Comparison between Olympic Weightlifting Lifts and Derivatives for External Load and Fatigue Monitoring

Load management is an extremely important subject in fatigue control and adaptation processes in almost all sports. In Olympic Weightlifting (OW), two of the load variables are intensity and volume. However, it is not known if all exercises produce fatigue of the same magnitude. Thus, this study aim...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Healthcare (Basel) 2022-12, Vol.10 (12), p.2499
Hauptverfasser: Antunes, Joaquim Paulo, Oliveira, Rafael, Reis, Victor Machado, Romero, Félix, Moutão, João, Brito, João Paulo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2499
container_title Healthcare (Basel)
container_volume 10
creator Antunes, Joaquim Paulo
Oliveira, Rafael
Reis, Victor Machado
Romero, Félix
Moutão, João
Brito, João Paulo
description Load management is an extremely important subject in fatigue control and adaptation processes in almost all sports. In Olympic Weightlifting (OW), two of the load variables are intensity and volume. However, it is not known if all exercises produce fatigue of the same magnitude. Thus, this study aimed to compare the fatigue prompted by the Clean and Jerk and the Snatch and their derivative exercises among male and female participants, respectively. We resorted to an experimental quantitative design in which fatigue was induced in adult individuals with weightlifting experience of at least two years through the execution of a set of 10 of the most used lifts and derivatives in OW (Snatch, Snatch Pull, Muscle Snatch, Power Snatch, and Back Squat; Clean and Jerk, Power Clean, Clean, High Hang Clean, and Hang Power Clean). Intensity and volume between exercises were equalized (four sets of three repetitions), after which one Snatch Pull test was performed where changes in velocity, range of motion, and mean power were assessed as fatigue measures. Nine women and twelve men participated in the study (age, 29.67 ± 5.74 years and 28.17 ± 5.06 years, respectively). The main results showed higher peak velocity values for the Snatch Pull test when compared with Power Snatch (p = 0.008; ES = 0.638), Snatch (p < 0.001; ES = 0.998), Snatch Pull (p < 0.001, ES = 0.906), and Back Squat (p < 0.001; ES = 0.906) while the differences between the Snatch Pull test and the derivatives of Clean and Jerk were almost nonexistent. It is concluded that there were differences in the induction of fatigue between most of the exercises analyzed and, therefore, coaches and athletes could improve the planning of training sessions by accounting for the fatigue induced by each lift.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/healthcare10122499
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9777922</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A744639564</galeid><sourcerecordid>A744639564</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-d0e7b32c322ac9b094b7677ea78f4ecd486f3921ecd09bfcee83d806fbc97efc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkUFvFCEUx4nR2Kb2C3gwJF68bGVgZoCLSbNt1WRNLxqPhGEeszQMrMCs9ttLu7WpCof3wvv9_w94CL1uyBljkrzfgvZla3SChjSUtlI-Q8eUUr6ShNHnT_IjdJrzDalLNkyw7iU6Yn3XtYSyYzSt47zTyeUY8ADlJ0DA1_523jmDv4ObtsU7W1yY8KbGjHUY8QUkt9fF7SFjGxO-_FUgBe3xJurxnriq1WkB_CUGV2Kq8lfohdU-w-lDPEHfri6_rj-tNtcfP6_PNyvT9rKsRgJ8YNQwSrWRA5HtwHvOQXNhWzBjK3rLJG1qSuRgDYBgoyC9HYzkYA07QR8OvrtlmGE0EErSXu2Sm3W6VVE79XcluK2a4l5JzrmktBq8ezBI8ccCuajZZQPe6wBxyYryTjRNR2hT0bf_oDdxufuIe6rvhZBUVOrsQE3ag3LBxtrX1D3C7EwMYF09P-dt2zPZ9W0V0IPApJhzAvt4-4aou9mr_2dfRW-evvtR8mfS7Ddtt69H</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2756688928</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between Olympic Weightlifting Lifts and Derivatives for External Load and Fatigue Monitoring</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Antunes, Joaquim Paulo ; Oliveira, Rafael ; Reis, Victor Machado ; Romero, Félix ; Moutão, João ; Brito, João Paulo</creator><creatorcontrib>Antunes, Joaquim Paulo ; Oliveira, Rafael ; Reis, Victor Machado ; Romero, Félix ; Moutão, João ; Brito, João Paulo</creatorcontrib><description>Load management is an extremely important subject in fatigue control and adaptation processes in almost all sports. In Olympic Weightlifting (OW), two of the load variables are intensity and volume. However, it is not known if all exercises produce fatigue of the same magnitude. Thus, this study aimed to compare the fatigue prompted by the Clean and Jerk and the Snatch and their derivative exercises among male and female participants, respectively. We resorted to an experimental quantitative design in which fatigue was induced in adult individuals with weightlifting experience of at least two years through the execution of a set of 10 of the most used lifts and derivatives in OW (Snatch, Snatch Pull, Muscle Snatch, Power Snatch, and Back Squat; Clean and Jerk, Power Clean, Clean, High Hang Clean, and Hang Power Clean). Intensity and volume between exercises were equalized (four sets of three repetitions), after which one Snatch Pull test was performed where changes in velocity, range of motion, and mean power were assessed as fatigue measures. Nine women and twelve men participated in the study (age, 29.67 ± 5.74 years and 28.17 ± 5.06 years, respectively). The main results showed higher peak velocity values for the Snatch Pull test when compared with Power Snatch (p = 0.008; ES = 0.638), Snatch (p &lt; 0.001; ES = 0.998), Snatch Pull (p &lt; 0.001, ES = 0.906), and Back Squat (p &lt; 0.001; ES = 0.906) while the differences between the Snatch Pull test and the derivatives of Clean and Jerk were almost nonexistent. It is concluded that there were differences in the induction of fatigue between most of the exercises analyzed and, therefore, coaches and athletes could improve the planning of training sessions by accounting for the fatigue induced by each lift.