Current approaches and questions yet to be resolved for the prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis
Prophylaxis is important for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP), which is the most common and serious complication of ERCP. Although the current guidelines include independent patient- and procedure-related risk factors for PEP and available PEP prophylacti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy 2022-11, Vol.14 (11), p.657-666 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 666 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 657 |
container_title | World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Saito, Hirokazu Fujimoto, Atsushi Oomoto, Kana Kadowaki, Yoshitaka Tada, Shuji |
description | Prophylaxis is important for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP), which is the most common and serious complication of ERCP. Although the current guidelines include independent patient- and procedure-related risk factors for PEP and available PEP prophylactic measures, the synergistic effect of these risk factors on PEP should also be considered, given that patients often harbor multiple risk factors. Furthermore, a combination of prophylactic measures is often selected in clinical practice. However, established methods estimating the synergistic effect of independent risk factors on PEP incidence are lacking, and evidence on the impact of combining prophylactic measures on PEP should be discussed. Selection of appropriate candidate patients for ERCP is also important to reduce the incidence of PEP associated with unnecessary ERCP. ERCP indications in patients with asymptomatic common bile duct stones (CBDSs) and in those with suspected CBDSs with no imaging-based evidence of stones are controversial. Further studies are warranted to predict the synergistic effect of independent risk factors on PEP, determine the best prophylactic PEP measures, and identify appropriate candidates for ERCP in patients with asymptomatic CBDSs and those with suspected CBDSs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4253/wjge.v14.i11.657 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9693687</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2740906936</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-4587c9d43e7d3eed37508d2c78d4c598abdcb7980084cea9e248bee940ac6c783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkbtOwzAUhiMEEgjYGT2ypDiJE9sLEqq4SZVYYLYc-7RxleYE2y30GXhpXAoIvPj2nd86_rLsoqATVtbV1dtyAZNNwSauKCZNzQ-yk0IykdeFpId_1sfZeQhLmgZjnBb8JPuYrr2HIRI9jh616SAQPVjyuoYQHQ6BbCGSiKQF4iFgvwFL5uhJ7ICkirHb9vrdBYJzMmKIOQwWg8HRmcRHjwuvLRDTYa-HhcNRD8aDjrvzVEt-9i66cJYdzXUf4Px7Ps1e7m6fpw_57On-cXozy01ZNzFnteBGWlYBtxWArXhNhS0NF5aZWgrdWtNyKSgVzICWUDLRAkhGtWkSVZ1m1_vccd2uwJrUvte9Gr1bab9VqJ36fzO4Ti1wo2Qjq0bwFHD5HeDx66PUygUDfWoRcB1UyRmVdAcnlO5R4zEED_PfZwqqdu7Uzp1K7lRyp5K76hO9gpUn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2740906936</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Current approaches and questions yet to be resolved for the prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis</title><source>Baishideng "World Journal of" online journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Saito, Hirokazu ; Fujimoto, Atsushi ; Oomoto, Kana ; Kadowaki, Yoshitaka ; Tada, Shuji</creator><creatorcontrib>Saito, Hirokazu ; Fujimoto, Atsushi ; Oomoto, Kana ; Kadowaki, Yoshitaka ; Tada, Shuji</creatorcontrib><description>Prophylaxis is important for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP), which is the most common and serious complication of ERCP. Although the current guidelines include independent patient- and procedure-related risk factors for PEP and available PEP prophylactic measures, the synergistic effect of these risk factors on PEP should also be considered, given that patients often harbor multiple risk factors. Furthermore, a combination of prophylactic measures is often selected in clinical practice. However, established methods estimating the synergistic effect of independent risk factors on PEP incidence are lacking, and evidence on the impact of combining prophylactic measures on PEP should be discussed. Selection of appropriate candidate patients for ERCP is also important to reduce the incidence of PEP associated with unnecessary ERCP. ERCP indications in patients with asymptomatic common bile duct stones (CBDSs) and in those with suspected CBDSs with no imaging-based evidence of stones are controversial. Further studies are warranted to predict the synergistic effect of independent risk factors on PEP, determine the best prophylactic PEP measures, and identify appropriate candidates for ERCP in patients with asymptomatic CBDSs and those with suspected CBDSs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1948-5190</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1948-5190</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i11.657</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</publisher><subject>Opinion Review</subject><ispartof>World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2022-11, Vol.14 (11), p.657-666</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 2022</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-4587c9d43e7d3eed37508d2c78d4c598abdcb7980084cea9e248bee940ac6c783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9693687/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9693687/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saito, Hirokazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujimoto, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oomoto, Kana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadowaki, Yoshitaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tada, Shuji</creatorcontrib><title>Current approaches and questions yet to be resolved for the prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis</title><title>World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><description>Prophylaxis is important