Contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy: technical feasibility and first outcomes

Objectives To evaluate the feasibility of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM)-guided biopsy at Hospital del Mar, a Spanish university hospital. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive women with a suspicious enhancing finding eligible for CEM-guided biopsy, who were prospectively enrolle...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2023-01, Vol.33 (1), p.417-428
Hauptverfasser: Alcantara, R., Posso, M., Pitarch, M., Arenas, N., Ejarque, B., Iotti, V., Besutti, G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 428
container_issue 1
container_start_page 417
container_title European radiology
container_volume 33
creator Alcantara, R.
Posso, M.
Pitarch, M.
Arenas, N.
Ejarque, B.
Iotti, V.
Besutti, G.
description Objectives To evaluate the feasibility of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM)-guided biopsy at Hospital del Mar, a Spanish university hospital. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive women with a suspicious enhancing finding eligible for CEM-guided biopsy, who were prospectively enrolled in a pre-marketing clinical validation and feasibility study (October 2019 to September 2021). CEM-guided biopsy is a stereotactic-based procedure that, by using intravenous iodinated contrast media administration and dual-energy acquisition, provides localisation of enhancing lesions. All the biopsies were performed using a vacuum-assisted device. We collected procedural characteristics (patient position and type of approach), and histopathological results. Feasibility endpoints included success (visualisation of the enhancing lesion, post-procedural biopsy changes and clip placement), procedural time, number of scout acquisitions and complications. Results A total of 66 suspicious enhancing lesions (18.0% foci, 44.0% mass, 38.0% non-mass enhancement; median size 8.5 mm) in 64 patients (median age 59 years, mostly minimal [48.4%] or mild [32.8%] background parenchymal enhancement) were referred for CEM-guided biopsy in the study period. The success rate was 63/66 (95.4%). Amongst successful procedures, patients were most frequently seated (52/63, 82.5%) and the preferred approach was horizontal (48/63, 76.2%). Median total time per procedure was 15 min. Median number of acquisitions needed before targeting was 2 (range 1–4). Complications consisted of hematoma (17/63, 27%) and vasovagal reaction (2/63, 3.2%). At histology, the malignancy rate was 25/63 (39.7%). Conclusion In this first patient series, CEM-guided breast biopsy was feasible, with success and complication rates similar to those previously reported for magnetic resonance guidance. Key points • CEM may be used to guide biopsy of enhancing lesions through a stereotactic-based procedure combined with intravenous iodinated contrast media administration and dual-energy acquisition. • In this first patient series (n = 64), the success rate of CEM-guided biopsy was above 95%, the only complications were hematoma (22.2%) and vasovagal reaction (3.2%), and median total time per procedure was 15 min. • CEM-guided biopsy is feasible and could potentially be a widely available biopsy technique for enhancing-only lesions.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00330-022-09021-w
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9755098</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2754651125</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-eaf59ad52f1186bd30309c5b80a273d203dc31af9c58577e32dfa34f2d8947a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctOHDEQRS2UKDySH8giaikbNk3Kr3E7i0jRCBIkJDawttx-zBh12xO7O2j-HsMQICxY2ao6dauuLkKfMZxgAPGtAFAKLRDSggSC29s9dIAZJS2Gjr178d9Hh6XcAIDETHxA-5R3kmOCD9D1MsUp6zK1Lq51NM42ox7HtMp6s962qznYWupD2pTt92ZyZh2D0UPjnS6hD0OYto2OtvEhl6lJ82TS6MpH9N7robhPj-8Ruj47vVr-bi8uf50vf160hglWV2rPpbaceIy7RW8pUJCG9x1oIqglQK2hWPta67gQjhLrNWWe2E4yoQU9Qj92upu5H5017t7LoDY5jDpvVdJB_d-JYa1W6a-SgnOQXRU4fhTI6c_syqTGUIwbBh1dmosiC8mJxHLBKvr1FXqT5hyrPUUEZwuOMeGVIjvK5FRKdv7pGAzqPjW1S03V1NRDauq2Dn15aeNp5F9MFaA7oNRWXLn8vPsN2Tvhx6TF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2754651125</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy: technical feasibility and first outcomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Alcantara, R. ; Posso, M. ; Pitarch, M. ; Arenas, N. ; Ejarque, B. ; Iotti, V. ; Besutti, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Alcantara, R. ; Posso, M. ; Pitarch, M. ; Arenas, N. ; Ejarque, B. ; Iotti, V. ; Besutti, G.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To evaluate the feasibility of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM)-guided biopsy at Hospital del Mar, a Spanish university hospital. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive women with a suspicious enhancing finding eligible for CEM-guided biopsy, who were prospectively enrolled in a pre-marketing clinical validation and feasibility study (October 2019 to September 2021). CEM-guided biopsy is a stereotactic-based procedure that, by using intravenous iodinated contrast media administration and dual-energy acquisition, provides localisation of enhancing lesions. All the biopsies were performed using a vacuum-assisted device. We collected procedural characteristics (patient position and type of approach), and histopathological results. Feasibility endpoints included success (visualisation of the enhancing lesion, post-procedural biopsy changes and clip placement), procedural time, number of scout acquisitions and complications. Results A total of 66 suspicious enhancing lesions (18.0% foci, 44.0% mass, 38.0% non-mass enhancement; median size 8.5 mm) in 64 patients (median age 59 years, mostly minimal [48.4%] or mild [32.8%] background parenchymal enhancement) were referred for CEM-guided biopsy in the study period. The success rate was 63/66 (95.4%). Amongst successful procedures, patients were most frequently seated (52/63, 82.5%) and the preferred approach was horizontal (48/63, 76.2%). Median total time per procedure was 15 min. Median number of acquisitions needed before targeting was 2 (range 1–4). Complications consisted of hematoma (17/63, 27%) and vasovagal reaction (2/63, 3.2%). At histology, the malignancy rate was 25/63 (39.7%). Conclusion In this first patient series, CEM-guided breast biopsy was feasible, with success and complication rates similar to those previously reported for magnetic resonance guidance. Key points • CEM may be used to guide biopsy of enhancing lesions through a stereotactic-based procedure combined with intravenous iodinated contrast media administration and dual-energy acquisition. • In this first patient series (n = 64), the success rate of CEM-guided biopsy was above 95%, the only complications were hematoma (22.2%) and vasovagal reaction (3.2%), and median total time per procedure was 15 min. • CEM-guided biopsy is feasible and could potentially be a widely available biopsy technique for enhancing-only lesions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09021-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35895121</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Breast ; Breast - diagnostic imaging ; Breast - pathology ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Complications ; Contrast agents ; Contrast media ; Contrast Media - pharmacology ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Foci ; Hematoma ; Hematoma - pathology ; Histology ; Humans ; Image-Guided Biopsy - methods ; Imaging ; Internal Medicine ; Interventional Radiology ; Intravenous administration ; Iodine Compounds ; Lesions ; Magnetic resonance ; Malignancy ; Mammography ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neuroradiology ; Patients ; Radiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Success ; Target acquisition ; Technology assessment ; Ultrasound ; Vasovagal syncope</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 2023-01, Vol.33 (1), p.417-428</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-eaf59ad52f1186bd30309c5b80a273d203dc31af9c58577e32dfa34f2d8947a73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-eaf59ad52f1186bd30309c5b80a273d203dc31af9c58577e32dfa34f2d8947a73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4365-5640</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00330-022-09021-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00330-022-09021-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35895121$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alcantara, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Posso, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitarch, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arenas, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ejarque, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iotti, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besutti, G.</creatorcontrib><title>Contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy: technical feasibility and first outcomes</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>Objectives To evaluate the feasibility of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM)-guided biopsy at Hospital del Mar, a Spanish university hospital. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive women with a suspicious enhancing finding eligible for CEM-guided biopsy, who were prospectively enrolled in a pre-marketing clinical validation and feasibility study (October 2019 to September 2021). CEM-guided biopsy is a stereotactic-based procedure that, by using intravenous iodinated contrast media administration and dual-energy acquisition, provides localisation of enhancing lesions. All the biopsies were performed using a vacuum-assisted device. We collected procedural characteristics (patient position and type of approach), and histopathological results. Feasibility endpoints included success (visualisation of the enhancing lesion, post-procedural biopsy changes and clip placement), procedural time, number of scout acquisitions and complications. Results A total of 66 suspicious enhancing lesions (18.0% foci, 44.0% mass, 38.0% non-mass enhancement; median size 8.5 mm) in 64 patients (median age 59 years, mostly minimal [48.4%] or mild [32.8%] background parenchymal enhancement) were referred for CEM-guided biopsy in the study period. The success rate was 63/66 (95.4%). Amongst successful procedures, patients were most frequently seated (52/63, 82.5%) and the preferred approach was horizontal (48/63, 76.2%). Median total time per procedure was 15 min. Median number of acquisitions needed before targeting was 2 (range 1–4). Complications consisted of hematoma (17/63, 27%) and vasovagal reaction (2/63, 3.2%). At histology, the malignancy rate was 25/63 (39.7%). Conclusion In this first patient series, CEM-guided breast biopsy was feasible, with success and complication rates similar to those previously reported for magnetic resonance guidance. Key points • CEM may be used to guide biopsy of enhancing lesions through a stereotactic-based procedure combined with intravenous iodinated contrast media administration and dual-energy acquisition. • In this first patient series (n = 64), the success rate of CEM-guided biopsy was above 95%, the only complications were hematoma (22.2%) and vasovagal reaction (3.2%), and median total time per procedure was 15 min. • CEM-guided biopsy is feasible and could potentially be a widely available biopsy technique for enhancing-only lesions.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast</subject><subject>Breast - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast - pathology</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Contrast agents</subject><subject>Contrast media</subject><subject>Contrast Media - pharmacology</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foci</subject><subject>Hematoma</subject><subject>Hematoma - pathology</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image-Guided Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Intravenous administration</subject><subject>Iodine Compounds</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Malignancy</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Target acquisition</subject><subject>Technology assessment</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Vasovagal syncope</subject><issn>1432-1084</issn><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctOHDEQRS2UKDySH8giaikbNk3Kr3E7i0jRCBIkJDawttx-zBh12xO7O2j-HsMQICxY2ao6dauuLkKfMZxgAPGtAFAKLRDSggSC29s9dIAZJS2Gjr178d9Hh6XcAIDETHxA-5R3kmOCD9D1MsUp6zK1Lq51NM42ox7HtMp6s962qznYWupD2pTt92ZyZh2D0UPjnS6hD0OYto2OtvEhl6lJ82TS6MpH9N7robhPj-8Ruj47vVr-bi8uf50vf160hglWV2rPpbaceIy7RW8pUJCG9x1oIqglQK2hWPta67gQjhLrNWWe2E4yoQU9Qj92upu5H5017t7LoDY5jDpvVdJB_d-JYa1W6a-SgnOQXRU4fhTI6c_syqTGUIwbBh1dmosiC8mJxHLBKvr1FXqT5hyrPUUEZwuOMeGVIjvK5FRKdv7pGAzqPjW1S03V1NRDauq2Dn15aeNp5F9MFaA7oNRWXLn8vPsN2Tvhx6TF</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Alcantara, R.</creator><creator>Posso, M.</creator><creator>Pitarch, M.</creator><creator>Arenas, N.</creator><creator>Ejarque, B.</creator><creator>Iotti, V.</creator><creator>Besutti, G.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4365-5640</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy: technical feasibility and first outcomes</title><author>Alcantara, R. ; Posso, M. ; Pitarch, M. ; Arenas, N. ; Ejarque, B. ; Iotti, V. ; Besutti, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-eaf59ad52f1186bd30309c5b80a273d203dc31af9c58577e32dfa34f2d8947a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast</topic><topic>Breast - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast - pathology</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Contrast agents</topic><topic>Contrast media</topic><topic>Contrast Media - pharmacology</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foci</topic><topic>Hematoma</topic><topic>Hematoma - pathology</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image-Guided Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Intravenous administration</topic><topic>Iodine Compounds</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Malignancy</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Target acquisition</topic><topic>Technology assessment</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Vasovagal syncope</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alcantara, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Posso, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitarch, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arenas, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ejarque, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iotti, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besutti, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alcantara, R.