Environmental impacts of corn silage production: influence of wheat residues under contrasting tillage management types
The intensification of specific land management operations (tillage, herbicide, etc.) is increasing land degradation and contributing to ecosystem pollution. Mulches can be a sustainable tool to counter these processes. This is particularly relevant for rural areas in low-income countries where agri...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental monitoring and assessment 2023-01, Vol.195 (1), p.171-171, Article 171 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 171 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 171 |
| container_title | Environmental monitoring and assessment |
| container_volume | 195 |
| creator | Mirzaei, Morad Gorji Anari, Manouchehr Saronjic, Nermina Sarkar, Sudip Kral, Iris Gronauer, Andreas Mohammed, Safwan Caballero-Calvo, Andrés |
| description | The intensification of specific land management operations (tillage, herbicide, etc.) is increasing land degradation and contributing to ecosystem pollution. Mulches can be a sustainable tool to counter these processes. This is particularly relevant for rural areas in low-income countries where agriculture is a vital sector. In this research, the environmental impact of different rates of wheat residues (no residues, 25, 50, 75, and 100%) in corn silage cultivation was evaluated using the life cycle assessment (LCA) method under conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) systems in a semi-arid region in Karaj, Iran. Results showed that in both tillage systems, marine aquatic ecotoxicity (ME) and global warming potential (GWP) had the highest levels of pollution among the environmental impact indicators. In CT systems, the minimum (17,730.70 kg 1,4-dichlorobenzene (DB) eq.) and maximum (33,683.97 kg 1,4-DB eq.) amounts of ME were related to 0 and 100% wheat residue rates, respectively. Also, in the CT system, 0 and 100% wheat residue rates resulted in minimum (176.72 kg CO
2
eq.) and maximum (324.95 kg CO
2
eq.) amounts of GWP, respectively. However, in the NT system, the 100% wheat residue rate showed the minimum amounts of ME (11,442.39 kg 1,4-DB eq.) and GWP (120.21 kg CO
2
eq.). Also, in the NT system, maximum amounts of ME (17,174 kg 1,4-DB eq.) and GWP (175.60 kg CO
2
eq.) were observed with a zero wheat residue rate. On-farm emissions and nitrogen fertilizers were the two factors with the highest contribution to the degradation related to environmental parameters at all rates of wheat residues. Moreover, in the CT system, the number of environmental pollutants increased with the addition of a higher wheat residue rate, while in the NT system, increasing residue rates decreased the amount of environmental pollutants. In conclusion, this LCA demonstrates that the NT system with the full retention of wheat residues (100%) is a more environmentally sustainable practice for corn silage production. Therefore, it may be considered one of the most adequate management strategies in this region and similar semi-arid conditions. Further long-term research and considering more environmental impact categories are required to assess the real potential of crop residues and tillage management for sustainable corn silage production. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10661-022-10675-8 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9718881</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2849893123</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-3fe96e868aed5603b76d251aaa753259d4e84cd34e8c5d854ab70b25d49e1d343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctuFDEQRVsIRCaBH2CBLLFh0-BH-8UCKYoSQIrEBtaWx66eOOq2B9udKH-POxPCY8GqLNepW3V1u-4Vwe8IxvJ9IVgI0mNK-_aSvFdPug3hkvVUc_2022AiZC-Y0EfdcSnXGGMtB_28O2Ji4JpKsuluz-NNyCnOEKudUJj31tWC0ohcyhGVMNkdoH1OfnE1pPgBhThOC0QHK3R7BbaiDCX4BQpaoofcJmPNttQQd6iG6V5htrGVdQuqd3soL7pno50KvHyoJ933i_NvZ5_7y6-fvpydXvaOY1l7NoIWoISy4LnAbCuFp5xYayVnlGs_gBqcZ6047hUf7FbiLeV-0EDaNzvpPh5098t2Bu9gPW0y-xxmm-9MssH83YnhyuzSjdGSKKVIE3j7IJDTj-axmjkUB81VhLQUQ9WglWaEsoa--Qe9TkuOzZ6hcuBEMYxVo-iBcjmVkmF8PIZgs-ZqDrmalqu5z9WsQ6__tPE48ivIBrADUFor7iD_3v0f2Z_OubF7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2745183008</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental impacts of corn silage production: influence of wheat residues under contrasting tillage management types</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Mirzaei, Morad ; Gorji Anari, Manouchehr ; Saronjic, Nermina ; Sarkar, Sudip ; Kral, Iris ; Gronauer, Andreas ; Mohammed, Safwan ; Caballero-Calvo, Andrés</creator><creatorcontrib>Mirzaei, Morad ; Gorji Anari, Manouchehr ; Saronjic, Nermina ; Sarkar, Sudip ; Kral, Iris ; Gronauer, Andreas ; Mohammed, Safwan ; Caballero-Calvo, Andrés</creatorcontrib><description>The intensification of specific land management operations (tillage, herbicide, etc.) is increasing land degradation and contributing to ecosystem pollution. Mulches can be a sustainable tool to counter these processes. This is particularly relevant for rural areas in low-income countries where agriculture is a vital sector. In this research, the environmental impact of different rates of wheat residues (no residues, 25, 50, 75, and 100%) in corn silage cultivation was evaluated using the life cycle assessment (LCA) method under conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) systems in a semi-arid region in Karaj, Iran. Results showed that in both tillage systems, marine aquatic ecotoxicity (ME) and global warming potential (GWP) had the highest levels of pollution among the environmental impact indicators. In CT systems, the minimum (17,730.70 kg 1,4-dichlorobenzene (DB) eq.) and maximum (33,683.97 kg 1,4-DB eq.) amounts of ME were related to 0 and 100% wheat residue rates, respectively. Also, in the CT system, 0 and 100% wheat residue rates resulted in minimum (176.72 kg CO
