Insectivorous birds reduce herbivory but do not increase mangrove growth across productivity zones

Top-down effects of predators and bottom-up effects of resources are important drivers of community structure and function in a wide array of ecosystems. Fertilization experiments impose variation in resource availability that can mediate the strength of predator impacts, but the prevalence of such...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecology (Durham) 2022-10, Vol.103 (10), p.1-13
Hauptverfasser: Forde, Alexander J., Feller, Ilka C., Parker, John D., Gruner, Daniel S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 13
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1
container_title Ecology (Durham)
container_volume 103
creator Forde, Alexander J.
Feller, Ilka C.
Parker, John D.
Gruner, Daniel S.
description Top-down effects of predators and bottom-up effects of resources are important drivers of community structure and function in a wide array of ecosystems. Fertilization experiments impose variation in resource availability that can mediate the strength of predator impacts, but the prevalence of such interactions across natural productivity gradients is less clear. We studied the joint impacts of topdown and bottom-up factors in a tropical mangrove forest system, leveraging fine-grained patchiness in resource availability and primary productivity on coastal cays of Belize. We excluded birds from canopies of red mangrove (Rhizophoraceae: Rhizophora mangle) for 13 months in zones of phosphoruslimited, stunted dwarf mangroves, and in adjacent zones of vigorous mangroves that receive detrital subsidies. Birds decreased total arthropod densities by 62%, herbivore densities more than fivefold, and reduced rates of leaf and bud herbivory by 45% and 52%, respectively. Despite similar arthropod densities across both zones of productivity, leaf and bud damage were 2.0 and 4.3 times greater in productive stands. Detrital subsidies strongly impacted a suite of plant traits in productive stands, potentially making leaves more nutritious and vulnerable to damage. Despite consistently strong impacts on herbivory, we did not detect top-down forcing that impacted mangrove growth, which was similar with and without birds. Our results indicated that both top-down and bottom-up forces drive arthropod community dynamics, but attenuation at the plant-herbivore interface weakens top-down control by avian insectivores.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ecy.3768
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9786852</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27189510</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27189510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4608-d104e2ba8eac776659324037de100b076c391d27f5dd6a1ff2e8547f346c87303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtvEzEURi1ERUNB4g-ALLFhM60f49cGCUUFKlXqpixYWR77TjPRZBzsmVTDr8chITwkvLAX9_jo3vsh9IqSS0oIuwI_X3Il9RO0oIabylBFnqIFIZRVRgp9jp7nvCbl0Fo_Q-dcSKIlMQvU3AwZ_NjtYopTxk2XQsYJwuQBryA1-8KMm2nEIeIhjrgbfAKXAW_c8JDiDnC5H8cVdj7FnPE2xfK5CLtxxt_jAPkFOmtdn-Hl8b1AXz5e3y8_V7d3n26WH24rX5duqkBJDaxxGpxXSkphOKsJVwHKiA1R0nNDA1OtCEE62rYMtKhVy2vpteKEX6D3B-92ajYQPAxjcr3dpm7j0myj6-zflaFb2Ye4s0ZpqQUrgndHQYrfJsij3XTZQ9-7AcpyLJNSG0olFwV9-w-6jlMayniWKUY4pVTUv4U_V5OgPTVDid0HZ0twdh9cQd_82fwJ_JVUAaoD8Nj1MP9XZK-XX4_C1wd-nceYTjxTVBtBCf8B3cCtUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2720311154</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Insectivorous birds reduce herbivory but do not increase mangrove growth across productivity zones</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Forde, Alexander J. ; Feller, Ilka C. ; Parker, John D. ; Gruner, Daniel S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Forde, Alexander J. ; Feller, Ilka C. ; Parker, John D. ; Gruner, Daniel S.</creatorcontrib><description>Top-down effects of predators and bottom-up effects of resources are important drivers of community structure and function in a wide array of ecosystems. Fertilization experiments impose variation in resource availability that can mediate the strength of predator impacts, but the prevalence of such interactions across natural productivity gradients is less clear. We studied the joint impacts of topdown and bottom-up factors in a tropical mangrove forest system, leveraging fine-grained patchiness in resource availability and primary productivity on coastal cays of Belize. We excluded birds from canopies of red mangrove (Rhizophoraceae: Rhizophora mangle) for 13 months in zones of phosphoruslimited, stunted dwarf mangroves, and in adjacent zones of vigorous mangroves that receive detrital subsidies. Birds decreased total arthropod densities by 62%, herbivore densities more than fivefold, and reduced rates of leaf and bud herbivory by 45% and 52%, respectively. Despite similar arthropod densities across both zones of productivity, leaf and bud damage were 2.0 and 4.3 times greater in productive stands. Detrital subsidies strongly impacted a suite of plant traits in productive stands, potentially making leaves more nutritious and vulnerable to damage. Despite consistently strong impacts on herbivory, we did not detect top-down forcing that impacted mangrove growth, which was similar with and without birds. Our results indicated that both top-down and bottom-up forces drive arthropod community dynamics, but attenuation at the plant-herbivore interface weakens top-down control by avian insectivores.