Vaccine-hesitant individuals accumulate additional COVID-19 risk due to divergent perception and behaviors related to SARS-CoV-2 testing: a population-based, cross-sectional study

Purpose To investigate the perception of SARS-CoV-2 detection methods, information sources, and opinions on appropriate behavior after receiving negative or positive test results. Methods In a questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study conducted between September 1 and November 17, 2021, epidemiolog...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Infection 2023-08, Vol.51 (4), p.909-919
Hauptverfasser: Wratil, Paul R., Kotter, Katharina, Bischof, Marie L., Hollerbach, Sophie, Apak, Elif, Kalteis, Anna-Lena, Nayeli-Pflantz, Tamara, Kaderali, Lars, Adorjan, Kristina, Keppler, Oliver T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 919
container_issue 4
container_start_page 909
container_title Infection
container_volume 51
creator Wratil, Paul R.
Kotter, Katharina
Bischof, Marie L.
Hollerbach, Sophie
Apak, Elif
Kalteis, Anna-Lena
Nayeli-Pflantz, Tamara
Kaderali, Lars
Adorjan, Kristina
Keppler, Oliver T.
description Purpose To investigate the perception of SARS-CoV-2 detection methods, information sources, and opinions on appropriate behavior after receiving negative or positive test results. Methods In a questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study conducted between September 1 and November 17, 2021, epidemiological, behavioral, and COVID-19-related data were acquired from the public in Munich, Germany. Results Most of the 1388 participants obtained information from online media (82.8%) as well as state and federal authorities (80.3%). 93.4% believed in the accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing and 41.2% in the accuracy of rapid antigen tests (RATs). However, RATs were preferred for testing (59.1%) over PCR (51.1%). 24.0% of all individuals were willing to ignore hygiene measures and 76.9% were less afraid of SARS-CoV-2 transmission after receiving a negative PCR test (5.9% and 48.8% in case of a negative RAT). 28.8% reported not to self-isolate after receiving a positive RAT. Multivariate analyses revealed that non-vaccinated individuals relied less on information from governmental authorities ( p  = 0.0004) and more on social media ( p  = 0.0216), disbelieved in the accuracy of the PCR test ( p  ≤ 0.0001) while displaying strong preference towards using RATs ( p  ≤ 0.0001), were more willing to abandon pandemic-related hygiene measures ( p  ≤ 0.0001), less afraid of transmitting SARS-CoV-2 after a negative RAT ( p  ≤ 0.0001), and less likely to isolate after a positive RAT ( p  ≤ 0.0001). Conclusion Insights into preferred information sources as well as perception, preferences, and behavior related to SARS-CoV-2 testing and hygiene measures are key to refining public health information and surveillance campaigns. Non-vaccinated individuals’ divergent believes and behaviors possibly increase their COVID-19 risk.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s15010-022-01947-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9647754</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2735167877</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-41b066656534e48a1551d4508643742a1516592414f30bfaf08c608178f900663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhS0EokPhBVggS2xYYLiO_xIWSNVQoFKlShRmazmxM-OSiYOdjNS-Vl8QpzOUnwWrKLrfOfce6yD0nMIbCqDeJiqAAoGiIEArrsjNA7SgnFUEKsUeogUwAFLSQh6hJyldAYDI2GN0xCQTopDVAt2uTNP43pGNS340_Yh9b_3O28l0CefZtJ06MzpsrPWjD73p8PJidfaB0ApHn75jOzk8BpxFLq5dNhhcbNwws9j0FtduY3Y-xISjm53sTF-efLkky7AiBR5dGn2_focNHsIwL8tKUpvk7GvcxJASSa45rE7jZK-fokdtvs49O3yP0bePp1-Xn8n5xaez5ck5abjiI-G0BimlkIJxx0tDhaCWCyglZ4oX-Z9KURWc8pZB3ZoWykZCSVXZVpCV7Bi93_sOU711tsnhoun0EP3WxGsdjNd_T3q_0euw05XkSgmeDV4dDGL4MeWceutT47rO9C5MSReK5RtUqVRGX_6DXoUp5siZKlkpKOUSMlXsqbt3ia69P4aCnjuh953QuRP6rhP6Jote_BnjXvKrBBlgeyDlUb928ffu_9j-BOWxw-0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2838511460</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vaccine-hesitant individuals accumulate additional COVID-19 risk due to divergent perception and behaviors related to SARS-CoV-2 testing: a population-based, cross-sectional study</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Wratil, Paul R. ; Kotter, Katharina ; Bischof, Marie L. ; Hollerbach, Sophie ; Apak, Elif ; Kalteis, Anna-Lena ; Nayeli-Pflantz, Tamara ; Kaderali, Lars ; Adorjan, Kristina ; Keppler, Oliver T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wratil, Paul R. ; Kotter, Katharina ; Bischof, Marie L. ; Hollerbach, Sophie ; Apak, Elif ; Kalteis, Anna-Lena ; Nayeli-Pflantz, Tamara ; Kaderali, Lars ; Adorjan, Kristina ; Keppler, Oliver T.