Insectivorous birds reduce herbivory but do not increase mangrove growth across productivity zones
Top-down effects of predators and bottom-up effects of resources are important drivers of community structure and function in a wide array of ecosystems. Fertilization experiments impose variation in resource availability that can mediate the strength of predator impacts, but the prevalence of such...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecology (Durham) 2022-10, Vol.103 (10), p.1-13 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 13 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Ecology (Durham) |
container_volume | 103 |
creator | Forde, Alexander J. Feller, Ilka C. Parker, John D. Gruner, Daniel S. |
description | Top-down effects of predators and bottom-up effects of resources are important drivers of community structure and function in a wide array of ecosystems. Fertilization experiments impose variation in resource availability that can mediate the strength of predator impacts, but the prevalence of such interactions across natural productivity gradients is less clear. We studied the joint impacts of topdown and bottom-up factors in a tropical mangrove forest system, leveraging fine-grained patchiness in resource availability and primary productivity on coastal cays of Belize. We excluded birds from canopies of red mangrove (Rhizophoraceae: Rhizophora mangle) for 13 months in zones of phosphoruslimited, stunted dwarf mangroves, and in adjacent zones of vigorous mangroves that receive detrital subsidies. Birds decreased total arthropod densities by 62%, herbivore densities more than fivefold, and reduced rates of leaf and bud herbivory by 45% and 52%, respectively. Despite similar arthropod densities across both zones of productivity, leaf and bud damage were 2.0 and 4.3 times greater in productive stands. Detrital subsidies strongly impacted a suite of plant traits in productive stands, potentially making leaves more nutritious and vulnerable to damage. Despite consistently strong impacts on herbivory, we did not detect top-down forcing that impacted mangrove growth, which was similar with and without birds. Our results indicated that both top-down and bottom-up forces drive arthropod community dynamics, but attenuation at the plant-herbivore interface weakens top-down control by avian insectivores. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ecy.3768 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9786852</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27189510</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27189510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4608-d104e2ba8eac776659324037de100b076c391d27f5dd6a1ff2e8547f346c87303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtvEzEURi1ERUNB4g-ALLFhM60f49cGCUUFKlXqpixYWR77TjPRZBzsmVTDr8chITwkvLAX9_jo3vsh9IqSS0oIuwI_X3Il9RO0oIabylBFnqIFIZRVRgp9jp7nvCbl0Fo_Q-dcSKIlMQvU3AwZ_NjtYopTxk2XQsYJwuQBryA1-8KMm2nEIeIhjrgbfAKXAW_c8JDiDnC5H8cVdj7FnPE2xfK5CLtxxt_jAPkFOmtdn-Hl8b1AXz5e3y8_V7d3n26WH24rX5duqkBJDaxxGpxXSkphOKsJVwHKiA1R0nNDA1OtCEE62rYMtKhVy2vpteKEX6D3B-92ajYQPAxjcr3dpm7j0myj6-zflaFb2Ye4s0ZpqQUrgndHQYrfJsij3XTZQ9-7AcpyLJNSG0olFwV9-w-6jlMayniWKUY4pVTUv4U_V5OgPTVDid0HZ0twdh9cQd_82fwJ_JVUAaoD8Nj1MP9XZK-XX4_C1wd-nceYTjxTVBtBCf8B3cCtUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2720311154</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Insectivorous birds reduce herbivory but do not increase mangrove growth across productivity zones</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Forde, Alexander J. ; Feller, Ilka C. ; Parker, John D. ; Gruner, Daniel S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Forde, Alexander J. ; Feller, Ilka C. ; Parker, John D. ; Gruner, Daniel S.</creatorcontrib><description>Top-down effects of predators and bottom-up effects of resources are important drivers of community structure and function in a wide array of ecosystems. Fertilization experiments impose variation in resource availability that can mediate the strength of predator impacts, but the prevalence of such interactions across natural productivity gradients is less clear. We studied the joint impacts of topdown and bottom-up factors in a tropical mangrove forest system, leveraging fine-grained patchiness in resource availability and primary productivity on coastal cays of Belize. We excluded birds from canopies of red mangrove (Rhizophoraceae: Rhizophora mangle) for 13 months in zones of phosphoruslimited, stunted dwarf mangroves, and in adjacent zones of vigorous mangroves that receive detrital subsidies. Birds decreased total arthropod densities by 62%, herbivore densities more than fivefold, and reduced rates of leaf and bud herbivory by 45% and 52%, respectively. Despite similar arthropod densities across both zones of productivity, leaf and bud damage were 2.0 and 4.3 times greater in productive stands. Detrital subsidies strongly impacted a suite of plant traits in productive stands, potentially making leaves more nutritious and vulnerable to damage. Despite consistently strong impacts on herbivory, we did not detect top-down forcing that impacted mangrove growth, which was similar with and without birds. Our results indicated that both top-down and bottom-up forces drive arthropod community dynamics, but attenuation at the plant-herbivore interface weakens top-down control by avian insectivores.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3768</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35608609</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley and Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Aquatic plants ; Arthropods ; Availability ; Birds ; Community structure ; Ecosystem ; Fertilization ; field experiment ; Herbivores ; Herbivory ; Impact damage ; Insectivores ; insectivorous birds ; Leaves ; mangrove ; Mangrove swamps ; Mangroves ; Phosphorus ; Plants ; Predators ; Productivity ; Resource availability ; Rhizophora mangle ; Rhizophoraceae ; Structural equation modeling ; structural equation models ; Structure-function relationships ; Subsidies ; top‐down and bottom‐up forces ; trophic dynamics ; Tropical forests ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 2022-10, Vol.103 (10), p.1-13</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4608-d104e2ba8eac776659324037de100b076c391d27f5dd6a1ff2e8547f346c87303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4608-d104e2ba8eac776659324037de100b076c391d27f5dd6a1ff2e8547f346c87303</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3632-7625 ; 0000-0002-6391-1608 ; 0000-0002-3153-4297</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fecy.3768$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fecy.3768$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,1414,27911,27912,45561,45562</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35608609$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Forde, Alexander J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feller, Ilka C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, John D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruner, Daniel S.</creatorcontrib><title>Insectivorous birds reduce herbivory but do not increase mangrove growth across productivity zones</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><description>Top-down effects of predators and bottom-up effects of resources are important drivers of community structure and function in a wide array of ecosystems. Fertilization experiments impose variation in resource availability that can mediate the strength of predator impacts, but the prevalence of such interactions across natural productivity gradients is less clear. We studied the joint impacts of topdown and bottom-up factors in a tropical mangrove forest system, leveraging fine-grained patchiness in resource availability and primary productivity on coastal cays of Belize. We excluded birds from canopies of red mangrove (Rhizophoraceae: Rhizophora mangle) for 13 months in zones of phosphoruslimited, stunted dwarf mangroves, and in adjacent zones of vigorous mangroves that receive detrital subsidies. Birds decreased total arthropod densities by 62%, herbivore densities more than fivefold, and reduced rates of leaf and bud herbivory by 45% and 52%, respectively. Despite similar arthropod densities across both zones of productivity, leaf and bud damage were 2.0 and 4.3 times greater in productive stands. Detrital subsidies strongly impacted a suite of plant traits in productive stands, potentially making leaves more nutritious and vulnerable to damage. Despite consistently strong impacts on herbivory, we did not detect top-down forcing that impacted mangrove growth, which was similar with and without birds. Our results indicated that both top-down and bottom-up forces drive arthropod community dynamics, but attenuation at the plant-herbivore interface weakens top-down control by avian insectivores.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Arthropods</subject><subject>Availability</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Fertilization</subject><subject>field experiment</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Herbivory</subject><subject>Impact damage</subject><subject>Insectivores</subject><subject>insectivorous birds</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>mangrove</subject><subject>Mangrove swamps</subject><subject>Mangroves</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Resource availability</subject><subject>Rhizophora mangle</subject><subject>Rhizophoraceae</subject><subject>Structural equation modeling</subject><subject>structural equation models</subject><subject>Structure-function relationships</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>top‐down and bottom‐up forces</subject><subject>trophic dynamics</subject><subject>Tropical forests</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtvEzEURi1ERUNB4g-ALLFhM60f49cGCUUFKlXqpixYWR77TjPRZBzsmVTDr8chITwkvLAX9_jo3vsh9IqSS0oIuwI_X3Il9RO0oIabylBFnqIFIZRVRgp9jp7nvCbl0Fo_Q-dcSKIlMQvU3AwZ_NjtYopTxk2XQsYJwuQBryA1-8KMm2nEIeIhjrgbfAKXAW_c8JDiDnC5H8cVdj7FnPE2xfK5CLtxxt_jAPkFOmtdn-Hl8b1AXz5e3y8_V7d3n26WH24rX5duqkBJDaxxGpxXSkphOKsJVwHKiA1R0nNDA1OtCEE62rYMtKhVy2vpteKEX6D3B-92ajYQPAxjcr3dpm7j0myj6-zflaFb2Ye4s0ZpqQUrgndHQYrfJsij3XTZQ9-7AcpyLJNSG0olFwV9-w-6jlMayniWKUY4pVTUv4U_V5OgPTVDid0HZ0twdh9cQd_82fwJ_JVUAaoD8Nj1MP9XZK-XX4_C1wd-nceYTjxTVBtBCf8B3cCtUw</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Forde, Alexander J.</creator><creator>Feller, Ilka C.</creator><creator>Parker, John D.</creator><creator>Gruner, Daniel S.