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3768</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35608609</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley and Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Aquatic plants ; Arthropods ; Availability ; Birds ; Community structure ; Ecosystem ; Fertilization ; field experiment ; Herbivores ; Herbivory ; Impact damage ; Insectivores ; insectivorous birds ; Leaves ; mangrove ; Mangrove swamps ; Mangroves ; Phosphorus ; Plants ; Predators ; Productivity ; Resource availability ; Rhizophora mangle ; Rhizophoraceae ; Structural equation modeling ; structural equation models ; Structure-function relationships ; Subsidies ; top‐down and bottom‐up forces ; trophic dynamics ; Tropical forests ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 2022-10, Vol.103 (10), p.1-13</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4608-d104e2ba8eac776659324037de100b076c391d27f5dd6a1ff2e8547f346c87303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4608-d104e2ba8eac776659324037de100b076c391d27f5dd6a1ff2e8547f346c87303</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3632-7625 ; 0000-0002-6391-1608 ; 0000-0002-3153-4297</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fecy.3768$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fecy.3768$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,1414,27911,27912,45561,45562</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35608609$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Forde, Alexander J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feller, Ilka C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, John D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruner, Daniel S.</creatorcontrib><title>Insectivorous birds reduce herbivory but do not increase mangrove growth across productivity zones</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><description>Top-down effects of predators and bottom-up effects of resources are important drivers of community structure and function in a wide array of ecosystems. Fertilization experiments impose variation in resource availability that can mediate the strength of predator impacts, but the prevalence of such interactions across natural productivity gradients is less clear. We studied the joint impacts of topdown and bottom-up factors in a tropical mangrove forest system, leveraging fine-grained patchiness in resource availability and primary productivity on coastal cays of Belize. We excluded birds from canopies of red mangrove (Rhizophoraceae: Rhizophora mangle) for 13 months in zones of phosphoruslimited, stunted dwarf mangroves, and in adjacent zones of vigorous mangroves that receive detrital subsidies. Birds decreased total arthropod densities by 62%, herbivore densities more than fivefold, and reduced rates of leaf and bud herbivory by 45% and 52%, respectively. Despite similar arthropod densities across both zones of productivity, leaf and bud damage were 2.0 and 4.3 times greater in productive stands. Detrital subsidies strongly impacted a suite of plant traits in productive stands, potentially making leaves more nutritious and vulnerable to damage. Despite consistently strong impacts on herbivory, we did not detect top-down forcing that impacted mangrove growth, which was similar with and without birds. Our results indicated that both top-down and bottom-up forces drive arthropod community dynamics, but attenuation at the plant-herbivore interface weakens top-down control by avian insectivores.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Arthropods</subject><subject>Availability</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Fertilization</subject><subject>field experiment</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Herbivory</subject><subject>Impact damage</subject><subject>Insectivores</subject><subject>insectivorous birds</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>mangrove</subject><subject>Mangrove swamps</subject><subject>Mangroves</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Resource availability</subject><subject>Rhizophora mangle</subject><subject>Rhizophoraceae</subject><subject>Structural equation modeling</subject><subject>structural equation models</subject><subject>Structure-function relationships</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>top‐down and bottom‐up forces</subject><subject>trophic dynamics</subject><subject>Tropical forests</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtvEzEURi1ERUNB4g-ALLFhM60f49cGCUUFKlXqpixYWR77TjPRZBzsmVTDr8chITwkvLAX9_jo3vsh9IqSS0oIuwI_X3Il9RO0oIabylBFnqIFIZRVRgp9jp7nvCbl0Fo_Q-dcSKIlMQvU3AwZ_NjtYopTxk2XQsYJwuQBryA1-8KMm2nEIeIhjrgbfAKXAW_c8JDiDnC5H8cVdj7FnPE2xfK5CLtxxt_jAPkFOmtdn-Hl8b1AXz5e3y8_V7d3n26WH24rX5duqkBJDaxxGpxXSkphOKsJVwHKiA1R0nNDA1OtCEE62rYMtKhVy2vpteKEX6D3B-92ajYQPAxjcr3dpm7j0myj6-zflaFb2Ye4s0ZpqQUrgndHQYrfJsij3XTZQ9-7AcpyLJNSG0olFwV9-w-6jlMayniWKUY4pVTUv4U_V5OgPTVDid0HZ0twdh9cQd_82fwJ_JVUAaoD8Nj1MP9XZK-XX4_C1wd-nceYTjxTVBtBCf8B3cCtUw</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Forde, Alexander J.</creator><creator>Feller, Ilka C.</creator><creator>Parker, John D.</creator><creator>Gruner, Daniel S.