Do Environmental Regulations Promote or Inhibit Cities' Innovation Capacity? Evidence from China
The "Porter Hypothesis" proposes that appropriate environmental regulations would promote firm innovation. This study aims to build a theoretical model for illustrating the impact and mechanism of environmental regulation on urban innovation through a panel of 281 Chinese prefecture-level...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of environmental research and public health 2022-12, Vol.19 (24), p.16993 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 24 |
| container_start_page | 16993 |
| container_title | International journal of environmental research and public health |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Zeng, Xiaowen Jin, Ming Pan, Shuang |
| description | The "Porter Hypothesis" proposes that appropriate environmental regulations would promote firm innovation. This study aims to build a theoretical model for illustrating the impact and mechanism of environmental regulation on urban innovation through a panel of 281 Chinese prefecture-level cities during 2003-2016. The results indicated that an increase in environmental regulation markedly suppressed the innovative capacity of Chinese cities during the sample period. This inhibitory effect is primarily transmitted through two mediating variables: lower regional fiscal revenue and reduced manufacturing output. Moreover, improved regional economic development level helps generate positive incentives for environmental regulation and mitigate its inhibitions to innovation. Environmental regulation and urban innovation might have a non-linear U-shape relation, with the former helping improve urban innovation capacity upon reaching a particular level. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ijerph192416993 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9779454</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2756701815</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-29e9737855a696869b60e2d9e1e83db8f4dc99ac5ea338123fc31e4a9e030da73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUU1LAzEQDaLYWj17k4AHT7XJJpvdXBRZqxYKiug5pruz3ZRuUrMf0H_vamupnmaGee_NGx5C55RcMybJyCzArwoqA06FlOwA9akQZMgFoYd7fQ-dVNWCEBZzIY9Rj4kw5HHE--jj3uGxbY13tgRb6yV-hXmz1LVxtsIv3pWuBuw8ntjCzEyNE1MbqK662br2B4YTvdKpqde3eNyaDGwKOO-IOCmM1afoKNfLCs62dYDeH8ZvydNw-vw4Se6mw5QHtB4GEmTEojgMtZAiFnImCASZBAoxy2ZxzrNUSp2GoBmLacDylFHgWgJhJNMRG6Cbje6qmZWQpd0zXi_VyptS-7Vy2qi_G2sKNXetklEkecg7gcutgHefDVS1WrjG286zCqJQRITGNOxQow0q9a6qPOS7C5So70jUv0g6xsW-sR3-NwP2Ba2iifg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2756701815</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do Environmental Regulations Promote or Inhibit Cities' Innovation Capacity? Evidence from China</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Zeng, Xiaowen ; Jin, Ming ; Pan, Shuang</creator><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Xiaowen ; Jin, Ming ; Pan, Shuang</creatorcontrib><description>The "Porter Hypothesis" proposes that appropriate environmental regulations would promote firm innovation. This study aims to build a theoretical model for illustrating the impact and mechanism of environmental regulation on urban innovation through a panel of 281 Chinese prefecture-level cities during 2003-2016. The results indicated that an increase in environmental regulation markedly suppressed the innovative capacity of Chinese cities during the sample period. This inhibitory effect is primarily transmitted through two mediating variables: lower regional fiscal revenue and reduced manufacturing output. Moreover, improved regional economic development level helps generate positive incentives for environmental regulation and mitigate its inhibitions to innovation. Environmental regulation and urban innovation might have a non-linear U-shape relation, with the former helping improve urban innovation capacity upon reaching a particular level.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192416993</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36554874</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>China ; Cities ; Economic Development ; Economic growth ; Energy industry ; Environmental impact ; Environmental policy ; Environmental protection ; Environmental regulations ; Growth rate ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Innovations ; Manufacturing ; Models, Theoretical ; Operating costs ; Pollution ; Productivity ; R&D ; Regional development ; Regulation ; Regulations ; Research & development ; Research & development expenditures</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022-12, Vol.19 (24), p.16993</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-29e9737855a696869b60e2d9e1e83db8f4dc99ac5ea338123fc31e4a9e030da73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-29e9737855a696869b60e2d9e1e83db8f4dc99ac5ea338123fc31e4a9e030da73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3553-8236</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779454/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779454/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36554874$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Xiaowen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Shuang</creatorcontrib><title>Do Environmental Regulations Promote or Inhibit Cities' Innovation Capacity? Evidence from China</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>The "Porter Hypothesis" proposes that appropriate environmental regulations would promote firm innovation. This study aims to build a theoretical model for illustrating the impact and mechanism of environmental regulation on urban innovation through a panel of 281 Chinese prefecture-level cities during 2003-2016. The results indicated that an increase in environmental regulation markedly suppressed the innovative capacity of Chinese cities during the sample period. This inhibitory effect is primarily transmitted through two mediating variables: lower regional fiscal revenue and reduced manufacturing output. Moreover, improved regional economic development level helps generate positive incentives for environmental regulation and mitigate its inhibitions to innovation. Environmental regulation and urban innovation might have a non-linear U-shape relation, with the former helping improve urban innovation capacity upon reaching a particular level.