Co-fermentation of non-Saccharomyces yeasts with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum FST 1.7 for the production of non-alcoholic beer
The non-alcoholic beer (NAB) sector has experienced steady growth in recent years, with breweries continuously seeking new ways to fulfil consumer demands. NAB can be produced by limited fermentation of non- Saccharomyces yeasts; however, beer produced in this manner is often critiqued for its sweet...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European food research & technology 2023-01, Vol.249 (1), p.167-181 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 181 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 167 |
container_title | European food research & technology |
container_volume | 249 |
creator | Nyhan, Laura Sahin, Aylin W. Arendt, Elke K. |
description | The non-alcoholic beer (NAB) sector has experienced steady growth in recent years, with breweries continuously seeking new ways to fulfil consumer demands. NAB can be produced by limited fermentation of non-
Saccharomyces
yeasts; however, beer produced in this manner is often critiqued for its sweet taste and wort-like off-flavours due to high levels of residual sugars and lack of flavour metabolites. The use of
Lactobacillus
in limited co-fermentation with non-
Saccharomyces
yeasts is a novel approach to produce NABs with varying flavour and aroma characteristics. In this study, lab-scale fermentations of
Lachancea fermentati
KBI 12.1 and
Cyberlindnera subsufficiens
C6.1 with
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum
FST 1.7 were performed and compared to a brewer’s yeast,
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
WLP001. Fermentations were monitored for pH, TTA, extract reduction, alcohol production, and microbial cell count. The final beers were analysed for sugar and organic acid concentration, free amino nitrogen content (FAN), glycerol, and levels of volatile metabolites. The inability of the non-
Saccharomyces
yeasts to utilise maltotriose as an energy source resulted in extended fermentation times compared to
S. cerevisiae
WLP001. Co-fermentation of yeasts with lactic acid bacteria (LAB) resulted in a decreased pH, higher TTA and increased levels of lactic acid in the final beers. The overall acceptability of the NABs produced by co-fermentation was higher than or similar to that of the beers fermented with the yeasts alone, indicating that LAB fermentation did not negatively impact the sensory attributes of the beer.
C. subsufficiens
C6.1 and
L. plantarum
FST 1.7 NAB was characterised as fruity tasting with the significantly higher ester concentrations masking the wort-like flavours resulting from limited fermentation. NAB produced with
L. fermentati
KBI12.1 and
L. plantarum
FST1.7 had decreased levels of the undesirable volatile compound diacetyl and was described as ‘fruity’ and ‘acidic’, with the increased sourness masking the sweet, wort-like characteristics of the NAB. Moreover, this NAB was ranked as the most highly acceptable in the sensory evaluation. In conclusion, the limited co-fermentation of non-
Saccharomyces
yeasts with LAB is a promising strategy for the production of NAB. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00217-022-04142-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9702684</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2747006052</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-f9c3466eb97b5df7d559c1a573ee77e5250c30cd04438c9673bf6031eca5a4dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxSMEoqXwBTggS1y4uPi_NxcktKJQaSUOLWfLmUwaV0m82AloT3x1vN2yLRw4jUfz5ud5elX1mrNzzph9nxkT3FImBGWKK0HVk-qUK7miQq700-Pb2pPqRc63jOnacPW8OpFGGSMFP61-rSPtMI04zX4OcSKxI1Oc6JUH6H2K4w4wkx36PGfyM8w92XiYw3bw0xwaD2EYlkzuWp-WkVxcXRN-bkkXE5l7JNsU2wUek_0AsY9DANIgppfVs84PGV_d17Pq28Wn6_UXuvn6-XL9cUNBMTXTrgZZTsamto1uO9tqXQP32kpEa1ELzUAyaJkqlqE2VjadYZIjeO1VC_Ks-nDgbpdmxBaK3-QHt01h9Gnnog_u78kUencTf7jaMmFWqgDe3QNS_L5gnt0YMuBQnGNcshNWWcYM06JI3_4jvY1Lmoq9ojLaCFHzPVAcVJBizgm74zGcuX2-7pCvK_m6u3zdfunNYxvHlT-BFoE8CHIZTTeYHv7-D_Y3mMKyzg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2765622914</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Co-fermentation of non-Saccharomyces yeasts with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum FST 1.7 for the production of non-alcoholic beer</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Nyhan, Laura ; Sahin, Aylin W. ; Arendt, Elke K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nyhan, Laura ; Sahin, Aylin W. ; Arendt, Elke K.</creatorcontrib><description>The non-alcoholic beer (NAB) sector has experienced steady growth in recent years, with breweries continuously seeking new ways to fulfil consumer demands. NAB can be produced by limited fermentation of non-
Saccharomyces
yeasts; however, beer produced in this manner is often critiqued for its sweet taste and wort-like off-flavours due to high levels of residual sugars and lack of flavour metabolites. The use of
Lactobacillus
in limited co-fermentation with non-
Saccharomyces
yeasts is a novel approach to produce NABs with varying flavour and aroma characteristics. In this study, lab-scale fermentations of
Lachancea fermentati
KBI 12.1 and
Cyberlindnera subsufficiens
C6.1 with
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum
FST 1.7 were performed and compared to a brewer’s yeast,
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
WLP001. Fermentations were monitored for pH, TTA, extract reduction, alcohol production, and microbial cell count. The final beers were analysed for sugar and organic acid concentration, free amino nitrogen content (FAN), glycerol, and levels of volatile metabolites. The inability of the non-
Saccharomyces
yeasts to utilise maltotriose as an energy source resulted in extended fermentation times compared to
S. cerevisiae
WLP001. Co-fermentation of yeasts with lactic acid bacteria (LAB) resulted in a decreased pH, higher TTA and increased levels of lactic acid in the final beers. The overall acceptability of the NABs produced by co-fermentation was higher than or similar to that of the beers fermented with the yeasts alone, indicating that LAB fermentation did not negatively impact the sensory attributes of the beer.
C. subsufficiens
C6.1 and
L. plantarum
FST 1.7 NAB was characterised as fruity tasting with the significantly higher ester concentrations masking the wort-like flavours resulting from limited fermentation. NAB produced with
L. fermentati
KBI12.1 and
L. plantarum
FST1.7 had decreased levels of the undesirable volatile compound diacetyl and was described as ‘fruity’ and ‘acidic’, with the increased sourness masking the sweet, wort-like characteristics of the NAB. Moreover, this NAB was ranked as the most highly acceptable in the sensory evaluation. In conclusion, the limited co-fermentation of non-
Saccharomyces
yeasts with LAB is a promising strategy for the production of NAB.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1438-2377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1438-2385</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00217-022-04142-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36466321</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Acceptability ; Agriculture ; Analytical Chemistry ; Aroma ; Bacteria ; Beer ; Biotechnology ; Breweries ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Diacetyl ; Energy sources ; Fermentation ; Flavors ; Food Science ; Forestry ; Glycerol ; Lactic acid ; Lactic acid bacteria ; Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ; Maltotriose ; Masking ; Metabolites ; Microorganisms ; Organic acids ; Original Paper ; pH effects ; Saccharomyces ; Saccharomyces cerevisiae ; Sensory evaluation ; Sensory perception ; Sensory properties ; Sourness ; Sugar ; Sweet taste ; Volatile compounds ; Wort ; Worts ; Yeast ; Yeasts</subject><ispartof>European food research & technology, 2023-01, Vol.249 (1), p.167-181</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-f9c3466eb97b5df7d559c1a573ee77e5250c30cd04438c9673bf6031eca5a4dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-f9c3466eb97b5df7d559c1a573ee77e5250c30cd04438c9673bf6031eca5a4dc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00217-022-04142-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00217-022-04142-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36466321$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nyhan, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahin, Aylin W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arendt, Elke K.</creatorcontrib><title>Co-fermentation of non-Saccharomyces yeasts with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum FST 1.7 for the production of non-alcoholic beer</title><title>European food research & technology</title><addtitle>Eur Food Res Technol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Food Res Technol</addtitle><description>The non-alcoholic beer (NAB) sector has experienced steady growth in recent years, with breweries continuously seeking new ways to fulfil consumer demands. NAB can be produced by limited fermentation of non-
Saccharomyces
yeasts; however, beer produced in this manner is often critiqued for its sweet taste and wort-like off-flavours due to high levels of residual sugars and lack of flavour metabolites. The use of
Lactobacillus
in limited co-fermentation with non-
Saccharomyces
yeasts is a novel approach to produce NABs with varying flavour and aroma characteristics. In this study, lab-scale fermentations of
Lachancea fermentati
KBI 12.1 and
Cyberlindnera subsufficiens
C6.1 with
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum
FST 1.7 were performed and compared to a brewer’s yeast,
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
WLP001. Fermentations were monitored for pH, TTA, extract reduction, alcohol production, and microbial cell count. The final beers were analysed for sugar and organic acid concentration, free amino nitrogen content (FAN), glycerol, and levels of volatile metabolites. The inability of the non-
Saccharomyces
yeasts to utilise maltotriose as an energy source resulted in extended fermentation times compared to
S. cerevisiae
WLP001. Co-fermentation of yeasts with lactic acid bacteria (LAB) resulted in a decreased pH, higher TTA and increased levels of lactic acid in the final beers. The overall acceptability of the NABs produced by co-fermentation was higher than or similar to that of the beers fermented with the yeasts alone, indicating that LAB fermentation did not negatively impact the sensory attributes of the beer.