2
eq.) and maximum (324.95 kg CO
2
eq.) amounts of GWP, respectively. However, in the NT system, the 100% wheat residue rate showed the minimum amounts of ME (11,442.39 kg 1,4-DB eq.) and GWP (120.21 kg CO
2
eq.). Also, in the NT system, maximum amounts of ME (17,174 kg 1,4-DB eq.) and GWP (175.60 kg CO
2
eq.) were observed with a zero wheat residue rate. On-farm emissions and nitrogen fertilizers were the two factors with the highest contribution to the degradation related to environmental parameters at all rates of wheat residues. Moreover, in the CT system, the number of environmental pollutants increased with the addition of a higher wheat residue rate, while in the NT system, increasing residue rates decreased the amount of environmental pollutants. In conclusion, this LCA demonstrates that the NT system with the full retention of wheat residues (100%) is a more environmentally sustainable practice for corn silage production. Therefore, it may be considered one of the most adequate management strategies in this region and similar semi-arid conditions. Further long-term research and considering more environmental impact categories are required to assess the real potential of crop residues and tillage management for sustainable corn silage production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10661-022-10675-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36459271</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Arid regions ; Arid zones ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Carbon Dioxide ; Climate change ; conventional tillage ; Corn ; Corn silage ; Crop production ; Crop residues ; Cultivation ; Dichlorobenzene ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; ecosystems ; Ecotoxicology ; Emissions ; Environment ; Environmental degradation ; Environmental factors ; Environmental impact ; Environmental indicators ; Environmental Management ; Environmental Monitoring ; Environmental parameters ; Environmental Pollutants ; Environmental science ; Farms ; Fertilizers ; Global warming ; Grain cultivation ; Herbicides ; Iran ; Land degradation ; Land management ; Land pollution ; Life cycle ; Life cycle analysis ; Life cycle assessment ; Life cycles ; Low income areas ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; Mulches ; nitrogen ; no-tillage ; Pollutants ; Pollution ; Pollution levels ; Residues ; Rural areas ; Semi arid areas ; Semiarid zones ; Silage ; Sustainability ; Sustainable practices ; Tillage ; Triticum ; Vegetables ; Wheat ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2023-01, Vol.195 (1), p.171-171, Article 171</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-3fe96e868aed5603b76d251aaa753259d4e84cd34e8c5d854ab70b25d49e1d343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-3fe96e868aed5603b76d251aaa753259d4e84cd34e8c5d854ab70b25d49e1d343</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4382-0055</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-022-10675-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10661-022-10675-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36459271$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mirzaei, Morad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorji Anari, Manouchehr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saronjic, Nermina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Sudip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kral, Iris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gronauer, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammed, Safwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caballero-Calvo, Andrés</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental impacts of corn silage production: influence of wheat residues under contrasting tillage management types</title><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment</title><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><description>The intensification of specific land management operations (tillage, herbicide, etc.) is increasing land degradation and contributing to ecosystem pollution. Mulches can be a sustainable tool to counter these processes. This is particularly relevant for rural areas in low-income countries where agriculture is a vital sector. In this research, the environmental impact of different rates of wheat residues (no residues, 25, 50, 75, and 100%) in corn silage cultivation was evaluated using the life cycle assessment (LCA) method under conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) systems in a semi-arid region in Karaj, Iran. Results showed that in both tillage systems, marine aquatic ecotoxicity (ME) and global warming potential (GWP) had the highest levels of pollution among the environmental impact indicators. In CT systems, the minimum (17,730.70 kg 1,4-dichlorobenzene (DB) eq.) and maximum (33,683.97 kg 1,4-DB eq.) amounts of ME were related to 0 and 100% wheat residue rates, respectively. Also, in the CT system, 0 and 100% wheat residue rates resulted in minimum (176.72 kg CO
2
eq.) and maximum (324.95 kg CO
2
eq.) amounts of GWP, respectively. However, in the NT system, the 100% wheat residue rate showed the minimum amounts of ME (11,442.39 kg 1,4-DB eq.) and GWP (120.21 kg CO
2
eq.). Also, in the NT system, maximum amounts of ME (17,174 kg 1,4-DB eq.) and GWP (175.60 kg CO
2
eq.) were observed with a zero wheat residue rate. On-farm emissions and nitrogen fertilizers were the two factors with the highest contribution to the degradation related to environmental parameters at all rates of wheat residues. Moreover, in the CT system, the number of environmental pollutants increased with the addition of a higher wheat residue rate, while in the NT system, increasing residue rates decreased the amount of environmental pollutants. In conclusion, this LCA demonstrates that the NT system with the full retention of wheat residues (100%) is a more environmentally sustainable practice for corn silage production. Therefore, it may be considered one of the most adequate management strategies in this region and similar semi-arid conditions. Further long-term research and considering more environmental impact categories are required to assess the real potential of crop residues and tillage management for sustainable corn silage production.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Arid regions</subject><subject>Arid zones</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Carbon Dioxide</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>conventional tillage</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Corn silage</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Crop residues</subject><subject>Cultivation</subject><subject>Dichlorobenzene</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>ecosystems</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental degradation</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental indicators</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental parameters</subject><subject>Environmental Pollutants</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Grain cultivation</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Iran</subject><subject>Land degradation</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Land pollution</subject><subject>Life cycle</subject><subject>Life cycle analysis</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>Low income areas</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>Mulches</subject><subject>nitrogen</subject><subject>no-tillage</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution levels</subject><subject>Residues</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Semi arid areas</subject><subject>Semiarid zones</subject><subject>Silage</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable practices</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Triticum</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>0167-6369</issn><issn>1573-2959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctuFDEQRVsIRCaBH2CBLLFh0-BH-8UCKYoSQIrEBtaWx66eOOq2B9udKH-POxPCY8GqLNepW3V1u-4Vwe8IxvJ9IVgI0mNK-_aSvFdPug3hkvVUc_2022AiZC-Y0EfdcSnXGGMtB_28O2Ji4JpKsuluz-NNyCnOEKudUJj31tWC0ohcyhGVMNkdoH1OfnE1pPgBhThOC0QHK3R7BbaiDCX4BQpaoofcJmPNttQQd6iG6V5htrGVdQuqd3soL7pno50KvHyoJ933i_NvZ5_7y6-fvpydXvaOY1l7NoIWoISy4LnAbCuFp5xYayVnlGs_gBqcZ6047hUf7FbiLeV-0EDaNzvpPh5098t2Bu9gPW0y-xxmm-9MssH83YnhyuzSjdGSKKVIE3j7IJDTj-axmjkUB81VhLQUQ9WglWaEsoa--Qe9TkuOzZ6hcuBEMYxVo-iBcjmVkmF8PIZgs-ZqDrmalqu5z9WsQ6__tPE48ivIBrADUFor7iD_3v0f2Z_OubF7</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Mirzaei, Morad</creator><creator>Gorji Anari, Manouchehr</creator><creator>Saronjic, Nermina</creator><creator>Sarkar, Sudip</creator><creator>Kral, Iris</creator><creator>Gronauer, Andreas</creator><creator>Mohammed, Safwan</creator><creator>Caballero-Calvo, Andrés</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4382-0055</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Environmental impacts of corn silage production: influence of wheat residues under contrasting tillage management types</title><author>Mirzaei, Morad ; Gorji Anari, Manouchehr ; Saronjic, Nermina ; Sarkar, Sudip ; Kral, Iris ; Gronauer, Andreas ; Mohammed, Safwan ; Caballero-Calvo, Andrés</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-3fe96e868aed5603b76d251aaa753259d4e84cd34e8c5d854ab70b25d49e1d343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Arid regions</topic><topic>Arid zones</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Carbon Dioxide</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>conventional tillage</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Corn silage</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Crop residues</topic><topic>Cultivation</topic><topic>Dichlorobenzene</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>ecosystems</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental degradation</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental indicators</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental parameters</topic><topic>Environmental Pollutants</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Grain cultivation</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Iran</topic><topic>Land degradation</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Land pollution</topic><topic>Life cycle</topic><topic>Life cycle analysis</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>Low income areas</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>Mulches</topic><topic>nitrogen</topic><topic>no-tillage</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution levels</topic><topic>Residues</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Semi arid areas</topic><topic>Semiarid zones</topic><topic>Silage</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable practices</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Triticum</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mirzaei, Morad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorji Anari, Manouchehr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saronjic, Nermina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Sudip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kral, Iris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gronauer, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammed, Safwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caballero-Calvo, Andrés</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mirzaei, Morad</au><au>Gorji Anari, Manouchehr</au><au>Saronjic, Nermina</au><au>Sarkar, Sudip</au><au>Kral, Iris</au><au>Gronauer, Andreas</au><au>Mohammed, Safwan</au><au>Caballero-Calvo, Andrés</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental impacts of corn silage production: influence of wheat residues under contrasting tillage management types</atitle><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle><stitle>Environ Monit Assess</stitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>195</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>171</spage><epage>171</epage><pages>171-171</pages><artnum>171</artnum><issn>0167-6369</issn><eissn>1573-2959</eissn><abstract>The intensification of specific land management operations (tillage, herbicide, etc.) is increasing land degradation and contributing to ecosystem pollution. Mulches can be a sustainable tool to counter these processes. This is particularly relevant for rural areas in low-income countries where agriculture is a vital sector. In this research, the environmental impact of different rates of wheat residues (no residues, 25, 50, 75, and 100%) in corn silage cultivation was evaluated using the life cycle assessment (LCA) method under conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) systems in a semi-arid region in Karaj, Iran. Results showed that in both tillage systems, marine aquatic ecotoxicity (ME) and global warming potential (GWP) had the highest levels of pollution among the environmental impact indicators. In CT systems, the minimum (17,730.70 kg 1,4-dichlorobenzene (DB) eq.) and maximum (33,683.97 kg 1,4-DB eq.) amounts of ME were related to 0 and 100% wheat residue rates, respectively. Also, in the CT system, 0 and 100% wheat residue rates resulted in minimum (176.72 kg CO
2
eq.) and maximum (324.95 kg CO
2
eq.) amounts of GWP, respectively. However, in the NT system, the 100% wheat residue rate showed the minimum amounts of ME (11,442.39 kg 1,4-DB eq.) and GWP (120.21 kg CO
2
eq.). Also, in the NT system, maximum amounts of ME (17,174 kg 1,4-DB eq.) and GWP (175.60 kg CO
2
eq.) were observed with a zero wheat residue rate. On-farm emissions and nitrogen fertilizers were the two factors with the highest contribution to the degradation related to environmental parameters at all rates of wheat residues. Moreover, in the CT system, the number of environmental pollutants increased with the addition of a higher wheat residue rate, while in the NT system, increasing residue rates decreased the amount of environmental pollutants. In conclusion, this LCA demonstrates that the NT system with the full retention of wheat residues (100%) is a more environmentally sustainable practice for corn silage production. Therefore, it may be considered one of the most adequate management strategies in this region and similar semi-arid conditions. Further long-term research and considering more environmental impact categories are required to assess the real potential of crop residues and tillage management for sustainable corn silage production.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>36459271</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10661-022-10675-8</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4382-0055</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0167-6369 |
| ispartof | Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2023-01, Vol.195 (1), p.171-171, Article 171 |
| issn | 0167-6369 1573-2959 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9718881 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Agriculture Arid regions Arid zones Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Carbon Dioxide Climate change conventional tillage Corn Corn silage Crop production Crop residues Cultivation Dichlorobenzene Earth and Environmental Science Ecology Ecosystem ecosystems Ecotoxicology Emissions Environment Environmental degradation Environmental factors Environmental impact Environmental indicators Environmental Management Environmental Monitoring Environmental parameters Environmental Pollutants Environmental science Farms Fertilizers Global warming Grain cultivation Herbicides Iran Land degradation Land management Land pollution Life cycle Life cycle analysis Life cycle assessment Life cycles Low income areas Monitoring/Environmental Analysis Mulches nitrogen no-tillage Pollutants Pollution Pollution levels Residues Rural areas Semi arid areas Semiarid zones Silage Sustainability Sustainable practices Tillage Triticum Vegetables Wheat Zea mays |
| title | Environmental impacts of corn silage production: influence of wheat residues under contrasting tillage management types |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T19%3A19%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20impacts%20of%20corn%20silage%20production:%20influence%20of%20wheat%20residues%20under%20contrasting%20tillage%20management%20types&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20monitoring%20and%20assessment&rft.au=Mirzaei,%20Morad&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=195&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=171&rft.pages=171-171&rft.artnum=171&rft.issn=0167-6369&rft.eissn=1573-2959&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10661-022-10675-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2849893123%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2745183008&rft_id=info:pmid/36459271&rfr_iscdi=true |