for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP), which is the most common and serious complication of ERCP. Although the current guidelines include independent patient- and procedure-related risk factors for PEP and available PEP prophylactic measures, the synergistic effect of these risk factors on PEP should also be considered, given that patients often harbor multiple risk factors. Furthermore, a combination of prophylactic measures is often selected in clinical practice. However, established methods estimating the synergistic effect of independent risk factors on PEP incidence are lacking, and evidence on the impact of combining prophylactic measures on PEP should be discussed. Selection of appropriate candidate patients for ERCP is also important to reduce the incidence of PEP associated with unnecessary ERCP. ERCP indications in patients with asymptomatic common bile duct stones (CBDSs) and in those with suspected CBDSs with no imaging-based evidence of stones are controversial. Further studies are warranted to predict the synergistic effect of independent risk factors on PEP, determine the best prophylactic PEP measures, and identify appropriate candidates for ERCP in patients with asymptomatic CBDSs and those with suspected CBDSs.</description><subject>Opinion Review</subject><issn>1948-5190</issn><issn>1948-5190</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkbtOwzAUhiMEEgjYGT2ypDiJE9sLEqq4SZVYYLYc-7RxleYE2y30GXhpXAoIvPj2nd86_rLsoqATVtbV1dtyAZNNwSauKCZNzQ-yk0IykdeFpId_1sfZeQhLmgZjnBb8JPuYrr2HIRI9jh616SAQPVjyuoYQHQ6BbCGSiKQF4iFgvwFL5uhJ7ICkirHb9vrdBYJzMmKIOQwWg8HRmcRHjwuvLRDTYa-HhcNRD8aDjrvzVEt-9i66cJYdzXUf4Px7Ps1e7m6fpw_57On-cXozy01ZNzFnteBGWlYBtxWArXhNhS0NF5aZWgrdWtNyKSgVzICWUDLRAkhGtWkSVZ1m1_vccd2uwJrUvte9Gr1bab9VqJ36fzO4Ti1wo2Qjq0bwFHD5HeDx66PUygUDfWoRcB1UyRmVdAcnlO5R4zEED_PfZwqqdu7Uzp1K7lRyp5K76hO9gpUn</recordid><startdate>20221116</startdate><enddate>20221116</enddate><creator>Saito, Hirokazu</creator><creator>Fujimoto, Atsushi</creator><creator>Oomoto, Kana</creator><creator>Kadowaki, Yoshitaka</creator><creator>Tada, Shuji</creator><general>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221116</creationdate><title>Current approaches and questions yet to be resolved for the prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis</title><author>Saito, Hirokazu ; Fujimoto, Atsushi ; Oomoto, Kana ; Kadowaki, Yoshitaka ; Tada, Shuji</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-4587c9d43e7d3eed37508d2c78d4c598abdcb7980084cea9e248bee940ac6c783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Opinion Review</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saito, Hirokazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujimoto, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oomoto, Kana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadowaki, Yoshitaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tada, Shuji</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saito, Hirokazu</au><au>Fujimoto, Atsushi</au><au>Oomoto, Kana</au><au>Kadowaki, Yoshitaka</au><au>Tada, Shuji</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Current approaches and questions yet to be resolved for the prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis</atitle><jtitle>World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><date>2022-11-16</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>657</spage><epage>666</epage><pages>657-666</pages><issn>1948-5190</issn><eissn>1948-5190</eissn><abstract>Prophylaxis is important for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP), which is the most common and serious complication of ERCP. Although the current guidelines include independent patient- and procedure-related risk factors for PEP and available PEP prophylactic measures, the synergistic effect of these risk factors on PEP should also be considered, given that patients often harbor multiple risk factors. Furthermore, a combination of prophylactic measures is often selected in clinical practice. However, established methods estimating the synergistic effect of independent risk factors on PEP incidence are lacking, and evidence on the impact of combining prophylactic measures on PEP should be discussed. Selection of appropriate candidate patients for ERCP is also important to reduce the incidence of PEP associated with unnecessary ERCP. ERCP indications in patients with asymptomatic common bile duct stones (CBDSs) and in those with suspected CBDSs with no imaging-based evidence of stones are controversial. Further studies are warranted to predict the synergistic effect of independent risk factors on PEP, determine the best prophylactic PEP measures, and identify appropriate candidates for ERCP in patients with asymptomatic CBDSs and those with suspected CBDSs.</abstract><pub>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</pub><doi>10.4253/wjge.v14.i11.657</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1948-5190 |
ispartof | World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2022-11, Vol.14 (11), p.657-666 |
issn | 1948-5190 1948-5190 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9693687 |
source | Baishideng "World Journal of" online journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Opinion Review |
title | Current approaches and questions yet to be resolved for the prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T05%3A55%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Current%20approaches%20and%20questions%20yet%20to%20be%20resolved%20for%20the%20prophylaxis%20of%20post-endoscopic%20retrograde%20cholangiopancreatography%20pancreatitis&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Saito,%20Hirokazu&rft.date=2022-11-16&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=657&rft.epage=666&rft.pages=657-666&rft.issn=1948-5190&rft.eissn=1948-5190&rft_id=info:doi/10.4253/wjge.v14.i11.657&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2740906936%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2740906936&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |