Embryo biotechnologies in sheep: Achievements and new improvements

To date, large‐scale use of multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET) programmes in ovine species is limited due to unpredictable results and high costs of hormonal stimulation and treatment. Therefore, even if considered reliable, they are not fully applicable in large‐scale systems. More recen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Reproduction in domestic animals 2022-10, Vol.57 (S5), p.22-33
Hauptverfasser: Falchi, Laura, Ledda, Sergio, Zedda, Maria T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 33
container_issue S5
container_start_page 22
container_title Reproduction in domestic animals
container_volume 57
creator Falchi, Laura
Ledda, Sergio
Zedda, Maria T.
description To date, large‐scale use of multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET) programmes in ovine species is limited due to unpredictable results and high costs of hormonal stimulation and treatment. Therefore, even if considered reliable, they are not fully applicable in large‐scale systems. More recently, the new prospects offered by in vitro embryo production (IVEP) through collection of oocytes post‐mortem or by repeated ovum pick‐up from live females suggested an alternative to MOET programmes and may be more extensively used, moving from the exclusive research in the laboratory to field application. The possibility to perform oocytes recovery from juvenile lambs to obtain embryos (JIVET) offers the great advantage to significantly reduce the generation interval, speeding the rate of genetic improvement. Although in the past decades several studies implemented novel protocols to enhance embryo production in sheep, the conditions of every single stage of IVEP can significantly affect embryo yield and successful transfer into the recipients. Moreover, the recent progresses on embryo production and freezing technologies might allow wider propagation of valuable genes in small ruminants populations and may be used for constitution of flocks without risks of disease. In addition, they can give a substantial contribution in preserving endangered breeds. The new era of gene editing might offer innovative perspectives in sheep breeding, but the application of such novel techniques implies involvement of specialized operators and is limited by relatively high costs for embryo manipulation and molecular biology analysis.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/rda.14127
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9790389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2652582334</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5097-5a2daddab84e4c89adcdefc9f957d9b6a783523aff9afe253b202f0e333406f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1LBCEUhiWK2j4u-gMx0E1dTDk6jmMXwfYdBEHUtTh6bI2ZcdPdjf33WbtFBXkj6MNz3sOL0G6Bj4p0joNRR0VZEL6CBkVJRY4ZLVbRAAta5RWv6g20GeMLxgWrOV9HG5SVlNeUDdDZZdeEuc8a5yegR71v_bODmLk-iyOA8Uk21CMHM-ign8RM9Sbr4S1z3Tj45eM2WrOqjbCzvLfQ09Xl4_lNfnd_fXs-vMs1w4LnTBGjjFFNXUKpa6GMNmC1sIJxI5pKfQQiVFkrlAXCaEMwsRgopSWubEW30OnCO542HRidZgfVynFwnQpz6ZWTv396N5LPfiYFF5jWIgkOloLgX6cQJ7JzUUPbqh78NEpSMcJqkuYldP8P-uKnoU_rScJTLkFpRRN1uKB08DEGsN9hCiw_mpGpGfnZTGL3fqb_Jr-qSMDxAnhzLcz_N8mHi-FC-Q6DI5ko</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2720293363</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Embryo biotechnologies in sheep: Achievements and new improvements</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Falchi, Laura ; Ledda, Sergio ; Zedda, Maria T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Falchi, Laura ; Ledda, Sergio ; Zedda, Maria T.</creatorcontrib><description>To date, large‐scale use of multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET) programmes in ovine species is limited due to unpredictable results and high costs of hormonal stimulation and treatment. Therefore, even if considered reliable, they are not fully applicable in large‐scale systems. More recently, the new prospects offered by in vitro embryo production (IVEP) through collection of oocytes post‐mortem or by repeated ovum pick‐up from live females suggested an alternative to MOET programmes and may be more extensively used, moving from the exclusive research in the laboratory to field application. The possibility to perform oocytes recovery from juvenile lambs to obtain embryos (JIVET) offers the great advantage to significantly reduce the generation interval, speeding the rate of genetic improvement. Although in the past decades several studies implemented novel protocols to enhance embryo production in sheep, the conditions of every single stage of IVEP can significantly affect embryo yield and successful transfer into the recipients. Moreover, the recent progresses on embryo production and freezing technologies might allow wider propagation of valuable genes in small ruminants populations and may be used for constitution of flocks without risks of disease. In addition, they can give a substantial contribution in preserving endangered breeds. The new era of gene editing might offer innovative perspectives in sheep breeding, but the application of such novel techniques implies involvement of