A Standardized Ward Round Proforma Improves Documentation in a Specialist Stroke Unit
Background and aim Ward-round documentation is important for clinical communication and patient safety. Standardized checklists have improved ward-round documentation in surgical and medical settings. This quality improvement project aimed to introduce a standardized ward round proforma to improve d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2022-11, Vol.14 (11), p.e31931 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | e31931 |
container_title | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Armstrong, Edward J Carpenter, Kilda J |
description | Background and aim Ward-round documentation is important for clinical communication and patient safety. Standardized checklists have improved ward-round documentation in surgical and medical settings. This quality improvement project aimed to introduce a standardized ward round proforma to improve documentation in a UK specialist stroke unit. Methods Ward round entries were assessed against internally agreed standardized criteria. A stroke-specific ward round proforma was designed and introduced with input from the multidisciplinary team. A repeat audit was performed, including assessment of the use of different proforma sections. Multidisciplinary team members were invited to provide feedback via an anonymous online survey. Results A total of 111 ward round entries were reviewed before the proforma was introduced. Ninety-five ward round entries were reviewed following introduction of the proforma, and 84.2% of these used the proforma for documentation. Overall documentation of standardized criteria improved from 48.7% to 62.1% with substantial improvement seen in documentation of neurological examination, presence/absence of mechanical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, and blood test results. Multidisciplinary team feedback was positive. Conclusions The stroke-specific ward round proforma improved the quality and consistency of documentation in the unit. An updated proforma was designed using these results and multidisciplinary team feedback. |
doi_str_mv | 10.7759/cureus.31931 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9701495</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2742928969</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-f399e1fc9f4de18b8f240ea62eb85c620c3acaa396fa675810b7c288ca3fa09c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1LxDAUxIMoKurNswS8eHA1H22TXARZP0FQ1MVjeJsmGm2TNWkF_eutrop6egPvxzDDILRJyZ4Qpdo3fbJ93uNUcbqAVhmt5EhSWSz-0itoI-dHQgglghFBltEKr4pCSKJW0eQQ33QQaki1f7M1vhsEvo59qPFVii6mFvB5O0vxxWZ8FE3f2tBB52PAPmDANzNrPDQ-d4NPik8WT4Lv1tGSgybbja-7hiYnx7fjs9HF5en5-PBiZHjBupHjSlnqjHJFbamcSscKYqFidipLUzFiOBgArioHlSglJVNhmJQGuAOiDF9DB3PfWT9tbW2GbAkaPUu-hfSqI3j99xP8g76PL1oJQgtVDgY7XwYpPvc2d7r12dimgWBjnzUTBS-JFEoO6PY_9DH2KQz1PiimmFSVGqjdOWVSzDlZ9xOGEv0xmZ5Ppj8nG_Ct3wV-4O-B-DtbLJRO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2742928969</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Standardized Ward Round Proforma Improves Documentation in a Specialist Stroke Unit</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Armstrong, Edward J ; Carpenter, Kilda J</creator><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Edward J ; Carpenter, Kilda J</creatorcontrib><description>Background and aim Ward-round documentation is important for clinical communication and patient safety. Standardized checklists have improved ward-round documentation in surgical and medical settings. This quality improvement project aimed to introduce a standardized ward round proforma to improve documentation in a UK specialist stroke unit. Methods Ward round entries were assessed against internally agreed standardized criteria. A stroke-specific ward round proforma was designed and introduced with input from the multidisciplinary team. A repeat audit was performed, including assessment of the use of different proforma sections. Multidisciplinary team members were invited to provide feedback via an anonymous online survey. Results A total of 111 ward round entries were reviewed before the proforma was introduced. Ninety-five ward round entries were reviewed following introduction of the proforma, and 84.2% of these used the proforma for documentation. Overall documentation of standardized criteria improved from 48.7% to 62.1% with substantial improvement seen in documentation of neurological examination, presence/absence of mechanical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, and blood test results. Multidisciplinary team feedback was positive. Conclusions The stroke-specific ward round proforma improved the quality and consistency of documentation in the unit. An updated proforma was designed using these results and multidisciplinary team feedback.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31931</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36447809</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cureus Inc</publisher><subject>Audits ; Blood pressure ; Blood tests ; Catheters ; Clinical outcomes ; Communication ; Creatinine ; Disease prevention ; Documentation ; Electrocardiography ; Feedback ; Geriatrics ; Heart rate ; Hemoglobin ; Hydration ; Molecular weight ; Patients ; Potassium ; Quality Improvement ; Questionnaires ; Stroke ; Thromboembolism</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2022-11, Vol.14 (11), p.e31931</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022, Armstrong et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022, Armstrong et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022, Armstrong et al. 2022 Armstrong et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-f399e1fc9f4de18b8f240ea62eb85c620c3acaa396fa675810b7c288ca3fa09c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-f399e1fc9f4de18b8f240ea62eb85c620c3acaa396fa675810b7c288ca3fa09c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9701495/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9701495/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36447809$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Edward J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Kilda J</creatorcontrib><title>A Standardized Ward Round Proforma Improves Documentation in a Specialist Stroke Unit</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><description>Background and aim Ward-round documentation is important for clinical communication and patient safety. Standardized checklists have improved ward-round documentation in surgical and medical settings. This quality improvement project aimed to introduce a standardized ward round proforma to improve documentation in a UK specialist stroke unit. Methods Ward round entries were assessed