A Standardized Ward Round Proforma Improves Documentation in a Specialist Stroke Unit

Background and aim Ward-round documentation is important for clinical communication and patient safety. Standardized checklists have improved ward-round documentation in surgical and medical settings. This quality improvement project aimed to introduce a standardized ward round proforma to improve d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2022-11, Vol.14 (11), p.e31931
Hauptverfasser: Armstrong, Edward J, Carpenter, Kilda J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page e31931
container_title Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)
container_volume 14
creator Armstrong, Edward J
Carpenter, Kilda J
description Background and aim Ward-round documentation is important for clinical communication and patient safety. Standardized checklists have improved ward-round documentation in surgical and medical settings. This quality improvement project aimed to introduce a standardized ward round proforma to improve documentation in a UK specialist stroke unit. Methods Ward round entries were assessed against internally agreed standardized criteria. A stroke-specific ward round proforma was designed and introduced with input from the multidisciplinary team. A repeat audit was performed, including assessment of the use of different proforma sections. Multidisciplinary team members were invited to provide feedback via an anonymous online survey. Results A total of 111 ward round entries were reviewed before the proforma was introduced. Ninety-five ward round entries were reviewed following introduction of the proforma, and 84.2% of these used the proforma for documentation. Overall documentation of standardized criteria improved from 48.7% to 62.1% with substantial improvement seen in documentation of neurological examination, presence/absence of mechanical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, and blood test results. Multidisciplinary team feedback was positive. Conclusions The stroke-specific ward round proforma improved the quality and consistency of documentation in the unit. An updated proforma was designed using these results and multidisciplinary team feedback.
doi_str_mv 10.7759/cureus.31931
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9701495</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2742928969</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-f399e1fc9f4de18b8f240ea62eb85c620c3acaa396fa675810b7c288ca3fa09c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1LxDAUxIMoKurNswS8eHA1H22TXARZP0FQ1MVjeJsmGm2TNWkF_eutrop6egPvxzDDILRJyZ4Qpdo3fbJ93uNUcbqAVhmt5EhSWSz-0itoI-dHQgglghFBltEKr4pCSKJW0eQQ33QQaki1f7M1vhsEvo59qPFVii6mFvB5O0vxxWZ8FE3f2tBB52PAPmDANzNrPDQ-d4NPik8WT4Lv1tGSgybbja-7hiYnx7fjs9HF5en5-PBiZHjBupHjSlnqjHJFbamcSscKYqFidipLUzFiOBgArioHlSglJVNhmJQGuAOiDF9DB3PfWT9tbW2GbAkaPUu-hfSqI3j99xP8g76PL1oJQgtVDgY7XwYpPvc2d7r12dimgWBjnzUTBS-JFEoO6PY_9DH2KQz1PiimmFSVGqjdOWVSzDlZ9xOGEv0xmZ5Ppj8nG_Ct3wV-4O-B-DtbLJRO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2742928969</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Standardized Ward Round Proforma Improves Documentation in a Specialist Stroke Unit</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Armstrong, Edward J ; Carpenter, Kilda J</creator><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Edward J ; Carpenter, Kilda J</creatorcontrib><description>Background and aim Ward-round documentation is important for clinical communication and patient safety. Standardized checklists have improved ward-round documentation in surgical and medical settings. This quality improvement project aimed to introduce a standardized ward round proforma to improve documentation in a UK specialist stroke unit. Methods Ward round entries were assessed against internally agreed standardized criteria. A stroke-specific ward round proforma was designed and introduced with input from the multidisciplinary team. A repeat audit was performed, including assessment of the use of different proforma sections. Multidisciplinary team members were invited to provide feedback via an anonymous online survey. Results A total of 111 ward round entries were reviewed before the proforma was introduced. Ninety-five ward round entries were reviewed following introduction of the proforma, and 84.2% of these used the proforma for documentation. Overall documentation of standardized criteria improved from 48.7% to 62.1% with substantial improvement seen in documentation of neurological examination, presence/absence of mechanical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, and blood test results. Multidisciplinary team feedback was positive. Conclusions The stroke-specific ward round proforma improved the quality and consistency of documentation in the unit. An updated proforma was designed using these results and multidisciplinary team feedback.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31931</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36447809</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cureus Inc</publisher><subject>Audits ; Blood pressure ; Blood tests ; Catheters ; Clinical outcomes ; Communication ; Creatinine ; Disease prevention ; Documentation ; Electrocardiography ; Feedback ; Geriatrics ; Heart rate ; Hemoglobin ; Hydration ; Molecular weight ; Patients ; Potassium ; Quality Improvement ; Questionnaires ; Stroke ; Thromboembolism</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2022-11, Vol.14 (11), p.e31931</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022, Armstrong et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022, Armstrong et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022, Armstrong et al. 2022 Armstrong et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-f399e1fc9f4de18b8f240ea62eb85c620c3acaa396fa675810b7c288ca3fa09c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-f399e1fc9f4de18b8f240ea62eb85c620c3acaa396fa675810b7c288ca3fa09c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9701495/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9701495/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36447809$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Edward J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Kilda J</creatorcontrib><title>A Standardized Ward Round Proforma Improves Documentation in a Specialist Stroke Unit</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><description>Background and aim Ward-round documentation is important for clinical communication and patient safety. Standardized checklists have improved ward-round documentation in surgical and medical settings. This quality improvement project aimed to introduce a standardized ward round proforma to improve documentation in a UK specialist stroke