Failure in Medical Practice: Human Error, System Failure, or Case Severity?

The success rate in medical practice will probably never reach 100%. Success rates depend on many factors. Defining the success rate is both a technical and a philosophical issue. In opposition to the concept of success, medical failure should also be discussed. Its causality is multifactorial and e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Healthcare (Basel) 2022-12, Vol.10 (12), p.2495
Hauptverfasser: Roman, Mihai Dan, Fleacă, Sorin Radu, Boicean, Adrian Gheorghe, Mohor, Cosmin Ioan, Morar, Silviu, Dura, Horatiu, Cristian, Adrian Nicolae, Bratu, Dan, Tanasescu, Ciprian, Teodoru, Adrian, Necula, Radu, Russu, Octav
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2495
container_title Healthcare (Basel)
container_volume 10
creator Roman, Mihai Dan
Fleacă, Sorin Radu
Boicean, Adrian Gheorghe
Mohor, Cosmin Ioan
Morar, Silviu
Dura, Horatiu
Cristian, Adrian Nicolae
Bratu, Dan
Tanasescu, Ciprian
Teodoru, Adrian
Necula, Radu
Russu, Octav
description The success rate in medical practice will probably never reach 100%. Success rates depend on many factors. Defining the success rate is both a technical and a philosophical issue. In opposition to the concept of success, medical failure should also be discussed. Its causality is multifactorial and extremely complex. Its actual rate and its real impact are unknown. In medical practice, failure depends not only on the human factor but also on the medical system and has at its center a very important variable-the patient. To combat errors, capturing, tracking, and analyzing them at an institutional level are important. Barriers such as the fear of consequences or a specific work climate or culture can affect this process. Although important data regarding medical errors and their consequences can be extracted by analyzing patient outcomes or using quality indicators, patient stories (clinical cases) seem to have the greatest impact on our subconscious as medical doctors and nurses and these may generate the corresponding and necessary reactions. Every clinical case has its own story. In this study, three different cases are presented to illustrate how human error, the limits of the system, and the particularities of the patient's condition (severity of the disease), alone or in combination, may lead to tragic outcomes There is a need to talk openly and in a balanced way about failure, regardless of its cause, to look at things as they are, without hiding the inconvenient truth. The common goal is not to find culprits but to find solutions and create a culture of safety.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/healthcare10122495
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9778633</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A744639560</galeid><sourcerecordid>A744639560</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-48eb0df3e3d9816c57f1cdd16561df03ca768123c99a876cf6f50b4e9be89b413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl1PFTEQhhsjEYL8AS9ME2-84GA_tl9eaMgJiAGjCXrddLtTTsnuFttdkvPv7QlHBKFz0Un7vG8z00HoDSVHnBvyYQWun1beZaCEMtYY8QLtMcbUwhDOXj7Id9FBKdekLkO55uIV2uVSiIZQvYfOT13s5ww4jvgbdNG7Hv_Izk_Rw0d8Ng9uxCc5p3yIL9dlggFvBYc4Zbx0BfAl3EKO0_rza7QTXF_gYLvvo1-nJz-XZ4uL71--Lo8vFr4xalo0GlrSBQ68M5pKL1SgvuuoFJJ2gXDvlNSUcW-M00r6IIMgbQOmBW3ahvJ99OnO92ZuB-g8jFN2vb3JcXB5bZOL9vHNGFf2Kt1ao5SWnFeD91uDnH7PUCY7xOKh790IaS6WKaEpFYSRir77D71Ocx5reRtKSkNVI_9RV64HG8eQ6rt-Y2qPVVMBI-TG6-gZqkYHQ_RphBDr-SMBuxP4nErJEO5rpMRupsA-nYIqevuwO_eSv3_O_wD1ya2V</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2756691746</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Failure in Medical Practice: Human Error, System Failure, or Case Severity?</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Roman, Mihai Dan ; Fleacă, Sorin Radu ; Boicean, Adrian Gheorghe ; Mohor, Cosmin Ioan ; Morar, Silviu ; Dura, Horatiu ; Cristian, Adrian Nicolae ; Bratu, Dan ; Tanasescu, Ciprian ; Teodoru, Adrian ; Necula, Radu ; Russu, Octav</creator><creatorcontrib>Roman, Mihai Dan ; Fleacă, Sorin Radu ; Boicean, Adrian Gheorghe ; Mohor, Cosmin Ioan ; Morar, Silviu ; Dura, Horatiu ; Cristian, Adrian Nicolae ; Bratu, Dan ; Tanasescu, Ciprian ; Teodoru, Adrian ; Necula, Radu ; Russu, Octav</creatorcontrib><description>The success rate in medical practice will probably never reach 100%. Success rates depend on many factors. Defining the success rate is both a technical and a philosophical issue. In opposition to the concept of success, medical failure should also be discussed. Its causality is multifactorial and extremely complex. Its actual rate and its real impact are unknown. In medical practice, failure depends not only on the human factor but also on the medical system and has at its center a very important variable-the patient. To combat errors, capturing, tracking, and analyzing them at an institutional level are important. Barriers such as the fear of consequences or a specific work climate or culture can affect this process. Although important data regarding medical errors and their consequences can be extracted by analyzing patient outcomes or using quality indicators, patient stories (clinical cases) seem to have the greatest impact on our subconscious as medical doctors and nurses and these may generate the corresponding and necessary reactions. Every clinical case has its own story. In this study, three different cases are presented to illustrate how human error, the limits of the system, and the particularities of the patient's condition (severity of the disease), alone or in combination, may lead to tragic outcomes There is a need to talk openly and in a balanced way about failure, regardless of its cause, to look at things as they are, without hiding the inconvenient truth. The common goal is not to find culprits but to find solutions and create a culture of safety.