Reflections on a registered report replicating a body of dyadic cross‐sectional research
This article reflects on a new kind of registered report (RR) that replicated the work of an early career researcher. The research items targeted in this RR were peer‐reviewed, cross‐sectional, dyadic studies to which the first author of this RR had contributed. The findings being replicated are not...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Personal relationships 2020-12, Vol.27 (4), p.907-938 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 938 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 907 |
| container_title | Personal relationships |
| container_volume | 27 |
| creator | Baker, Zachary G. Gentzis, Ersie‐Anastasia Watlington, Emily M. Castejon, Sabrina Petit, Whitney E. Britton, Maggie Haddad, Sana DiBello, Angelo M. Rodriguez, Lindsey M. Derrick, Jaye L. Knee, C. Raymond |
| description | This article reflects on a new kind of registered report (RR) that replicated the work of an early career researcher. The research items targeted in this RR were peer‐reviewed, cross‐sectional, dyadic studies to which the first author of this RR had contributed. The findings being replicated are not noteworthy for their prestige or representativeness of the wider field. Instead, this method of replication may have several benefits and less desirable qualities for the researcher and research team whose work is being replicated, for science more broadly, and for relationship science specifically, reviewed herein. The authors hope that this reflection inspires researchers to improve upon their methodology by incorporating replication of their work early and often into their own research process. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/pere.12343 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9681012</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2739743153</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4253-b2d7af0773c84ff5d4abbb8c3e22c736ed04a2f12e0e51ce330bdf02233bebd13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctKAzEUhoMoqNWNTzDgRoTRXDvtRhCpFygoohs3IZeTNmU6qclU6c5H8Bl9ElNHBF14NufA-c5P8v8IHRB8QnKdLiDCCaGMsw20Q3glyv6AkM08M4FLTmh_G-2mNMOYDAUlO-jpHlwNpvWhSUVoClVEmPjUZh2bx0WI7brV3qjWN5O818GuiuAKu1LWm8LEkNLH23vqRFSd8QQqmuke2nKqTrD_3Xvo8XL0cHFdjm-vbi7Ox6XhVLBSU1sph6uKmQF3TliutNYDw4BSU7E-WMwVdYQCBkEMMIa1dZhSxjRoS1gPnXW6i6WegzXQtFHVchH9XMWVDMrL35vGT-UkvMhh9gZns3ro6FsghuclpFbOfTJQ16qBsEySVmxYcUYEy-jhH3QWljH_OlO8ooIPBOGZOu6oL3MiuJ_HECzXOcl1TvIrpwyTDn71Naz-IeXd6H7U3XwCXa2YyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2472548514</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reflections on a registered report replicating a body of dyadic cross‐sectional research</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Baker, Zachary G. ; Gentzis, Ersie‐Anastasia ; Watlington, Emily M. ; Castejon, Sabrina ; Petit, Whitney E. ; Britton, Maggie ; Haddad, Sana ; DiBello, Angelo M. ; Rodriguez, Lindsey M. ; Derrick, Jaye L. ; Knee, C. Raymond</creator><creatorcontrib>Baker, Zachary G. ; Gentzis, Ersie‐Anastasia ; Watlington, Emily M. ; Castejon, Sabrina ; Petit, Whitney E. ; Britton, Maggie ; Haddad, Sana ; DiBello, Angelo M. ; Rodriguez, Lindsey M. ; Derrick, Jaye L. ; Knee, C. Raymond</creatorcontrib><description>This article reflects on a new kind of registered report (RR) that replicated the work of an early career researcher. The research items targeted in this RR were peer‐reviewed, cross‐sectional, dyadic studies to which the first author of this RR had contributed. The findings being replicated are not noteworthy for their prestige or representativeness of the wider field. Instead, this method of replication may have several benefits and less desirable qualities for the researcher and research team whose work is being replicated, for science more broadly, and for relationship science specifically, reviewed herein. The authors hope that this reflection inspires researchers to improve upon their methodology by incorporating replication of their work early and often into their own research process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-4126</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-6811</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/pere.12343</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>dyadic data analysis ; other ; surveys</subject><ispartof>Personal relationships, 2020-12, Vol.27 (4), p.907-938</ispartof><rights>2020 International Association for Relationship Research</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 IARR</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4253-b2d7af0773c84ff5d4abbb8c3e22c736ed04a2f12e0e51ce330bdf02233bebd13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4253-b2d7af0773c84ff5d4abbb8c3e22c736ed04a2f12e0e51ce330bdf02233bebd13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5345-7643</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fpere.12343$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fpere.12343$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baker, Zachary G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gentzis, Ersie‐Anastasia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watlington, Emily M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castejon, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petit, Whitney E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Britton, Maggie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddad, Sana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiBello, Angelo M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Lindsey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derrick, Jaye L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knee, C. Raymond</creatorcontrib><title>Reflections on a registered report replicating a body of dyadic cross‐sectional research</title><title>Personal relationships</title><description>This article reflects on a new kind of registered report (RR) that replicated the work of an early career researcher. The research items targeted in this RR were peer‐reviewed, cross‐sectional, dyadic studies to which the first author of this RR had contributed. The findings being replicated are not noteworthy for their prestige or representativeness of the wider field. Instead, this method of replication may have several benefits and less desirable qualities for the researcher and research team whose work is being replicated, for science more broadly, and for relationship science specifically, reviewed herein. The authors hope that this reflection inspires researchers to improve upon their methodology by incorporating replication of their work early and often into their own research process.</description><subject>dyadic data analysis</subject><subject>other</subject><subject>surveys</subject><issn>1350-4126</issn><issn>1475-6811</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctKAzEUhoMoqNWNTzDgRoTRXDvtRhCpFygoohs3IZeTNmU6qclU6c5H8Bl9ElNHBF14NufA-c5P8v8IHRB8QnKdLiDCCaGMsw20Q3glyv6AkM08M4FLTmh_G-2mNMOYDAUlO-jpHlwNpvWhSUVoClVEmPjUZh2bx0WI7brV3qjWN5O818GuiuAKu1LWm8LEkNLH23vqRFSd8QQqmuke2nKqTrD_3Xvo8XL0cHFdjm-vbi7Ox6XhVLBSU1sph6uKmQF3TliutNYDw4BSU7E-WMwVdYQCBkEMMIa1dZhSxjRoS1gPnXW6i6WegzXQtFHVchH9XMWVDMrL35vGT-UkvMhh9gZns3ro6FsghuclpFbOfTJQ16qBsEySVmxYcUYEy-jhH3QWljH_OlO8ooIPBOGZOu6oL3MiuJ_HECzXOcl1TvIrpwyTDn71Naz-IeXd6H7U3XwCXa2YyA</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Baker, Zachary G.</creator><creator>Gentzis, Ersie‐Anastasia</creator><creator>Watlington, Emily M.</creator><creator>Castejon, Sabrina</creator><creator>Petit, Whitney E.</creator><creator>Britton, Maggie</creator><creator>Haddad, Sana</creator><creator>DiBello, Angelo M.</creator><creator>Rodriguez, Lindsey M.</creator><creator>Derrick, Jaye L.</creator><creator>Knee, C. Raymond</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5345-7643</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Reflections on a registered report replicating a body of dyadic cross‐sectional research</title><author>Baker, Zachary G. ; Gentzis, Ersie‐Anastasia ; Watlington, Emily M. ; Castejon, Sabrina ; Petit, Whitney E. ; Britton, Maggie ; Haddad, Sana ; DiBello, Angelo M. ; Rodriguez, Lindsey M. ; Derrick, Jaye L. ; Knee, C. Raymond</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4253-b2d7af0773c84ff5d4abbb8c3e22c736ed04a2f12e0e51ce330bdf02233bebd13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>dyadic data analysis</topic><topic>other</topic><topic>surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baker, Zachary G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gentzis, Ersie‐Anastasia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watlington, Emily M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castejon, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petit, Whitney E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Britton, Maggie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddad, Sana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiBello, Angelo M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Lindsey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derrick, Jaye L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knee, C. Raymond</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Personal relationships</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baker, Zachary G.</au><au>Gentzis, Ersie‐Anastasia</au><au>Watlington, Emily M.</au><au>Castejon, Sabrina</au><au>Petit, Whitney E.</au><au>Britton, Maggie</au><au>Haddad, Sana</au><au>DiBello, Angelo M.</au><au>Rodriguez, Lindsey M.</au><au>Derrick, Jaye L.</au><au>Knee, C. Raymond</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reflections on a registered report replicating a body of dyadic cross‐sectional research</atitle><jtitle>Personal relationships</jtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>907</spage><epage>938</epage><pages>907-938</pages><issn>1350-4126</issn><eissn>1475-6811</eissn><abstract>This article reflects on a new kind of registered report (RR) that replicated the work of an early career researcher. The research items targeted in this RR were peer‐reviewed, cross‐sectional, dyadic studies to which the first author of this RR had contributed. The findings being replicated are not noteworthy for their prestige or representativeness of the wider field. Instead, this method of replication may have several benefits and less desirable qualities for the researcher and research team whose work is being replicated, for science more broadly, and for relationship science specifically, reviewed herein. The authors hope that this reflection inspires researchers to improve upon their methodology by incorporating replication of their work early and often into their own research process.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/pere.12343</doi><tpages>32</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5345-7643</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1350-4126 |
| ispartof | Personal relationships, 2020-12, Vol.27 (4), p.907-938 |
| issn | 1350-4126 1475-6811 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9681012 |
| source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | dyadic data analysis other surveys |
| title | Reflections on a registered report replicating a body of dyadic cross‐sectional research |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T08%3A50%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reflections%20on%20a%20registered%20report%20replicating%20a%20body%20of%20dyadic%20cross%E2%80%90sectional%20research&rft.jtitle=Personal%20relationships&rft.au=Baker,%20Zachary%20G.&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=907&rft.epage=938&rft.pages=907-938&rft.issn=1350-4126&rft.eissn=1475-6811&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/pere.12343&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2739743153%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2472548514&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |