Efficacy of Visual Feedback Training for Motor Recovery in Post-Operative Subjects with Knee Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial
To evaluate the effects of visual feedback training on motor recovery in postoperative patients with a total knee replacement (TKR). The performance of 40 first-ever TKR patients (27 females; mean age: 70.5 (67.2−74.0) years) was evaluated in a single center, single-blind, randomized controlled stud...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical medicine 2022-12, Vol.11 (24), p.7355 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 24 |
container_start_page | 7355 |
container_title | Journal of clinical medicine |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Carozzo, Simone Vatrano, Martina Coschignano, Francesco Battaglia, Riccardo Calabrò, Rocco Salvatore Pignolo, Loris Contrada, Marianna Tonin, Paolo Cerasa, Antonio Demeco, Andrea |
description | To evaluate the effects of visual feedback training on motor recovery in postoperative patients with a total knee replacement (TKR). The performance of 40 first-ever TKR patients (27 females; mean age: 70.5 (67.2−74.0) years) was evaluated in a single center, single-blind, randomized controlled study. The patients were randomly and equally distributed into two demographically/clinically matched groups undergoing experimental or traditional treatments. All patients have been treated in a 1 h session, 2/day for 5 days a week, for six consecutive weeks. The first group (“control”) underwent conventional physical therapy, whereas the experimental group received advanced knee training with visual feedback using the TecnoBody® device (Walker View 3.0 SCX, Dalmine (BG), Italy). The clinical scales and kinematic parameters coming from the gait analysis were evaluated to demonstrate the dynamic balance function in a standing position before and after each treatment. After the treatment, both experimental and control groups improved significantly and similarly, as measured by the clinical scales (Numeric Rating Scale for Pain and Barthel index). A significant boosting of the motor performance was detected in the experimental group with respect to the control group in the terms of symmetry index 84 (80.8−85.4) vs. 87.15 (84−92.8) p = 0.001 *; single stance support 34.9 (34.1−36.5) vs. 37.8 (36.6−38.9); p < 0.001; and obliquity parameters 58.65 (51.3−70.3) vs. 73 (62.3−82.1); p < 0.001. Applying visual feedback training in addition to traditional rehabilitation strategies improves the knee function and motor control in postoperative TKR patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/jcm11247355 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9783629</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2758099660</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-bf4c134a369cb6e96cad8859e58e05727c793d2f136b290511a202d18d34e0d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1rFEEQhgdRTEhy8i4NXgQZ0x_TXx6EsCQqRiJx9dr09NQkvfZ0b7pnVtY_4N92YmJYrUNVQT28vMVbVc8Ifs2YxscrNxBCG8k4f1TtUyxljZlij3f2veqolBWeS6mGEvm02mOCc64l2a9-nfa9d9ZtUerRN18mG9AZQNda9x0ts_XRxyvUp4w-pXHul-DSBvIW-Yg-pzLWF2vIdvQbQF-mdgVuLOiHH6_Rxwgw0-tgHQwQxzfoBF3a2KXB_4QOLVIccwphXpfZ23BYPeltKHB0Pw-qr2eny8X7-vzi3YfFyXntGqzHuu0bR1hjmdCuFaCFs51SXANXgLmk0knNOtoTJlqqMSfEUkw7ojrWAO4adlC9vdNdT-0AnZudZRvMOvvB5q1J1pt_L9Ffm6u0MVoqJqieBV7eC-R0M0EZzeCLgxBshDQVQyVXWGsh8Iy--A9dpSnH-b1bSkjasD-Cr-4ol1MpGfoHMwSb24zNTsYz_XzX_wP7N1H2G0qOouI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2756724329</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of Visual Feedback Training for Motor Recovery in Post-Operative Subjects with Knee Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Carozzo, Simone ; Vatrano, Martina ; Coschignano, Francesco ; Battaglia, Riccardo ; Calabrò, Rocco Salvatore ; Pignolo, Loris ; Contrada, Marianna ; Tonin, Paolo ; Cerasa, Antonio ; Demeco, Andrea</creator><creatorcontrib>Carozzo, Simone ; Vatrano, Martina ; Coschignano, Francesco ; Battaglia, Riccardo ; Calabrò, Rocco Salvatore ; Pignolo, Loris ; Contrada, Marianna ; Tonin, Paolo ; Cerasa, Antonio ; Demeco, Andrea</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the effects of visual feedback training on motor recovery in postoperative patients with a total knee replacement (TKR). The performance of 40 first-ever TKR patients (27 females; mean age: 70.5 (67.2−74.0) years) was evaluated in a single center, single-blind, randomized controlled study. The patients were randomly and equally distributed into two demographically/clinically matched groups undergoing experimental or traditional treatments. All patients have been treated in a 1 h session, 2/day for 5 days a week, for six consecutive weeks. The first group (“control”) underwent conventional physical therapy, whereas the experimental group received advanced knee training with visual feedback using the TecnoBody® device (Walker View 3.0 SCX, Dalmine (BG), Italy). The clinical scales and kinematic parameters coming from the gait analysis were evaluated to demonstrate the dynamic balance function in a standing position before and after each treatment. After the treatment, both experimental and control groups improved significantly and similarly, as measured by the clinical scales (Numeric Rating Scale for Pain and Barthel index). A significant boosting of the motor performance was detected in the experimental group with respect