A clinical diagnostic test on the detection of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast neoplasms using a 1-step RT-PCR

BackgroundCurrently, assessment of sentinel lymph node (SLN) requires cytology, hematoxylin-eosin (HE), and immunohistochemistry (IHC). However, routine pathological slides still suffer from certain sampling errors and have time limitations. This study sought to investigate the sensitivity and speci...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gland surgery 2022-10, Vol.11 (10), p.1628-1638
Hauptverfasser: Shang, Jiuyan, Zhao, Meng, Deng, Huiyan, Liu, Chang, Cai, Lijing, Liu, Yueping
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1638
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1628
container_title Gland surgery
container_volume 11
creator Shang, Jiuyan
Zhao, Meng
Deng, Huiyan
Liu, Chang
Cai, Lijing
Liu, Yueping
description BackgroundCurrently, assessment of sentinel lymph node (SLN) requires cytology, hematoxylin-eosin (HE), and immunohistochemistry (IHC). However, routine pathological slides still suffer from certain sampling errors and have time limitations. This study sought to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of SLN detection by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), which quantifies the expression of mammaglobin and cytokeratin-19 genes to determine SLN status. MethodsThe RT-PCR detection of cycles threshold (CT) values has a direct relationship with the lymph node metastasis. This study prospectively collected 256 sentinel lymph nodes from 150 patients diagnosed with breast cancer between August and November 2017. In the detection of metastases in lymph nodes, molecular markers can be verified at the cell-level and tissue-level of tumor cells. In this study, IHC results were used as the gold standard for judging sentinel lymph node status. Results(I) According to the established cell models, as the lymph nodes in tumor cells increase, RT-PCR CT values decrease. (II) 83 lymph nodes were first collected, and the interpretation criteria for the molecular detection results were determined based on the IHC results. (III) The statistical analysis showed that the sensitivity of the RT-PCR was 80.49% and the specificity was 91.55%. The positive predictive and negative predictive values were 64.71% and 96.06%, respectively. There was no significant difference between RT-PCR detection and IHC detection (P=0.076). Statistical chi-square analysis also showed that the difference between intraoperative freezing and immunohistochemistry was statistically significant (P=0.000). There was a statistically significant difference between intraoperative freezing and RT-PCR detection (P=0.000). RT-PCR detection is more sensitive than intraoperative frozen detection, and is closer to the results of immunohistochemistry. ConclusionsRT-PCR had objective and rapid output advantages, and was proven to be true and reliable. RT-PCR detection can not only rapidly assess sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients during surgery, but its accuracy is also close to that of IHC. Correctly determine whether to perform axillary lymph node dissection and improve the survival rate of patients.
doi_str_mv 10.21037/gs-22-485
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9638790</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2735169279</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-4009e0539cfaf32c234b3fdbdbbb07d09c3100c4ca93f9b8a217d4b57b09b2073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUV1L5TAQLYuCor7sL5jHRaibJm3TvAhy8WPhgiIu7FtI0rQ3kia1k-ty_73BexGEgZnDnDnzVRQ_K3JFK8L47xFLSsu6a34Up5RSXnYNb44OcdvV_06KC8RXQkjFaN229LT4fwPGu-CM8tA7NYaIyRlIFhPEAGljobfJmuQyigOgDckF68HvpnkDIfYWJpsUZnMILoBebEYQbJy9wglhiy6MoKAqMdkZnl_Kp9XzeXE8KI_24uDPir93ty-rh3L9eP9ndbMuDWuaVNaECEsaJsygBkYNZbVmQ697rTXhPRGGVYSY2ijBBqE7RSve17rhmghNCWdnxfVed97qyfYmj78oL-fFTWrZyaic_J4JbiPH-C5FyzouSBb4dRBY4ts2n0VODo31XuUNtygpZ03VCspFpl7uqWaJiIsdvtpURH5-SI65gMr8IfYBtamF-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2735169279</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A clinical diagnostic test on the detection of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast neoplasms using a 1-step RT-PCR</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Shang, Jiuyan ; Zhao, Meng ; Deng, Huiyan ; Liu, Chang ; Cai, Lijing ; Liu, Yueping</creator><creatorcontrib>Shang, Jiuyan ; Zhao, Meng ; Deng, Huiyan ; Liu, Chang ; Cai, Lijing ; Liu, Yueping</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundCurrently, assessment of sentinel lymph node (SLN) requires cytology, hematoxylin-eosin (HE), and immunohistochemistry (IHC). However, routine pathological slides still suffer from certain sampling errors and have time limitations. This study sought