Quality of Documentation in Paediatric Supracondylar Fractures: A Quality Improvement Project
Introduction Supracondylar fractures are the most common elbow fractures in children. Their documentation and management must be done fully and correctly. This Quality Improvement Project (QIP) assessed the quality of documentation for paediatric supracondylar fractures admitted, in accordance with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2022-11, Vol.14 (11), p.e31431-e31431 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e31431 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | e31431 |
container_title | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Sibanda, Vusumuzi Raad, Marjan Legg, Peter I Chipperfield, Alex Oliver, Matthew C |
description | Introduction Supracondylar fractures are the most common elbow fractures in children. Their documentation and management must be done fully and correctly. This Quality Improvement Project (QIP) assessed the quality of documentation for paediatric supracondylar fractures admitted, in accordance with the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST). Methods We present a case series of supracondylar fractures presenting to a single UK-based district general hospital from January 2018 - October 2021. We performed a quality improvement intervention starting in November 2020. The retrospective data prior to intervention (January 2018-November 2020) were deemed "pre-intervention". Prospective "post-intervention" data were collected from April to October 2021. After "pre-intervention" data analysis, an intervention in the form of a documentation proforma was developed and multidisciplinary teaching sessions were delivered. Post-intervention prospective data collection followed from April - October 2021. Results There were 48 and 26 patients in cycles one and two, respectively. The mean age was 6.4 (SD 3.5) and 6.5 (SD 2.7) years, respectively; 42/48 in cycle one and all 26/26 in cycle two required operative management. The mean time to surgery was 1.3 and 0.96 days, respectively. Post-intervention, cycle two showed a reduction in patients with "no neurovascular documentation" pre-reduction (17% vs 12%) and an increase in patients documented as having "neurovascular status intact" (NVI) (44% vs 69%). In post-operative documentation, there was an improvement in documentation with 73% of patients having a post-operative neurovascular assessment documented, versus 50% in the pre-intervention cohort. Conclusion This QIP provided some early improvement in the documentation but with room for future progress as the project continues. It showed proformas can be an effective tool in implementing positive change. It also highlights the need for continuous clinical education across the multidisciplinary teams managing trauma. |
doi_str_mv | 10.7759/cureus.31431 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9745387</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2755577029</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-428ed627deb9d6899cd43bbf21ac2bcbfe0609b721e218c794738f905addc99f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1LxDAQhoMoKurNswS8eHA1H20-PAiiri4IKupRQpqkmqVt1qQR9t_bdVXU0wzMwzMzvADsYnTEeSmPTY4upyOKC4pXwCbBTIwEFsXqr34D7KQ0RQhhxAniaB1sUFYSypjYBM_3WTe-n8NQw4tgcuu6Xvc-dNB38E4763UfvYEPeRa1CZ2dNzrC8dD3w-p0As_gt2HSzmJ4dwsDvIth6ky_DdZq3SS381W3wNP48vH8enRzezU5P7sZGVqQflQQ4Swj3LpKWiakNLagVVUTrA2pTFU7xJCsOMGOYGG4LDgVtUSlttZIWdMtcLr0znLVOmuGE6Ju1Cz6Vse5Ctqrv5POv6qX8K4kL0oq-CA4-BLE8JZd6lXrk3FNozsXclKEl2XJOSJyQPf_odOQYze8t6AkZ0xiMVCHS8rEkFJ09c8xGKlFdGoZnfqMbsD3fj_wA38HRT8Ak2eX0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2759766918</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality of Documentation in Paediatric Supracondylar Fractures: A Quality Improvement Project</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Sibanda, Vusumuzi ; Raad, Marjan ; Legg, Peter I ; Chipperfield, Alex ; Oliver, Matthew C</creator><creatorcontrib>Sibanda, Vusumuzi ; Raad, Marjan ; Legg, Peter I ; Chipperfield, Alex ; Oliver, Matthew C</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Supracondylar fractures are the most common elbow fractures in children. Their documentation and management must be done fully and correctly. This Quality Improvement Project (QIP) assessed the quality of documentation for paediatric supracondylar fractures admitted, in accordance with the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST). Methods We present a case series of supracondylar fractures presenting to a single UK-based district general hospital from January 2018 - October 2021. We performed a quality improvement intervention starting in November 2020. The retrospective data prior to intervention (January 2018-November 2020) were deemed "pre-intervention". Prospective "post-intervention" data were collected from April to October 2021. After "pre-intervention" data analysis, an intervention in the form of a documentation proforma was developed and multidisciplinary teaching sessions were delivered. Post-intervention prospective data collection followed from April - October 2021. Results There were 48 and 26 patients in cycles one and two, respectively. The mean age was 6.4 (SD 3.5) and 6.5 (SD 2.7) years, respectively; 42/48 in cycle one and all 26/26 in cycle two required operative management. The mean time to surgery was 1.3 and 0.96 days, respectively. Post-intervention, cycle two showed a reduction in patients with "no neurovascular documentation" pre-reduction (17% vs 12%) and an increase in patients documented as having "neurovascular status intact" (NVI) (44% vs 69%). In post-operative documentation, there was an improvement in documentation with 73% of patients having a post-operative neurovascular assessment documented, versus 50% in the pre-intervention cohort. Conclusion This QIP provided some early improvement in the documentation but with room for future progress as the project continues. It showed proformas can be an effective tool in implementing positive change. It also highlights the need for continuous clinical education across the multidisciplinary teams managing trauma.