Barriers and Facilitators in Implementation of an Esophagectomy Care Pathway: a Qualitative Analysis
Introduction A new postoperative esophagectomy care pathway was recently implemented at our institution. Practice pattern change among provider teams can prove challenging; therefore, we sought to study the barriers and facilitators toward pathway implementation at the provider level. Methods This q...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2023-02, Vol.27 (2), p.213-221 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 221 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 213 |
container_title | Journal of gastrointestinal surgery |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Madsen, Helen J. Lambert-Kerzner, Anne Mucharsky, Ellison Gergen, Anna K. Dyas, Adam R. McCarter, Martin Stewart, Camille Pratap, Akshay Mitchell, John Randhawa, Simran Meguid, Robert A. |
description | Introduction
A new postoperative esophagectomy care pathway was recently implemented at our institution. Practice pattern change among provider teams can prove challenging; therefore, we sought to study the barriers and facilitators toward pathway implementation at the provider level.
Methods
This qualitative study was guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to study the adoption and implementation of a post-esophagectomy care pathway. Sixteen in-depth interviews were conducted with providers involved with the pathway. Matrix analysis was used to analyze the data.
Results
Providers included attending surgeons (
n
= 6), advanced practice providers (
n
= 8), registered dietitian (
n
= 1), and clinic staff (
n
= 1). TDF domains that were salient across our findings included knowledge, beliefs about consequences, social influences, and environmental context and resources. Identified facilitators included were electronic health record tools, such as note templates including pathway components and a pathway-specific order set, patient satisfaction, and preliminary data indicating clinical benefits such as a reduced anastomotic leak rate. The major barrier reported was a hesitance to abandon previous practice patterns, most prevalent at the attending surgeon level.
Conclusion
The TDF enabled us to identify and understand the individuals’ perceived barriers and facilitators toward adoption and implementation of a postoperative esophagectomy pathway. This analysis can help guide and improve adoption of surgical patient care pathways among providers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11605-022-05537-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9707093</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2780586993</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-5dde97fb2286f0c0cd1c45c0a8299a34c33adda6e39a1223aadff5e063cda5803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rGzEQxUVJadK0X6CHIMh5m5G0Wu3mUEhMnAQCTaCF3sRE0toKuytXWrv421e28_eS04iZN2-e-BHyjcF3BqBOEmMVyAI4L0BKoQr4QA5YrURRVrzay29oWMGl_LNPPqf0AMAUsPoT2RdVWQopywNizzFG72KiOFg6ReM7P-IYcsMP9LpfdK53Q-74MNDQZhW9SGExx5kzY-jXdILR0Vsc5_9wfUqR3i1x6-BXjp4N2K2TT1_Ixxa75L4-1kPye3rxa3JV3Py8vJ6c3RSmVOVYSGtdo9p7zuuqBQPGMlNKA1jzpkFRGiHQWqycaJBxLhBt20oHlTAWZQ3ikPzY-S6W972zJgeP2OlF9D3GtQ7o9dvJ4Od6Fla6UaCgEdng-NEghr9Ll0b9EJYx_yJprmqQddVsVXynMjGkFF37fIGB3pDROzI6k9FbMnqT7eh1tueVJxRZIHaClEfDzMWX2-_Y_gdUmJv9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2780586993</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Barriers and Facilitators in Implementation of an Esophagectomy Care Pathway: a Qualitative Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Madsen, Helen J. ; Lambert-Kerzner, Anne ; Mucharsky, Ellison ; Gergen, Anna K. ; Dyas, Adam R. ; McCarter, Martin ; Stewart, Camille ; Pratap, Akshay ; Mitchell, John ; Randhawa, Simran ; Meguid, Robert A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Helen J. ; Lambert-Kerzner, Anne ; Mucharsky, Ellison ; Gergen, Anna K. ; Dyas, Adam R. ; McCarter, Martin ; Stewart, Camille ; Pratap, Akshay ; Mitchell, John ; Randhawa, Simran ; Meguid, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
A new postoperative esophagectomy care pathway was recently implemented at our institution. Practice pattern change among provider teams can prove challenging; therefore, we sought to study the barriers and facilitators toward pathway implementation at the provider level.
Methods
This qualitative study was guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to study the adoption and implementation of a post-esophagectomy care pathway. Sixteen in-depth interviews were conducted with providers involved with the pathway. Matrix analysis was used to analyze the data.
