Randomized Phase II Study of Physiologic MRI-Directed Adaptive Radiation Boost in Poor Prognosis Head and Neck Cancer

We conducted a randomized phase II multicenter clinical trial to test the hypothesis that physiologic MRI-based radiotherapy (RT) dose escalation would improve the outcome of patients with poor prognosis head and neck cancer. MRI was acquired at baseline and at RT fraction 10 to create low blood vol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical cancer research 2022-12, Vol.28 (23), p.5049-5057
Hauptverfasser: Mierzwa, Michelle L, Aryal, Madhava, Lee, Choonik, Schipper, Matthew, VanTil, Monica, Morales, Krystal, Swiecicki, Paul L, Casper, Keith A, Malloy, Kelly M, Spector, Matthew E, Shuman, Andrew G, Chinn, Steven B, Prince, Mark E P, Stucken, Chaz L, Rosko, Andrew J, Lawrence, Theodore S, Brenner, J Chad, Rosen, Benjamin, Schonewolf, Caitlin A, Shah, Jennifer, Eisbruch, Avraham, Worden, Francis P, Cao, Yue
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5057
container_issue 23
container_start_page 5049
container_title Clinical cancer research
container_volume 28
creator Mierzwa, Michelle L
Aryal, Madhava
Lee, Choonik
Schipper, Matthew
VanTil, Monica
Morales, Krystal
Swiecicki, Paul L
Casper, Keith A
Malloy, Kelly M
Spector, Matthew E
Shuman, Andrew G
Chinn, Steven B
Prince, Mark E P
Stucken, Chaz L
Rosko, Andrew J
Lawrence, Theodore S
Brenner, J Chad
Rosen, Benjamin
Schonewolf, Caitlin A
Shah, Jennifer
Eisbruch, Avraham
Worden, Francis P
Cao, Yue
description We conducted a randomized phase II multicenter clinical trial to test the hypothesis that physiologic MRI-based radiotherapy (RT) dose escalation would improve the outcome of patients with poor prognosis head and neck cancer. MRI was acquired at baseline and at RT fraction 10 to create low blood volume/apparent diffusion coefficient maps for RT boost subvolume definition in gross tumor volume. Patients were randomized to receive 70 Gy (standard RT) or 80 Gy to the boost subvolume (RT boost) with concurrent weekly platinum. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) with significance defined at a one-sided 0.1 level, and secondary endpoints included locoregional failure (LRF), overall survival (OS), comparison of adverse events and patient reported outcomes (PRO). Among 81 randomized patients, neither the primary endpoint of DFS (HR = 0.849, P = 0.31) nor OS (HR = 1.19, P = 0.66) was significantly improved in the RT boost arm. However, the incidence of LRF was significantly improved with the addition of the RT boost (HR = 0.43, P = 0.047). Two-year estimates [90% confidence interval (CI)] of the cumulative incidence of LRF were 40% (27%-53%) in the standard RT arm and 18% (10%-31%) in the RT boost arm. Two-year estimates (90% CI) for DFS were 48% (34%-60%) in the standard RT arm and 57% (43%-69%) in the RT boost arm. There were no significant differences in toxicity or longitudinal differences seen in EORTC QLQ30/HN35 subscales between treatment arms in linear mixed-effects models. Physiologic MRI-based RT boost decreased LRF without a significant increase in grade 3+ toxicity or longitudinal PRO differences, but did not significantly improve DFS or OS. Additional improvements in systemic therapy are likely necessary to realize improvements in DFS and OS.
doi_str_mv 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1522
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9773159</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>36107219</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-58766cb746326af3786bc5e5d0cb7d46e4e2f123fde8a315e8170d9885af3c333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUdlOwzAQtBCIluMTQP6BFB9xjhekEo5GKlAFeLZc22kNbVzZaaXy9TgqreBpV7szs9oZAK4wGmDMshuM0ixCMSWDoqgiQiLMCDkCfcxYGlGSsOPQ7zE9cOb9J0I4xig-BT2ahBXBeR-sK9EouzTfWsHJXHgNyxK-tWu1hbYOk603dmFnRsLnqozujdOyDdChEqvWbDSshDKiNbaBd9b6FpoGTqx1cOLsrLHeeDjSQsFwBL5o-QUL0UjtLsBJLRZeX_7Wc_Dx-PBejKLx61NZDMeRjDFuI5alSSKnaZyEh0RN0yyZSqaZQmGo4kTHmtSY0FrpTFDMdIZTpPIsYwEsKaXn4Hanu1pPl1pJ3bROLPjKmaVwW26F4f83jZnzmd3wPE2DXh4E2E5AOuu90_WBixHvcuCdx7zzmIccOCG8yyHwrv8ePrD2xtMfUTWFQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Randomized Phase II Study of Physiologic MRI-Directed Adaptive Radiation Boost in Poor Prognosis Head and Neck Cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>American Association for Cancer Research</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mierzwa, Michelle L ; Aryal, Madhava ; Lee, Choonik ; Schipper, Matthew ; VanTil, Monica ; Morales, Krystal ; Swiecicki, Paul L ; Casper, Keith A ; Malloy, Kelly M ; Spector, Matthew E ; Shuman, Andrew G ; Chinn, Steven B ; Prince, Mark E P ; Stucken, Chaz L ; Rosko, Andrew J ; Lawrence, Theodore S ; Brenner, J Chad ; Rosen, Benjamin ; Schonewolf, Caitlin A ; Shah, Jennifer ; Eisbruch, Avraham ; Worden, Francis P ; Cao, Yue</creator><creatorcontrib>Mierzwa, Michelle L ; Aryal, Madhava ; Lee, Choonik ; Schipper, Matthew ; VanTil, Monica ; Morales, Krystal ; Swiecicki, Paul L ; Casper, Keith A ; Malloy, Kelly M ; Spector, Matthew E ; Shuman, Andrew G ; Chinn, Steven B ; Prince, Mark E P ; Stucken, Chaz L ; Rosko, Andrew J ; Lawrence, Theodore S ; Brenner, J Chad ; Rosen, Benjamin ; Schonewolf, Caitlin A ; Shah, Jennifer ; Eisbruch, Avraham ; Worden, Francis P ; Cao, Yue</creatorcontrib><description>We conducted a randomized phase II multicenter clinical trial to test the hypothesis that physiologic MRI-based radiotherapy (RT) dose escalation would improve the outcome of patients with poor prognosis head and neck cancer. MRI was acquired at baseline and at RT fraction 10 to create low blood volume/apparent diffusion coefficient maps for RT boost subvolume definition in gross tumor volume. Patients were randomized to receive 70 Gy (standard RT) or 80 Gy to the boost subvolume (RT boost) with concurrent weekly platinum. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) with significance defined at a one-sided 0.1 level, and secondary endpoints included locoregional failure (LRF), overall survival (OS), comparison of adverse events and patient reported outcomes (PRO). Among 81 randomized patients, neither the primary endpoint of DFS (HR = 0.849, P = 0.31) nor OS (HR = 1.19, P = 0.66) was significantly improved in the RT boost arm. However, the incidence of LRF was significantly improved with the addition of the RT boost (HR = 0.43, P = 0.047). Two-year estimates [90% confidence interval (CI)] of the cumulative incidence of LRF were 40% (27%-53%) in the standard RT arm and 18% (10%-31%) in the RT boost arm. Two-year estimates (90% CI) for DFS were 48% (34%-60%) in the standard RT arm and 57% (43%-69%) in the RT boost arm. There were no significant differences in toxicity or longitudinal differences seen in EORTC QLQ30/HN35 subscales between treatment arms in linear mixed-effects models. Physiologic MRI-based RT boost decreased LRF without a significant increase in grade 3+ toxicity or longitudinal PRO differences, but did not significantly improve DFS or OS. Additional improvements in systemic therapy are likely necessary to realize improvements in DFS and OS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-0432</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-3265</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1522</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36107219</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Disease-Free Survival ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><ispartof>Clinical cancer research, 2022-12, Vol.28 (23), p.5049-5057</ispartof><rights>2022 American Association for Cancer Research.