to the control group in the terms of symmetry index 84 (80.8−85.4) vs. 87.15 (84−92.8) p = 0.001 *; single stance support 34.9 (34.1−36.5) vs. 37.8 (36.6−38.9); p < 0.001; and obliquity parameters 58.65 (51.3−70.3) vs. 73 (62.3−82.1); p < 0.001. Applying visual feedback training in addition to traditional rehabilitation strategies improves the knee function and motor control in postoperative TKR patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm11247355</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36555971</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accelerometers ; Arthritis ; Clinical medicine ; Feedback ; Gait ; Kinematics ; Neuromuscular electrical stimulation ; Pain ; Patients ; Rehabilitation ; Surgery ; Walking</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2022-12, Vol.11 (24), p.7355</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-bf4c134a369cb6e96cad8859e58e05727c793d2f136b290511a202d18d34e0d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-bf4c134a369cb6e96cad8859e58e05727c793d2f136b290511a202d18d34e0d43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4867-1378 ; 0000-0001-9706-0779 ; 0000-0003-4536-9832 ; 0000-0003-4423-440X ; 0000-0001-5419-4275 ; 0000-0002-8022-4770</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9783629/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9783629/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36555971$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carozzo, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vatrano, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coschignano, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battaglia, Riccardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calabrò, Rocco Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pignolo, Loris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Contrada, Marianna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonin, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerasa, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demeco, Andrea</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of Visual Feedback Training for Motor Recovery in Post-Operative Subjects with Knee Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><description>To evaluate the effects of visual feedback training on motor recovery in postoperative patients with a total knee replacement (TKR). The performance of 40 first-ever TKR patients (27 females; mean age: 70.5 (67.2−74.0) years) was evaluated in a single center, single-blind, randomized controlled study. The patients were randomly and equally distributed into two demographically/clinically matched groups undergoing experimental or traditional treatments. All patients have been treated in a 1 h session, 2/day for 5 days a week, for six consecutive weeks. The first group (“control”) underwent conventional physical therapy, whereas the experimental group received advanced knee training with visual feedback using the TecnoBody® device (Walker View 3.0 SCX, Dalmine (BG), Italy). The clinical scales and kinematic parameters coming from the gait analysis were evaluated to demonstrate the dynamic balance function in a standing position before and after each treatment. After the treatment, both experimental and control groups improved significantly and similarly, as measured by the clinical scales (Numeric Rating Scale for Pain and Barthel index). A significant boosting of the motor performance was detected in the experimental group with respect to the control group in the terms of symmetry index 84 (80.8−85.4) vs. 87.15 (84−92.8) p = 0.001 *; single stance support 34.9 (34.1−36.5) vs. 37.8 (36.6−38.9); p < 0.001; and obliquity parameters 58.65 (51.3−70.3) vs. 73 (62.3−82.1); p < 0.001. Applying visual feedback training in addition to traditional rehabilitation strategies improves the knee function and motor control in postoperative TKR patients.</description><subject>Accelerometers</subject><subject>Arthritis</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Neuromuscular electrical stimulation</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1rFEEQhgdRTEhy8i4NXgQZ0x_TXx6EsCQqRiJx9dr09NQkvfZ0b7pnVtY_4N92YmJYrUNVQT28vMVbVc8Ifs2YxscrNxBCG8k4f1TtUyxljZlij3f2veqolBWeS6mGEvm02mOCc64l2a9-nfa9d9ZtUerRN18mG9AZQNda9x0ts_XRxyvUp4w-pXHul-DSBvIW-Yg-pzLWF2vIdvQbQF-mdgVuLOiHH6_Rxwgw0-tgHQwQxzfoBF3a2KXB_4QOLVIccwphXpfZ23BYPeltKHB0Pw-qr2eny8X7-vzi3YfFyXntGqzHuu0bR1hjmdCuFaCFs51SXANXgLmk0knNOtoTJlqqMSfEUkw7ojrWAO4adlC9vdNdT-0AnZudZRvMOvvB5q1J1pt_L9Ffm6u0MVoqJqieBV7eC-R0M0EZzeCLgxBshDQVQyVXWGsh8Iy--A9dpSnH-b1bSkjasD-Cr-4ol1MpGfoHMwSb24zNTsYz_XzX_wP7N1H2G0qOouI</recordid><startdate>20221211</startdate><enddate>20221211</enddate><creator>Carozzo, Simone</creator><creator>Vatrano, Martina</creator><creator>Coschignano, Francesco</creator><creator>Battaglia, Riccardo</creator><creator>Calabrò, Rocco Salvatore</creator><creator>Pignolo, Loris</creator><creator>Contrada, Marianna</creator><creator>Tonin, Paolo</creator><creator>Cerasa, Antonio</creator><creator>Demeco, Andrea</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4867-1378</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9706-0779</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4536-9832</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4423-440X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5419-4275</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8022-4770</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221211</creationdate><title>Efficacy