specialized operators and is limited by relatively high costs for embryo manipulation and molecular biology analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-6768</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0531</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/rda.14127</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35437835</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal husbandry ; Animals ; Biotechnology ; Cost analysis ; Embryo transfer ; Embryo Transfer - veterinary ; Embryo, Mammalian - physiology ; Embryos ; ewe ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro - veterinary ; Freezing ; Gametocytes ; Genetic improvement ; Genetic modification ; Health risks ; IVEP ; LOPU ; Molecular biology ; oocyte competence ; Oocytes ; Oocytes - physiology ; Ovulation ; recipient ; Reproduction ; Review ; Sheep ; transfer</subject><ispartof>Reproduction in domestic animals, 2022-10, Vol.57 (S5), p.22-33</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Reproduction in Domestic Animals published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5097-5a2daddab84e4c89adcdefc9f957d9b6a783523aff9afe253b202f0e333406f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5097-5a2daddab84e4c89adcdefc9f957d9b6a783523aff9afe253b202f0e333406f63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0927-8220 ; 0000-0002-9779-5684</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Frda.14127$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Frda.14127$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35437835$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Falchi, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ledda, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zedda, Maria T.</creatorcontrib><title>Embryo biotechnologies in sheep: Achievements and new improvements</title><title>Reproduction in domestic animals</title><addtitle>Reprod Domest Anim</addtitle><description>To date, large‐scale use of multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET) programmes in ovine species is limited due to unpredictable results and high costs of hormonal stimulation and treatment. Therefore, even if considered reliable, they are not fully applicable in large‐scale systems. More recently, the new prospects offered by in vitro embryo production (IVEP) through collection of oocytes post‐mortem or by repeated ovum pick‐up from live females suggested an alternative to MOET programmes and may be more extensively used, moving from the exclusive research in the laboratory to field application. The possibility to perform oocytes recovery from juvenile lambs to obtain embryos (JIVET) offers the great advantage to significantly reduce the generation interval, speeding the rate of genetic improvement. Although in the past decades several studies implemented novel protocols to enhance embryo production in sheep, the conditions of every single stage of IVEP can significantly affect embryo yield and successful transfer into the recipients. Moreover, the recent progresses on embryo production and freezing technologies might allow wider propagation of valuable genes in small ruminants populations and may be used for constitution of flocks without risks of disease. In addition, they can give a substantial contribution in preserving endangered breeds. The new era of gene editing might offer innovative perspectives in sheep breeding, but the application of such novel techniques implies involvement of specialized operators and is limited by relatively high costs for embryo manipulation and molecular biology analysis.</description><subject>Animal husbandry</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Embryo transfer</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer - veterinary</subject><subject>Embryo, Mammalian - physiology</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>ewe</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - veterinary</subject><subject>Freezing</subject><subject>Gametocytes</subject><subject>Genetic improvement</subject><subject>Genetic modification</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>IVEP</subject><subject>LOPU</subject><subject>Molecular biology</subject><subject>oocyte competence</subject><subject>Oocytes</subject><subject>Oocytes - physiology</subject><subject>Ovulation</subject><subject>recipient</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>transfer</subject><issn>0936-6768</issn><issn>1439-0531</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1LBCEUhiWK2j4u-gMx0E1dTDk6jmMXwfYdBEHUtTh6bI2ZcdPdjf33WbtFBXkj6MNz3sOL0G6Bj4p0joNRR0VZEL6CBkVJRY4ZLVbRAAta5RWv6g20GeMLxgWrOV9HG5SVlNeUDdDZZdeEuc8a5yegR71v_bODmLk-iyOA8Uk21CMHM-ign8RM9Sbr4S1z3Tj45eM2WrOqjbCzvLfQ09Xl4_lNfnd_fXs-vMs1w4LnTBGjjFFNXUKpa6GMNmC1sIJxI5pKfQQiVFkrlAXCaEMwsRgopSWubEW30OnCO542HRidZgfVynFwnQpz6ZWTv396N5LPfiYFF5jWIgkOloLgX6cQJ7JzUUPbqh78NEpSMcJqkuYldP8P-uKnoU_rScJTLkFpRRN1uKB08DEGsN9hCiw_mpGpGfnZTGL3fqb_Jr-qSMDxAnhzLcz_N8mHi-FC-Q6DI5ko</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Falchi, Laura</creator><creator>Ledda, Sergio</creator><creator>Zedda, Maria T.