No widespread signature of the COVID-19 quarantine period on water quality across a spectrum of coastal systems in the United States of America

During the recent COVID-19 related quarantine period, anecdotal evidence emerged pointing to a rapid, sharp improvement in water quality in some localities. Here we present results from an analysis of the impacts of the COVID-19 quarantine period using two long-term coastal water quality datasets. T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2022-02, Vol.807 (Pt 2), p.150825-150825, Article 150825
Hauptverfasser: Wetz, Michael S., Powers, Nicole C., Turner, Jeffrey W., Huang, Yuxia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 150825
container_issue Pt 2
container_start_page 150825
container_title The Science of the total environment
container_volume 807
creator Wetz, Michael S.
Powers, Nicole C.
Turner, Jeffrey W.
Huang, Yuxia
description During the recent COVID-19 related quarantine period, anecdotal evidence emerged pointing to a rapid, sharp improvement in water quality in some localities. Here we present results from an analysis of the impacts of the COVID-19 quarantine period using two long-term coastal water quality datasets. These datasets rely on sampling that operates at appropriate timescales to quantify the influence of reduced human activity on coastal water quality and span coastal ecosystems ranging from low human influence to highly urbanized systems. We tested two hypotheses: 1) reduced tourism during the COVID-19 quarantine period would lead to improved coastal water quality, and 2) water quality improvements would scale to the level of human influence, meaning that highly urbanized or tourist-centric watersheds would see greater improvement than more rural watersheds. A localized reduction in fecal indicator bacteria was observed in four highly impacted regions of the Texas (USA) coast, but this pattern was not widespread. In less impacted regions, the signature of natural, decadal environmental variability (e.g., dissolved oxygen and turbidity) overwhelmed any potential signature of reduced human activity. Results from this study add to the growing body of literature on the environmental impacts of the COVID-19 quarantine period, and when considered with existing literature, emphasize that coastal water quality improvements appear to be ephemeral and reserved for the most severely affected (by human activity) systems. Furthermore, results show the importance of assessing COVID-19 signatures against long-term, decadal datasets that adequately reveal a system's natural variation. [Display omitted] •This study addressed the question: did the COVID-19 quarantine period lead to improved coastal water quality?•Long-term, high temporal resolution water quality data was assessed from a range of coastal waterbodies.•Natural variability dominated the water quality data.•No large-scale improvements in water quality occurred during the COVID-19 quarantine period.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150825
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9751947</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048969721059039</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0048969721059039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-ab5d1643a44a3274b104004e37568376f7b99fc138400e597b4894842dbf77f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd1uGyEQhVHVqHHTvkLLC6wLu-wCN5Us9y9S1Fy06S1iYTbB8sIWsCM_RV45bNxa7VW4GYk55xvNHITeU7KkhHYfNstkXA4Z_H5Zk5ouaUtE3b5ACyq4rCipu5doQQgTlewkP0evU9qQ8rigr9B5w7qaC1Ev0MP3gO-dhTRF0BYnd-t13kXAYcD5DvD6-tflp4pK_Huno_bZecATRBcsDh7f6wxxbm1dPmBtYkgJa5wmMDnuxhligk5Zb3E6pAxjws4_cW-8y2Dxj1wIadatxkI1-g06G_Q2wds_9QLdfPn8c_2turr-erleXVWG8TZXum8t7VijGdNNzVlPCSvbQsPbTjS8G3gv5WBoI8o3tJL3TEgmWG37gfOBNRfo45E77foRrAGfo96qKbpRx4MK2qn_O97dqduwV5K3VDJeAPwIeFo6wnDyUqLmjNRGnTJSc0bqmFFxvvt39Mn3N5QiWB0FUA6wdxBnEHgD1sVyWGWDe3bII_sJqds</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>No widespread signature of the COVID-19 quarantine period on water quality across a spectrum of coastal systems in the United States of America</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Wetz, Michael S. ; Powers, Nicole C. ; Turner, Jeffrey W. ; Huang, Yuxia</creator><creatorcontrib>Wetz, Michael S. ; Powers, Nicole C. ; Turner, Jeffrey W. ; Huang, Yuxia</creatorcontrib><description>During the recent COVID-19 related quarantine period, anecdotal evidence emerged pointing to a rapid, sharp improvement in water quality in some localities. Here we present results from an analysis of the impacts of the COVID-19 quarantine period using two long-term coastal water quality datasets. These datasets rely on sampling that operates at appropriate timescales to quantify the influence of reduced human activity on coastal water quality and span coastal ecosystems ranging from low human influence to highly urbanized systems. We tested two hypotheses: 1) reduced tourism during the COVID-19 quarantine period would lead to improved coastal water quality, and 2) water quality improvements would scale to the level of human influence, meaning that highly urbanized or tourist-centric watersheds would see greater improvement than more rural watersheds. A localized reduction in fecal indicator bacteria was observed in four highly impacted regions of the Texas (USA) coast, but this pattern was not widespread. In less impacted regions, the signature of natural, decadal environmental variability (e.g., dissolved oxygen and turbidity) overwhelmed any potential signature of reduced human activity. Results from this study add to the growing body of literature on the environmental impacts of the COVID-19 quarantine period, and when considered with existing literature, emphasize that coastal water quality improvements appear to be ephemeral and reserved for the most severely affected (by human activity) systems. Furthermore, results show the importance of assessing COVID-19 signatures against long-term, decadal datasets that adequately reveal a system's natural variation. [Display omitted] •This study addressed the question: did the COVID-19 quarantine period lead to improved coastal water quality?•Long-term, high temporal resolution water quality data was assessed from a range of coastal waterbodies.•Natural variability dominated the water quality data.•No large-scale improvements in water quality occurred during the COVID-19 quarantine period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150825</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34627882</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Coastal ; COVID-19 ; Dissolved oxygen ; Ecosystem ; Humans ; Quarantine ; Texas ; Turbidity ; Water Quality</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2022-02, Vol.807 (Pt 2), p.150825-150825, Article 150825</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-ab5d1643a44a3274b104004e37568376f7b99fc138400e597b4894842dbf77f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-ab5d1643a44a3274b104004e37568376f7b99fc138400e597b4894842dbf77f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969721059039$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34627882$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wetz, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powers, Nicole C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Jeffrey W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yuxia</creatorcontrib><title>No widespread signature of the COVID-19 quarantine period on water quality across a spectrum of coastal systems in the United States of America</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><description>During the recent COVID-19 related quarantine period, anecdotal evidence emerged pointing to a rapid, sharp improvement in water quality in some localities. Here we present results from an analysis of the impacts of the COVID-19 quarantine period using two long-term coastal water quality datasets. These datasets rely on sampling that operates at appropriate timescales to quantify the influence of reduced human activity on coastal water quality and span coastal ecosystems ranging from low human influence to highly urbanized systems. We tested two hypotheses: 1) reduced tourism during the COVID-19 quarantine period would lead to improved coastal water quality, and 2) water quality improvements would scale to the level of human influence, meaning that highly urbanized or tourist-centric watersheds would see greater improvement than more rural watersheds. A localized reduction in fecal indicator bacteria was observed in four highly impacted regions of the Texas (USA) coast, but this pattern was not widespread. In less impacted regions, the signature of natural, decadal environmental variability (e.g., dissolved oxygen and turbidity) overwhelmed any potential signature of reduced human activity. Results from this study add to the growing body of literature on the environmental impacts of the COVID-19 quarantine period, and when considered with existing literature, emphasize that coastal water quality improvements appear to be ephemeral and reserved for the most severely affected (by human activity) systems. Furthermore, results show the importance of assessing COVID-19 signatures against long-term, decadal datasets that adequately reveal a system's natural variation. [Display omitted] •This study addressed the question: did the COVID-19 quarantine period lead to improved coastal water quality?•Long-term, high temporal resolution water quality data was assessed from a range of coastal waterbodies.•Natural variability dominated the water quality data.•No large-scale improvements in water quality occurred during the COVID-19 quarantine period.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Coastal</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Dissolved oxygen</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Quarantine</subject><subject>Texas</subject><subject>Turbidity</subject><subject>Water Quality</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkd1uGyEQhVHVqHHTvkLLC6wLu-wCN5Us9y9S1Fy06S1iYTbB8sIWsCM_RV45bNxa7VW4GYk55xvNHITeU7KkhHYfNstkXA4Z_H5Zk5ouaUtE3b5ACyq4rCipu5doQQgTlewkP0evU9qQ8rigr9B5w7qaC1Ev0MP3gO-dhTRF0BYnd-t13kXAYcD5DvD6-tflp4pK_Huno_bZecATRBcsDh7f6wxxbm1dPmBtYkgJa5wmMDnuxhligk5Zb3E6pAxjws4_cW-8y2Dxj1wIadatxkI1-g06G_Q2wds_9QLdfPn8c_2turr-erleXVWG8TZXum8t7VijGdNNzVlPCSvbQsPbTjS8G3gv5WBoI8o3tJL3TEgmWG37gfOBNRfo45E77foRrAGfo96qKbpRx4MK2qn_O97dqduwV5K3VDJeAPwIeFo6wnDyUqLmjNRGnTJSc0bqmFFxvvt39Mn3N5QiWB0FUA6wdxBnEHgD1sVyWGWDe3bII_sJqds</recordid><startdate>20220210</startdate><enddate>20220210</enddate><creator>Wetz, Michael S.</creator><creator>Powers, Nicole C.</creator><creator>Turner, Jeffrey W.</creator><creator>Huang, Yuxia</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220210</creationdate><title>No widespread signature of the COVID-19 quarantine period on water quality across a spectrum of coastal systems in the United States of America</title><author>Wetz, Michael S. ; Powers, Nicole C. ; Turner, Jeffrey W. ; Huang, Yuxia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-ab5d1643a44a3274b104004e37568376f7b99fc138400e597b4894842dbf77f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Coastal</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Dissolved oxygen</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Quarantine</topic><topic>Texas</topic><topic>Turbidity</topic><topic>Water Quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wetz, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powers, Nicole C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Jeffrey W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yuxia</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wetz, Michael S.</au><au>Powers, Nicole C.</au><au>Turner, Jeffrey W.</au><au>Huang, Yuxia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>No widespread signature of the COVID-19 quarantine period on water quality across a spectrum of coastal systems in the United States of America</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><date>2022-02-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>807</volume><issue>Pt 2</issue><spage>150825</spage><epage>150825</epage><pages>150825-150825</pages><artnum>150825</artnum><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>During the recent COVID-19 related quarantine period, anecdotal evidence emerged pointing to a rapid, sharp improvement in water quality in some localities. Here we present results from an analysis of the impacts of the COVID-19 quarantine period using two long-term coastal water quality datasets. These datasets rely on sampling that operates at appropriate timescales to quantify the influence of reduced human activity on coastal water quality and span coastal ecosystems ranging from low human influence to highly urbanized systems. We tested two hypotheses: 1) reduced tourism during the COVID-19 quarantine period would lead to improved coastal water quality, and 2) water quality improvements would scale to the level of human influence, meaning that highly urbanized or tourist-centric watersheds would see greater improvement than more rural watersheds. A localized reduction in fecal indicator bacteria was observed in four highly impacted regions of the Texas (USA) coast, but this pattern was not widespread. In less impacted regions, the signature of natural, decadal environmental variability (e.g., dissolved oxygen and turbidity) overwhelmed any potential signature of reduced human activity. Results from this study add to the growing body of literature on the environmental impacts of the COVID-19 quarantine period, and when considered with existing literature, emphasize that coastal water quality improvements appear to be ephemeral and reserved for the most severely affected (by human activity) systems. Furthermore, results show the importance of assessing COVID-19 signatures against long-term, decadal datasets that adequately reveal a system's natural variation. [Display omitted] •This study addressed the question: did the COVID-19 quarantine period lead to improved coastal water quality?•Long-term, high temporal resolution water quality data was assessed from a range of coastal waterbodies.•Natural variability dominated the water quality data.•No large-scale improvements in water quality occurred during the COVID-19 quarantine period.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>34627882</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150825</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-9697
ispartof The Science of the total environment, 2022-02, Vol.807 (Pt 2), p.150825-150825, Article 150825
issn 0048-9697
1879-1026
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9751947
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Bacteria
Coastal
COVID-19
Dissolved oxygen
Ecosystem
Humans
Quarantine
Texas
Turbidity
Water Quality
title No widespread signature of the COVID-19 quarantine period on water quality across a spectrum of coastal systems in the United States of America
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T22%3A54%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=No%20widespread%20signature%20of%20the%20COVID-19%20quarantine%20period%20on%20water%20quality%20across%20a%20spectrum%20of%20coastal%20systems%20in%20the%20United%20States%20of%20America&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Wetz,%20Michael%20S.&rft.date=2022-02-10&rft.volume=807&rft.issue=Pt%202&rft.spage=150825&rft.epage=150825&rft.pages=150825-150825&rft.artnum=150825&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150825&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_pubme%3ES0048969721059039%3C/elsevier_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/34627882&rft_els_id=S0048969721059039&rfr_iscdi=true