Results
Providers included attending surgeons (
n
= 6), advanced practice providers (
n
= 8), registered dietitian (
n
= 1), and clinic staff (
n
= 1). TDF domains that were salient across our findings included knowledge, beliefs about consequences, social influences, and environmental context and resources. Identified facilitators included were electronic health record tools, such as note templates including pathway components and a pathway-specific order set, patient satisfaction, and preliminary data indicating clinical benefits such as a reduced anastomotic leak rate. The major barrier reported was a hesitance to abandon previous practice patterns, most prevalent at the attending surgeon level.
Conclusion
The TDF enabled us to identify and understand the individuals’ perceived barriers and facilitators toward adoption and implementation of a postoperative esophagectomy pathway. This analysis can help guide and improve adoption of surgical patient care pathways among providers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1091-255X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05537-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36443554</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Clinical outcomes ; Critical Pathways ; Esophagectomy ; Gastroenterology ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Interviews ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original ; Original Article ; Ostomy ; Patient care planning ; Patient Satisfaction ; Qualitative Research ; Surgery ; Surgical anastomosis ; Surgical outcomes ; Teams ; Thoracic surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2023-02, Vol.27 (2), p.213-221</ispartof><rights>The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2022. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.</rights><rights>The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-5dde97fb2286f0c0cd1c45c0a8299a34c33adda6e39a1223aadff5e063cda5803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-5dde97fb2286f0c0cd1c45c0a8299a34c33adda6e39a1223aadff5e063cda5803</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0954-1052</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11605-022-05537-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11605-022-05537-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36443554$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Helen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambert-Kerzner, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mucharsky, Ellison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gergen, Anna K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyas, Adam R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarter, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Camille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratap, Akshay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randhawa, Simran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meguid, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><title>Barriers and Facilitators in Implementation of an Esophagectomy Care Pathway: a Qualitative Analysis</title><title>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</title><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><description>Introduction
A new postoperative esophagectomy care pathway was recently implemented at our institution. Practice pattern change among provider teams can prove challenging; therefore, we sought to study the barriers and facilitators toward pathway implementation at the provider level.
Methods
This qualitative study was guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to study the adoption and implementation of a post-esophagectomy care pathway. Sixteen in-depth interviews were conducted with providers involved with the pathway. Matrix analysis was used to analyze the data.
Results
Providers included attending surgeons (
n
= 6), advanced practice providers (
n
= 8), registered dietitian (
n
= 1), and clinic staff (
n
= 1). TDF domains that were salient across our findings included knowledge, beliefs about consequences, social influences, and environmental context and resources. Identified facilitators included were electronic health record tools, such as note templates including pathway components and a pathway-specific order set, patient satisfaction, and preliminary data indicating clinical benefits such as a reduced anastomotic leak rate. The major barrier reported was a hesitance to abandon previous practice patterns, most prevalent at the attending surgeon level.
Conclusion
The TDF enabled us to identify and understand the individuals’ perceived barriers and facilitators toward adoption and implementation of a postoperative esophagectomy pathway. This analysis can help guide and improve adoption of surgical patient care pathways among providers.</description><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Critical Pathways</subject><subject>Esophagectomy</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Patient care planning</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical anastomosis</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Thoracic surgery</subject><issn>1091-255X</issn><issn>1873-4626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9rGzEQxUVJadK0X6CHIMh5m5G0Wu3mUEhMnAQCTaCF3sRE0toKuytXWrv421e28_eS04iZN2-e-BHyjcF3BqBOEmMVyAI4L0BKoQr4QA5YrURRVrzay29oWMGl_LNPPqf0AMAUsPoT2RdVWQopywNizzFG72KiOFg6ReM7P-IYcsMP9LpfdK53Q-74MNDQZhW9SGExx5kzY-jXdILR0Vsc5_9wfUqR3i1x6-BXjp4N2K2TT1_Ixxa75L4-1kPye3rxa3JV3Py8vJ6c3RSmVOVYSGtdo9p7zuuqBQPGMlNKA1jzpkFRGiHQWqycaJBxLhBt20oHlTAWZQ3ikPzY-S6W972zJgeP2OlF9D3GtQ7o9dvJ4Od6Fla6UaCgEdng-NEghr9Ll0b9EJYx_yJprmqQddVsVXynMjGkFF37fIGB3pDROzI6k9FbMnqT7eh1tueVJxRZIHaClEfDzMWX2-_Y_gdUmJv9</recordid><startdate>20230201</startdate><enddate>20230201</enddate><creator>Madsen, Helen J.