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31431</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36523668</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cureus Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; Audit departments ; Case reports ; Classification ; Closed reduction ; Compartment syndrome ; Documentation ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency Medicine ; Gender ; Injuries ; Orthopedics ; Outpatient care facilities ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Quality Improvement ; Surgery ; Trauma ; Wire</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2022-11, Vol.14 (11), p.e31431-e31431</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022, Sibanda et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022, Sibanda et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022, Sibanda et al. 2022 Sibanda et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-428ed627deb9d6899cd43bbf21ac2bcbfe0609b721e218c794738f905addc99f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-428ed627deb9d6899cd43bbf21ac2bcbfe0609b721e218c794738f905addc99f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9745387/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9745387/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36523668$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sibanda, Vusumuzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raad, Marjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legg, Peter I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chipperfield, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliver, Matthew C</creatorcontrib><title>Quality of Documentation in Paediatric Supracondylar Fractures: A Quality Improvement Project</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><description>Introduction Supracondylar fractures are the most common elbow fractures in children. Their documentation and management must be done fully and correctly. This Quality Improvement Project (QIP) assessed the quality of documentation for paediatric supracondylar fractures admitted, in accordance with the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST). Methods We present a case series of supracondylar fractures presenting to a single UK-based district general hospital from January 2018 - October 2021. We performed a quality improvement intervention starting in November 2020. The retrospective data prior to intervention (January 2018-November 2020) were deemed "pre-intervention". Prospective "post-intervention" data were collected from April to October 2021. After "pre-intervention" data analysis, an intervention in the form of a documentation proforma was developed and multidisciplinary teaching sessions were delivered. Post-intervention prospective data collection followed from April - October 2021. Results There were 48 and 26 patients in cycles one and two, respectively. The mean age was 6.4 (SD 3.5) and 6.5 (SD 2.7) years, respectively; 42/48 in cycle one and all 26/26 in cycle two required operative management. The mean time to surgery was 1.3 and 0.96 days, respectively. Post-intervention, cycle two showed a reduction in patients with "no neurovascular documentation" pre-reduction (17% vs 12%) and an increase in patients documented as having "neurovascular status intact" (NVI) (44% vs 69%). In post-operative documentation, there was an improvement in documentation with 73% of patients having a post-operative neurovascular assessment documented, versus 50% in the pre-intervention cohort. Conclusion This QIP provided some early improvement in the documentation but with room for future progress as the project continues. It showed proformas can be an effective tool in implementing positive change. It also highlights the need for continuous clinical education across the multidisciplinary teams managing trauma.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Audit departments</subject><subject>Case reports</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Closed reduction</subject><subject>Compartment syndrome</subject><subject>Documentation</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Outpatient care facilities</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Quality Improvement</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Wire</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1LxDAQhoMoKurNswS8eHA1H20-PAiiri4IKupRQpqkmqVt1qQR9t_bdVXU0wzMwzMzvADsYnTEeSmPTY4upyOKC4pXwCbBTIwEFsXqr34D7KQ0RQhhxAniaB1sUFYSypjYBM_3WTe-n8NQw4tgcuu6Xvc-dNB38E4763UfvYEPeRa1CZ2dNzrC8dD3w-p0As_gt2HSzmJ4dwsDvIth6ky_DdZq3SS381W3wNP48vH8enRzezU5P7sZGVqQflQQ4Swj3LpKWiakNLagVVUTrA2pTFU7xJCsOMGOYGG4LDgVtUSlttZIWdMtcLr0znLVOmuGE6Ju1Cz6Vse5Ctqrv5POv6qX8K4kL0oq-CA4-BLE8JZd6lXrk3FNozsXclKEl2XJOSJyQPf_odOQYze8t6AkZ0xiMVCHS8rEkFJ09c8xGKlFdGoZnfqMbsD3fj_wA38HRT8Ak2eX0w</recordid><startdate>20221112</startdate><enddate>20221112</enddate><creator>Sibanda, Vusumuzi</creator><creator>Raad, Marjan</creator><creator>Legg, Peter