Minimally Invasive Surgery in the United States, 2022: Understanding Its Value Using New Datasets

While minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has transformed the treatment landscape of surgical care, its utilization is not well understood. The newly released Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample allows for more accurate estimates of MIS volume in the United States—in combination with inpatient dataset...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of surgical research 2023-01, Vol.281, p.33-36
Hauptverfasser: Mattingly, Aviva S., Chen, Michelle M., Divi, Vasu, Holsinger, F. Christopher, Saraswathula, Anirudh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 36
container_issue
container_start_page 33
container_title The Journal of surgical research
container_volume 281
creator Mattingly, Aviva S.
Chen, Michelle M.
Divi, Vasu
Holsinger, F. Christopher
Saraswathula, Anirudh
description While minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has transformed the treatment landscape of surgical care, its utilization is not well understood. The newly released Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample allows for more accurate estimates of MIS volume in the United States—in combination with inpatient datasets. Multiple nationwide databases from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) were used: the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample and National Inpatient Sample. The volume of MIS and robotic procedures were calculated from 2016 to 2018. An online query system, HCUPNet, was queried for inpatient stays from 1993 to 2014. In 2017, 9.8 million inpatient major operating room procedures were analyzed, of which 11.1% were MIS and 2.5% were robotic-assisted, compared with 9.6 million inpatient operating room procedures (11.2% MIS and 2.9% robotic-assisted) in 2018. There were 10.6, 10.6, and 10.7 million ambulatory procedures in 2016, 2017, and 2018, respectively. Ambulatory MIS procedures showed an increasing trend across years, representing 16.9%, 17.4%, and 18%, respectively. HCUPNet data revealed an increase in inpatient MIS cases from 529,811 (8.9%) in 1993 to 1,443,446 (20.7%) in 2014. This study is the first to estimate national MIS volume across specialties in both inpatient and ambulatory hospital settings. We found a trend toward a higher proportion of MIS and robotic cases from 1997 to 2018. These data may help contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of MIS value within surgery and highlight limitations of current databases, especially when categorizing robotic cases on a national scale.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jss.2022.08.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9691544</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022480422005091</els_id><sourcerecordid>2715441236</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-992f6d213654efff878d1bfaa42b0c4216daa89564dd246e78b25afc060d25ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi1ERbeFH8AF-ciBBNtxnAQkJNTysVKBQylXyxuPt15lndbjLNp_X0dbKnrpaTQzz7xjz0vIa85Kzrh6vyk3iKVgQpSsLRlTz8iCs64uWtVUz8mC5U4hWyaPyQnihuW8a6oX5LhSnNdcqgUxP3zwWzMMe7oMO4N-B_RyimuIe-oDTddAr4JPYOllMgnwHZ3XfchFCxGTCdaHNV0mpH_MMGUY5_wn_KXnJhmEhC_JkTMDwqv7eEquvn75ffa9uPj1bXn2-aLoZc1T0XXCKSt4pWoJzrm2aS1fOWOkWLFeCq6sMW1XK2mtkAqadiVq43qmmBW1c9Up-XTQvZlWW7A9hBTNoG9i_l7c69F4_bgT_LVejzvdqY7XUmaBt_cCcbydAJPeeuxhGEyAcUItmhnjolIZ5Qe0jyNiBPewhjM9W6M3Oluj51tp1upsTZ558__7Hib-eZGBjwcA8pV2HqLG3kPowfoIfdJ29E_I3wE3qZ_p</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2715441236</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Minimally Invasive Surgery in the United States, 2022: Understanding Its Value Using New Datasets</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mattingly, Aviva S. ; Chen, Michelle M. ; Divi, Vasu ; Holsinger, F. Christopher ; Saraswathula, Anirudh</creator><creatorcontrib>Mattingly, Aviva S. ; Chen, Michelle M. ; Divi, Vasu ; Holsinger, F. Christopher ; Saraswathula, Anirudh</creatorcontrib><description>While minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has transformed the treatment landscape of surgical care, its utilization is not well understood. The newly released Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample allows for more accurate estimates of MIS volume in the United States—in combination with inpatient datasets. Multiple nationwide databases from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) were used: the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample and National Inpatient Sample. The volume of MIS and robotic procedures were calculated from 2016 to 2018. An online query system, HCUPNet, was queried for inpatient stays from 1993 to 2014. In 2017, 9.8 million inpatient major operating room procedures were analyzed, of which 11.1% were MIS and 2.5% were robotic-assisted, compared with 9.6 million inpatient operating room procedures (11.2% MIS and 2.9% robotic-assisted) in 2018. There were 10.6, 10.6, and 10.7 million ambulatory procedures in 2016, 2017, and 2018, respectively. Ambulatory MIS procedures showed an increasing trend across years, representing 16.9%, 17.4%, and 18%, respectively. HCUPNet data revealed an increase in inpatient MIS cases from 529,811 (8.9%) in 1993 to 1,443,446 (20.7%) in 2014. This study is the first to estimate national MIS volume across specialties in both inpatient and ambulatory hospital settings. We found a trend toward a higher proportion of MIS and robotic cases from 1997 to 2018. These data may help contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of MIS value within surgery and highlight limitations of current databases, especially when categorizing robotic cases on a national scale.