Current practice of live donor nephrectomy in Turkey

Over the last few years, the deceased donor organ donation rate was declined or remained stable, whereas the live donor organ donation rate has increased to compensate for the demand. Minimally invasive techniques for live donor nephrectomy (LDN) have also improved the live donor kidney donation rat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of transplantation 2022-12, Vol.12 (12), p.405-414
Hauptverfasser: Mankiev, Bakytbek, Cimen, Sanem Guler, Kaya, Ismail Oskay, Cimen, Sertac, Eraslan, Asir
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 414
container_issue 12
container_start_page 405
container_title World journal of transplantation
container_volume 12
creator Mankiev, Bakytbek
Cimen, Sanem Guler
Kaya, Ismail Oskay
Cimen, Sertac
Eraslan, Asir
description Over the last few years, the deceased donor organ donation rate was declined or remained stable, whereas the live donor organ donation rate has increased to compensate for the demand. Minimally invasive techniques for live donor nephrectomy (LDN) have also improved the live donor kidney donation rates. This increase has led to an interest in the surgical procedures used for LDN. To evaluate the LDN techniques performed in Turkey, the structure of surgical teams, and the training received. Additionally, the number of kidney transplantations at different centers, the surgeon experience level, differences in surgical approach during donor surgeries, and outcomes were assessed. A questionnaire was sent to the Turkish Ministry of Health-accredited transplant centers. It inquired of the number of LDN surgeries, surgical techniques, complications, optimization protocols, the experience of surgeons, and the training. Descriptive statistics were outlined as follows: Discrete numeric variables were expressed as medians (minimum-maximum), while categorical variables were shown as numbers and percentages. As a result of the goodness-of-fit tests, if the significance of the differences between the groups in discrete numerical variables for which the parametric test statistical assumptions were not met, data were analyzed with the Mann Whitney test and the test. The questionnaire was sent to 72 transplant centers, all of which replied. Five centers that reported not performing LDN procedures were excluded. Responses from the remaining 67 centers were analyzed. In 2019, the median number of kidney transplants performed was 45, and the median number of kidney transplants from living donors was 28 (1-238). Eleven (16.5%) centers performed 5-10, while 34 (50.7%) centers performed more than 100 live donor kidney transplants in 2019. While 19 (28.4%) centers performed the LDN procedures using the open technique, 48 (71.6%) centers implemented minimally invasive techniques. Among the centers preferring minimally invasive techniques for LDN, eight (16.6%) used more than one surgical technique. The most and the least common surgical techniques were transperitoneal laparoscopic (43 centers, 89.6%) and single port laparoscopic LDN (1 center, 2.1%) techniques, respectively. A positive association was found between the performance of minimally invasive techniques and the case volume of a transplant center, both in the total number and live donor kidney transplants (15 55, = 0.001 an
doi_str_mv 10.5500/wjt.v12.i12.405
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9782686</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2758353058</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3085-e4afbf785e574a7a1a928a151f74af37877ed6395fdce95a35b7a679f6e8af5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1PwzAMhiMEYmjszA31yKWbmzRNekFCE1_SJC7jHGWdwzK6piTt0P49QRvTOMSx5devrYeQmwzGnANMvtfdeJvRsY0vB35GriilkDLK4PwkH5BRCGsAyIBToOUlGbCCC8hBXJF82nuPTZe0XledrTBxJqntFpOla5xPGmxXHqvObXaJbZJ57z9xd00ujK4Djg7_kLw_Pc6nL-ns7fl1-jBLKwaSp5hrszBCcuQi10JnuqRSZzwzsTRMSCFwWbCSm2WFJdeML4QuRGkKlNpwZENyv_dt-8UGo6jpvK5V6-1G-51y2qr_ncau1IfbqlJIWsgiGtwdDLz76jF0amNDhXWtG3R9UFRwyTiDGIdkspdW3oXg0RzXZKB-cauIW0XcKuJWEXecuD297qj_g8t-APVvfTE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2758353058</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Current practice of live donor nephrectomy in Turkey</title><source>Baishideng "World Journal of" online journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Mankiev, Bakytbek ; Cimen, Sanem Guler ; Kaya, Ismail Oskay ; Cimen, Sertac ; Eraslan, Asir</creator><creatorcontrib>Mankiev, Bakytbek ; Cimen, Sanem Guler ; Kaya, Ismail Oskay ; Cimen, Sertac ; Eraslan, Asir</creatorcontrib><description>Over the last few years, the deceased donor organ donation rate was declined or remained stable, whereas the live donor organ donation rate has increased to compensate for the demand. Minimally invasive techniques for live donor nephrectomy (LDN) have also improved the live donor kidney donation rates. This increase has led to an interest in the surgical procedures used for LDN. To evaluate the LDN techniques performed in Turkey, the structure of surgical teams, and the training received. Additionally, the number of kidney transplantations at different centers, the surgeon experience level, differences in surgical approach during donor surgeries, and outcomes were assessed. A questionnaire was sent to the Turkish Ministry of Health-accredited transplant centers. It inquired of the number of LDN surgeries, surgical techniques, complications, optimization protocols, the experience of surgeons, and the training. Descriptive statistics were outlined as follows: Discrete numeric variables were expressed as medians (minimum-maximum), while categorical variables were shown as numbers and percentages. As a result of the goodness-of-fit tests, if the significance of the differences between the groups in discrete numerical variables for which the parametric test statistical assumptions were not met, data were analyzed with the Mann Whitney test and the test. The questionnaire was sent to 72 transplant centers, all of which replied. Five centers that reported not performing LDN procedures were excluded. Responses from the remaining 67 centers were analyzed. In 2019, the median number of kidney transplants performed was 45, and the median number of kidney transplants from living donors was 28 (1-238). Eleven (16.5%) centers performed 5-10, while 34 (50.7%) centers performed more than 100 live donor kidney transplants in 2019. While 19 (28.4%) centers performed the LDN procedures using the open technique, 48 (71.6%) centers implemented minimally invasive techniques. Among the centers preferring minimally invasive techniques for LDN, eight (16.6%) used more than one surgical technique. The most and the least common surgical techniques were transperitoneal laparoscopic (43 centers, 89.6%) and single port laparoscopic LDN (1 center, 2.1%) techniques, respectively. A positive association was found between the performance of minimally invasive techniques and the case volume of a transplant center, both in the total number and live donor kidney transplants (15 55, = 0.001 and 9 42, ≤ 0001 respectively). The most frequently reported complication was postoperative atelectasis ( = 33, 49.2%). There was no difference between the techniques concerning complications except for the chyle leak. Turkish transplant centers performed LDN surgeries successfully through various techniques. Centers implementing minimally invasive techniques had a relatively higher number of live donor kidney transplants in 2019.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2220-3230</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2220-3230</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v12.i12.405</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36570407</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</publisher><subject>Observational Study</subject><ispartof>World journal of transplantation, 2022-12, Vol.12 (12), p.405-414</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 2022</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3085-e4afbf785e574a7a1a928a151f74af37877ed6395fdce95a35b7a679f6e8af5e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3085-e4afbf785e574a7a1a928a151f74af37877ed6395fdce95a35b7a679f6e8af5e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9782686/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9782686/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36570407$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mankiev, Bakytbek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cimen, Sanem Guler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Ismail Oskay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cimen, Sertac</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eraslan, Asir</creatorcontrib><title>Current practice of live donor nephrectomy in Turkey</title><title>World journal of transplantation</title><addtitle>World J Transplant</addtitle><description>Over the last few years, the deceased donor organ donation rate was declined or remained stable, whereas the live donor organ donation rate has increased to compensate for the demand. Minimally invasive techniques for live donor nephrectomy (LDN) have also improved the live donor kidney donation rates. This increase has led to an interest in the surgical procedures used for LDN. To evaluate the LDN techniques performed in Turkey, the structure of surgical teams, and the training received. Additionally, the number of kidney transplantations at different centers, the surgeon experience level, differences in surgical approach during donor surgeries, and outcomes were assessed. A questionnaire was sent to the Turkish Ministry of Health-accredited transplant centers. It inquired of the number of LDN surgeries, surgical techniques, complications, optimization protocols, the experience of surgeons, and the training. Descriptive statistics were outlined as follows: Discrete numeric variables were expressed as medians (minimum-maximum), while categorical variables were shown as numbers and percentages. As a result of the goodness-of-fit tests, if the significance of the differences between the groups in discrete numerical variables for which the parametric test statistical assumptions were not met, data were analyzed with the Mann Whitney test and the test. The questionnaire was sent to 72 transplant centers, all of which replied. Five centers that reported not performing LDN procedures were excluded. Responses from the remaining 67 centers were analyzed. In 2019, the median number of kidney transplants performed was 45, and the median number of kidney transplants from living donors was 28 (1-238). Eleven (16.5%) centers performed 5-10, while 34 (50.7%) centers performed more than 100 live donor kidney transplants in 2019. While 19 (28.4%) centers performed the LDN procedures using the open technique, 48 (71.6%) centers implemented minimally invasive techniques. Among the centers preferring minimally invasive techniques for LDN, eight (16.6%) used more than one surgical technique. The most and the least common surgical techniques were transperitoneal laparoscopic (43 centers, 89.6%) and single port laparoscopic LDN (1 center, 2.1%) techniques, respectively. A positive association was found between the performance of minimally invasive techniques and the case volume of a transplant center, both in the total number and live donor kidney transplants (15 55, = 0.001 and 9 42, ≤ 0001 respectively). The most frequently reported complication was postoperative atelectasis ( = 33, 49.2%). There was no difference between the techniques concerning complications except for the chyle leak. Turkish transplant centers performed LDN surgeries successfully through various techniques. Centers implementing minimally invasive techniques had a relatively higher number of live donor kidney transplants in 2019.</description><subject>Observational Study</subject><issn>2220-3230</issn><issn>2220-3230</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkE1PwzAMhiMEYmjszA31yKWbmzRNekFCE1_SJC7jHGWdwzK6piTt0P49QRvTOMSx5devrYeQmwzGnANMvtfdeJvRsY0vB35GriilkDLK4PwkH5BRCGsAyIBToOUlGbCCC8hBXJF82nuPTZe0XledrTBxJqntFpOla5xPGmxXHqvObXaJbZJ57z9xd00ujK4Djg7_kLw_Pc6nL-ns7fl1-jBLKwaSp5hrszBCcuQi10JnuqRSZzwzsTRMSCFwWbCSm2WFJdeML4QuRGkKlNpwZENyv_dt-8UGo6jpvK5V6-1G-51y2qr_ncau1IfbqlJIWsgiGtwdDLz76jF0amNDhXWtG3R9UFRwyTiDGIdkspdW3oXg0RzXZKB-cauIW0XcKuJWEXecuD297qj_g8t-APVvfTE</recordid><startdate>20221218</startdate><enddate>20221218</enddate><creator>Mankiev, Bakytbek</creator><creator>Cimen, Sanem Guler</creator><creator>Kaya, Ismail Oskay</creator><creator>Cimen, Sertac</creator><creator>Eraslan, Asir</creator><general>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221218</creationdate><title>Current practice of live donor nephrectomy in Turkey</title><author>Mankiev, Bakytbek ; Cimen, Sanem Guler ; Kaya, Ismail Oskay ; Cimen, Sertac ; Eraslan, Asir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3085-e4afbf785e574a7a1a928a151f74af37877ed6395fdce95a35b7a679f6e8af5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Observational Study</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mankiev, Bakytbek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cimen, Sanem Guler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Ismail Oskay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cimen, Sertac</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eraslan, Asir</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>World journal of transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mankiev, Bakytbek</au><au>Cimen, Sanem