Validity and Reliability of Questionnaires That Assess Barriers and Facilitators of Sedentary Behavior in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review
We systematically reviewed the literature about the validity and reliability of barriers and facilitators of sedentary behavior questionnaires for children and adolescents, considering accelerometers as the reference method. We included studies that assessed the agreement between the barriers and fa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of environmental research and public health 2022-12, Vol.19 (24), p.16834 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 24 |
container_start_page | 16834 |
container_title | International journal of environmental research and public health |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Oliveira, Guilherme Augusto Marcelino, Andressa Costa Tristão Parra, Maíra Nascimento-Ferreira, Marcus Vinicius De Moraes, Augusto César Ferreira |
description | We systematically reviewed the literature about the validity and reliability of barriers and facilitators of sedentary behavior questionnaires for children and adolescents, considering accelerometers as the reference method. We included studies that assessed the agreement between the barriers and facilitators of sedentary behavior through a questionnaire and an objective measure (e.g., accelerometry). We searched four electronic databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and SCOPUS): these databases were searched for records from inception to 5 March 2021, and updated to November 2022. The search strategy used the following descriptors: children and adolescents; barriers or facilitators; questionnaires; accelerometers; and validation or reliability coefficient. Studies identified in the search were selected independently by two reviewers. The inclusion criteria were: (i) population of children and adolescents, (ii) original studies, (iii) subjective and objective measurement methods, (iv) studies that report validity or reliability, and (v) population without specific diseases. Seven studies were eligible for our review. The main exclusion reasons were studies that did not report validity or reliability coefficients (56.6%) and non-original studies (14.5%). The participants' ages in the primary studies ranged from 2 to 18 years. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was the most reported reliability assessment among the eligible articles, while Pearson and Spearman's coefficients were prevalent for validity. The reliability of self-report questionnaires for assessing sedentary behavior ranged from r = 0.3 to 1.0. The validity of the accelerometers ranged from r = -0.1 to 0.9. Family environment was the main factor associated with sedentary behavior. Our findings suggest that questionnaires assessing the barriers and facilitators of sedentary behavior are weak to moderate. PROSPERO Registration (CRD42021233945). |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ijerph192416834 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9778761</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2756703688</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-8bb4ef16c2b1b15f06209789849825d667c62889c7ea2ee6e2e48330423c7b823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV1PHCEYhYlpU63ttXcNSa-38jXAeGGyGj-amFSr7S1hmHc6bGaHFdg1-0v6d8tUa6xX8MI5hycchA4o-cJ5TQ79AuKqpzUTVGoudtAelZLMhCT0zYv9Lnqf0oIQroWs36FdLqtKKFrtod8_7eBbn7fYji3-DoO3jR-mOXT4Zg0p-zCO1kdI-K63Gc9TgpTwiY3RQ0x_befWTR6bQzkovltoYcw2bvEJ9HbjQ8R-xLkHfA2ttzl6h6_Daj3YKf0Iz_HtNmVYltEVho2Hhw_obWeHBB-f1n304_zs7vRydvXt4uvp_GrmBKN5pptGQEelYw1taNURyUitdK1FrVnVSqmcZFrXToFlABIYCM05EYw71WjG99HxY-5q3SyhdYU72sGsol8WfhOsN__fjL43v8LG1EppJWkJ-PwUEMP99F9mEdZxLMyGqUoqwqXWRXX4qHIxpBShe36BEjM1aV41WRyfXoI96_9Vx_8Av06d7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2756703688</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity and Reliability of Questionnaires That Assess Barriers and Facilitators of Sedentary Behavior in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Oliveira, Guilherme Augusto ; Marcelino, Andressa Costa ; Tristão Parra, Maíra ; Nascimento-Ferreira, Marcus Vinicius ; De Moraes, Augusto César Ferreira</creator><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Guilherme Augusto ; Marcelino, Andressa Costa ; Tristão Parra, Maíra ; Nascimento-Ferreira, Marcus Vinicius ; De Moraes, Augusto César Ferreira</creatorcontrib><description>We systematically reviewed the literature about the validity and reliability of barriers and facilitators of sedentary behavior questionnaires for children and adolescents, considering accelerometers as the reference method. We included studies that assessed the agreement between the barriers and facilitators of sedentary behavior through a questionnaire and an objective measure (e.g., accelerometry). We searched four electronic databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and SCOPUS): these databases were searched for records from inception to 5 March 2021, and updated to November 2022. The search strategy used the following descriptors: children and adolescents; barriers or facilitators; questionnaires; accelerometers; and validation or reliability coefficient. Studies identified in the search were selected independently by two reviewers. The inclusion criteria were: (i) population of children and adolescents, (ii) original studies, (iii) subjective and objective measurement methods, (iv) studies that report validity or reliability, and (v) population without specific diseases. Seven studies were eligible for our review. The main exclusion reasons were studies that did not report validity or reliability coefficients (56.6%) and non-original studies (14.5%). The participants' ages in the primary studies ranged from 2 to 18 years. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was the most reported reliability assessment among the eligible articles, while Pearson and Spearman's coefficients were prevalent for validity. The reliability of self-report questionnaires for assessing sedentary behavior ranged from r = 0.3 to 1.0. The validity of the accelerometers ranged from r = -0.1 to 0.9. Family environment was the main factor associated with sedentary behavior. Our findings suggest that questionnaires assessing the barriers and facilitators of sedentary behavior are weak to moderate. PROSPERO Registration (CRD42021233945).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192416834</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36554715</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accelerometers ; Accelerometry ; Adolescent ; Adolescents ; Agreements ; Behavior ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Coefficients ; Computer & video games ; Heart rate ; Humans ; Measurement methods ; Methods ; Neighborhoods ; Obesity ; Outdoor activities ; Pediatrics ; Questionnaires ; Reliability analysis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Review ; Screen time ; Search methods ; Sedentary Behavior ; Self Report ; Smartphones ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Systematic review ; Teenagers ; Validity</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022-12, Vol.19 (24), p.16834</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-8bb4ef16c2b1b15f06209789849825d667c62889c7ea2ee6e2e48330423c7b823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-8bb4ef16c2b1b15f06209789849825d667c62889c7ea2ee6e2e48330423c7b823</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6344-1044 ; 0000-0001-6761-9631 ; 0000-0002-5763-435X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9778761/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9778761/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36554715$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Guilherme Augusto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcelino, Andressa Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tristão Parra, Maíra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nascimento-Ferreira, Marcus Vinicius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Moraes, Augusto César Ferreira</creatorcontrib><title>Validity and Reliability of Questionnaires That Assess Barriers and Facilitators of Sedentary Behavior in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>We systematically reviewed the literature about the validity and reliability of barriers and facilitators of sedentary behavior questionnaires for children and adolescents, considering accelerometers as the reference method. We included studies that assessed the agreement between the barriers and facilitators of sedentary behavior through a questionnaire and an objective measure (e.g., accelerometry). We searched four electronic databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and SCOPUS): these databases were searched for records from inception to 5 March 2021, and updated to November 2022. The search strategy used the following descriptors: children and adolescents; barriers or facilitators; questionnaires; accelerometers; and validation or reliability coefficient. Studies identified in the search were selected independently by two reviewers. The inclusion criteria were: (i) population of children and adolescents, (ii) original studies, (iii) subjective and objective measurement methods, (iv) studies that report validity or reliability, and (v) population without specific diseases. Seven studies were eligible for our review. The main exclusion reasons were studies that did not report validity or reliability coefficients (56.6%) and non-original studies (14.5%). The participants' ages in the primary studies ranged from 2 to 18 years. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was the most reported reliability assessment among the eligible articles, while Pearson and Spearman's coefficients were prevalent for validity. The reliability of self-report questionnaires for assessing sedentary behavior ranged from r = 0.3 to 1.0. The validity of the accelerometers ranged from r = -0.1 to 0.9. Family environment was the main factor associated with sedentary behavior. Our findings suggest that questionnaires assessing the barriers and facilitators of sedentary behavior are weak to moderate. PROSPERO Registration (CRD42021233945).</description><subject>Accelerometers</subject><subject>Accelerometry</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>Computer & video games</subject><subject>Heart rate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Measurement methods</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Outdoor activities</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Screen time</subject><subject>Search methods</subject><subject>Sedentary Behavior</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Smartphones</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV1PHCEYhYlpU63ttXcNSa-38jXAeGGyGj-amFSr7S1hmHc6bGaHFdg1-0v6d8tUa6xX8MI5hycchA4o-cJ5TQ79AuKqpzUTVGoudtAelZLMhCT0zYv9Lnqf0oIQroWs36FdLqtKKFrtod8_7eBbn7fYji3-DoO3jR-mOXT4Zg0p-zCO1kdI-K63Gc9TgpTwiY3RQ0x_befWTR6bQzkovltoYcw2bvEJ9HbjQ8R-xLkHfA2ttzl6h6_Daj3YKf0Iz_HtNmVYltEVho2Hhw_obWeHBB-f1n304_zs7vRydvXt4uvp_GrmBKN5pptGQEelYw1taNURyUitdK1FrVnVSqmcZFrXToFlABIYCM05EYw71WjG99HxY-5q3SyhdYU72sGsol8WfhOsN__fjL43v8LG1EppJWkJ-PwUEMP99F9mEdZxLMyGqUoqwqXWRXX4qHIxpBShe36BEjM1aV41WRyfXoI96_9Vx_8Av06d7w</recordid><startdate>20221215</startdate><enddate>20221215</enddate><creator>Oliveira, Guilherme Augusto</creator><creator>Marcelino, Andressa Costa</creator><creator>Tristão Parra, Maíra</creator><creator>Nascimento-Ferreira, Marcus Vinicius</creator><creator>De Moraes, Augusto César Ferreira</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6344-1044</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6761-9631</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5763-435X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221215</creationdate><title>Validity