</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3632-7625</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6391-1608</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3153-4297</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Insectivorous birds reduce herbivory but do not increase mangrove growth across productivity zones</title><author>Forde, Alexander J. ; Feller, Ilka C. ; Parker, John D. ; Gruner, Daniel S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4608-d104e2ba8eac776659324037de100b076c391d27f5dd6a1ff2e8547f346c87303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Arthropods</topic><topic>Availability</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Fertilization</topic><topic>field experiment</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Herbivory</topic><topic>Impact damage</topic><topic>Insectivores</topic><topic>insectivorous birds</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>mangrove</topic><topic>Mangrove swamps</topic><topic>Mangroves</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Resource availability</topic><topic>Rhizophora mangle</topic><topic>Rhizophoraceae</topic><topic>Structural equation modeling</topic><topic>structural equation models</topic><topic>Structure-function relationships</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>top‐down and bottom‐up forces</topic><topic>trophic dynamics</topic><topic>Tropical forests</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Forde, Alexander J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feller, Ilka C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, John D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruner, Daniel S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Forde, Alexander J.</au><au>Feller, Ilka C.</au><au>Parker, John D.</au><au>Gruner, Daniel S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Insectivorous birds reduce herbivory but do not increase mangrove growth across productivity zones</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>1-13</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><abstract>Top-down effects of predators and bottom-up effects of resources are important drivers of community structure and function in a wide array of ecosystems. Fertilization experiments impose variation in resource availability that can mediate the strength of predator impacts, but the prevalence of such interactions across natural productivity gradients is less clear. We studied the joint impacts of topdown and bottom-up factors in a tropical mangrove forest system, leveraging fine-grained patchiness in resource availability and primary productivity on coastal cays of Belize. We excluded birds from canopies of red mangrove (Rhizophoraceae: Rhizophora mangle) for 13 months in zones of phosphoruslimited, stunted dwarf mangroves, and in adjacent zones of vigorous mangroves that receive detrital subsidies. Birds decreased total arthropod densities by 62%, herbivore densities more than fivefold, and reduced rates of leaf and bud herbivory by 45% and 52%, respectively. Despite similar arthropod densities across both zones of productivity, leaf and bud damage were 2.0 and 4.3 times greater in productive stands. Detrital subsidies strongly impacted a suite of plant traits in productive stands, potentially making leaves more nutritious and vulnerable to damage. Despite consistently strong impacts on herbivory, we did not detect top-down forcing that impacted mangrove growth, which was similar with and without birds. Our results indicated that both top-down and bottom-up forces drive arthropod community dynamics, but attenuation at the plant-herbivore interface weakens top-down control by avian insectivores.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>35608609</pmid><doi>10.1002/ecy.3768</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3632-7625</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6391-1608</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3153-4297</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-9658
ispartof Ecology (Durham), 2022-10, Vol.103 (10), p.1-13
issn 0012-9658
1939-9170
1939-9170
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9786852
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animals
Aquatic plants
Arthropods
Availability
Birds
Community structure
Ecosystem
Fertilization
field experiment
Herbivores
Herbivory
Impact damage
Insectivores
insectivorous birds
Leaves
mangrove
Mangrove swamps
Mangroves
Phosphorus
Plants
Predators
Productivity
Resource availability
Rhizophora mangle
Rhizophoraceae
Structural equation modeling
structural equation models
Structure-function relationships
Subsidies
top‐down and bottom‐up forces
trophic dynamics
Tropical forests
Wetlands
title Insectivorous birds reduce herbivory but do not increase mangrove growth across productivity zones
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T23%3A12%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Insectivorous%20birds%20reduce%20herbivory%20but%20do%20not%20increase%20mangrove%20growth%20across%20productivity%20zones&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Forde,%20Alexander%20J.&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=1-13&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ecy.3768&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E27189510%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2720311154&rft_id=info:pmid/35608609&rft_jstor_id=27189510&rfr_iscdi=true