Does Chemical Property Marking Deter Burglary? Results from a New Danish Experiment
Research Question Does enrollment of a burglarized household in a chemical property marking program reduce the risk of repeat burglary of the household? Data This randomized controlled trial utilizes a sample of 12,000 previously burgled households in North Zealand, Denmark, randomly divided into tr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cambridge journal of evidence-based policing 2022-12, Vol.6 (3-4), p.226-239 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Research Question
Does enrollment of a burglarized household in a chemical property marking program reduce the risk of repeat burglary of the household?
Data
This randomized controlled trial utilizes a sample of 12,000 previously burgled households in North Zealand, Denmark, randomly divided into treatment, placebo, and control groups.
Methods
Treatment households received a letter describing local burglary problems and were offered a free chemical property marking kit including warning stickers to deter would-be burglars. Placebo households received a letter outlining generic methods of burglary prevention but were not offered a property marking kit. Control households were not contacted.
Results
A process evaluation shows that only 29% of the 4000-household treatment group both registered for the experiment and posted warning stickers as instructed. An intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis conducted after 15½ months indicated no statistically significant (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 2520-1344 2520-1336 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s41887-022-00085-8 |