</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3632-7625</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6391-1608</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3153-4297</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Insectivorous birds reduce herbivory but do not increase mangrove growth across productivity zones</title><author>Forde, Alexander J. ; Feller, Ilka C. ; Parker, John D. ; Gruner, Daniel S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4608-d104e2ba8eac776659324037de100b076c391d27f5dd6a1ff2e8547f346c87303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Arthropods</topic><topic>Availability</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Fertilization</topic><topic>field experiment</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Herbivory</topic><topic>Impact damage</topic><topic>Insectivores</topic><topic>insectivorous birds</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>mangrove</topic><topic>Mangrove swamps</topic><topic>Mangroves</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Resource availability</topic><topic>Rhizophora mangle</topic><topic>Rhizophoraceae</topic><topic>Structural equation modeling</topic><topic>structural equation models</topic><topic>Structure-function relationships</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>top‐down and bottom‐up forces</topic><topic>trophic dynamics</topic><topic>Tropical forests</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Forde, Alexander J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feller, Ilka C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, John D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruner, Daniel S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Forde, Alexander J.</au><au>Feller, Ilka C.</au><au>Parker, John D.</au><au>Gruner, Daniel S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Insectivorous birds reduce herbivory but do not increase mangrove growth across productivity zones</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>1-13</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><abstract>Top-down effects of predators and bottom-up effects of resources are important drivers of community structure and function in a wide array of ecosystems. Fertilization experiments impose variation in resource availability that can mediate the strength of predator impacts, but the prevalence of such interactions across natural productivity gradients is less clear. We studied the joint impacts of topdown and bottom-up factors in a tropical mangrove forest system, leveraging fine-grained patchiness in resource availability and primary productivity on coastal cays of Belize. We excluded birds from canopies of red mangrove (Rhizophoraceae: Rhizophora mangle) for 13 months in zones of phosphoruslimited, stunted dwarf mangroves, and in adjacent zones of vigorous mangroves that receive detrital subsidies. Birds decreased total arthropod densities by 62%, herbivore densities more than fivefold, and reduced rates of leaf and bud herbivory by 45% and 52%, respectively. Despite similar arthropod densities across both zones of productivity, leaf and bud damage were 2.0 and 4.3 times greater in productive stands. Detrital subsidies strongly impacted a suite of plant traits in productive stands, potentially making leaves more nutritious and vulnerable to damage. Despite consistently strong impacts on herbivory, we did not detect top-down forcing that impacted mangrove growth, which was similar with and without birds. Our results indicated that both top-down and bottom-up forces drive arthropod community dynamics, but attenuation at the plant-herbivore interface weakens top-down control by avian insectivores.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>35608609</pmid><doi>10.1002/ecy.3768</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3632-7625</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6391-1608</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3153-4297</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-9658 |
ispartof | Ecology (Durham), 2022-10, Vol.103 (10), p.1-13 |
issn | 0012-9658 1939-9170 1939-9170 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9786852 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Animals Aquatic plants Arthropods Availability Birds Community structure Ecosystem Fertilization field experiment Herbivores Herbivory Impact damage Insectivores insectivorous birds Leaves mangrove Mangrove swamps Mangroves Phosphorus Plants Predators Productivity Resource availability Rhizophora mangle Rhizophoraceae Structural equation modeling structural equation models Structure-function relationships Subsidies top‐down and bottom‐up forces trophic dynamics Tropical forests Wetlands |
title | Insectivorous birds reduce herbivory but do not increase mangrove growth across productivity zones |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T23%3A12%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Insectivorous%20birds%20reduce%20herbivory%20but%20do%20not%20increase%20mangrove%20growth%20across%20productivity%20zones&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Forde,%20Alexander%20J.&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=1-13&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ecy.3768&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E27189510%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2720311154&rft_id=info:pmid/35608609&rft_jstor_id=27189510&rfr_iscdi=true |