Rural‐urban survival disparities for patients with surgically treated lung cancer

Background Nonsmall‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a common diagnosis among patients living in rural areas and small towns who face unique challenges accessing care. We examined differences in survival for surgically treated rural and small‐town patients compared to those from urban and metropolitan ar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of surgical oncology 2022-12, Vol.126 (7), p.1341-1349
Hauptverfasser: Logan, Charles D., Feinglass, Joe, Halverson, Amy L., Lung, Kalvin, Kim, Samuel, Bharat, Ankit, Odell, David D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1349
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1341
container_title Journal of surgical oncology
container_volume 126
creator Logan, Charles D.
Feinglass, Joe
Halverson, Amy L.
Lung, Kalvin
Kim, Samuel
Bharat, Ankit
Odell, David D.
description Background Nonsmall‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a common diagnosis among patients living in rural areas and small towns who face unique challenges accessing care. We examined differences in survival for surgically treated rural and small‐town patients compared to those from urban and metropolitan areas. Methods The National Cancer Database was used to identify surgically treated NSCLC patients from 2004 to 2016. Patients from rural/small‐town counties were compared to urban/metro counties. Differences in patient clinical, sociodemographic, hospital, and travel characteristics were described. Survival differences were examined with Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models. Results The study included 366 373 surgically treated NSCLC patients with 12.4% (n = 45 304) categorized as rural/small‐town. Rural/small‐town patients traveled farther for treatment and were from areas characterized by lower income and education(all p 
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jso.27045
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9710511</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2729038340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-267262ce55d3c4ae9f5deffe35ceea63a57a33c57eb73dc096a0877330fdab563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1qFEEUhQtRzBhd-ALS4EYXndz665raCBKMPwQCRtfFnerbkxpquseq7gmz8xHyjD6JNU4MKriqgvvxcQ6HseccTjiAOF3l4UQYUPoBm3GwTW3Bzh-yWbmJWhkLR-xJzisAsLZRj9mRbDjXIOSMXX2eEsYf32-ntMC-ylPahi3Gqg15gymMgXLVDanaYPn2Y65uwni9x5bBY4y7akyEI7VVnPpl5bH3lJ6yRx3GTM_u3mP29fzdl7MP9cXl-49nby9qr5TUtWiMaIQnrVvpFZLtdEtdR1J7ImwkaoNSem1oYWTrSy-EuTFSQtfiQjfymL05eDfTYk2tL_lKF7dJYY1p5wYM7u9LH67dctg6azhozovg1Z0gDd8myqNbh-wpRuxpmLIThmulGqn26Mt_0NUwpb7UK5SwIOdSQaFeHyifhpwTdfdhOLj9VK5M5X5NVdgXf6a_J39vU4DTA3ATIu3-b3Kfri4Pyp-lN6C_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2729038340</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rural‐urban survival disparities for patients with surgically treated lung cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Logan, Charles D. ; Feinglass, Joe ; Halverson, Amy L. ; Lung, Kalvin ; Kim, Samuel ; Bharat, Ankit ; Odell, David D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Logan, Charles D. ; Feinglass, Joe ; Halverson, Amy L. ; Lung, Kalvin ; Kim, Samuel ; Bharat, Ankit ; Odell, David D.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Nonsmall‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a common diagnosis among patients living in rural areas and small towns who face unique challenges accessing care. We examined differences in survival for surgically treated rural and small‐town patients compared to those from urban and metropolitan areas. Methods The National Cancer Database was used to identify surgically treated NSCLC patients from 2004 to 2016. Patients from rural/small‐town counties were compared to urban/metro counties. Differences in patient clinical, sociodemographic, hospital, and travel characteristics were described. Survival differences were examined with Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models. Results The study included 366 373 surgically treated NSCLC patients with 12.4% (n = 45 304) categorized as rural/small‐town. Rural/small‐town patients traveled farther for treatment and were from areas characterized by lower income and education(all p &lt; 0.001). Survival probabilities for rural/small‐town patients were worse at 1 year (85% vs. 87%), 5 years (48% vs. 54%), and 10 years (26% vs. 31%) (p &lt; 0.001). Travel distance &gt;100 miles (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07–1.16, vs. &lt;25 miles) and living in a rural/small‐town county (HR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01–1.07) were associated with increased risk for death. Conclusions Rural and small‐town patients with surgically treated NSCLC had worse survival outcomes compared to urban and metropolitan patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9098</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jso.27045</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36115023</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - surgery ; health disparity ; Humans ; Income ; Lung cancer ; Lung Neoplasms - surgery ; nonsmall‐cell lung cancer ; Rural areas ; rural health ; Rural Population ; Thoracic ; Travel</subject><ispartof>Journal of surgical oncology, 2022-12, Vol.126 (7), p.1341-1349</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Journal of Surgical Oncology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-267262ce55d3c4ae9f5deffe35ceea63a57a33c57eb73dc096a0877330fdab563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-267262ce55d3c4ae9f5deffe35ceea63a57a33c57eb73dc096a0877330fdab563</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2184-8954</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjso.27045$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjso.27045$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,782,786,887,1419,27931,27932,45581,45582</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36115023$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Logan, Charles D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feinglass, Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halverson, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lung, Kalvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bharat, Ankit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odell, David D.</creatorcontrib><title>Rural‐urban survival disparities for patients with surgically treated lung cancer</title><title>Journal of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>J Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Background Nonsmall‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a common diagnosis among patients living in rural areas and small towns who face unique challenges accessing care. We examined differences in survival for surgically treated rural and small‐town patients compared to those from urban and metropolitan areas. Methods The National Cancer Database was used to identify surgically treated NSCLC patients from 2004 to 2016. Patients from rural/small‐town counties were compared to urban/metro counties. Differences in patient clinical, sociodemographic, hospital, and travel characteristics were described. Survival differences were examined with Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models. Results The study included 366 373 surgically treated NSCLC patients with 12.4% (n = 45 304) categorized as rural/small‐town. Rural/small‐town patients traveled farther for treatment and were from areas characterized by lower income and education(all p &lt; 0.001). Survival probabilities for rural/small‐town patients were worse at 1 year (85% vs. 87%), 5 years (48% vs. 54%), and 10 years (26% vs. 31%) (p &lt; 0.001). Travel distance &gt;100 miles (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07–1.16, vs. &lt;25 miles) and living in a rural/small‐town county (HR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01–1.07) were associated with increased risk for death. Conclusions Rural and small‐town patients with surgically treated NSCLC had worse survival outcomes compared to urban and metropolitan patients.</description><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - surgery</subject><subject>health disparity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>nonsmall‐cell lung cancer</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>rural health</subject><subject>Rural Population</subject><subject>Thoracic</subject><subject>Travel</subject><issn>0022-4790</issn><issn>1096-9098</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1qFEEUhQtRzBhd-ALS4EYXndz665raCBKMPwQCRtfFnerbkxpquseq7gmz8xHyjD6JNU4MKriqgvvxcQ6HseccTjiAOF3l4UQYUPoBm3GwTW3Bzh-yWbmJWhkLR-xJzisAsLZRj9mRbDjXIOSMXX2eEsYf32-ntMC-ylPahi3Gqg15gymMgXLVDanaYPn2Y65uwni9x5bBY4y7akyEI7VVnPpl5bH3lJ6yRx3GTM_u3mP29fzdl7MP9cXl-49nby9qr5TUtWiMaIQnrVvpFZLtdEtdR1J7ImwkaoNSem1oYWTrSy-EuTFSQtfiQjfymL05eDfTYk2tL_lKF7dJYY1p5wYM7u9LH67dctg6azhozovg1Z0gDd8myqNbh-wpRuxpmLIThmulGqn26Mt_0NUwpb7UK5SwIOdSQaFeHyifhpwTdfdhOLj9VK5M5X5NVdgXf6a_J39vU4DTA3ATIu3-b3Kfri4Pyp-lN6C_</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Logan, Charles D.</creator><creator>Feinglass, Joe</creator><creator>Halverson, Amy L.</creator><creator>Lung, Kalvin</creator><creator>Kim, Samuel</creator><creator>Bharat, Ankit</creator><creator>Odell, David D.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2184-8954</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>Rural‐urban survival disparities for patients with surgically treated lung cancer</title><author>Logan, Charles D. ; Feinglass, Joe ; Halverson, Amy L. ; Lung, Kalvin ; Kim, Samuel ; Bharat, Ankit ; Odell, David D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-267262ce55d3c4ae9f5deffe35ceea63a57a33c57eb73dc096a0877330fdab563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - surgery</topic><topic>health disparity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>nonsmall‐cell lung cancer</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>rural health</topic><topic>Rural Population</topic><topic>Thoracic</topic><topic>Travel</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Logan, Charles D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feinglass, Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halverson, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lung, Kalvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bharat, Ankit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odell, David D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Logan, Charles D.</au><au>Feinglass, Joe</au><au>Halverson, Amy L.</au><au>Lung, Kalvin</au><au>Kim, Samuel</au><au>Bharat, Ankit</au><au>Odell, David D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rural‐urban survival disparities for patients with surgically treated lung cancer</atitle><jtitle>Journal of surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1341</spage><epage>1349</epage><pages>1341-1349</pages><issn>0022-4790</issn><eissn>1096-9098</eissn><abstract>Background Nonsmall‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a common diagnosis among patients living in rural areas and small towns who face unique challenges accessing care. We examined differences in survival for surgically treated rural and small‐town patients compared to those from urban and metropolitan areas. Methods The National Cancer Database was used to identify surgically treated NSCLC patients from 2004 to 2016. Patients from rural/small‐town counties were compared to urban/metro counties. Differences in patient clinical, sociodemographic, hospital, and travel characteristics were described. Survival differences were examined with Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models. Results The study included 366 373 surgically treated NSCLC patients with 12.4% (n = 45 304) categorized as rural/small‐town. Rural/small‐town patients traveled farther for treatment and were from areas characterized by lower income and education(all p &lt; 0.001). Survival probabilities for rural/small‐town patients were worse at 1 year (85% vs. 87%), 5 years (48% vs. 54%), and 10 years (26% vs. 31%) (p &lt; 0.001). Travel distance &gt;100 miles (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07–1.16, vs. &lt;25 miles) and living in a rural/small‐town county (HR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01–1.07) were associated with increased risk for death. Conclusions Rural and small‐town patients with surgically treated NSCLC had worse survival outcomes compared to urban and metropolitan patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>36115023</pmid><doi>10.1002/jso.27045</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2184-8954</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4790
ispartof Journal of surgical oncology, 2022-12, Vol.126 (7), p.1341-1349
issn 0022-4790
1096-9098
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9710511
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - surgery
health disparity
Humans
Income
Lung cancer
Lung Neoplasms - surgery
nonsmall‐cell lung cancer
Rural areas
rural health
Rural Population
Thoracic
Travel
title Rural‐urban survival disparities for patients with surgically treated lung cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T21%3A31%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rural%E2%80%90urban%20survival%20disparities%20for%20patients%20with%20surgically%20treated%20lung%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Logan,%20Charles%20D.&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1341&rft.epage=1349&rft.pages=1341-1349&rft.issn=0022-4790&rft.eissn=1096-9098&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jso.27045&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2729038340%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2729038340&rft_id=info:pmid/36115023&rfr_iscdi=true