INNV-12. REPRODUCIBLE REDUCTIONS OF CONTRAST-ENHANCED TUMOR VOLUMES IN TWO END-STAGE RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS WITH IN-HOME ONCOMAGNETIC MONOTHERAPY

A spinning oscillating magnetic field-generating device called the Oncomagnetic device selectively kills glioblastoma (GBM) cells. It produced > 30% shrinkage of a recurrent GBM tumor in an end-stage patient after < 5 weeks of Oncomagnetic treatment (OMT). We have now reproduced this treatment...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.) Va.), 2022-11, Vol.24 (Supplement_7), p.vii143-vii143
Hauptverfasser: Helekar, Santosh, Baskin, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page vii143
container_issue Supplement_7
container_start_page vii143
container_title Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)
container_volume 24
creator Helekar, Santosh
Baskin, David
description A spinning oscillating magnetic field-generating device called the Oncomagnetic device selectively kills glioblastoma (GBM) cells. It produced > 30% shrinkage of a recurrent GBM tumor in an end-stage patient after < 5 weeks of Oncomagnetic treatment (OMT). We have now reproduced this treatment response with additional insights into device effectiveness in two more such patients undergoing compassionate use OMT. We provided OMT to a 55-year-old man with massive recurrent tumor regrowth and a 79-year-old woman with multifocal recurrent GBM showing rapid progression, with leptomeningeal spread in both cases. Both had failed standard of care chemoradiotherapy and in the former case had not tolerated Optune treatment. They received one 2-hour, two 2-hour and three 2-hour OMTs per day in the clinic on the first three days under the supervision of the treating physician. 3 2-hour daily treatments were continued subsequently at home. The first patient received a steroid drug along with OMT to control cerebral edema from the start. In the second patient it was added after 14 days while also reducing OMT to 2 hours a day because of significant evidence of edema. MRI scans were done periodically to assess the treatment response. Both patients tolerated OMT well with no serious adverse effects – for 7 months in the first patient, including four 2-hour treatments for the last 5 months, and for 2 months in the second patient. Their last MRI scans at Day 146 and Day 42 showed > 35% and > 91% reduction, respectively, in contrast-enhanced tumor volume compared to pre-OMT scans. A modified treatment response assessment mapping analysis showed substantial reductions in both necrotic and active tumor volumes. These findings strongly support the observations in our published single patient case report and provide firm grounds for proposing in-home OMT monotherapy as a safe and effective noninvasive treatment for GBM.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/neuonc/noac209.552
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9660763</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9660763</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1422-e4a6d5d25a57ed1a8b9e6a6027bbd9ec4c62bf4450b35ba928273648a0dc7b323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkd1KxDAQhYso-PsCXuUFuiZpk7Y3Qu3GbaBNljZVvAppm9UVbaVVwVfxaY2uCF7NmTl8B4bjeecILhBMgovBvo1DdzGMpsMwWRCC97wjRHDgk5jS_R-N_Zig6NA7nudHCDEiFB15n1yIGx_hBajYupLLJuNXBXOLU4pLUQN5DTIpVJXWymciT0XGlkA1pazAjSyaktWAC6BuJWBi6dcqXX3jWVNVTCiwKri8KhwryxSsU8XdsQa3XOWO8nNZMiBF5syVYIpnoJRCqpxV6fru1DvYmKfZnv3OE6-5ZirL_UKueJYWfodC95QNDe1Jj4khke2RidvEUkMhjtq2T2wXdhS3mzAksA1IaxIc4yigYWxg30VtgIMT73KX-_LWPtu-s8PrZJ70y7R9NtOHHs1W_3eG7YO-H991QimMaOAC8C6gm8Z5nuzmj0VQf9ejd_Xo33q0qyf4Aq92fQs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>INNV-12. REPRODUCIBLE REDUCTIONS OF CONTRAST-ENHANCED TUMOR VOLUMES IN TWO END-STAGE RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS WITH IN-HOME ONCOMAGNETIC MONOTHERAPY</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Helekar, Santosh ; Baskin, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Helekar, Santosh ; Baskin, David</creatorcontrib><description>A spinning oscillating magnetic field-generating device called the Oncomagnetic device selectively kills glioblastoma (GBM) cells. It produced &gt; 30% shrinkage of a recurrent GBM tumor in an end-stage patient after &lt; 5 weeks of Oncomagnetic treatment (OMT). We have now reproduced this treatment response with additional insights into device effectiveness in two more such patients undergoing compassionate use OMT. We provided OMT to a 55-year-old man with massive recurrent tumor regrowth and a 79-year-old woman with multifocal recurrent GBM showing rapid progression, with leptomeningeal spread in both cases. Both had failed standard of care chemoradiotherapy and in the former case had not tolerated Optune treatment. They received one 2-hour, two 2-hour and three 2-hour OMTs per day in the clinic on the first three days under the supervision of the treating physician. 