The brief case for everyday problems: a proposal of two brief alternate forms of the Everyday Problems Test
Everyday Problems Test (EPT; Willis and Marsiske, Manual for the everyday problems test, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, 1993) is an 84-item performance-based measure of older adults' everyday cognitive competencies in seven everyday domains (e.g., finance, reading prescription). I...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of ageing 2022-12, Vol.19 (4), p.1519-1528 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1528 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 1519 |
| container_title | European journal of ageing |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Juras, Luka Martincević, Marina Vranić, Andrea Rebernjak, Blaž Hromatko, Ivana |
| description | Everyday Problems Test (EPT; Willis and Marsiske, Manual for the everyday problems test, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, 1993) is an 84-item performance-based measure of older adults' everyday cognitive competencies in seven everyday domains (e.g., finance, reading prescription). Its length makes it disadvantageous in the typical time-constrained testing context. Due to the potential practice effects, it is also impractical for longitudinal and intervention studies which require repetitive testing. We have addressed these issues by adapting two brief forms of EPT, with 14 items each. The psychometric evaluation of these two versions was conducted on a sample of 157 cognitively healthy older adults. Both brief forms demonstrated good internal consistency, high inter-correlation, and have shown satisfactory concurrent criterion-related validity based on their correlations with socio-demographic and cognitive variables. Results indicate that the two proposed brief forms can be a valuable tool in assessing the everyday cognitive competence of healthy older adults either as a one-time screening instrument or as a pretest–posttest difference indicator of the intervention efficacy. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10433-022-00734-x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9729654</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2747839674</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-1c9dbf0a659b795c5bc929aa93bd0d3d96647db22371229739de153bccea375c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9PHSEUxYlpo1b9Al00JN24GQvcYXh0YWKMbU1MdPFcE2Du6NiZ4RXmqe_by_vja-vCFZB7zo8Dh5DPnJ1wxtS3xFkJUDAhinyEsnjeIfu84lBomLAP270Se-RTSg-MgRaa7ZI9qCSrKqn3ye_pPVIXW2yotwlpEyLFR4yL2i7oLAbXYZ--U7vcz0KyHQ0NHZ_CxmO7EeNgx5WxT6thBl68Em42BDrFNB6Sj43tEh5t1gNy--Niev6ruLr-eXl-dlX4Usix4F7XrmE253NKSy-dz7Gt1eBqVkOtq6pUtRMCFBdCK9A1cgnOe7SgpIcDcrrmzuaux9rjMEbbmVlsexsXJtjW_D8Z2ntzFx6NVkJXssyA4w0ghj_znNz0bfLYdXbAME9GKAk5BMhJln59I30I8_wj3VJVqgnoSi2BYq3yMaQUsdmG4cwsuzTrLk3u0qy6NM_Z9OXfZ2wtr-VlAawFKY-GO4x_734H-wLWNKwO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2747839674</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The brief case for everyday problems: a proposal of two brief alternate forms of the Everyday Problems Test</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Juras, Luka ; Martincević, Marina ; Vranić, Andrea ; Rebernjak, Blaž ; Hromatko, Ivana</creator><creatorcontrib>Juras, Luka ; Martincević, Marina ; Vranić, Andrea ; Rebernjak, Blaž ; Hromatko, Ivana</creatorcontrib><description>Everyday Problems Test (EPT; Willis and Marsiske, Manual for the everyday problems test, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, 1993) is an 84-item performance-based measure of older adults' everyday cognitive competencies in seven everyday domains (e.g., finance, reading prescription). Its length makes it disadvantageous in the typical time-constrained testing context. Due to the potential practice effects, it is also impractical for longitudinal and intervention studies which require repetitive testing. We have addressed these issues by adapting two brief forms of EPT, with 14 items each. The psychometric evaluation of these two versions was conducted on a sample of 157 cognitively healthy older adults. Both brief forms demonstrated good internal consistency, high inter-correlation, and have shown satisfactory concurrent criterion-related validity based on their correlations with socio-demographic and cognitive variables. Results indicate that the two proposed brief forms can be a valuable tool in assessing the everyday cognitive competence of healthy older adults either as a one-time screening instrument or as a pretest–posttest difference indicator of the intervention efficacy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1613-9372</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1613-9380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10433-022-00734-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36506659</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Aging ; Cognitive ability ; Demography ; Geriatrics/Gerontology ; Older people ; Original Investigation ; Psychology ; Public Health ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>European journal of ageing, 2022-12, Vol.19 (4), p.1519-1528</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-1c9dbf0a659b795c5bc929aa93bd0d3d96647db22371229739de153bccea375c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4235-8014 ; 0000-0002-3837-1929 ; 0000-0003-2925-3303 ; 0000-0002-4674-3083 ; 0000-0002-5170-1793</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9729654/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9729654/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27906,27907,41470,42539,51301,53773,53775</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506659$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Juras, Luka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martincević, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vranić, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rebernjak, Blaž</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hromatko, Ivana</creatorcontrib><title>The brief case for everyday problems: a proposal of two brief alternate forms of the Everyday Problems Test</title><title>European journal of ageing</title><addtitle>Eur J Ageing</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Ageing</addtitle><description>Everyday Problems Test (EPT; Willis and Marsiske, Manual for the everyday problems test, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, 1993) is an 84-item performance-based measure of older adults' everyday cognitive competencies in seven everyday domains (e.g., finance, reading prescription). Its length makes it disadvantageous in the typical time-constrained testing context. Due to the potential practice effects, it is also impractical for longitudinal and intervention studies which require repetitive testing. We have addressed these issues by adapting two brief forms of EPT, with 14 items each. The psychometric evaluation of these two versions was conducted on a sample of 157 cognitively healthy older adults. Both brief forms demonstrated good internal consistency, high inter-correlation, and have shown satisfactory concurrent criterion-related validity based on their correlations with socio-demographic and cognitive variables. Results indicate that the two proposed brief forms can be a valuable tool in assessing the everyday cognitive competence of healthy older adults either as a one-time screening instrument or as a pretest–posttest difference indicator of the intervention efficacy.</description><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Geriatrics/Gerontology</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Original Investigation</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>1613-9372</issn><issn>1613-9380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9PHSEUxYlpo1b9Al00JN24GQvcYXh0YWKMbU1MdPFcE2Du6NiZ4RXmqe_by_vja-vCFZB7zo8Dh5DPnJ1wxtS3xFkJUDAhinyEsnjeIfu84lBomLAP270Se-RTSg-MgRaa7ZI9qCSrKqn3ye_pPVIXW2yotwlpEyLFR4yL2i7oLAbXYZ--U7vcz0KyHQ0NHZ_CxmO7EeNgx5WxT6thBl68Em42BDrFNB6Sj43tEh5t1gNy--Niev6ruLr-eXl-dlX4Usix4F7XrmE253NKSy-dz7Gt1eBqVkOtq6pUtRMCFBdCK9A1cgnOe7SgpIcDcrrmzuaux9rjMEbbmVlsexsXJtjW_D8Z2ntzFx6NVkJXssyA4w0ghj_znNz0bfLYdXbAME9GKAk5BMhJln59I30I8_wj3VJVqgnoSi2BYq3yMaQUsdmG4cwsuzTrLk3u0qy6NM_Z9OXfZ2wtr-VlAawFKY-GO4x_734H-wLWNKwO</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Juras, Luka</creator><creator>Martincević, Marina</creator><creator>Vranić, Andrea</creator><creator>Rebernjak, Blaž</creator><creator>Hromatko, Ivana</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4235-8014</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3837-1929</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2925-3303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4674-3083</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5170-1793</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>The brief case for everyday problems: a proposal of two brief alternate forms of the Everyday Problems Test</title><author>Juras, Luka ; Martincević, Marina ; Vranić, Andrea ; Rebernjak, Blaž ; Hromatko, Ivana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-1c9dbf0a659b795c5bc929aa93bd0d3d96647db22371229739de153bccea375c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Geriatrics/Gerontology</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Original Investigation</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Juras, Luka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martincević, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vranić, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rebernjak, Blaž</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hromatko, Ivana</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European journal of ageing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Juras, Luka</au><au>Martincević, Marina</au><au>Vranić, Andrea</au><au>Rebernjak, Blaž</au><au>Hromatko, Ivana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The brief case for everyday problems: a proposal of two brief alternate forms of the Everyday Problems Test</atitle><jtitle>European journal of ageing</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Ageing</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Ageing</addtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1519</spage><epage>1528</epage><pages>1519-1528</pages><issn>1613-9372</issn><eissn>1613-9380</eissn><abstract>Everyday Problems Test (EPT; Willis and Marsiske, Manual for the everyday problems test, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, 1993) is an 84-item performance-based measure of older adults' everyday cognitive competencies in seven everyday domains (e.g., finance, reading prescription). Its length makes it disadvantageous in the typical time-constrained testing context. Due to the potential practice effects, it is also impractical for longitudinal and intervention studies which require repetitive testing. We have addressed these issues by adapting two brief forms of EPT, with 14 items each. The psychometric evaluation of these two versions was conducted on a sample of 157 cognitively healthy older adults. Both brief forms demonstrated good internal consistency, high inter-correlation, and have shown satisfactory concurrent criterion-related validity based on their correlations with socio-demographic and cognitive variables. Results indicate that the two proposed brief forms can be a valuable tool in assessing the everyday cognitive competence of healthy older adults either as a one-time screening instrument or as a pretest–posttest difference indicator of the intervention efficacy.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>36506659</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10433-022-00734-x</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4235-8014</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3837-1929</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2925-3303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4674-3083</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5170-1793</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1613-9372 |
| ispartof | European journal of ageing, 2022-12, Vol.19 (4), p.1519-1528 |
| issn | 1613-9372 1613-9380 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9729654 |
| source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Aging Cognitive ability Demography Geriatrics/Gerontology Older people Original Investigation Psychology Public Health Social Sciences |
| title | The brief case for everyday problems: a proposal of two brief alternate forms of the Everyday Problems Test |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T10%3A16%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20brief%20case%20for%20everyday%20problems:%20a%20proposal%20of%20two%20brief%20alternate%20forms%20of%20the%20Everyday%20Problems%20Test&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20ageing&rft.au=Juras,%20Luka&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1519&rft.epage=1528&rft.pages=1519-1528&rft.issn=1613-9372&rft.eissn=1613-9380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10433-022-00734-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2747839674%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2747839674&rft_id=info:pmid/36506659&rfr_iscdi=true |