of Visual Feedback Training for Motor Recovery in Post-Operative Subjects with Knee Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><author>Carozzo, Simone ; Vatrano, Martina ; Coschignano, Francesco ; Battaglia, Riccardo ; Calabrò, Rocco Salvatore ; Pignolo, Loris ; Contrada, Marianna ; Tonin, Paolo ; Cerasa, Antonio ; Demeco, Andrea</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-bf4c134a369cb6e96cad8859e58e05727c793d2f136b290511a202d18d34e0d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accelerometers</topic><topic>Arthritis</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Neuromuscular electrical stimulation</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carozzo, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vatrano, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coschignano, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battaglia, Riccardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calabrò, Rocco Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pignolo, Loris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Contrada, Marianna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonin, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerasa, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demeco, Andrea</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carozzo, Simone</au><au>Vatrano, Martina</au><au>Coschignano, Francesco</au><au>Battaglia, Riccardo</au><au>Calabrò, Rocco Salvatore</au><au>Pignolo, Loris</au><au>Contrada, Marianna</au><au>Tonin, Paolo</au><au>Cerasa, Antonio</au><au>Demeco, Andrea</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of Visual Feedback Training for Motor Recovery in Post-Operative Subjects with Knee Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><date>2022-12-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>7355</spage><pages>7355-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the effects of visual feedback training on motor recovery in postoperative patients with a total knee replacement (TKR). The performance of 40 first-ever TKR patients (27 females; mean age: 70.5 (67.2−74.0) years) was evaluated in a single center, single-blind, randomized controlled study. The patients were randomly and equally distributed into two demographically/clinically matched groups undergoing experimental or traditional treatments. All patients have been treated in a 1 h session, 2/day for 5 days a week, for six consecutive weeks. The first group (“control”) underwent conventional physical therapy, whereas the experimental group received advanced knee training with visual feedback using the TecnoBody® device (Walker View 3.0 SCX, Dalmine (BG), Italy). The clinical scales and kinematic parameters coming from the gait analysis were evaluated to demonstrate the dynamic balance function in a standing position before and after each treatment. After the treatment, both experimental and control groups improved significantly and similarly, as measured by the clinical scales (Numeric Rating Scale for Pain and Barthel index). A significant boosting of the motor performance was detected in the experimental group with respect to the control group in the terms of symmetry index 84 (80.8−85.4) vs. 87.15 (84−92.8) p = 0.001 *; single stance support 34.9 (34.1−36.5) vs. 37.8 (36.6−38.9); p < 0.001; and obliquity parameters 58.65 (51.3−70.3) vs. 73 (62.3−82.1); p < 0.001. Applying visual feedback training in addition to traditional rehabilitation strategies improves the knee function and motor control in postoperative TKR patients.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>36555971</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm11247355</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4867-1378</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9706-0779</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4536-9832</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4423-440X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5419-4275</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8022-4770</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2077-0383 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical medicine, 2022-12, Vol.11 (24), p.7355 |
issn | 2077-0383 2077-0383 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9783629 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central |
subjects | Accelerometers Arthritis Clinical medicine Feedback Gait Kinematics Neuromuscular electrical stimulation Pain Patients Rehabilitation Surgery Walking |
title | Efficacy of Visual Feedback Training for Motor Recovery in Post-Operative Subjects with Knee Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T16%3A55%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20Visual%20Feedback%20Training%20for%20Motor%20Recovery%20in%20Post-Operative%20Subjects%20with%20Knee%20Replacement:%20A%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Carozzo,%20Simone&rft.date=2022-12-11&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=7355&rft.pages=7355-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm11247355&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2758099660%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2756724329&rft_id=info:pmid/36555971&rfr_iscdi=true |