I</creator><creator>Chipperfield, Alex</creator><creator>Oliver, Matthew C</creator><general>Cureus Inc</general><general>Cureus</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221112</creationdate><title>Quality of Documentation in Paediatric Supracondylar Fractures: A Quality Improvement Project</title><author>Sibanda, Vusumuzi ; Raad, Marjan ; Legg, Peter I ; Chipperfield, Alex ; Oliver, Matthew C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-428ed627deb9d6899cd43bbf21ac2bcbfe0609b721e218c794738f905addc99f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Audit departments</topic><topic>Case reports</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Closed reduction</topic><topic>Compartment syndrome</topic><topic>Documentation</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Outpatient care facilities</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Quality Improvement</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Wire</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sibanda, Vusumuzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raad, Marjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legg, Peter I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chipperfield, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliver, Matthew C</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sibanda, Vusumuzi</au><au>Raad, Marjan</au><au>Legg, Peter I</au><au>Chipperfield, Alex</au><au>Oliver, Matthew C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality of Documentation in Paediatric Supracondylar Fractures: A Quality Improvement Project</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><date>2022-11-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e31431</spage><epage>e31431</epage><pages>e31431-e31431</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>Introduction Supracondylar fractures are the most common elbow fractures in children. Their documentation and management must be done fully and correctly. This Quality Improvement Project (QIP) assessed the quality of documentation for paediatric supracondylar fractures admitted, in accordance with the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST). Methods We present a case series of supracondylar fractures presenting to a single UK-based district general hospital from January 2018 - October 2021. We performed a quality improvement intervention starting in November 2020. The retrospective data prior to intervention (January 2018-November 2020) were deemed "pre-intervention". Prospective "post-intervention" data were collected from April to October 2021. After "pre-intervention" data analysis, an intervention in the form of a documentation proforma was developed and multidisciplinary teaching sessions were delivered. Post-intervention prospective data collection followed from April - October 2021. Results There were 48 and 26 patients in cycles one and two, respectively. The mean age was 6.4 (SD 3.5) and 6.5 (SD 2.7) years, respectively; 42/48 in cycle one and all 26/26 in cycle two required operative management. The mean time to surgery was 1.3 and 0.96 days, respectively. Post-intervention, cycle two showed a reduction in patients with "no neurovascular documentation" pre-reduction (17% vs 12%) and an increase in patients documented as having "neurovascular status intact" (NVI) (44% vs 69%). In post-operative documentation, there was an improvement in documentation with 73% of patients having a post-operative neurovascular assessment documented, versus 50% in the pre-intervention cohort. Conclusion This QIP provided some early improvement in the documentation but with room for future progress as the project continues. It showed proformas can be an effective tool in implementing positive change. It also highlights the need for continuous clinical education across the multidisciplinary teams managing trauma.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cureus Inc</pub><pmid>36523668</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.31431</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2168-8184 |
ispartof | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2022-11, Vol.14 (11), p.e31431-e31431 |
issn | 2168-8184 2168-8184 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9745387 |
source | PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | Age Audit departments Case reports Classification Closed reduction Compartment syndrome Documentation Emergency medical care Emergency Medicine Gender Injuries Orthopedics Outpatient care facilities Patients Pediatrics Quality Improvement Surgery Trauma Wire |
title | Quality of Documentation in Paediatric Supracondylar Fractures: A Quality Improvement Project |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T04%3A54%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20of%20Documentation%20in%20Paediatric%20Supracondylar%20Fractures:%20A%20Quality%20Improvement%20Project&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Sibanda,%20Vusumuzi&rft.date=2022-11-12&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e31431&rft.epage=e31431&rft.pages=e31431-e31431&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.31431&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2755577029%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2759766918&rft_id=info:pmid/36523668&rfr_iscdi=true |