</description><subject>China</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Economic Development</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Environmental regulations</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Operating costs</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Regional development</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Regulations</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Research & development expenditures</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUU1LAzEQDaLYWj17k4AHT7XJJpvdXBRZqxYKiug5pruz3ZRuUrMf0H_vamupnmaGee_NGx5C55RcMybJyCzArwoqA06FlOwA9akQZMgFoYd7fQ-dVNWCEBZzIY9Rj4kw5HHE--jj3uGxbY13tgRb6yV-hXmz1LVxtsIv3pWuBuw8ntjCzEyNE1MbqK662br2B4YTvdKpqde3eNyaDGwKOO-IOCmM1afoKNfLCs62dYDeH8ZvydNw-vw4Se6mw5QHtB4GEmTEojgMtZAiFnImCASZBAoxy2ZxzrNUSp2GoBmLacDylFHgWgJhJNMRG6Cbje6qmZWQpd0zXi_VyptS-7Vy2qi_G2sKNXetklEkecg7gcutgHefDVS1WrjG286zCqJQRITGNOxQow0q9a6qPOS7C5So70jUv0g6xsW-sR3-NwP2Ba2iifg</recordid><startdate>20221217</startdate><enddate>20221217</enddate><creator>Zeng, Xiaowen</creator><creator>Jin, Ming</creator><creator>Pan, Shuang</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3553-8236</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221217</creationdate><title>Do Environmental Regulations Promote or Inhibit Cities' Innovation Capacity? Evidence from China</title><author>Zeng, Xiaowen ; Jin, Ming ; Pan, Shuang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-29e9737855a696869b60e2d9e1e83db8f4dc99ac5ea338123fc31e4a9e030da73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>China</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Economic Development</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Environmental regulations</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Operating costs</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Regional development</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Regulations</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Research & development expenditures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Xiaowen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Shuang</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zeng, Xiaowen</au><au>Jin, Ming</au><au>Pan, Shuang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do Environmental Regulations Promote or Inhibit Cities' Innovation Capacity? Evidence from China</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2022-12-17</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>16993</spage><pages>16993-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>The "Porter Hypothesis" proposes that appropriate environmental regulations would promote firm innovation. This study aims to build a theoretical model for illustrating the impact and mechanism of environmental regulation on urban innovation through a panel of 281 Chinese prefecture-level cities during 2003-2016. The results indicated that an increase in environmental regulation markedly suppressed the innovative capacity of Chinese cities during the sample period. This inhibitory effect is primarily transmitted through two mediating variables: lower regional fiscal revenue and reduced manufacturing output. Moreover, improved regional economic development level helps generate positive incentives for environmental regulation and mitigate its inhibitions to innovation. Environmental regulation and urban innovation might have a non-linear U-shape relation, with the former helping improve urban innovation capacity upon reaching a particular level.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>36554874</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph192416993</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3553-8236</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| ispartof | International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022-12, Vol.19 (24), p.16993 |
| issn | 1660-4601 1661-7827 1660-4601 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9779454 |
| source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | China Cities Economic Development Economic growth Energy industry Environmental impact Environmental policy Environmental protection Environmental regulations Growth rate Humans Hypotheses Innovations Manufacturing Models, Theoretical Operating costs Pollution Productivity R&D Regional development Regulation Regulations Research & development Research & development expenditures |
| title | Do Environmental Regulations Promote or Inhibit Cities' Innovation Capacity? Evidence from China |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T01%3A16%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20Environmental%20Regulations%20Promote%20or%20Inhibit%20Cities'%20Innovation%20Capacity?%20Evidence%20from%20China&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Zeng,%20Xiaowen&rft.date=2022-12-17&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=16993&rft.pages=16993-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph192416993&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2756701815%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2756701815&rft_id=info:pmid/36554874&rfr_iscdi=true |