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2227-9032</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2227-9032</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10122495</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36554018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Care and treatment ; Chronic diseases ; Debridement ; Decision making ; Development and progression ; Failure ; Feedback ; Hospitals ; Human error ; Intensive care ; Medical errors ; Medical practices ; Medicine ; Orthopedics ; Patient outcomes ; Practice ; Prevention ; Prostheses ; Success ; Trauma ; Vascular surgery ; Veins &amp; arteries</subject><ispartof>Healthcare (Basel), 2022-12, Vol.10 (12), p.2495</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-48eb0df3e3d9816c57f1cdd16561df03ca768123c99a876cf6f50b4e9be89b413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-48eb0df3e3d9816c57f1cdd16561df03ca768123c99a876cf6f50b4e9be89b413</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2444-9828 ; 0000-0002-8625-2828 ; 0000-0001-9856-8515</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9778633/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9778633/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27915,27916,53782,53784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36554018$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roman, Mihai Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleacă, Sorin Radu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boicean, Adrian Gheorghe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohor, Cosmin Ioan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morar, Silviu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dura, Horatiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristian, Adrian Nicolae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bratu, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanasescu, Ciprian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teodoru, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Necula, Radu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russu, Octav</creatorcontrib><title>Failure in Medical Practice: Human Error, System Failure, or Case Severity?</title><title>Healthcare (Basel)</title><addtitle>Healthcare (Basel)</addtitle><description>The success rate in medical practice will probably never reach 100%. Success rates depend on many factors. Defining the success rate is both a technical and a philosophical issue. In opposition to the concept of success, medical failure should also be discussed. Its causality is multifactorial and extremely complex. Its actual rate and its real impact are unknown. In medical practice, failure depends not only on the human factor but also on the medical system and has at its center a very important variable-the patient. To combat errors, capturing, tracking, and analyzing them at an institutional level are important. Barriers such as the fear of consequences or a specific work climate or culture can affect this process. Although important data regarding medical errors and their consequences can be extracted by analyzing patient outcomes or using quality indicators, patient stories (clinical cases) seem to have the greatest impact on our subconscious as medical doctors and nurses and these may generate the corresponding and necessary reactions. Every clinical case has its own story. In this study, three different cases are presented to illustrate how human error, the limits of the system, and the particularities of the patient's condition (severity of the disease), alone or in combination, may lead to tragic outcomes There is a need to talk openly and in a balanced way about failure, regardless of its cause, to look at things as they are, without hiding the inconvenient truth. The common goal is not to find culprits but to find solutions and create a culture of safety.</description><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Chronic diseases</subject><subject>Debridement</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Development and progression</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Human error</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Medical errors</subject><subject>Medical practices</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Vascular surgery</subject><subject>Veins &amp; arteries</subject><issn>2227-9032</issn><issn>2227-9032</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl1PFTEQhhsjEYL8AS9ME2-84GA_tl9eaMgJiAGjCXrddLtTTsnuFttdkvPv7QlHBKFz0Un7vG8z00HoDSVHnBvyYQWun1beZaCEMtYY8QLtMcbUwhDOXj7Id9FBKdekLkO55uIV2uVSiIZQvYfOT13s5ww4jvgbdNG7Hv_Izk_Rw0d8Ng9uxCc5p3yIL9dlggFvBYc4Zbx0BfAl3EKO0_rza7QTXF_gYLvvo1-nJz-XZ4uL71--Lo8vFr4xalo0GlrSBQ68M5pKL1SgvuuoFJJ2gXDvlNSUcW-M00r6IIMgbQOmBW3ahvJ99OnO92ZuB-g8jFN2vb3JcXB5bZOL9vHNGFf2Kt1ao5SWnFeD91uDnH7PUCY7xOKh790IaS6WKaEpFYSRir77D71Ocx5reRtKSkNVI_9RV64HG8eQ6rt-Y2qPVVMBI-TG6-gZqkYHQ_RphBDr-SMBuxP4nErJEO5rpMRupsA-nYIqevuwO_eSv3_O_wD1ya2V</recordid><startdate>20221209</startdate><enddate>20221209</enddate><creator>Roman, Mihai Dan</creator><creator>Fleacă, Sorin Radu</creator><creator>Boicean, Adrian Gheorghe</creator><creator>Mohor, Cosmin Ioan</creator><creator>Morar, Silviu</creator><creator>Dura, Horatiu</creator><creator>Cristian, Adrian Nicolae</creator><creator>Bratu, Dan</creator><creator>Tanasescu, Ciprian</creator><creator>Teodoru, Adrian</creator><creator>Necula, Radu</creator><creator>Russu, Octav</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2444-9828</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8625-2828</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9856-8515</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221209</creationdate><title>Failure in Medical Practice: Human Error, System Failure, or Case Severity?