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-58766cb746326af3786bc5e5d0cb7d46e4e2f123fde8a315e8170d9885af3c333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-58766cb746326af3786bc5e5d0cb7d46e4e2f123fde8a315e8170d9885af3c333</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9305-7860 ; 0000-0002-3847-8865 ; 0000-0003-2286-3555 ; 0000-0003-3910-3261 ; 0000-0003-2578-027X ; 0000-0002-0337-9293 ; 0000-0002-7827-4197 ; 0000-0001-7646-6075 ; 0000-0003-3238-1111 ; 0000-0002-4102-5197 ; 0000-0003-1448-3376 ; 0000-0002-3923-9970 ; 0000-0003-0341-9977 ; 0000-0003-3938-1843 ; 0000-0001-6728-4720 ; 0000-0003-4282-0640 ; 0000-0002-6632-4951 ; 0000-0002-5769-5945 ; 0000-0002-4186-8821 ; 0000-0003-2878-3863 ; 0000-0002-1120-9008 ; 0000-0001-6432-5451 ; 0000-0002-5063-2562</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,3357,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36107219$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mierzwa, Michelle L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aryal, Madhava</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Choonik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schipper, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VanTil, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morales, Krystal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swiecicki, Paul L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casper, Keith A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malloy, Kelly M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spector, Matthew E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shuman, Andrew G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chinn, Steven B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prince, Mark E P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stucken, Chaz L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosko, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, Theodore S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brenner, J Chad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schonewolf, Caitlin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisbruch, Avraham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worden, Francis P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Yue</creatorcontrib><title>Randomized Phase II Study of Physiologic MRI-Directed Adaptive Radiation Boost in Poor Prognosis Head and Neck Cancer</title><title>Clinical cancer research</title><addtitle>Clin Cancer Res</addtitle><description>We conducted a randomized phase II multicenter clinical trial to test the hypothesis that physiologic MRI-based radiotherapy (RT) dose escalation would improve the outcome of patients with poor prognosis head and neck cancer. MRI was acquired at baseline and at RT fraction 10 to create low blood volume/apparent diffusion coefficient maps for RT boost subvolume definition in gross tumor volume. Patients were randomized to receive 70 Gy (standard RT) or 80 Gy to the boost subvolume (RT boost) with concurrent weekly platinum. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) with significance defined at a one-sided 0.1 level, and secondary endpoints included locoregional failure (LRF), overall survival (OS), comparison of adverse events and patient reported outcomes (PRO). Among 81 randomized patients, neither the primary endpoint of DFS (HR = 0.849, P = 0.31) nor OS (HR = 1.19, P = 0.66) was significantly improved in the RT boost arm. However, the incidence of LRF was significantly improved with the addition of the RT boost (HR = 0.43, P = 0.047). Two-year estimates [90% confidence interval (CI)] of the cumulative incidence of LRF were 40% (27%-53%) in the standard RT arm and 18% (10%-31%) in the RT boost arm. Two-year estimates (90% CI) for DFS were 48% (34%-60%) in the standard RT arm and 57% (43%-69%) in the RT boost arm. There were no significant differences in toxicity or longitudinal differences seen in EORTC QLQ30/HN35 subscales between treatment arms in linear mixed-effects models. Physiologic MRI-based RT boost decreased LRF without a significant increase in grade 3+ toxicity or longitudinal PRO differences, but did not significantly improve DFS or OS. Additional improvements in systemic therapy are likely necessary to realize improvements in DFS and OS.</description><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><issn>1078-0432</issn><issn>1557-3265</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUdlOwzAQtBCIluMTQP6BFB9xjhekEo5GKlAFeLZc22kNbVzZaaXy9TgqreBpV7szs9oZAK4wGmDMshuM0ixCMSWDoqgiQiLMCDkCfcxYGlGSsOPQ7zE9cOb9J0I4xig-BT2ahBXBeR-sK9EouzTfWsHJXHgNyxK-tWu1hbYOk603dmFnRsLnqozujdOyDdChEqvWbDSshDKiNbaBd9b6FpoGTqx1cOLsrLHeeDjSQsFwBL5o-QUL0UjtLsBJLRZeX_7Wc_Dx-PBejKLx61NZDMeRjDFuI5alSSKnaZyEh0RN0yyZSqaZQmGo4kTHmtSY0FrpTFDMdIZTpPIsYwEsKaXn4Hanu1pPl1pJ3bROLPjKmaVwW26F4f83jZnzmd3wPE2DXh4E2E5AOuu90_WBixHvcuCdx7zzmIccOCG8yyHwrv8ePrD2xtMfUTWFQw</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Mierzwa, Michelle L</creator><creator>Aryal, Madhava</creator><creator>Lee, Choonik</creator><creator>Schipper, Matthew</creator><creator>VanTil, Monica</creator><creator>Morales, Krystal</creator><creator>Swiecicki, Paul L</creator><creator>Casper, Keith A</creator><creator>Malloy, Kelly M</creator><creator>Spector, Matthew E</creator><creator>Shuman, Andrew G</creator><creator>Chinn, Steven B</creator><creator>Prince, Mark E P</creator><creator>Stucken, Chaz