</au><au>Posso, M.</au><au>Pitarch, M.</au><au>Arenas, N.</au><au>Ejarque, B.</au><au>Iotti, V.</au><au>Besutti, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy: technical feasibility and first outcomes</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>417</spage><epage>428</epage><pages>417-428</pages><issn>1432-1084</issn><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>Objectives To evaluate the feasibility of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM)-guided biopsy at Hospital del Mar, a Spanish university hospital. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive women with a suspicious enhancing finding eligible for CEM-guided biopsy, who were prospectively enrolled in a pre-marketing clinical validation and feasibility study (October 2019 to September 2021). CEM-guided biopsy is a stereotactic-based procedure that, by using intravenous iodinated contrast media administration and dual-energy acquisition, provides localisation of enhancing lesions. All the biopsies were performed using a vacuum-assisted device. We collected procedural characteristics (patient position and type of approach), and histopathological results. Feasibility endpoints included success (visualisation of the enhancing lesion, post-procedural biopsy changes and clip placement), procedural time, number of scout acquisitions and complications. Results A total of 66 suspicious enhancing lesions (18.0% foci, 44.0% mass, 38.0% non-mass enhancement; median size 8.5 mm) in 64 patients (median age 59 years, mostly minimal [48.4%] or mild [32.8%] background parenchymal enhancement) were referred for CEM-guided biopsy in the study period. The success rate was 63/66 (95.4%). Amongst successful procedures, patients were most frequently seated (52/63, 82.5%) and the preferred approach was horizontal (48/63, 76.2%). Median total time per procedure was 15 min. Median number of acquisitions needed before targeting was 2 (range 1–4). Complications consisted of hematoma (17/63, 27%) and vasovagal reaction (2/63, 3.2%). At histology, the malignancy rate was 25/63 (39.7%). Conclusion In this first patient series, CEM-guided breast biopsy was feasible, with success and complication rates similar to those previously reported for magnetic resonance guidance. Key points • CEM may be used to guide biopsy of enhancing lesions through a stereotactic-based procedure combined with intravenous iodinated contrast media administration and dual-energy acquisition. • In this first patient series (n = 64), the success rate of CEM-guided biopsy was above 95%, the only complications were hematoma (22.2%) and vasovagal reaction (3.2%), and median total time per procedure was 15 min. • CEM-guided biopsy is feasible and could potentially be a widely available biopsy technique for enhancing-only lesions.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>35895121</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00330-022-09021-w</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4365-5640</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1432-1084
ispartof European radiology, 2023-01, Vol.33 (1), p.417-428
issn 1432-1084
0938-7994
1432-1084
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9755098
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Biopsy
Breast
Breast - diagnostic imaging
Breast - pathology
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Complications
Contrast agents
Contrast media
Contrast Media - pharmacology
Diagnostic Radiology
Feasibility Studies
Female
Foci
Hematoma
Hematoma - pathology
Histology
Humans
Image-Guided Biopsy - methods
Imaging
Internal Medicine
Interventional Radiology
Intravenous administration
Iodine Compounds
Lesions
Magnetic resonance
Malignancy
Mammography
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Neuroradiology
Patients
Radiology
Retrospective Studies
Success
Target acquisition
Technology assessment
Ultrasound
Vasovagal syncope
title Contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy: technical feasibility and first outcomes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T19%3A49%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contrast-enhanced%20mammography-guided%20biopsy:%20technical%20feasibility%20and%20first%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Alcantara,%20R.&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=417&rft.epage=428&rft.pages=417-428&rft.issn=1432-1084&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00330-022-09021-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2754651125%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2754651125&rft_id=info:pmid/35895121&rfr_iscdi=true