C. subsufficiens
C6.1 and
L. plantarum
FST 1.7 NAB was characterised as fruity tasting with the significantly higher ester concentrations masking the wort-like flavours resulting from limited fermentation. NAB produced with
L. fermentati
KBI12.1 and
L. plantarum
FST1.7 had decreased levels of the undesirable volatile compound diacetyl and was described as ‘fruity’ and ‘acidic’, with the increased sourness masking the sweet, wort-like characteristics of the NAB. Moreover, this NAB was ranked as the most highly acceptable in the sensory evaluation. In conclusion, the limited co-fermentation of non-
Saccharomyces
yeasts with LAB is a promising strategy for the production of NAB.</description><subject>Acceptability</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Analytical Chemistry</subject><subject>Aroma</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Beer</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Breweries</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Diacetyl</subject><subject>Energy sources</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Flavors</subject><subject>Food Science</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Glycerol</subject><subject>Lactic acid</subject><subject>Lactic acid bacteria</subject><subject>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</subject><subject>Maltotriose</subject><subject>Masking</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Organic acids</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>pH effects</subject><subject>Saccharomyces</subject><subject>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</subject><subject>Sensory evaluation</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Sensory properties</subject><subject>Sourness</subject><subject>Sugar</subject><subject>Sweet taste</subject><subject>Volatile compounds</subject><subject>Wort</subject><subject>Worts</subject><subject>Yeast</subject><subject>Yeasts</subject><issn>1438-2377</issn><issn>1438-2385</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxSMEoqXwBTggS1y4uPi_NxcktKJQaSUOLWfLmUwaV0m82AloT3x1vN2yLRw4jUfz5ud5elX1mrNzzph9nxkT3FImBGWKK0HVk-qUK7miQq700-Pb2pPqRc63jOnacPW8OpFGGSMFP61-rSPtMI04zX4OcSKxI1Oc6JUH6H2K4w4wkx36PGfyM8w92XiYw3bw0xwaD2EYlkzuWp-WkVxcXRN-bkkXE5l7JNsU2wUek_0AsY9DANIgppfVs84PGV_d17Pq28Wn6_UXuvn6-XL9cUNBMTXTrgZZTsamto1uO9tqXQP32kpEa1ELzUAyaJkqlqE2VjadYZIjeO1VC_Ks-nDgbpdmxBaK3-QHt01h9Gnnog_u78kUencTf7jaMmFWqgDe3QNS_L5gnt0YMuBQnGNcshNWWcYM06JI3_4jvY1Lmoq9ojLaCFHzPVAcVJBizgm74zGcuX2-7pCvK_m6u3zdfunNYxvHlT-BFoE8CHIZTTeYHv7-D_Y3mMKyzg</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Nyhan, Laura</creator><creator>Sahin, Aylin W.</creator><creator>Arendt, Elke K.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Co-fermentation of non-Saccharomyces yeasts with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum FST 1.7 for the production of non-alcoholic beer</title><author>Nyhan, Laura ; Sahin, Aylin W. ; Arendt, Elke K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-f9c3466eb97b5df7d559c1a573ee77e5250c30cd04438c9673bf6031eca5a4dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Acceptability</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Analytical Chemistry</topic><topic>Aroma</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Beer</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Breweries</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Diacetyl</topic><topic>Energy sources</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Flavors</topic><topic>Food Science</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Glycerol</topic><topic>Lactic acid</topic><topic>Lactic acid bacteria</topic><topic>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</topic><topic>Maltotriose</topic><topic>Masking</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Organic acids</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>pH effects</topic><topic>Saccharomyces</topic><topic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</topic><topic>Sensory evaluation</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Sensory properties</topic><topic>Sourness</topic><topic>Sugar</topic><topic>Sweet taste</topic><topic>Volatile compounds</topic><topic>Wort</topic><topic>Worts</topic><topic>Yeast</topic><topic>Yeasts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nyhan, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahin, Aylin W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arendt, Elke K.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European food research & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nyhan, Laura</au><au>Sahin, Aylin W.</au><au>Arendt, Elke K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Co-fermentation of non-Saccharomyces yeasts with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum FST 1.7 for the production of non-alcoholic beer</atitle><jtitle>European food research & technology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Food Res Technol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Food Res Technol</addtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>249</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>167</spage><epage>181</epage><pages>167-181</pages><issn>1438-2377</issn><eissn>1438-2385</eissn><abstract>The non-alcoholic beer (NAB) sector has experienced steady growth in recent years, with breweries continuously seeking new ways to fulfil consumer demands. NAB can be produced by limited fermentation of non-
Saccharomyces
yeasts; however, beer produced in this manner is often critiqued for its sweet taste and wort-like off-flavours due to high levels of residual sugars and lack of flavour metabolites. The use of
Lactobacillus
in limited co-fermentation with non-
Saccharomyces
yeasts is a novel approach to produce NABs with varying flavour and aroma characteristics. In this study, lab-scale fermentations of
Lachancea fermentati
KBI 12.1 and
Cyberlindnera subsufficiens
C6.1 with
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum
FST 1.7 were performed and compared to a brewer’s yeast,
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
WLP001. Fermentations were monitored for pH, TTA, extract reduction, alcohol production, and microbial cell count. The final beers were analysed for sugar and organic acid concentration, free amino nitrogen content (FAN), glycerol, and levels of volatile metabolites. The inability of the non-
Saccharomyces
yeasts to utilise maltotriose as an energy source resulted in extended fermentation times compared to
S. cerevisiae
WLP001. Co-fermentation of yeasts with lactic acid bacteria (LAB) resulted in a decreased pH, higher TTA and increased levels of lactic acid in the final beers. The overall acceptability of the NABs produced by co-fermentation was higher than or similar to that of the beers fermented with the yeasts alone, indicating that LAB fermentation did not negatively impact the sensory attributes of the beer.
C. subsufficiens
C6.1 and
L. plantarum
FST 1.7 NAB was characterised as fruity tasting with the significantly higher ester concentrations masking the wort-like flavours resulting from limited fermentation. NAB produced with
L. fermentati
KBI12.1 and
L. plantarum
FST1.7 had decreased levels of the undesirable volatile compound diacetyl and was described as ‘fruity’ and ‘acidic’, with the increased sourness masking the sweet, wort-like characteristics of the NAB. Moreover, this NAB was ranked as the most highly acceptable in the sensory evaluation. In conclusion, the limited co-fermentation of non-
Saccharomyces
yeasts with LAB is a promising strategy for the production of NAB.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>36466321</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00217-022-04142-4</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1438-2377 |
ispartof | European food research & technology, 2023-01, Vol.249 (1), p.167-181 |
issn | 1438-2377 1438-2385 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9702684 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Acceptability Agriculture Analytical Chemistry Aroma Bacteria Beer Biotechnology Breweries Chemistry Chemistry and Materials Science Diacetyl Energy sources Fermentation Flavors Food Science Forestry Glycerol Lactic acid Lactic acid bacteria Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Maltotriose Masking Metabolites Microorganisms Organic acids Original Paper pH effects Saccharomyces Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sensory evaluation Sensory perception Sensory properties Sourness Sugar Sweet taste Volatile compounds Wort Worts Yeast Yeasts |
title | Co-fermentation of non-Saccharomyces yeasts with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum FST 1.7 for the production of non-alcoholic beer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T08%3A46%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Co-fermentation%20of%20non-Saccharomyces%20yeasts%20with%20Lactiplantibacillus%20plantarum%20FST%201.7%20for%20the%20production%20of%20non-alcoholic%20beer&rft.jtitle=European%20food%20research%20&%20technology&rft.au=Nyhan,%20Laura&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=249&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=181&rft.pages=167-181&rft.issn=1438-2377&rft.eissn=1438-2385&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00217-022-04142-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2747006052%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2765622914&rft_id=info:pmid/36466321&rfr_iscdi=true |