7aa50a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3780-151634cfaaa5d0b31cfdc1c8e3fd969ac4ea1bb087a441c8baff9307cb7aa50a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6370-9573 ; 0000-0001-7228-6202 ; 0000-0002-4980-526X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ftbed.14560$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ftbed.14560$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35416426$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trevisan, Giovani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeller, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ganwu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jianqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gauger, Phillip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linhares, Daniel C.L.</creatorcontrib><title>Implementing a user‐friendly format to analyze PRRSV next‐generation sequencing results and associating breeding herd production performance with number of PRRSV strains and recombination events</title><title>Transboundary and emerging diseases</title><addtitle>Transbound Emerg Dis</addtitle><description>The open reading frames (ORF)5 represents approximately 4% of the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)‐2 genome (whole‐PRRSV) and is often determined by the Sanger technique, which rarely detects >1 PRRSV strain if present in the sample. Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) may provide a more appropriate method of detecting multiple PRRSV strains in one sample. This work assessed the effect of PRRSV genetic variability and recombination events, using NGS, on the time‐to‐low prevalence (TTLP) and total losses in breeding herds (n 20) that detected a PRRSV outbreak and adopted measures to eliminate PRRSV. Serum, lung or live virus inoculation material collected within 3‐weeks of outbreak, and subsequently, processing fluids (PFs) were tested for PRRSV by RT‐qPCR and NGS. Recovered whole‐PRRSV or partial sequences were used to characterize within and between herd PRRSV genetic variability. Whole‐PRRSV was recovered in five out of six (83.3%) lung, 16 out of 22 (72.73%) serum and in five out of 95 (5.26%) PF. Whole‐PRRSV recovered from serum or lung were used as farm referent strains in 16 out of 20 (80%) farms. In four farms, only partial genome sequences were recovered and used as farm referent strains. At least two wild‐type PRRSV strains (wt‐PRRSV) were circulating simultaneously in 18 out of 20 (90%) and at least one vaccine‐like strain co‐circulating in eight out of 20 (40%) farms. PRRSV recombination events were detected in 12 farms (59%), been 10 out of 12 between wt‐PRRSV and two out of 12 between wt‐PRRSV and vaccine‐like strains. Farms having ≥3 strains had a 12‐week increase TTLP versus herds ≤2 strains detected. Farms with ≤2 strains (n 10) had 1837 and farms with no recombination events detected (n 8) had 1827 fewer piglet losses per 1000 sows versus farms with ≥3 PRRSV strains (n 8) or detected recombination (n 10), respectively. NGS outcomes and novel visualization methods provided more thorough insight into PRRSV dynamics, genetic variability, detection of multiple strains co‐circulating in breeding herds and helped establish practical guidelines for using PRRSV NGS outputs.</description><subject>Animal diseases</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gene sequencing</subject><subject>Genetic variability</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing - veterinary</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Inoculation</subject><subject>Lungs</subject><subject>NGS</subject><subject>Open Reading Frames</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Outbreaks</subject><subject>Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome - epidemiology</subject><subject>Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome - prevention & control</subject><subject>Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus - genetics</subject><subject>production outcomes</subject><subject>PRRSV</subject><subject>Recombination</subject><subject>Strains (organisms)</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Swine Diseases</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Viral Vaccines</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><issn>1865-1674</issn><issn>1865-1682</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ksFu1DAQhiMEoqVw4QGQJS4IaYu9SZzkggSlQKVKoFK4WmN7vOsqsRfbaVlOPAJPxYPwJHg3ywo44ItH9jf_P7L_onjI6DHL61mSqI9ZVXN6qzhkLa9njLfz2_u6qQ6KezFeUcppx-u7xUFZV4xXc35Y_DgbVj0O6JJ1CwJkjBh-fvtugkWn-zUxPgyQSPIEHPTrr0jeX1x8-EQcfkmZW6DDAMl6RyJ-HtGpjUzAOPYp5hZNIEavLGzlZUDUm2KJQZNV8HpU294Vhq2RU0hubFoSNw4SA_FmZxdTAOsmxYDKD9K6yRav8-zxfnHHQB_xwW4_Kj6-Pr08eTs7f_fm7OTF-UyVTUtnrGa8rJQBgFpTWTJltGKqxdLojnegKgQmJW0bqKp8LsGYrqSNkk3uoFAeFc8n3dUoB9QqewfoxSrYAcJaeLDi7xtnl2Lhr0XXdLQu51ngyU4g-PxeMYnBRoV9Dw79GMWcV13XtVXNMvr4H_TKjyH_QqYa1tSZq3mmnk6UCj7GgGY_DKNiEw-xiYfYxiPDj_4cf4_-zkMG2ATc2B7X_5ESly9PX02ivwC3vM8L</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Trevisan, Giovani</creator><creator>Zeller, Michael</creator><creator>Li, Ganwu</creator><creator>Zhang, Jianqiang</creator><creator>Gauger, Phillip</creator><creator>Linhares, Daniel C.L.</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6370-9573</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7228-6202</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4980-526X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>Implementing a user‐friendly format to analyze PRRSV next‐generation sequencing results and associating breeding herd production performance with number of PRRSV strains and recombination events</title><author>Trevisan, Giovani ; Zeller, Michael ; Li, Ganwu ; Zhang, Jianqiang ; Gauger, Phillip ; Linhares, Daniel C.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3780-151634cfaaa5d0b31cfdc1c8e3fd969ac4ea1bb087a441c8baff9307cb7aa50a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animal diseases</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gene sequencing</topic><topic>Genetic variability</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing - veterinary</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Inoculation</topic><topic>Lungs</topic><topic>NGS</topic><topic>Open Reading Frames</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Outbreaks</topic><topic>Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome - epidemiology</topic><topic>Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome - prevention & control</topic><topic>Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus - genetics</topic><topic>production outcomes</topic><topic>PRRSV</topic><topic>Recombination</topic><topic>Strains (organisms)</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Swine Diseases</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Viral Vaccines</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trevisan, Giovani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeller, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ganwu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jianqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gauger, Phillip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linhares, Daniel C.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Transboundary and emerging diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trevisan, Giovani</au><au>Zeller, Michael</au><au>Li, Ganwu</au><au>Zhang, Jianqiang</au><au>Gauger, Phillip</au><au>Linhares, Daniel C.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementing a user‐friendly format to analyze PRRSV next‐generation sequencing results and associating breeding herd production performance with number of PRRSV strains and recombination events</atitle><jtitle>Transboundary and emerging diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Transbound Emerg Dis</addtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e2214</spage><epage>e2229</epage><pages>e2214-e2229</pages><issn>1865-1674</issn><eissn>1865-1682</eissn><abstract>The open reading frames (ORF)5 represents approximately 4% of the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)‐2 genome (whole‐PRRSV) and is often determined by the Sanger technique, which rarely detects >1 PRRSV strain if present in the sample. Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) may provide a more appropriate method of detecting multiple PRRSV strains in one sample. This work assessed the effect of PRRSV genetic variability and recombination events, using NGS, on the time‐to‐low prevalence (TTLP) and total losses in breeding herds (n 20) that detected a PRRSV outbreak and adopted measures to eliminate PRRSV. Serum, lung or live virus inoculation material collected within 3‐weeks of outbreak, and subsequently, processing fluids (PFs) were tested for PRRSV by RT‐qPCR and NGS. Recovered whole‐PRRSV or partial sequences were used to characterize within and between herd PRRSV genetic variability. Whole‐PRRSV was recovered in five out of six (83.3%) lung, 16 out of 22 (72.73%) serum and in five out of 95 (5.26%) PF. Whole‐PRRSV recovered from serum or lung were used as farm referent strains in 16 out of 20 (80%) farms. In four farms, only partial genome sequences were recovered and used as farm referent strains. At least two wild‐type PRRSV strains (wt‐PRRSV) were circulating simultaneously in 18 out of 20 (90%) and at least one vaccine‐like strain co‐circulating in eight out of 20 (40%) farms. PRRSV recombination events were detected in 12 farms (59%), been 10 out of 12 between wt‐PRRSV and two out of 12 between wt‐PRRSV and vaccine‐like strains. Farms having ≥3 strains had a 12‐week increase TTLP versus herds ≤2 strains detected. Farms with ≤2 strains (n 10) had 1837 and farms with no recombination events detected (n 8) had 1827 fewer piglet losses per 1000 sows versus farms with ≥3 PRRSV strains (n 8) or detected recombination (n 10), respectively. NGS outcomes and novel visualization methods provided more thorough insight into PRRSV dynamics, genetic variability, detection of multiple strains co‐circulating in breeding herds and helped establish practical guidelines for using PRRSV NGS outputs.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><pmid>35416426</pmid><doi>10.1111/tbed.14560</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6370-9573</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7228-6202</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4980-526X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1865-1674 |
ispartof | Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2022-09, Vol.69 (5), p.e2214-e2229 |
issn | 1865-1674 1865-1682 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9790532 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Animal diseases Animals Breeding Farms Female Gene sequencing Genetic variability Genomes High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing - veterinary Immunization Inoculation Lungs NGS Open Reading Frames Original Outbreaks Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome - epidemiology Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome - prevention & control Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus - genetics production outcomes PRRSV Recombination Strains (organisms) Swine Swine Diseases Vaccines Viral diseases Viral Vaccines Viruses |
title | Implementing a user‐friendly format to analyze PRRSV next‐generation sequencing results and associating breeding herd production performance with number of PRRSV strains and recombination events |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T13%3A49%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementing%20a%20user%E2%80%90friendly%20format%20to%20analyze%20PRRSV%20next%E2%80%90generation%20sequencing%20results%20and%20associating%20breeding%20herd%20production%20performance%20with%20number%20of%20PRRSV%20strains%20and%20recombination%20events&rft.jtitle=Transboundary%20and%20emerging%20diseases&rft.au=Trevisan,%20Giovani&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e2214&rft.epage=e2229&rft.pages=e2214-e2229&rft.issn=1865-1674&rft.eissn=1865-1682&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/tbed.14560&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2717599956%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2717599956&rft_id=info:pmid/35416426&rfr_iscdi=true |