and Reliability of Questionnaires That Assess Barriers and Facilitators of Sedentary Behavior in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review</title><author>Oliveira, Guilherme Augusto ; Marcelino, Andressa Costa ; Tristão Parra, Maíra ; Nascimento-Ferreira, Marcus Vinicius ; De Moraes, Augusto César Ferreira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-8bb4ef16c2b1b15f06209789849825d667c62889c7ea2ee6e2e48330423c7b823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accelerometers</topic><topic>Accelerometry</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>Computer & video games</topic><topic>Heart rate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Measurement methods</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Outdoor activities</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Screen time</topic><topic>Search methods</topic><topic>Sedentary Behavior</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Smartphones</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Guilherme Augusto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcelino, Andressa Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tristão Parra, Maíra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nascimento-Ferreira, Marcus Vinicius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Moraes, Augusto César Ferreira</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oliveira, Guilherme Augusto</au><au>Marcelino, Andressa Costa</au><au>Tristão Parra, Maíra</au><au>Nascimento-Ferreira, Marcus Vinicius</au><au>De Moraes, Augusto César Ferreira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity and Reliability of Questionnaires That Assess Barriers and Facilitators of Sedentary Behavior in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2022-12-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>16834</spage><pages>16834-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>We systematically reviewed the literature about the validity and reliability of barriers and facilitators of sedentary behavior questionnaires for children and adolescents, considering accelerometers as the reference method. We included studies that assessed the agreement between the barriers and facilitators of sedentary behavior through a questionnaire and an objective measure (e.g., accelerometry). We searched four electronic databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and SCOPUS): these databases were searched for records from inception to 5 March 2021, and updated to November 2022. The search strategy used the following descriptors: children and adolescents; barriers or facilitators; questionnaires; accelerometers; and validation or reliability coefficient. Studies identified in the search were selected independently by two reviewers. The inclusion criteria were: (i) population of children and adolescents, (ii) original studies, (iii) subjective and objective measurement methods, (iv) studies that report validity or reliability, and (v) population without specific diseases. Seven studies were eligible for our review. The main exclusion reasons were studies that did not report validity or reliability coefficients (56.6%) and non-original studies (14.5%). The participants' ages in the primary studies ranged from 2 to 18 years. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was the most reported reliability assessment among the eligible articles, while Pearson and Spearman's coefficients were prevalent for validity. The reliability of self-report questionnaires for assessing sedentary behavior ranged from r = 0.3 to 1.0. The validity of the accelerometers ranged from r = -0.1 to 0.9. Family environment was the main factor associated with sedentary behavior. Our findings suggest that questionnaires assessing the barriers and facilitators of sedentary behavior are weak to moderate. PROSPERO Registration (CRD42021233945).</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>36554715</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph192416834</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6344-1044</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6761-9631</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5763-435X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1660-4601 |
ispartof | International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022-12, Vol.19 (24), p.16834 |
issn | 1660-4601 1661-7827 1660-4601 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9778761 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | Accelerometers Accelerometry Adolescent Adolescents Agreements Behavior Child Child, Preschool Children Coefficients Computer & video games Heart rate Humans Measurement methods Methods Neighborhoods Obesity Outdoor activities Pediatrics Questionnaires Reliability analysis Reproducibility of Results Review Screen time Search methods Sedentary Behavior Self Report Smartphones Surveys and Questionnaires Systematic review Teenagers Validity |
title | Validity and Reliability of Questionnaires That Assess Barriers and Facilitators of Sedentary Behavior in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T19%3A18%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20and%20Reliability%20of%20Questionnaires%20That%20Assess%20Barriers%20and%20Facilitators%20of%20Sedentary%20Behavior%20in%20the%20Pediatric%20Population:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Oliveira,%20Guilherme%20Augusto&rft.date=2022-12-15&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=16834&rft.pages=16834-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph192416834&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2756703688%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2756703688&rft_id=info:pmid/36554715&rfr_iscdi=true |