3 2-hour daily treatments were continued subsequently at home. The first patient received a steroid drug along with OMT to control cerebral edema from the start. In the second patient it was added after 14 days while also reducing OMT to 2 hours a day because of significant evidence of edema. MRI scans were done periodically to assess the treatment response. Both patients tolerated OMT well with no serious adverse effects – for 7 months in the first patient, including four 2-hour treatments for the last 5 months, and for 2 months in the second patient. Their last MRI scans at Day 146 and Day 42 showed &gt; 35% and &gt; 91% reduction, respectively, in contrast-enhanced tumor volume compared to pre-OMT scans. A modified treatment response assessment mapping analysis showed substantial reductions in both necrotic and active tumor volumes. These findings strongly support the observations in our published single patient case report and provide firm grounds for proposing in-home OMT monotherapy as a safe and effective noninvasive treatment for GBM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-8517</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-5866</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac209.552</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Innovations in Patient Care</subject><ispartof>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.), 2022-11, Vol.24 (Supplement_7), p.vii143-vii143</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9660763/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9660763/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Helekar, Santosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baskin, David</creatorcontrib><title>INNV-12. REPRODUCIBLE REDUCTIONS OF CONTRAST-ENHANCED TUMOR VOLUMES IN TWO END-STAGE RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS WITH IN-HOME ONCOMAGNETIC MONOTHERAPY</title><title>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)</title><description>A spinning oscillating magnetic field-generating device called the Oncomagnetic device selectively kills glioblastoma (GBM) cells. It produced &gt; 30% shrinkage of a recurrent GBM tumor in an end-stage patient after &lt; 5 weeks of Oncomagnetic treatment (OMT). We have now reproduced this treatment response with additional insights into device effectiveness in two more such patients undergoing compassionate use OMT. We provided OMT to a 55-year-old man with massive recurrent tumor regrowth and a 79-year-old woman with multifocal recurrent GBM showing rapid progression, with leptomeningeal spread in both cases. Both had failed standard of care chemoradiotherapy and in the former case had not tolerated Optune treatment. They received one 2-hour, two 2-hour and three 2-hour OMTs per day in the clinic on the first three days under the supervision of the treating physician. 3 2-hour daily treatments were continued subsequently at home. The first patient received a steroid drug along with OMT to control cerebral edema from the start. In the second patient it was added after 14 days while also reducing OMT to 2 hours a day because of significant evidence of edema. MRI scans were done periodically to assess the treatment response. Both patients tolerated OMT well with no serious adverse effects – for 7 months in the first patient, including four 2-hour treatments for the last 5 months, and for 2 months in the second patient. Their last MRI scans at Day 146 and Day 42 showed &gt; 35% and &gt; 91% reduction, respectively, in contrast-enhanced tumor volume compared to pre-OMT scans. A modified treatment response assessment mapping analysis showed substantial reductions in both necrotic and active tumor volumes. These findings strongly support the observations in our published single patient case report and provide firm grounds for proposing in-home OMT monotherapy as a safe and effective noninvasive treatment for GBM.