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2227-9032</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2227-9032</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10122499</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36554023</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Data collection ; Exercise ; Fatigue ; Females ; Load ; Physiological aspects ; Variables ; Velocity ; Weight lifting (Sports)</subject><ispartof>Healthcare (Basel), 2022-12, Vol.10 (12), p.2499</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-d0e7b32c322ac9b094b7677ea78f4ecd486f3921ecd09bfcee83d806fbc97efc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-d0e7b32c322ac9b094b7677ea78f4ecd486f3921ecd09bfcee83d806fbc97efc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4357-4269 ; 0000-0001-6671-6229 ; 0000-0002-4996-1414</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9777922/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9777922/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36554023$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Antunes, Joaquim Paulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Victor Machado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero, Félix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moutão, João</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brito, João Paulo</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between Olympic Weightlifting Lifts and Derivatives for External Load and Fatigue Monitoring</title><title>Healthcare (Basel)</title><addtitle>Healthcare (Basel)</addtitle><description>Load management is an extremely important subject in fatigue control and adaptation processes in almost all sports. In Olympic Weightlifting (OW), two of the load variables are intensity and volume. However, it is not known if all exercises produce fatigue of the same magnitude. Thus, this study aimed to compare the fatigue prompted by the Clean and Jerk and the Snatch and their derivative exercises among male and female participants, respectively. We resorted to an experimental quantitative design in which fatigue was induced in adult individuals with weightlifting experience of at least two years through the execution of a set of 10 of the most used lifts and derivatives in OW (Snatch, Snatch Pull, Muscle Snatch, Power Snatch, and Back Squat; Clean and Jerk, Power Clean, Clean, High Hang Clean, and Hang Power Clean). Intensity and volume between exercises were equalized (four sets of three repetitions), after which one Snatch Pull test was performed where changes in velocity, range of motion, and mean power were assessed as fatigue measures. Nine women and twelve men participated in the study (age, 29.67 ± 5.74 years and 28.17 ± 5.06 years, respectively). The main results showed higher peak velocity values for the Snatch Pull test when compared with Power Snatch (p = 0.008; ES = 0.638), Snatch (p &lt; 0.001; ES = 0.998), Snatch Pull (p &lt; 0.001, ES = 0.906), and Back Squat (p &lt; 0.001; ES = 0.906) while the differences between the Snatch Pull test and the derivatives of Clean and Jerk were almost nonexistent. It is concluded that there were differences in the induction of fatigue between most of the exercises analyzed and, therefore, coaches and athletes could improve the planning of training sessions by accounting for the fatigue induced by each lift.</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Fatigue</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Load</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Weight lifting (Sports)</subject><issn>2227-9032</issn><issn>2227-9032</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNplkUFvFCEUx4nR2Kb2C3gwJF68bGVgZoCLSbNt1WRNLxqPhGEeszQMrMCs9ttLu7WpCof3wvv9_w94CL1uyBljkrzfgvZla3SChjSUtlI-Q8eUUr6ShNHnT_IjdJrzDalLNkyw7iU6Yn3XtYSyYzSt47zTyeUY8ADlJ0DA1_523jmDv4ObtsU7W1yY8KbGjHUY8QUkt9fF7SFjGxO-_FUgBe3xJurxnriq1WkB_CUGV2Kq8lfohdU-w-lDPEHfri6_rj-tNtcfP6_PNyvT9rKsRgJ8YNQwSrWRA5HtwHvOQXNhWzBjK3rLJG1qSuRgDYBgoyC9HYzkYA07QR8OvrtlmGE0EErSXu2Sm3W6VVE79XcluK2a4l5JzrmktBq8ezBI8ccCuajZZQPe6wBxyYryTjRNR2hT0bf_oDdxufuIe6rvhZBUVOrsQE3ag3LBxtrX1D3C7EwMYF09P-dt2zPZ9W0V0IPApJhzAvt4-4aou9mr_2dfRW-evvtR8mfS7Ddtt69H</recordid><startdate>20221210</startdate><enddate>20221210</enddate><creator>Antunes, Joaquim Paulo</creator><creator>Oliveira, Rafael</creator><creator>Reis, Victor Machado</creator><creator>Romero, Félix</creator><creator>Moutão, João</creator><creator>Brito, João Paulo</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4357-4269</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6671-6229</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4996-1414</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221210</creationdate><title>Comparison between Olympic Weightlifting Lifts and Derivatives for External Load and Fatigue Monitoring</title><author>Antunes, Joaquim Paulo ; Oliveira, Rafael ; Reis, Victor Machado ; Romero, Félix ; Moutão, João ; Brito, João Paulo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-d0e7b32c322ac9b094b7677ea78f4ecd486f3921ecd09bfcee83d806fbc97efc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Fatigue</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Load</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Weight lifting (Sports)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Antunes, Joaquim Paulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Victor Machado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero, Félix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moutão, João</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brito, João Paulo</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Healthcare (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Antunes, Joaquim Paulo</au><au>Oliveira, Rafael</au><au>Reis, Victor Machado</au><au>Romero, Félix</au><au>Moutão, João</au><au>Brito, João Paulo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between Olympic Weightlifting Lifts and Derivatives for External Load and Fatigue Monitoring</atitle><jtitle>Healthcare (Basel)</jtitle><addtitle>Healthcare (Basel)</addtitle><date>2022-12-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2499</spage><pages>2499-</pages><issn>2227-9032</issn><eissn>2227-9032</eissn><abstract>Load management is an extremely important subject in fatigue control and adaptation processes in almost all sports. In Olympic Weightlifting (OW), two of the load variables are intensity and volume. However, it is not known if all exercises produce fatigue of the same magnitude. Thus, this study aimed to compare the fatigue prompted by the Clean and Jerk and the Snatch and their derivative exercises among male and female participants, respectively. We resorted to an experimental quantitative design in which fatigue was induced in adult individuals with weightlifting experience of at least two years through the execution of a set of 10 of the most used lifts and derivatives in OW (Snatch, Snatch Pull, Muscle Snatch, Power Snatch, and Back Squat; Clean and Jerk, Power Clean, Clean, High Hang Clean, and Hang Power Clean). Intensity and volume between exercises were equalized (four sets of three repetitions), after which one Snatch Pull test was performed where changes in velocity, range of motion, and mean power were assessed as fatigue measures. Nine women and twelve men participated in the study (age, 29.67 ± 5.74 years and 28.17 ± 5.06 years, respectively). The main results showed higher peak velocity values for the Snatch Pull test when compared with Power Snatch (p = 0.008; ES = 0.638), Snatch (p &lt; 0.001; ES = 0.998), Snatch Pull (p &lt; 0.001, ES = 0.906), and Back Squat (p &lt; 0.001; ES = 0.906) while the differences between the Snatch Pull test and the derivatives of Clean and Jerk were almost nonexistent. It is concluded that there were differences in the induction of fatigue between most of the exercises analyzed and, therefore, coaches and athletes could improve the planning of training sessions by accounting for the fatigue induced by each lift.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>36554023</pmid><doi>10.3390/healthcare10122499</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4357-4269</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6671-6229</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4996-1414</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2227-9032
ispartof Healthcare (Basel), 2022-12, Vol.10 (12), p.2499
issn 2227-9032
2227-9032
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9777922
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Comparative analysis
Data collection
Exercise
Fatigue
Females
Load
Physiological aspects
Variables
Velocity
Weight lifting (Sports)
title Comparison between Olympic Weightlifting Lifts and Derivatives for External Load and Fatigue Monitoring
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T13%3A38%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20Olympic%20Weightlifting%20Lifts%20and%20Derivatives%20for%20External%20Load%20and%20Fatigue%20Monitoring&rft.jtitle=Healthcare%20(Basel)&rft.au=Antunes,%20Joaquim%20Paulo&rft.date=2022-12-10&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2499&rft.pages=2499-&rft.issn=2227-9032&rft.eissn=2227-9032&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/healthcare10122499&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA744639564%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2756688928&rft_id=info:pmid/36554023&rft_galeid=A744639564&rfr_iscdi=true