</creator><creator>Lambert-Kerzner, Anne</creator><creator>Mucharsky, Ellison</creator><creator>Gergen, Anna K.</creator><creator>Dyas, Adam R.</creator><creator>McCarter, Martin</creator><creator>Stewart, Camille</creator><creator>Pratap, Akshay</creator><creator>Mitchell, John</creator><creator>Randhawa, Simran</creator><creator>Meguid, Robert A.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0954-1052</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230201</creationdate><title>Barriers and Facilitators in Implementation of an Esophagectomy Care Pathway: a Qualitative Analysis</title><author>Madsen, Helen J. ; Lambert-Kerzner, Anne ; Mucharsky, Ellison ; Gergen, Anna K. ; Dyas, Adam R. ; McCarter, Martin ; Stewart, Camille ; Pratap, Akshay ; Mitchell, John ; Randhawa, Simran ; Meguid, Robert A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-5dde97fb2286f0c0cd1c45c0a8299a34c33adda6e39a1223aadff5e063cda5803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Critical Pathways</topic><topic>Esophagectomy</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Patient care planning</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical anastomosis</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Thoracic surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Helen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambert-Kerzner, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mucharsky, Ellison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gergen, Anna K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyas, Adam R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarter, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Camille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratap, Akshay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randhawa, Simran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meguid, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Madsen, Helen J.</au><au>Lambert-Kerzner, Anne</au><au>Mucharsky, Ellison</au><au>Gergen, Anna K.</au><au>Dyas, Adam R.</au><au>McCarter, Martin</au><au>Stewart, Camille</au><au>Pratap, Akshay</au><au>Mitchell, John</au><au>Randhawa, Simran</au><au>Meguid, Robert A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Barriers and Facilitators in Implementation of an Esophagectomy Care Pathway: a Qualitative Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle><stitle>J Gastrointest Surg</stitle><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><date>2023-02-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>213</spage><epage>221</epage><pages>213-221</pages><issn>1091-255X</issn><eissn>1873-4626</eissn><abstract>Introduction
A new postoperative esophagectomy care pathway was recently implemented at our institution. Practice pattern change among provider teams can prove challenging; therefore, we sought to study the barriers and facilitators toward pathway implementation at the provider level.
Methods
This qualitative study was guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to study the adoption and implementation of a post-esophagectomy care pathway. Sixteen in-depth interviews were conducted with providers involved with the pathway. Matrix analysis was used to analyze the data.
Results
Providers included attending surgeons (
n
= 6), advanced practice providers (
n
= 8), registered dietitian (
n
= 1), and clinic staff (
n
= 1). TDF domains that were salient across our findings included knowledge, beliefs about consequences, social influences, and environmental context and resources. Identified facilitators included were electronic health record tools, such as note templates including pathway components and a pathway-specific order set, patient satisfaction, and preliminary data indicating clinical benefits such as a reduced anastomotic leak rate. The major barrier reported was a hesitance to abandon previous practice patterns, most prevalent at the attending surgeon level.
Conclusion
The TDF enabled us to identify and understand the individuals’ perceived barriers and facilitators toward adoption and implementation of a postoperative esophagectomy pathway. This analysis can help guide and improve adoption of surgical patient care pathways among providers.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>36443554</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11605-022-05537-0</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0954-1052</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1091-255X |
ispartof | Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2023-02, Vol.27 (2), p.213-221 |
issn | 1091-255X 1873-4626 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9707093 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Clinical outcomes Critical Pathways Esophagectomy Gastroenterology Gastrointestinal surgery Hospitals Humans Interviews Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Original Article Ostomy Patient care planning Patient Satisfaction Qualitative Research Surgery Surgical anastomosis Surgical outcomes Teams Thoracic surgery |
title | Barriers and Facilitators in Implementation of an Esophagectomy Care Pathway: a Qualitative Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T19%3A50%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Barriers%20and%20Facilitators%20in%20Implementation%20of%20an%20Esophagectomy%20Care%20Pathway:%20a%20Qualitative%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastrointestinal%20surgery&rft.au=Madsen,%20Helen%20J.&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=213&rft.epage=221&rft.pages=213-221&rft.issn=1091-255X&rft.eissn=1873-4626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11605-022-05537-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2780586993%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2780586993&rft_id=info:pmid/36443554&rfr_iscdi=true |