Quality of Documentation in Paediatric Supracondylar Fractures: A Quality Improvement Project

Introduction Supracondylar fractures are the most common elbow fractures in children. Their documentation and management must be done fully and correctly. This Quality Improvement Project (QIP) assessed the quality of documentation for paediatric supracondylar fractures admitted, in accordance with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2022-11, Vol.14 (11), p.e31431-e31431
Hauptverfasser: Sibanda, Vusumuzi, Raad, Marjan, Legg, Peter I, Chipperfield, Alex, Oliver, Matthew C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e31431
container_issue 11
container_start_page e31431
container_title Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)
container_volume 14
creator Sibanda, Vusumuzi
Raad, Marjan
Legg, Peter I
Chipperfield, Alex
Oliver, Matthew C
description Introduction Supracondylar fractures are the most common elbow fractures in children. Their documentation and management must be done fully and correctly. This Quality Improvement Project (QIP) assessed the quality of documentation for paediatric supracondylar fractures admitted, in accordance with the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST). Methods We present a case series of supracondylar fractures presenting to a single UK-based district general hospital from January 2018 - October 2021. We performed a quality improvement intervention starting in November 2020. The retrospective data prior to intervention (January 2018-November 2020) were deemed "pre-intervention". Prospective "post-intervention" data were collected from April to October 2021. After "pre-intervention" data analysis, an intervention in the form of a documentation proforma was developed and multidisciplinary teaching sessions were delivered. Post-intervention prospective data collection followed from April - October 2021. Results There were 48 and 26 patients in cycles one and two, respectively. The mean age was 6.4 (SD 3.5) and 6.5 (SD 2.7) years, respectively; 42/48 in cycle one and all 26/26 in cycle two required operative management. The mean time to surgery was 1.3 and 0.96 days, respectively. Post-intervention, cycle two showed a reduction in patients with "no neurovascular documentation" pre-reduction (17% vs 12%) and an increase in patients documented as having "neurovascular status intact" (NVI) (44% vs 69%). In post-operative documentation, there was an improvement in documentation with 73% of patients having a post-operative neurovascular assessment documented, versus 50% in the pre-intervention cohort. Conclusion This QIP provided some early improvement in the documentation but with room for future progress as the project continues. It showed proformas can be an effective tool in implementing positive change. It also highlights the need for continuous clinical education across the multidisciplinary teams managing trauma.
doi_str_mv 10.7759/cureus.31431
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9745387</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2755577029</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-428ed627deb9d6899cd43bbf21ac2bcbfe0609b721e218c794738f905addc99f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1LxDAQhoMoKurNswS8eHA1H20-PAiiri4IKupRQpqkmqVt1qQR9t_bdVXU0wzMwzMzvADsYnTEeSmPTY4upyOKC4pXwCbBTIwEFsXqr34D7KQ0RQhhxAniaB1sUFYSypjYBM_3WTe-n8NQw4tgcuu6Xvc-dNB38E4763UfvYEPeRa1CZ2dNzrC8dD3w-p0As_gt2HSzmJ4dwsDvIth6ky_DdZq3SS381W3wNP48vH8enRzezU5P7sZGVqQflQQ4Swj3LpKWiakNLagVVUTrA2pTFU7xJCsOMGOYGG4LDgVtUSlttZIWdMtcLr0znLVOmuGE6Ju1Cz6Vse5Ctqrv5POv6qX8K4kL0oq-CA4-BLE8JZd6lXrk3FNozsXclKEl2XJOSJyQPf_odOQYze8t6AkZ0xiMVCHS8rEkFJ09c8xGKlFdGoZnfqMbsD3fj_wA38HRT8Ak2eX0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2759766918</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality of Documentation in Paediatric Supracondylar Fractures: A Quality Improvement Project</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Sibanda, Vusumuzi ; Raad, Marjan ; Legg, Peter I ; Chipperfield, Alex ; Oliver, Matthew C</creator><creatorcontrib>Sibanda, Vusumuzi ; Raad, Marjan ; Legg, Peter I ; Chipperfield, Alex ; Oliver, Matthew C</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Supracondylar fractures are the most common elbow fractures in children. Their documentation and management must be done fully and correctly. This Quality Improvement Project (QIP) assessed the quality of documentation for paediatric supracondylar fractures admitted, in accordance with the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST). Methods We present a case series of supracondylar fractures presenting to a single UK-based district general hospital from January 2018 - October 2021. We performed a quality improvement intervention starting in November 2020. The retrospective data prior to intervention (January 2018-November 2020) were deemed "pre-intervention". Prospective "post-intervention" data were collected from April to October 2021. After "pre-intervention" data analysis, an intervention in the form of a documentation proforma was developed and multidisciplinary teaching sessions were delivered. Post-intervention prospective data collection followed from April - October 2021. Results There were 48 and 26 patients in cycles one and two, respectively. The mean age was 6.4 (SD 3.5) and 6.5 (SD 2.7) years, respectively; 42/48 in cycle one and all 26/26 in cycle two required operative management. The mean time to surgery was 1.3 and 0.96 days, respectively. Post-intervention, cycle two showed a reduction in patients with "no neurovascular documentation" pre-reduction (17% vs 12%) and an increase in patients documented as having "neurovascular status intact" (NVI) (44% vs 69%). In post-operative documentation, there was an improvement in documentation with 73% of patients having a post-operative neurovascular assessment documented, versus 50% in the pre-intervention cohort. Conclusion This QIP provided some early improvement in the documentation but with room for future progress as the project continues. It showed proformas can be an effective tool in implementing positive change. It also highlights the need for continuous clinical education across the multidisciplinary teams managing trauma.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31431</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36523668</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cureus Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; Audit departments ; Case reports ; Classification ; Closed reduction ; Compartment syndrome ; Documentation ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency Medicine ; Gender ; Injuries ; Orthopedics ; Outpatient care facilities ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Quality Improvement ; Surgery ; Trauma ; Wire</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2022-11, Vol.14 (11), p.e31431-e31431</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022, Sibanda et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022, Sibanda et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022, Sibanda et al. 2022 Sibanda et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-428ed627deb9d6899cd43bbf21ac2bcbfe0609b721e218c794738f905addc99f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-428ed627deb9d6899cd43bbf21ac2bcbfe0609b721e218c794738f905addc99f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9745387/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9745387/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36523668$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sibanda, Vusumuzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raad, Marjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legg, Peter I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chipperfield, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliver, Matthew C</creatorcontrib><title>Quality of Documentation in Paediatric Supracondylar Fractures: A Quality Improvement Project</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><description>Introduction Supracondylar fractures are the most common elbow fractures in children. Their documentation and management must be done fully and correctly. This Quality Improvement Project (QIP) assessed the quality of documentation for paediatric supracondylar fractures admitted, in accordance with the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST). Methods We present a case series of supracondylar fractures presenting to a single UK-based district general hospital from January 2018 - October 2021. We performed a quality improvement intervention starting in November 2020. The retrospective data prior to intervention (January 2018-November 2020) were deemed "pre-intervention". Prospective "post-intervention" data were collected from April to October 2021. After "pre-intervention" data analysis, an intervention in the form of a documentation proforma was developed and multidisciplinary teaching sessions were delivered. Post-intervention prospective data collection followed from April - October 2021. Results There were 48 and 26 patients in cycles one and two, respectively. The mean age was 6.4 (SD 3.5) and 6.5 (SD 2.7) years, respectively; 42/48 in cycle one and all 26/26 in cycle two required operative management. The mean time to surgery was 1.3 and 0.96 days, respectively. Post-intervention, cycle two showed a reduction in patients with "no neurovascular documentation" pre-reduction (17% vs 12%) and an increase in patients documented as having "neurovascular status intact" (NVI) (44% vs 69%). In post-operative documentation, there was an improvement in documentation with 73% of patients having a post-operative neurovascular assessment documented, versus 50% in the pre-intervention cohort. Conclusion This QIP provided some early improvement in the documentation but with room for future progress as the project continues. It showed proformas can be an effective tool in implementing positive change. It also highlights the need for continuous clinical education across the multidisciplinary teams managing trauma.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Audit departments</subject><subject>Case reports</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Closed reduction</subject><subject>Compartment syndrome</subject><subject>Documentation</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Outpatient care facilities</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Quality Improvement</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Wire</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1LxDAQhoMoKurNswS8eHA1H20-PAiiri4IKupRQpqkmqVt1qQR9t_bdVXU0wzMwzMzvADsYnTEeSmPTY4upyOKC4pXwCbBTIwEFsXqr34D7KQ0RQhhxAniaB1sUFYSypjYBM_3WTe-n8NQw4tgcuu6Xvc-dNB38E4763UfvYEPeRa1CZ2dNzrC8dD3w-p0As_gt2HSzmJ4dwsDvIth6ky_DdZq3SS381W3wNP48vH8enRzezU5P7sZGVqQflQQ4Swj3LpKWiakNLagVVUTrA2pTFU7xJCsOMGOYGG4LDgVtUSlttZIWdMtcLr0znLVOmuGE6Ju1Cz6Vse5Ctqrv5POv6qX8K4kL0oq-CA4-BLE8JZd6lXrk3FNozsXclKEl2XJOSJyQPf_odOQYze8t6AkZ0xiMVCHS8rEkFJ09c8xGKlFdGoZnfqMbsD3fj_wA38HRT8Ak2eX0w</recordid><startdate>20221112</startdate><enddate>20221112</enddate><creator>Sibanda, Vusumuzi</creator><creator>Raad, Marjan</creator><creator>Legg, Peter I</creator><creator>Chipperfield, Alex</creator><creator>Oliver, Matthew C</creator><general>Cureus Inc</general><general>Cureus</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221112</creationdate><title>Quality of Documentation in Paediatric Supracondylar Fractures: A Quality Improvement Project</title><author>Sibanda, Vusumuzi ; Raad, Marjan ; Legg, Peter I ; Chipperfield, Alex ; Oliver, Matthew C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-428ed627deb9d6899cd43bbf21ac2bcbfe0609b721e218c794738f905addc99f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Audit departments</topic><topic>Case reports</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Closed reduction</topic><topic>Compartment syndrome</topic><topic>Documentation</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Outpatient care facilities</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Quality Improvement</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Wire</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sibanda, Vusumuzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raad, Marjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legg, Peter I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chipperfield, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliver, Matthew C</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sibanda, Vusumuzi</au><au>Raad, Marjan</au><au>Legg, Peter I</au><au>Chipperfield, Alex</au><au>Oliver, Matthew C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality of Documentation in Paediatric Supracondylar Fractures: A Quality Improvement Project</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><date>2022-11-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e31431</spage><epage>e31431</epage><pages>e31431-e31431</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>Introduction Supracondylar fractures are the most common elbow fractures in children. Their documentation and management must be done fully and correctly. This Quality Improvement Project (QIP) assessed the quality of documentation for paediatric supracondylar fractures admitted, in accordance with the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST). Methods We present a case series of supracondylar fractures presenting to a single UK-based district general hospital from January 2018 - October 2021. We performed a quality improvement intervention starting in November 2020. The retrospective data prior to intervention (January 2018-November 2020) were deemed "pre-intervention". Prospective "post-intervention" data were collected from April to October 2021. After "pre-intervention" data analysis, an intervention in the form of a documentation proforma was developed and multidisciplinary teaching sessions were delivered. Post-intervention prospective data collection followed from April - October 2021. Results There were 48 and 26 patients in cycles one and two, respectively. The mean age was 6.4 (SD 3.5) and 6.5 (SD 2.7) years, respectively; 42/48 in cycle one and all 26/26 in cycle two required operative management. The mean time to surgery was 1.3 and 0.96 days, respectively. Post-intervention, cycle two showed a reduction in patients with "no neurovascular documentation" pre-reduction (17% vs 12%) and an increase in patients documented as having "neurovascular status intact" (NVI) (44% vs 69%). In post-operative documentation, there was an improvement in documentation with 73% of patients having a post-operative neurovascular assessment documented, versus 50% in the pre-intervention cohort. Conclusion This QIP provided some early improvement in the documentation but with room for future progress as the project continues. It showed proformas can be an effective tool in implementing positive change. It also highlights the need for continuous clinical education across the multidisciplinary teams managing trauma.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cureus Inc</pub><pmid>36523668</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.31431</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-8184
ispartof Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2022-11, Vol.14 (11), p.e31431-e31431
issn 2168-8184
2168-8184
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9745387
source PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Age
Audit departments
Case reports
Classification
Closed reduction
Compartment syndrome
Documentation
Emergency medical care
Emergency Medicine
Gender
Injuries
Orthopedics
Outpatient care facilities
Patients
Pediatrics
Quality Improvement
Surgery
Trauma
Wire
title Quality of Documentation in Paediatric Supracondylar Fractures: A Quality Improvement Project
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T04%3A54%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20of%20Documentation%20in%20Paediatric%20Supracondylar%20Fractures:%20A%20Quality%20Improvement%20Project&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Sibanda,%20Vusumuzi&rft.date=2022-11-12&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e31431&rft.epage=e31431&rft.pages=e31431-e31431&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.31431&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2755577029%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2759766918&rft_id=info:pmid/36523668&rfr_iscdi=true