</description><subject>Innovations in Patient Care</subject><issn>1522-8517</issn><issn>1523-5866</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkd1KxDAQhYso-PsCXuUFuiZpk7Y3Qu3GbaBNljZVvAppm9UVbaVVwVfxaY2uCF7NmTl8B4bjeecILhBMgovBvo1DdzGMpsMwWRCC97wjRHDgk5jS_R-N_Zig6NA7nudHCDEiFB15n1yIGx_hBajYupLLJuNXBXOLU4pLUQN5DTIpVJXWymciT0XGlkA1pazAjSyaktWAC6BuJWBi6dcqXX3jWVNVTCiwKri8KhwryxSsU8XdsQa3XOWO8nNZMiBF5syVYIpnoJRCqpxV6fru1DvYmKfZnv3OE6-5ZirL_UKueJYWfodC95QNDe1Jj4khke2RidvEUkMhjtq2T2wXdhS3mzAksA1IaxIc4yigYWxg30VtgIMT73KX-_LWPtu-s8PrZJ70y7R9NtOHHs1W_3eG7YO-H991QimMaOAC8C6gm8Z5nuzmj0VQf9ejd_Xo33q0qyf4Aq92fQs</recordid><startdate>20221114</startdate><enddate>20221114</enddate><creator>Helekar, Santosh</creator><creator>Baskin, David</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221114</creationdate><title>INNV-12. REPRODUCIBLE REDUCTIONS OF CONTRAST-ENHANCED TUMOR VOLUMES IN TWO END-STAGE RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS WITH IN-HOME ONCOMAGNETIC MONOTHERAPY</title><author>Helekar, Santosh ; Baskin, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1422-e4a6d5d25a57ed1a8b9e6a6027bbd9ec4c62bf4450b35ba928273648a0dc7b323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Innovations in Patient Care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Helekar, Santosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baskin, David</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Helekar, Santosh</au><au>Baskin, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>INNV-12. REPRODUCIBLE REDUCTIONS OF CONTRAST-ENHANCED TUMOR VOLUMES IN TWO END-STAGE RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS WITH IN-HOME ONCOMAGNETIC MONOTHERAPY</atitle><jtitle>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle><date>2022-11-14</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>Supplement_7</issue><spage>vii143</spage><epage>vii143</epage><pages>vii143-vii143</pages><issn>1522-8517</issn><eissn>1523-5866</eissn><abstract>A spinning oscillating magnetic field-generating device called the Oncomagnetic device selectively kills glioblastoma (GBM) cells. It produced &gt; 30% shrinkage of a recurrent GBM tumor in an end-stage patient after &lt; 5 weeks of Oncomagnetic treatment (OMT). We have now reproduced this treatment response with additional insights into device effectiveness in two more such patients undergoing compassionate use OMT. We provided OMT to a 55-year-old man with massive recurrent tumor regrowth and a 79-year-old woman with multifocal recurrent GBM showing rapid progression, with leptomeningeal spread in both cases. Both had failed standard of care chemoradiotherapy and in the former case had not tolerated Optune treatment. They received one 2-hour, two 2-hour and three 2-hour OMTs per day in the clinic on the first three days under the supervision of the treating physician. 3 2-hour daily treatments were continued subsequently at home. The first patient received a steroid drug along with OMT to control cerebral edema from the start. In the second patient it was added after 14 days while also reducing OMT to 2 hours a day because of significant evidence of edema. MRI scans were done periodically to assess the treatment response. Both patients tolerated OMT well with no serious adverse effects – for 7 months in the first patient, including four 2-hour treatments for the last 5 months, and for 2 months in the second patient. Their last MRI scans at Day 146 and Day 42 showed &gt; 35% and &gt; 91% reduction, respectively, in contrast-enhanced tumor volume compared to pre-OMT scans. A modified treatment response assessment mapping analysis showed substantial reductions in both necrotic and active tumor volumes. These findings strongly support the observations in our published single patient case report and provide firm grounds for proposing in-home OMT monotherapy as a safe and effective noninvasive treatment for GBM.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/neuonc/noac209.552</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1522-8517
ispartof Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.), 2022-11, Vol.24 (Supplement_7), p.vii143-vii143
issn 1522-8517
1523-5866
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9660763
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Innovations in Patient Care
title INNV-12. REPRODUCIBLE REDUCTIONS OF CONTRAST-ENHANCED TUMOR VOLUMES IN TWO END-STAGE RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS WITH IN-HOME ONCOMAGNETIC MONOTHERAPY
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T20%3A38%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=INNV-12.%20REPRODUCIBLE%20REDUCTIONS%20OF%20CONTRAST-ENHANCED%20TUMOR%20VOLUMES%20IN%20TWO%20END-STAGE%20RECURRENT%20GLIOBLASTOMA%20PATIENTS%20WITH%20IN-HOME%20ONCOMAGNETIC%20MONOTHERAPY&rft.jtitle=Neuro-oncology%20(Charlottesville,%20Va.)&rft.au=Helekar,%20Santosh&rft.date=2022-11-14&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=Supplement_7&rft.spage=vii143&rft.epage=vii143&rft.pages=vii143-vii143&rft.issn=1522-8517&rft.eissn=1523-5866&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/neuonc/noac209.552&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral_cross%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9660763%3C/pubmedcentral_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true