Guler</au><au>Kaya, Ismail Oskay</au><au>Cimen, Sertac</au><au>Eraslan, Asir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Current practice of live donor nephrectomy in Turkey</atitle><jtitle>World journal of transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>World J Transplant</addtitle><date>2022-12-18</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>405</spage><epage>414</epage><pages>405-414</pages><issn>2220-3230</issn><eissn>2220-3230</eissn><abstract>Over the last few years, the deceased donor organ donation rate was declined or remained stable, whereas the live donor organ donation rate has increased to compensate for the demand. Minimally invasive techniques for live donor nephrectomy (LDN) have also improved the live donor kidney donation rates. This increase has led to an interest in the surgical procedures used for LDN. To evaluate the LDN techniques performed in Turkey, the structure of surgical teams, and the training received. Additionally, the number of kidney transplantations at different centers, the surgeon experience level, differences in surgical approach during donor surgeries, and outcomes were assessed. A questionnaire was sent to the Turkish Ministry of Health-accredited transplant centers. It inquired of the number of LDN surgeries, surgical techniques, complications, optimization protocols, the experience of surgeons, and the training. Descriptive statistics were outlined as follows: Discrete numeric variables were expressed as medians (minimum-maximum), while categorical variables were shown as numbers and percentages. As a result of the goodness-of-fit tests, if the significance of the differences between the groups in discrete numerical variables for which the parametric test statistical assumptions were not met, data were analyzed with the Mann Whitney test and the test. The questionnaire was sent to 72 transplant centers, all of which replied. Five centers that reported not performing LDN procedures were excluded. Responses from the remaining 67 centers were analyzed. In 2019, the median number of kidney transplants performed was 45, and the median number of kidney transplants from living donors was 28 (1-238). Eleven (16.5%) centers performed 5-10, while 34 (50.7%) centers performed more than 100 live donor kidney transplants in 2019. While 19 (28.4%) centers performed the LDN procedures using the open technique, 48 (71.6%) centers implemented minimally invasive techniques. Among the centers preferring minimally invasive techniques for LDN, eight (16.6%) used more than one surgical technique. The most and the least common surgical techniques were transperitoneal laparoscopic (43 centers, 89.6%) and single port laparoscopic LDN (1 center, 2.1%) techniques, respectively. A positive association was found between the performance of minimally invasive techniques and the case volume of a transplant center, both in the total number and live donor kidney transplants (15 55, = 0.001 and 9 42, ≤ 0001 respectively). The most frequently reported complication was postoperative atelectasis ( = 33, 49.2%). There was no difference between the techniques concerning complications except for the chyle leak. Turkish transplant centers performed LDN surgeries successfully through various techniques. Centers implementing minimally invasive techniques had a relatively higher number of live donor kidney transplants in 2019.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</pub><pmid>36570407</pmid><doi>10.5500/wjt.v12.i12.405</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2220-3230
ispartof World journal of transplantation, 2022-12, Vol.12 (12), p.405-414
issn 2220-3230
2220-3230
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9782686
source Baishideng "World Journal of" online journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Observational Study
title Current practice of live donor nephrectomy in Turkey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T18%3A44%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Current%20practice%20of%20live%20donor%20nephrectomy%20in%20Turkey&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20transplantation&rft.au=Mankiev,%20Bakytbek&rft.date=2022-12-18&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=405&rft.epage=414&rft.pages=405-414&rft.issn=2220-3230&rft.eissn=2220-3230&rft_id=info:doi/10.5500/wjt.v12.i12.405&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2758353058%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2758353058&rft_id=info:pmid/36570407&rfr_iscdi=true