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To investigate the perception of SARS-CoV-2 detection methods, information sources, and opinions on appropriate behavior after receiving negative or positive test results. Methods In a questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study conducted between September 1 and November 17, 2021, epidemiological, behavioral, and COVID-19-related data were acquired from the public in Munich, Germany. Results Most of the 1388 participants obtained information from online media (82.8%) as well as state and federal authorities (80.3%). 93.4% believed in the accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing and 41.2% in the accuracy of rapid antigen tests (RATs). However, RATs were preferred for testing (59.1%) over PCR (51.1%). 24.0% of all individuals were willing to ignore hygiene measures and 76.9% were less afraid of SARS-CoV-2 transmission after receiving a negative PCR test (5.9% and 48.8% in case of a negative RAT). 28.8% reported not to self-isolate after receiving a positive RAT. Multivariate analyses revealed that non-vaccinated individuals relied less on information from governmental authorities ( p  = 0.0004) and more on social media ( p  = 0.0216), disbelieved in the accuracy of the PCR test ( p  ≤ 0.0001) while displaying strong preference towards using RATs ( p  ≤ 0.0001), were more willing to abandon pandemic-related hygiene measures ( p  ≤ 0.0001), less afraid of transmitting SARS-CoV-2 after a negative RAT ( p  ≤ 0.0001), and less likely to isolate after a positive RAT ( p  ≤ 0.0001). Conclusion Insights into preferred information sources as well as perception, preferences, and behavior related to SARS-CoV-2 testing and hygiene measures are key to refining public health information and surveillance campaigns. Non-vaccinated individuals’ divergent believes and behaviors possibly increase their COVID-19 risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-8126</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s15010-022-01947-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36355269</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Antigens ; Behavior ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 vaccines ; Cross-sectional studies ; Data acquisition ; Disease transmission ; Epidemiology ; Family Medicine ; General Practice ; Hygiene ; Infectious Diseases ; Information sources ; Internal Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Pandemics ; Perception ; Population studies ; Population-based studies ; Public health ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><ispartof>Infection, 2023-08, Vol.51 (4), p.909-919</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-41b066656534e48a1551d4508643742a1516592414f30bfaf08c608178f900663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-41b066656534e48a1551d4508643742a1516592414f30bfaf08c608178f900663</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0942-0637</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s15010-022-01947-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s15010-022-01947-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36355269$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wratil, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotter, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bischof, Marie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollerbach, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apak, Elif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalteis, Anna-Lena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nayeli-Pflantz, Tamara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaderali, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adorjan, Kristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keppler, Oliver T.</creatorcontrib><title>Vaccine-hesitant individuals accumulate additional COVID-19 risk due to divergent perception and behaviors related to SARS-CoV-2 testing: a population-based, cross-sectional study</title><title>Infection</title><addtitle>Infection</addtitle><addtitle>Infection</addtitle><description>Purpose To investigate the perception of SARS-CoV-2 detection methods, information sources, and opinions on appropriate behavior after receiving negative or positive test results. Methods In a questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study conducted between September 1 and November 17, 2021, epidemiological, behavioral, and COVID-19-related data were acquired from the public in Munich, Germany. Results Most of the 1388 participants obtained information from online media (82.8%) as well as state and federal authorities (80.3%). 93.4% believed in the accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing and 41.2% in the accuracy of rapid antigen tests (RATs). However, RATs were preferred for testing (59.1%) over PCR (51.1%). 24.0% of all individuals were willing to ignore hygiene measures and 76.9% were less afraid of SARS-CoV-2 transmission after receiving a negative PCR test (5.9% and 48.8% in case of a negative RAT). 28.8% reported not to self-isolate after receiving a positive RAT. Multivariate analyses revealed that non-vaccinated individuals relied less on information from governmental authorities ( p  = 0.0004) and more on social media ( p  = 0.0216), disbelieved in the accuracy of the PCR test ( p  ≤ 0.0001) while displaying strong preference towards using RATs ( p  ≤ 0.0001), were more willing to abandon pandemic-related hygiene measures ( p  ≤ 0.0001), less afraid of transmitting SARS-CoV-2 after a negative RAT ( p  ≤ 0.0001), and less likely to isolate after a positive RAT ( p  ≤ 0.0001). Conclusion Insights into preferred information sources as well as perception, preferences, and behavior related to SARS-CoV-2 testing and hygiene measures are key to refining public health information and surveillance campaigns. Non-vaccinated individuals’ divergent believes and behaviors possibly increase their COVID-19 risk.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 vaccines</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Data acquisition</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Family Medicine</subject><subject>General Practice</subject><subject>Hygiene</subject><subject>Infectious Diseases</subject><subject>Information sources</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Population-based studies</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><issn>0300-8126</issn><issn>1439-0973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhS0EokPhBVggS2xYYLiO_xIWSNVQoFKlShRmazmxM-OSiYOdjNS-Vl8QpzOUnwWrKLrfOfce6yD0nMIbCqDeJiqAAoGiIEArrsjNA7SgnFUEKsUeogUwAFLSQh6hJyldAYDI2GN0xCQTopDVAt2uTNP43pGNS340_Yh9b_3O28l0CefZtJ06MzpsrPWjD73p8PJidfaB0ApHn75jOzk8BpxFLq5dNhhcbNwws9j0FtduY3Y-xISjm53sTF-efLkky7AiBR5dGn2_focNHsIwL8tKUpvk7GvcxJASSa45rE7jZK-fokdtvs49O3yP0bePp1-Xn8n5xaez5ck5abjiI-G0BimlkIJxx0tDhaCWCyglZ4oX-Z9KURWc8pZB3ZoWykZCSVXZVpCV7Bi93_sOU711tsnhoun0EP3WxGsdjNd_T3q_0euw05XkSgmeDV4dDGL4MeWceutT47rO9C5MSReK5RtUqVRGX_6DXoUp5siZKlkpKOUSMlXsqbt3ia69P4aCnjuh953QuRP6rhP6Jote_BnjXvKrBBlgeyDlUb928ffu_9j-BOWxw-0</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Wratil, Paul R.</creator><creator>Kotter, Katharina</creator><creator>Bischof, Marie L.</creator><creator>Hollerbach, Sophie</creator><creator>Apak, Elif</creator><creator>Kalteis, Anna-Lena</creator><creator>Nayeli-Pflantz, Tamara</creator><creator>Kaderali, Lars</creator><creator>Adorjan, Kristina</creator><creator>Keppler, Oliver T.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0942-0637</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>Vaccine-hesitant individuals accumulate additional COVID-19 risk due to divergent perception and behaviors related to SARS-CoV-2 testing: a population-based, cross-sectional study</title><author>Wratil, Paul R. ; Kotter, Katharina ; Bischof, Marie L. ; Hollerbach, Sophie ; Apak, Elif ; Kalteis, Anna-Lena ; Nayeli-Pflantz, Tamara ; Kaderali, Lars ; Adorjan, Kristina ; Keppler, Oliver T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-41b066656534e48a1551d4508643742a1516592414f30bfaf08c608178f900663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 vaccines</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Data acquisition</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Family Medicine</topic><topic>General Practice</topic><topic>Hygiene</topic><topic>Infectious Diseases</topic><topic>Information sources</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Population-based studies</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wratil, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotter, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bischof, Marie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollerbach, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apak, Elif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalteis, Anna-Lena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nayeli-Pflantz, Tamara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaderali, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adorjan, Kristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keppler, Oliver T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wratil, Paul R.