Does Chemical Property Marking Deter Burglary? Results from a New Danish Experiment

Research Question Does enrollment of a burglarized household in a chemical property marking program reduce the risk of repeat burglary of the household? Data This randomized controlled trial utilizes a sample of 12,000 previously burgled households in North Zealand, Denmark, randomly divided into tr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cambridge journal of evidence-based policing 2022-12, Vol.6 (3-4), p.226-239
Hauptverfasser: Kyvsgaard, Britta, Ribe, Malthe Øland, Sorensen, David W. M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Research Question Does enrollment of a burglarized household in a chemical property marking program reduce the risk of repeat burglary of the household? Data This randomized controlled trial utilizes a sample of 12,000 previously burgled households in North Zealand, Denmark, randomly divided into treatment, placebo, and control groups. Methods Treatment households received a letter describing local burglary problems and were offered a free chemical property marking kit including warning stickers to deter would-be burglars. Placebo households received a letter outlining generic methods of burglary prevention but were not offered a property marking kit. Control households were not contacted. Results A process evaluation shows that only 29% of the 4000-household treatment group both registered for the experiment and posted warning stickers as instructed. An intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis conducted after 15½ months indicated no statistically significant ( p  
ISSN:2520-1344
2520-1336
DOI:10.1007/s41887-022-00085-8