against internally agreed standardized criteria. A stroke-specific ward round proforma was designed and introduced with input from the multidisciplinary team. A repeat audit was performed, including assessment of the use of different proforma sections. Multidisciplinary team members were invited to provide feedback via an anonymous online survey. Results A total of 111 ward round entries were reviewed before the proforma was introduced. Ninety-five ward round entries were reviewed following introduction of the proforma, and 84.2% of these used the proforma for documentation. Overall documentation of standardized criteria improved from 48.7% to 62.1% with substantial improvement seen in documentation of neurological examination, presence/absence of mechanical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, and blood test results. Multidisciplinary team feedback was positive. Conclusions The stroke-specific ward round proforma improved the quality and consistency of documentation in the unit. An updated proforma was designed using these results and multidisciplinary team feedback.</description><subject>Audits</subject><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Blood tests</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Creatinine</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Documentation</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Heart rate</subject><subject>Hemoglobin</subject><subject>Hydration</subject><subject>Molecular weight</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Potassium</subject><subject>Quality Improvement</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Thromboembolism</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1LxDAUxIMoKurNswS8eHA1H22TXARZP0FQ1MVjeJsmGm2TNWkF_eutrop6egPvxzDDILRJyZ4Qpdo3fbJ93uNUcbqAVhmt5EhSWSz-0itoI-dHQgglghFBltEKr4pCSKJW0eQQ33QQaki1f7M1vhsEvo59qPFVii6mFvB5O0vxxWZ8FE3f2tBB52PAPmDANzNrPDQ-d4NPik8WT4Lv1tGSgybbja-7hiYnx7fjs9HF5en5-PBiZHjBupHjSlnqjHJFbamcSscKYqFidipLUzFiOBgArioHlSglJVNhmJQGuAOiDF9DB3PfWT9tbW2GbAkaPUu-hfSqI3j99xP8g76PL1oJQgtVDgY7XwYpPvc2d7r12dimgWBjnzUTBS-JFEoO6PY_9DH2KQz1PiimmFSVGqjdOWVSzDlZ9xOGEv0xmZ5Ppj8nG_Ct3wV-4O-B-DtbLJRO</recordid><startdate>20221127</startdate><enddate>20221127</enddate><creator>Armstrong, Edward J</creator><creator>Carpenter, Kilda J</creator><general>Cureus Inc</general><general>Cureus</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221127</creationdate><title>A Standardized Ward Round Proforma Improves Documentation in a Specialist Stroke Unit</title><author>Armstrong, Edward J ; Carpenter, Kilda J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-f399e1fc9f4de18b8f240ea62eb85c620c3acaa396fa675810b7c288ca3fa09c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Audits</topic><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Blood tests</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Creatinine</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Documentation</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Heart rate</topic><topic>Hemoglobin</topic><topic>Hydration</topic><topic>Molecular weight</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Potassium</topic><topic>Quality Improvement</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Thromboembolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Edward J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Kilda J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Armstrong, Edward J</au><au>Carpenter, Kilda J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Standardized Ward Round Proforma Improves Documentation in a Specialist Stroke Unit</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><date>2022-11-27</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e31931</spage><pages>e31931-</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>Background and aim Ward-round documentation is important for clinical communication and patient safety. Standardized checklists have improved ward-round documentation in surgical and medical settings. This quality improvement project aimed to introduce a standardized ward round proforma to improve documentation in a UK specialist stroke unit. Methods Ward round entries were assessed against internally agreed standardized criteria. A stroke-specific ward round proforma was designed and introduced with input from the multidisciplinary team. A repeat audit was performed, including assessment of the use of different proforma sections. Multidisciplinary team members were invited to provide feedback via an anonymous online survey. Results A total of 111 ward round entries were reviewed before the proforma was introduced. Ninety-five ward round entries were reviewed following introduction of the proforma, and 84.2% of these used the proforma for documentation. Overall documentation of standardized criteria improved from 48.7% to 62.1% with substantial improvement seen in documentation of neurological examination, presence/absence of mechanical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, and blood test results. Multidisciplinary team feedback was positive. Conclusions The stroke-specific ward round proforma improved the quality and consistency of documentation in the unit. An updated proforma was designed using these results and multidisciplinary team feedback.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cureus Inc</pub><pmid>36447809</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.31931</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2168-8184 |
ispartof | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2022-11, Vol.14 (11), p.e31931 |
issn | 2168-8184 2168-8184 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9701495 |
source | PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | Audits Blood pressure Blood tests Catheters Clinical outcomes Communication Creatinine Disease prevention Documentation Electrocardiography Feedback Geriatrics Heart rate Hemoglobin Hydration Molecular weight Patients Potassium Quality Improvement Questionnaires Stroke Thromboembolism |
title | A Standardized Ward Round Proforma Improves Documentation in a Specialist Stroke Unit |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T18%3A18%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Standardized%20Ward%20Round%20Proforma%20Improves%20Documentation%20in%20a%20Specialist%20Stroke%20Unit&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Armstrong,%20Edward%20J&rft.date=2022-11-27&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e31931&rft.pages=e31931-&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.31931&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2742928969%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2742928969&rft_id=info:pmid/36447809&rfr_iscdi=true |