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0927-8220</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9779-5684</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Embryo biotechnologies in sheep: Achievements and new improvements</title><author>Falchi, Laura ; Ledda, Sergio ; Zedda, Maria T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5097-5a2daddab84e4c89adcdefc9f957d9b6a783523aff9afe253b202f0e333406f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animal husbandry</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Embryo transfer</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer - veterinary</topic><topic>Embryo, Mammalian - physiology</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>ewe</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - veterinary</topic><topic>Freezing</topic><topic>Gametocytes</topic><topic>Genetic improvement</topic><topic>Genetic modification</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>IVEP</topic><topic>LOPU</topic><topic>Molecular biology</topic><topic>oocyte competence</topic><topic>Oocytes</topic><topic>Oocytes - physiology</topic><topic>Ovulation</topic><topic>recipient</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>transfer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Falchi, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ledda, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zedda, Maria T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Reproduction in domestic animals</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Falchi, Laura</au><au>Ledda, Sergio</au><au>Zedda, Maria T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Embryo biotechnologies in sheep: Achievements and new improvements</atitle><jtitle>Reproduction in domestic animals</jtitle><addtitle>Reprod Domest Anim</addtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>S5</issue><spage>22</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>22-33</pages><issn>0936-6768</issn><eissn>1439-0531</eissn><abstract>To date, large‐scale use of multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET) programmes in ovine species is limited due to unpredictable results and high costs of hormonal stimulation and treatment. Therefore, even if considered reliable, they are not fully applicable in large‐scale systems. More recently, the new prospects offered by in vitro embryo production (IVEP) through collection of oocytes post‐mortem or by repeated ovum pick‐up from live females suggested an alternative to MOET programmes and may be more extensively used, moving from the exclusive research in the laboratory to field application. The possibility to perform oocytes recovery from juvenile lambs to obtain embryos (JIVET) offers the great advantage to significantly reduce the generation interval, speeding the rate of genetic improvement. Although in the past decades several studies implemented novel protocols to enhance embryo production in sheep, the conditions of every single stage of IVEP can significantly affect embryo yield and successful transfer into the recipients. Moreover, the recent progresses on embryo production and freezing technologies might allow wider propagation of valuable genes in small ruminants populations and may be used for constitution of flocks without risks of disease. In addition, they can give a substantial contribution in preserving endangered breeds. The new era of gene editing might offer innovative perspectives in sheep breeding, but the application of such novel techniques implies involvement of specialized operators and is limited by relatively high costs for embryo manipulation and molecular biology analysis.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>35437835</pmid><doi>10.1111/rda.14127</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0927-8220</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9779-5684</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0936-6768
ispartof Reproduction in domestic animals, 2022-10, Vol.57 (S5), p.22-33
issn 0936-6768
1439-0531
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9790389
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animal husbandry
Animals
Biotechnology
Cost analysis
Embryo transfer
Embryo Transfer - veterinary
Embryo, Mammalian - physiology
Embryos
ewe
Female
Fertilization in Vitro - veterinary
Freezing
Gametocytes
Genetic improvement
Genetic modification
Health risks
IVEP
LOPU
Molecular biology
oocyte competence
Oocytes
Oocytes - physiology
Ovulation
recipient
Reproduction
Review
Sheep
transfer
title Embryo biotechnologies in sheep: Achievements and new improvements
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A10%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Embryo%20biotechnologies%20in%20sheep:%20Achievements%20and%20new%20improvements&rft.jtitle=Reproduction%20in%20domestic%20animals&rft.au=Falchi,%20Laura&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=S5&rft.spage=22&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=22-33&rft.issn=0936-6768&rft.eissn=1439-0531&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/rda.14127&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2652582334%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2720293363&rft_id=info:pmid/35437835&rfr_iscdi=true