</au><au>Kotter, Katharina</au><au>Bischof, Marie L.</au><au>Hollerbach, Sophie</au><au>Apak, Elif</au><au>Kalteis, Anna-Lena</au><au>Nayeli-Pflantz, Tamara</au><au>Kaderali, Lars</au><au>Adorjan, Kristina</au><au>Keppler, Oliver T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vaccine-hesitant individuals accumulate additional COVID-19 risk due to divergent perception and behaviors related to SARS-CoV-2 testing: a population-based, cross-sectional study</atitle><jtitle>Infection</jtitle><stitle>Infection</stitle><addtitle>Infection</addtitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>909</spage><epage>919</epage><pages>909-919</pages><issn>0300-8126</issn><eissn>1439-0973</eissn><abstract>Purpose To investigate the perception of SARS-CoV-2 detection methods, information sources, and opinions on appropriate behavior after receiving negative or positive test results. Methods In a questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study conducted between September 1 and November 17, 2021, epidemiological, behavioral, and COVID-19-related data were acquired from the public in Munich, Germany. Results Most of the 1388 participants obtained information from online media (82.8%) as well as state and federal authorities (80.3%). 93.4% believed in the accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing and 41.2% in the accuracy of rapid antigen tests (RATs). However, RATs were preferred for testing (59.1%) over PCR (51.1%). 24.0% of all individuals were willing to ignore hygiene measures and 76.9% were less afraid of SARS-CoV-2 transmission after receiving a negative PCR test (5.9% and 48.8% in case of a negative RAT). 28.8% reported not to self-isolate after receiving a positive RAT. Multivariate analyses revealed that non-vaccinated individuals relied less on information from governmental authorities ( p  = 0.0004) and more on social media ( p  = 0.0216), disbelieved in the accuracy of the PCR test ( p  ≤ 0.0001) while displaying strong preference towards using RATs ( p  ≤ 0.0001), were more willing to abandon pandemic-related hygiene measures ( p  ≤ 0.0001), less afraid of transmitting SARS-CoV-2 after a negative RAT ( p  ≤ 0.0001), and less likely to isolate after a positive RAT ( p  ≤ 0.0001). Conclusion Insights into preferred information sources as well as perception, preferences, and behavior related to SARS-CoV-2 testing and hygiene measures are key to refining public health information and surveillance campaigns. Non-vaccinated individuals’ divergent believes and behaviors possibly increase their COVID-19 risk.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>36355269</pmid><doi>10.1007/s15010-022-01947-z</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0942-0637</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-8126
ispartof Infection, 2023-08, Vol.51 (4), p.909-919
issn 0300-8126
1439-0973
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9647754
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Accuracy
Antigens
Behavior
COVID-19
COVID-19 vaccines
Cross-sectional studies
Data acquisition
Disease transmission
Epidemiology
Family Medicine
General Practice
Hygiene
Infectious Diseases
Information sources
Internal Medicine
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Pandemics
Perception
Population studies
Population-based studies
Public health
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
title Vaccine-hesitant individuals accumulate additional COVID-19 risk due to divergent perception and behaviors related to SARS-CoV-2 testing: a population-based, cross-sectional study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T01%3A06%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vaccine-hesitant%20individuals%20accumulate%20additional%20COVID-19%20risk%20due%20to%20divergent%20perception%20and%20behaviors%20related%20to%20SARS-CoV-2%20testing:%20a%20population-based,%20cross-sectional%20study&rft.jtitle=Infection&rft.au=Wratil,%20Paul%20R.&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=909&rft.epage=919&rft.pages=909-919&rft.issn=0300-8126&rft.eissn=1439-0973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s15010-022-01947-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2735167877%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2838511460&rft_id=info:pmid/36355269&rfr_iscdi=true