unit. Methods Ward round entries were assessed against internally agreed standardized criteria. A stroke-specific ward round proforma was designed and introduced with input from the multidisciplinary team. A repeat audit was performed, including assessment of the use of different proforma sections. Multidisciplinary team members were invited to provide feedback via an anonymous online survey. Results A total of 111 ward round entries were reviewed before the proforma was introduced. Ninety-five ward round entries were reviewed following introduction of the proforma, and 84.2% of these used the proforma for documentation. Overall documentation of standardized criteria improved from 48.7% to 62.1% with substantial improvement seen in documentation of neurological examination, presence/absence of mechanical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, and blood test results. Multidisciplinary team feedback was positive. Conclusions The stroke-specific ward round proforma improved the quality and consistency of documentation in the unit. An updated proforma was designed using these results and multidisciplinary team feedback.</description><subject>Audits</subject><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Blood tests</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Creatinine</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Documentation</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Heart rate</subject><subject>Hemoglobin</subject><subject>Hydration</subject><subject>Molecular weight</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Potassium</subject><subject>Quality Improvement</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Thromboembolism</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1LxDAUxIMoKurNswS8eHA1H22TXARZP0FQ1MVjeJsmGm2TNWkF_eutrop6egPvxzDDILRJyZ4Qpdo3fbJ93uNUcbqAVhmt5EhSWSz-0itoI-dHQgglghFBltEKr4pCSKJW0eQQ33QQaki1f7M1vhsEvo59qPFVii6mFvB5O0vxxWZ8FE3f2tBB52PAPmDANzNrPDQ-d4NPik8WT4Lv1tGSgybbja-7hiYnx7fjs9HF5en5-PBiZHjBupHjSlnqjHJFbamcSscKYqFidipLUzFiOBgArioHlSglJVNhmJQGuAOiDF9DB3PfWT9tbW2GbAkaPUu-hfSqI3j99xP8g76PL1oJQgtVDgY7XwYpPvc2d7r12dimgWBjnzUTBS-JFEoO6PY_9DH2KQz1PiimmFSVGqjdOWVSzDlZ9xOGEv0xmZ5Ppj8nG_Ct3wV-4O-B-DtbLJRO</recordid><startdate>20221127</startdate><enddate>20221127</enddate><creator>Armstrong, Edward J</creator><creator>Carpenter, Kilda J</creator><general>Cureus Inc</general><general>Cureus</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221127</creationdate><title>A Standardized Ward Round Proforma Improves Documentation in a Specialist Stroke Unit</title><author>Armstrong, Edward J ; Carpenter, Kilda J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-f399e1fc9f4de18b8f240ea62eb85c620c3acaa396fa675810b7c288ca3fa09c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Audits</topic><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Blood tests</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Creatinine</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Documentation</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Heart rate</topic><topic>Hemoglobin</topic><topic>Hydration</topic><topic>Molecular weight</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Potassium</topic><topic>Quality Improvement</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Thromboembolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Edward J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Kilda J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Armstrong, Edward J</au><au>Carpenter, Kilda J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Standardized Ward Round Proforma Improves Documentation in a Specialist Stroke Unit</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><date>2022-11-27</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e31931</spage><pages>e31931-</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>Background and aim Ward-round documentation is important for clinical communication and patient safety. Standardized checklists have improved ward-round documentation in surgical and medical settings. This quality improvement project aimed to introduce a standardized ward round proforma to improve documentation in a UK specialist stroke unit. Methods Ward round entries were assessed against internally agreed standardized criteria. A stroke-specific ward round proforma was designed and introduced with input from the multidisciplinary team. A repeat audit was performed, including assessment of the use of different proforma sections. Multidisciplinary team members were invited to provide feedback via an anonymous online survey. Results A total of 111 ward round entries were reviewed before the proforma was introduced. Ninety-five ward round entries were reviewed following introduction of the proforma, and 84.2% of these used the proforma for documentation. Overall documentation of standardized criteria improved from 48.7% to 62.1% with substantial improvement seen in documentation of neurological examination, presence/absence of mechanical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, and blood test results. Multidisciplinary team feedback was positive. Conclusions The stroke-specific ward round proforma improved the quality and consistency of documentation in the unit. An updated proforma was designed using these results and multidisciplinary team feedback.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cureus Inc</pub><pmid>36447809</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.31931</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-8184
ispartof Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2022-11, Vol.14 (11), p.e31931
issn 2168-8184
2168-8184
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9701495
source PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Audits
Blood pressure
Blood tests
Catheters
Clinical outcomes
Communication
Creatinine
Disease prevention
Documentation
Electrocardiography
Feedback
Geriatrics
Heart rate
Hemoglobin
Hydration
Molecular weight
Patients
Potassium
Quality Improvement
Questionnaires
Stroke
Thromboembolism
title A Standardized Ward Round Proforma Improves Documentation in a Specialist Stroke Unit
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T18%3A18%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Standardized%20Ward%20Round%20Proforma%20Improves%20Documentation%20in%20a%20Specialist%20Stroke%20Unit&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Armstrong,%20Edward%20J&rft.date=2022-11-27&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e31931&rft.pages=e31931-&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.31931&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2742928969%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2742928969&rft_id=info:pmid/36447809&rfr_iscdi=true