L</creator><creator>Rosko, Andrew J</creator><creator>Lawrence, Theodore S</creator><creator>Brenner, J Chad</creator><creator>Rosen, Benjamin</creator><creator>Schonewolf, Caitlin A</creator><creator>Shah, Jennifer</creator><creator>Eisbruch, Avraham</creator><creator>Worden, Francis P</creator><creator>Cao, Yue</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9305-7860</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3847-8865</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2286-3555</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3910-3261</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2578-027X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0337-9293</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7827-4197</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7646-6075</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3238-1111</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4102-5197</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1448-3376</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3923-9970</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0341-9977</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3938-1843</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6728-4720</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4282-0640</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6632-4951</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5769-5945</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4186-8821</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2878-3863</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1120-9008</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6432-5451</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5063-2562</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Randomized Phase II Study of Physiologic MRI-Directed Adaptive Radiation Boost in Poor Prognosis Head and Neck Cancer</title><author>Mierzwa, Michelle L ; Aryal, Madhava ; Lee, Choonik ; Schipper, Matthew ; VanTil, Monica ; Morales, Krystal ; Swiecicki, Paul L ; Casper, Keith A ; Malloy, Kelly M ; Spector, Matthew E ; Shuman, Andrew G ; Chinn, Steven B ; Prince, Mark E P ; Stucken, Chaz L ; Rosko, Andrew J ; Lawrence, Theodore S ; Brenner, J Chad ; Rosen, Benjamin ; Schonewolf, Caitlin A ; Shah, Jennifer ; Eisbruch, Avraham ; Worden, Francis P ; Cao, Yue</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-58766cb746326af3786bc5e5d0cb7d46e4e2f123fde8a315e8170d9885af3c333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mierzwa, Michelle L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aryal, Madhava</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Choonik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schipper, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VanTil, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morales, Krystal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swiecicki, Paul L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casper, Keith A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malloy, Kelly M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spector, Matthew E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shuman, Andrew G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chinn, Steven B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prince, Mark E P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stucken, Chaz L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosko, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, Theodore S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brenner, J Chad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schonewolf, Caitlin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisbruch, Avraham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worden, Francis P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Yue</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical cancer research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mierzwa, Michelle L</au><au>Aryal, Madhava</au><au>Lee, Choonik</au><au>Schipper, Matthew</au><au>VanTil, Monica</au><au>Morales, Krystal</au><au>Swiecicki, Paul L</au><au>Casper, Keith A</au><au>Malloy, Kelly M</au><au>Spector, Matthew E</au><au>Shuman, Andrew G</au><au>Chinn, Steven B</au><au>Prince, Mark E P</au><au>Stucken, Chaz L</au><au>Rosko, Andrew J</au><au>Lawrence, Theodore S</au><au>Brenner, J Chad</au><au>Rosen, Benjamin</au><au>Schonewolf, Caitlin A</au><au>Shah, Jennifer</au><au>Eisbruch, Avraham</au><au>Worden, Francis P</au><au>Cao, Yue</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Randomized Phase II Study of Physiologic MRI-Directed Adaptive Radiation Boost in Poor Prognosis Head and Neck Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Clinical cancer research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Cancer Res</addtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>23</issue><spage>5049</spage><epage>5057</epage><pages>5049-5057</pages><issn>1078-0432</issn><eissn>1557-3265</eissn><abstract>We conducted a randomized phase II multicenter clinical trial to test the hypothesis that physiologic MRI-based radiotherapy (RT) dose escalation would improve the outcome of patients with poor prognosis head and neck cancer. MRI was acquired at baseline and at RT fraction 10 to create low blood volume/apparent diffusion coefficient maps for RT boost subvolume definition in gross tumor volume. Patients were randomized to receive 70 Gy (standard RT) or 80 Gy to the boost subvolume (RT boost) with concurrent weekly platinum. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) with significance defined at a one-sided 0.1 level, and secondary endpoints included locoregional failure (LRF), overall survival (OS), comparison of adverse events and patient reported outcomes (PRO). Among 81 randomized patients, neither the primary endpoint of DFS (HR = 0.849, P = 0.31) nor OS (HR = 1.19, P = 0.66) was significantly improved in the RT boost arm. However, the incidence of LRF was significantly improved with the addition of the RT boost (HR = 0.43, P = 0.047). Two-year estimates [90% confidence interval (CI)] of the cumulative incidence of LRF were 40% (27%-53%) in the standard RT arm and 18% (10%-31%) in the RT boost arm. Two-year estimates (90% CI) for DFS were 48% (34%-60%) in the standard RT arm and 57% (43%-69%) in the RT boost arm. There were no significant differences in toxicity or longitudinal differences seen in EORTC QLQ30/HN35 subscales between treatment arms in linear mixed-effects models. Physiologic MRI-based RT boost decreased LRF without a significant increase in grade 3+ toxicity or longitudinal PRO differences, but did not significantly improve DFS or OS. Additional improvements in systemic therapy are likely necessary to realize improvements in DFS and OS.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>36107219</pmid><doi>10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1522</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9305-7860</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3847-8865</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2286-3555</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3910-3261</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2578-027X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0337-9293</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7827-4197</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7646-6075</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3238-1111</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4102-5197</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1448-3376</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3923-9970</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0341-9977</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3938-1843</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6728-4720</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4282-0640</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6632-4951</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5769-5945</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4186-8821</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2878-3863</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1120-9008</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6432-5451</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5063-2562</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-0432
ispartof Clinical cancer research, 2022-12, Vol.28 (23), p.5049-5057
issn 1078-0432
1557-3265
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9773159
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; American Association for Cancer Research; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Disease-Free Survival
Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Radiotherapy Dosage
title Randomized Phase II Study of Physiologic MRI-Directed Adaptive Radiation Boost in Poor Prognosis Head and Neck Cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T21%3A03%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Randomized%20Phase%20II%20Study%20of%20Physiologic%20MRI-Directed%20Adaptive%20Radiation%20Boost%20in%20Poor%20Prognosis%20Head%20and%20Neck%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20cancer%20research&rft.au=Mierzwa,%20Michelle%20L&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=5049&rft.epage=5057&rft.pages=5049-5057&rft.issn=1078-0432&rft.eissn=1557-3265&rft_id=info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1522&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E36107219%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/36107219&rfr_iscdi=true