Déjà vu all over again? Monkeypox and the urgent need for randomised controlled trials
5 months into the monkeypox epidemic, there are no proven therapies and no comparative safety and efficacy data in the treatment of affected individuals. The question remains whether we, as a scientific and medical community, will apply the lessons learned from the past decade of outbreaks that well...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet infectious diseases 2023-02, Vol.23 (2), p.e56-e58 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e58 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | e56 |
container_title | The Lancet infectious diseases |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Lindholm, David A Kalil, Andre C |
description | 5 months into the monkeypox epidemic, there are no proven therapies and no comparative safety and efficacy data in the treatment of affected individuals. The question remains whether we, as a scientific and medical community, will apply the lessons learned from the past decade of outbreaks that well conducted randomised controlled trials can be ethically, safely, and efficiently performed to guide clinical decision making so that the right drug is used for the right patient at the right time. Furthermore, the robust level of evidence from randomised controlled trials is highly relevant to advocating for equitable access to new treatments in low-income and middle-income countries. As with COVID-19, we need to pair optimal supportive care with rigorously designed double-blind randomised controlled trials to elucidate safe and effective therapies for monkeypox. The need remains for the funding and development of predesigned, adaptive trial protocols for diseases with epidemic or pandemic potential that can be timely pulled off the shelf and launched early in an outbreak, leveraging ready clinical trial networks and infrastructure for rapid discovery and implementation of new treatments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00722-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9665938</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1473309922007228</els_id><sourcerecordid>2738188263</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-dca1d78a823ea4c7da90b2ca397a874a7349732458fa7fc7aab2883259a73bee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtuFDEQhlsIRB5wBJAlNsmiwa9u2xsilEBACmIBSOysGnf1xEOPPdjdo-Q2bDlHLhbPTIiADasquz7_rqq_qp4x-pJR1r76zKQStaDGHHF-TKnivNYPqv1yLWspG_Vwm--Qveog5wWlTDEqH1d7opWU0rbdr76d3fxa3Pwk64nAMJC4xkRgDj6ckI8xfMfrVbwiEDoyXiKZ0hzDSAJiR_qYSCqFuPS5HF0MY4rDUNIxeRjyk-pRXwI-vYuH1dd3b7-cvq8vPp1_OH1zUTtpmrHuHLBOadBcIEinOjB0xh0Io0ArCUpIowSXje5B9U4BzLjWgjemlGaI4rB6vdNdTbMldq40mGCwq-SXkK5tBG__rgR_aedxbU3bNkboInB0J5DijwnzaMtEDocBAsYpW66EZlrzVhT0xT_oIk4plPEK1ZpGlbWbQjU7yqWYc8L-vhlG7cY7u_XOboyxnNutd3bTyPM_J7l_9dusApzsACz7XHtMNjuPwWHnE7rRdtH_54tbiI6rQQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2769574579</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Déjà vu all over again? Monkeypox and the urgent need for randomised controlled trials</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Lindholm, David A ; Kalil, Andre C</creator><creatorcontrib>Lindholm, David A ; Kalil, Andre C</creatorcontrib><description>5 months into the monkeypox epidemic, there are no proven therapies and no comparative safety and efficacy data in the treatment of affected individuals. The question remains whether we, as a scientific and medical community, will apply the lessons learned from the past decade of outbreaks that well conducted randomised controlled trials can be ethically, safely, and efficiently performed to guide clinical decision making so that the right drug is used for the right patient at the right time. Furthermore, the robust level of evidence from randomised controlled trials is highly relevant to advocating for equitable access to new treatments in low-income and middle-income countries. As with COVID-19, we need to pair optimal supportive care with rigorously designed double-blind randomised controlled trials to elucidate safe and effective therapies for monkeypox. The need remains for the funding and development of predesigned, adaptive trial protocols for diseases with epidemic or pandemic potential that can be timely pulled off the shelf and launched early in an outbreak, leveraging ready clinical trial networks and infrastructure for rapid discovery and implementation of new treatments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1473-3099</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-4457</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00722-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36400066</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Clinical decision making ; Clinical trials ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Data collection ; Decision making ; Disease Outbreaks ; Double-Blind Method ; Ebola virus ; Epidemics ; Humans ; Income ; Infectious diseases ; Mpox ; Mpox (monkeypox) - drug therapy ; Mpox (monkeypox) - epidemiology ; Outbreaks ; Palliative care ; Pandemics ; Patients ; Personal View ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><ispartof>The Lancet infectious diseases, 2023-02, Vol.23 (2), p.e56-e58</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2023. Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-dca1d78a823ea4c7da90b2ca397a874a7349732458fa7fc7aab2883259a73bee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-dca1d78a823ea4c7da90b2ca397a874a7349732458fa7fc7aab2883259a73bee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473309922007228$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36400066$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lindholm, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalil, Andre C</creatorcontrib><title>Déjà vu all over again? Monkeypox and the urgent need for randomised controlled trials</title><title>The Lancet infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Lancet Infect Dis</addtitle><description>5 months into the monkeypox epidemic, there are no proven therapies and no comparative safety and efficacy data in the treatment of affected individuals. The question remains whether we, as a scientific and medical community, will apply the lessons learned from the past decade of outbreaks that well conducted randomised controlled trials can be ethically, safely, and efficiently performed to guide clinical decision making so that the right drug is used for the right patient at the right time. Furthermore, the robust level of evidence from randomised controlled trials is highly relevant to advocating for equitable access to new treatments in low-income and middle-income countries. As with COVID-19, we need to pair optimal supportive care with rigorously designed double-blind randomised controlled trials to elucidate safe and effective therapies for monkeypox. The need remains for the funding and development of predesigned, adaptive trial protocols for diseases with epidemic or pandemic potential that can be timely pulled off the shelf and launched early in an outbreak, leveraging ready clinical trial networks and infrastructure for rapid discovery and implementation of new treatments.</description><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Disease Outbreaks</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Ebola virus</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Mpox</subject><subject>Mpox (monkeypox) - drug therapy</subject><subject>Mpox (monkeypox) - epidemiology</subject><subject>Outbreaks</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Personal View</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><issn>1473-3099</issn><issn>1474-4457</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtuFDEQhlsIRB5wBJAlNsmiwa9u2xsilEBACmIBSOysGnf1xEOPPdjdo-Q2bDlHLhbPTIiADasquz7_rqq_qp4x-pJR1r76zKQStaDGHHF-TKnivNYPqv1yLWspG_Vwm--Qveog5wWlTDEqH1d7opWU0rbdr76d3fxa3Pwk64nAMJC4xkRgDj6ckI8xfMfrVbwiEDoyXiKZ0hzDSAJiR_qYSCqFuPS5HF0MY4rDUNIxeRjyk-pRXwI-vYuH1dd3b7-cvq8vPp1_OH1zUTtpmrHuHLBOadBcIEinOjB0xh0Io0ArCUpIowSXje5B9U4BzLjWgjemlGaI4rB6vdNdTbMldq40mGCwq-SXkK5tBG__rgR_aedxbU3bNkboInB0J5DijwnzaMtEDocBAsYpW66EZlrzVhT0xT_oIk4plPEK1ZpGlbWbQjU7yqWYc8L-vhlG7cY7u_XOboyxnNutd3bTyPM_J7l_9dusApzsACz7XHtMNjuPwWHnE7rRdtH_54tbiI6rQQ</recordid><startdate>20230201</startdate><enddate>20230201</enddate><creator>Lindholm, David A</creator><creator>Kalil, Andre C</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><general>Elsevier Science ;, The Lancet Pub. Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230201</creationdate><title>Déjà vu all over again? Monkeypox and the urgent need for randomised controlled trials</title><author>Lindholm, David A ; Kalil, Andre C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-dca1d78a823ea4c7da90b2ca397a874a7349732458fa7fc7aab2883259a73bee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Disease Outbreaks</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Ebola virus</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Mpox</topic><topic>Mpox (monkeypox) - drug therapy</topic><topic>Mpox (monkeypox) - epidemiology</topic><topic>Outbreaks</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Personal View</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lindholm, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalil, Andre C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Lancet infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lindholm, David A</au><au>Kalil, Andre C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Déjà vu all over again? Monkeypox and the urgent need for randomised controlled trials</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2023-02-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e56</spage><epage>e58</epage><pages>e56-e58</pages><issn>1473-3099</issn><eissn>1474-4457</eissn><abstract>5 months into the monkeypox epidemic, there are no proven therapies and no comparative safety and efficacy data in the treatment of affected individuals. The question remains whether we, as a scientific and medical community, will apply the lessons learned from the past decade of outbreaks that well conducted randomised controlled trials can be ethically, safely, and efficiently performed to guide clinical decision making so that the right drug is used for the right patient at the right time. Furthermore, the robust level of evidence from randomised controlled trials is highly relevant to advocating for equitable access to new treatments in low-income and middle-income countries. As with COVID-19, we need to pair optimal supportive care with rigorously designed double-blind randomised controlled trials to elucidate safe and effective therapies for monkeypox. The need remains for the funding and development of predesigned, adaptive trial protocols for diseases with epidemic or pandemic potential that can be timely pulled off the shelf and launched early in an outbreak, leveraging ready clinical trial networks and infrastructure for rapid discovery and implementation of new treatments.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>36400066</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00722-8</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1473-3099 |
ispartof | The Lancet infectious diseases, 2023-02, Vol.23 (2), p.e56-e58 |
issn | 1473-3099 1474-4457 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9665938 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Clinical decision making Clinical trials Coronaviruses COVID-19 Data collection Decision making Disease Outbreaks Double-Blind Method Ebola virus Epidemics Humans Income Infectious diseases Mpox Mpox (monkeypox) - drug therapy Mpox (monkeypox) - epidemiology Outbreaks Palliative care Pandemics Patients Personal View Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic |
title | Déjà vu all over again? Monkeypox and the urgent need for randomised controlled trials |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T06%3A41%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=D%C3%A9j%C3%A0%20vu%20all%20over%20again?%20Monkeypox%20and%20the%20urgent%20need%20for%20randomised%20controlled%20trials&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Lindholm,%20David%20A&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e56&rft.epage=e58&rft.pages=e56-e58&rft.issn=1473-3099&rft.eissn=1474-4457&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00722-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2738188263%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2769574579&rft_id=info:pmid/36400066&rft_els_id=S1473309922007228&rfr_iscdi=true |