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4804</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8673</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.08.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36115146</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Ambulatory surgery ; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures ; Databases, Factual ; HCUP ; Humans ; Inpatients ; Minimally invasive surgery ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods ; NASS ; NIS ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; Robotic-assisted ; Robotics ; United States</subject><ispartof>The Journal of surgical research, 2023-01, Vol.281, p.33-36</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-992f6d213654efff878d1bfaa42b0c4216daa89564dd246e78b25afc060d25ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-992f6d213654efff878d1bfaa42b0c4216daa89564dd246e78b25afc060d25ff3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7066-4465</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.08.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36115146$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mattingly, Aviva S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Michelle M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Divi, Vasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holsinger, F. Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saraswathula, Anirudh</creatorcontrib><title>Minimally Invasive Surgery in the United States, 2022: Understanding Its Value Using New Datasets</title><title>The Journal of surgical research</title><addtitle>J Surg Res</addtitle><description>While minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has transformed the treatment landscape of surgical care, its utilization is not well understood. The newly released Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample allows for more accurate estimates of MIS volume in the United States—in combination with inpatient datasets. Multiple nationwide databases from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) were used: the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample and National Inpatient Sample. The volume of MIS and robotic procedures were calculated from 2016 to 2018. An online query system, HCUPNet, was queried for inpatient stays from 1993 to 2014. In 2017, 9.8 million inpatient major operating room procedures were analyzed, of which 11.1% were MIS and 2.5% were robotic-assisted, compared with 9.6 million inpatient operating room procedures (11.2% MIS and 2.9% robotic-assisted) in 2018. There were 10.6, 10.6, and 10.7 million ambulatory procedures in 2016, 2017, and 2018, respectively. Ambulatory MIS procedures showed an increasing trend across years, representing 16.9%, 17.4%, and 18%, respectively. HCUPNet data revealed an increase in inpatient MIS cases from 529,811 (8.9%) in 1993 to 1,443,446 (20.7%) in 2014. This study is the first to estimate national MIS volume across specialties in both inpatient and ambulatory hospital settings. We found a trend toward a higher proportion of MIS and robotic cases from 1997 to 2018. These data may help contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of MIS value within surgery and highlight limitations of current databases, especially when categorizing robotic cases on a national scale.</description><subject>Ambulatory surgery</subject><subject>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>HCUP</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inpatients</subject><subject>Minimally invasive surgery</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>NASS</subject><subject>NIS</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Robotic-assisted</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0022-4804</issn><issn>1095-8673</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi1ERbeFH8AF-ciBBNtxnAQkJNTysVKBQylXyxuPt15lndbjLNp_X0dbKnrpaTQzz7xjz0vIa85Kzrh6vyk3iKVgQpSsLRlTz8iCs64uWtVUz8mC5U4hWyaPyQnihuW8a6oX5LhSnNdcqgUxP3zwWzMMe7oMO4N-B_RyimuIe-oDTddAr4JPYOllMgnwHZ3XfchFCxGTCdaHNV0mpH_MMGUY5_wn_KXnJhmEhC_JkTMDwqv7eEquvn75ffa9uPj1bXn2-aLoZc1T0XXCKSt4pWoJzrm2aS1fOWOkWLFeCq6sMW1XK2mtkAqadiVq43qmmBW1c9Up-XTQvZlWW7A9hBTNoG9i_l7c69F4_bgT_LVejzvdqY7XUmaBt_cCcbydAJPeeuxhGEyAcUItmhnjolIZ5Qe0jyNiBPewhjM9W6M3Oluj51tp1upsTZ558__7Hib-eZGBjwcA8pV2HqLG3kPowfoIfdJ29E_I3wE3qZ_p</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Mattingly, Aviva S.</creator><creator>Chen, Michelle M.</creator><creator>Divi, Vasu</creator><creator>Holsinger, F. Christopher</creator><creator>Saraswathula, Anirudh</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7066-4465</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Minimally Invasive Surgery in the United States, 2022: Understanding Its Value Using New Datasets</title><author>Mattingly, Aviva S. ; Chen, Michelle M. ; Divi, Vasu ; Holsinger, F. Christopher ; Saraswathula, Anirudh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-992f6d213654efff878d1bfaa42b0c4216daa89564dd246e78b25afc060d25ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Ambulatory surgery</topic><topic>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>HCUP</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inpatients</topic><topic>Minimally invasive surgery</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>NASS</topic><topic>NIS</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Robotic-assisted</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mattingly, Aviva S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Michelle M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Divi, Vasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holsinger, F. Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saraswathula, Anirudh</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of surgical research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mattingly, Aviva S.</au><au>Chen, Michelle M.</au><au>Divi, Vasu</au><au>Holsinger, F. Christopher</au><au>Saraswathula, Anirudh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Minimally Invasive Surgery in the United States, 2022: Understanding Its Value Using New Datasets</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of surgical research</jtitle><addtitle>J Surg Res</addtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>281</volume><spage>33</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>33-36</pages><issn>0022-4804</issn><eissn>1095-8673</eissn><abstract>While minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has transformed the treatment landscape of surgical care, its utilization is not well understood. The newly released Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample allows for more accurate estimates of MIS volume in the United States—in combination with inpatient datasets. Multiple nationwide databases from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) were used: the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample and National Inpatient Sample. The volume of MIS and robotic procedures were calculated from 2016 to 2018. An online query system, HCUPNet, was queried for inpatient stays from 1993 to 2014. In 2017, 9.8 million inpatient major operating room procedures were analyzed, of which 11.1% were MIS and 2.5% were robotic-assisted, compared with 9.6 million inpatient operating room procedures (11.2% MIS and 2.9% robotic-assisted) in 2018. There were 10.6, 10.6, and 10.7 million ambulatory procedures in 2016, 2017, and 2018, respectively. Ambulatory MIS procedures showed an increasing trend across years, representing 16.9%, 17.4%, and 18%, respectively. HCUPNet data revealed an increase in inpatient MIS cases from 529,811 (8.9%) in 1993 to 1,443,446 (20.7%) in 2014. This study is the first to estimate national MIS volume across specialties in both inpatient and ambulatory hospital settings. We found a trend toward a higher proportion of MIS and robotic cases from 1997 to 2018. These data may help contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of MIS value within surgery and highlight limitations of current databases, especially when categorizing robotic cases on a national scale.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>36115146</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jss.2022.08.006</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7066-4465</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4804
ispartof The Journal of surgical research, 2023-01, Vol.281, p.33-36
issn 0022-4804
1095-8673
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9691544
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Ambulatory surgery
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
Databases, Factual
HCUP
Humans
Inpatients
Minimally invasive surgery
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods
NASS
NIS
Retrospective Studies
Robotic Surgical Procedures
Robotic-assisted
Robotics
United States
title Minimally Invasive Surgery in the United States, 2022: Understanding Its Value Using New Datasets
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T19%3A33%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Minimally%20Invasive%20Surgery%20in%20the%20United%20States,%202022:%20Understanding%20Its%20Value%20Using%20New%20Datasets&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20surgical%20research&rft.au=Mattingly,%20Aviva%20S.&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=281&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=33-36&rft.issn=0022-4804&rft.eissn=1095-8673&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jss.2022.08.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2715441236%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2715441236&rft_id=info:pmid/36115146&rft_els_id=S0022480422005091&rfr_iscdi=true