</title><author>Roman, Mihai Dan ; Fleacă, Sorin Radu ; Boicean, Adrian Gheorghe ; Mohor, Cosmin Ioan ; Morar, Silviu ; Dura, Horatiu ; Cristian, Adrian Nicolae ; Bratu, Dan ; Tanasescu, Ciprian ; Teodoru, Adrian ; Necula, Radu ; Russu, Octav</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-48eb0df3e3d9816c57f1cdd16561df03ca768123c99a876cf6f50b4e9be89b413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Chronic diseases</topic><topic>Debridement</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Development and progression</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Human error</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Medical errors</topic><topic>Medical practices</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Vascular surgery</topic><topic>Veins &amp; arteries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roman, Mihai Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleacă, Sorin Radu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boicean, Adrian Gheorghe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohor, Cosmin Ioan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morar, Silviu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dura, Horatiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristian, Adrian Nicolae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bratu, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanasescu, Ciprian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teodoru, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Necula, Radu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russu, Octav</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Healthcare (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roman, Mihai Dan</au><au>Fleacă, Sorin Radu</au><au>Boicean, Adrian Gheorghe</au><au>Mohor, Cosmin Ioan</au><au>Morar, Silviu</au><au>Dura, Horatiu</au><au>Cristian, Adrian Nicolae</au><au>Bratu, Dan</au><au>Tanasescu, Ciprian</au><au>Teodoru, Adrian</au><au>Necula, Radu</au><au>Russu, Octav</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Failure in Medical Practice: Human Error, System Failure, or Case Severity?</atitle><jtitle>Healthcare (Basel)</jtitle><addtitle>Healthcare (Basel)</addtitle><date>2022-12-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2495</spage><pages>2495-</pages><issn>2227-9032</issn><eissn>2227-9032</eissn><abstract>The success rate in medical practice will probably never reach 100%. Success rates depend on many factors. Defining the success rate is both a technical and a philosophical issue. In opposition to the concept of success, medical failure should also be discussed. Its causality is multifactorial and extremely complex. Its actual rate and its real impact are unknown. In medical practice, failure depends not only on the human factor but also on the medical system and has at its center a very important variable-the patient. To combat errors, capturing, tracking, and analyzing them at an institutional level are important. Barriers such as the fear of consequences or a specific work climate or culture can affect this process. Although important data regarding medical errors and their consequences can be extracted by analyzing patient outcomes or using quality indicators, patient stories (clinical cases) seem to have the greatest impact on our subconscious as medical doctors and nurses and these may generate the corresponding and necessary reactions. Every clinical case has its own story. In this study, three different cases are presented to illustrate how human error, the limits of the system, and the particularities of the patient's condition (severity of the disease), alone or in combination, may lead to tragic outcomes There is a need to talk openly and in a balanced way about failure, regardless of its cause, to look at things as they are, without hiding the inconvenient truth. The common goal is not to find culprits but to find solutions and create a culture of safety.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>36554018</pmid><doi>10.3390/healthcare10122495</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2444-9828</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8625-2828</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9856-8515</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2227-9032
ispartof Healthcare (Basel), 2022-12, Vol.10 (12), p.2495
issn 2227-9032
2227-9032
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9778633
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central
subjects Care and treatment
Chronic diseases
Debridement
Decision making
Development and progression
Failure
Feedback
Hospitals
Human error
Intensive care
Medical errors
Medical practices
Medicine
Orthopedics
Patient outcomes
Practice
Prevention
Prostheses
Success
Trauma
Vascular surgery
Veins & arteries
title Failure in Medical Practice: Human Error, System Failure, or Case Severity?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T03%3A54%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Failure%20in%20Medical%20Practice:%20Human%20Error,%20System%20Failure,%20or%20Case%20Severity?&rft.jtitle=Healthcare%20(Basel)&rft.au=Roman,%20Mihai%20Dan&rft.date=2022-12-09&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2495&rft.pages=2495-&rft.issn=2227-9032&rft.eissn=2227-9032&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/healthcare10122495&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA744639560%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2756691746&rft_id=info:pmid/36554018&rft_galeid=A744639560&rfr_iscdi=true