to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of SLN detection by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), which quantifies the expression of mammaglobin and cytokeratin-19 genes to determine SLN status. MethodsThe RT-PCR detection of cycles threshold (CT) values has a direct relationship with the lymph node metastasis. This study prospectively collected 256 sentinel lymph nodes from 150 patients diagnosed with breast cancer between August and November 2017. In the detection of metastases in lymph nodes, molecular markers can be verified at the cell-level and tissue-level of tumor cells. In this study, IHC results were used as the gold standard for judging sentinel lymph node status. Results(I) According to the established cell models, as the lymph nodes in tumor cells increase, RT-PCR CT values decrease. (II) 83 lymph nodes were first collected, and the interpretation criteria for the molecular detection results were determined based on the IHC results. (III) The statistical analysis showed that the sensitivity of the RT-PCR was 80.49% and the specificity was 91.55%. The positive predictive and negative predictive values were 64.71% and 96.06%, respectively. There was no significant difference between RT-PCR detection and IHC detection (P=0.076). Statistical chi-square analysis also showed that the difference between intraoperative freezing and immunohistochemistry was statistically significant (P=0.000). There was a statistically significant difference between intraoperative freezing and RT-PCR detection (P=0.000). RT-PCR detection is more sensitive than intraoperative frozen detection, and is closer to the results of immunohistochemistry. ConclusionsRT-PCR had objective and rapid output advantages, and was proven to be true and reliable. RT-PCR detection can not only rapidly assess sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients during surgery, but its accuracy is also close to that of IHC. Correctly determine whether to perform axillary lymph node dissection and improve the survival rate of patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2227-684X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2227-8575</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21037/gs-22-485</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>AME Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Gland surgery, 2022-10, Vol.11 (10), p.1628-1638</ispartof><rights>2022 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved. 2022 Gland Surgery.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-4009e0539cfaf32c234b3fdbdbbb07d09c3100c4ca93f9b8a217d4b57b09b2073</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9638790/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9638790/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shang, Jiuyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Huiyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Lijing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yueping</creatorcontrib><title>A clinical diagnostic test on the detection of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast neoplasms using a 1-step RT-PCR</title><title>Gland surgery</title><description>BackgroundCurrently, assessment of sentinel lymph node (SLN) requires cytology, hematoxylin-eosin (HE), and immunohistochemistry (IHC). However, routine pathological slides still suffer from certain sampling errors and have time limitations. This study sought to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of SLN detection by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), which quantifies the expression of mammaglobin and cytokeratin-19 genes to determine SLN status. MethodsThe RT-PCR detection of cycles threshold (CT) values has a direct relationship with the lymph node metastasis. This study prospectively collected 256 sentinel lymph nodes from 150 patients diagnosed with breast cancer between August and November 2017. In the detection of metastases in lymph nodes, molecular markers can be verified at the cell-level and tissue-level of tumor cells. In this study, IHC results were used as the gold standard for judging sentinel lymph node status. Results(I) According to the established cell models, as the lymph nodes in tumor cells increase, RT-PCR CT values decrease. (II) 83 lymph nodes were first collected, and the interpretation criteria for the molecular detection results were determined based on the IHC results. (III) The statistical analysis showed that the sensitivity of the RT-PCR was 80.49% and the specificity was 91.55%. The positive predictive and negative predictive values were 64.71% and 96.06%, respectively. There was no significant difference between RT-PCR detection and IHC detection (P=0.076). Statistical chi-square analysis also showed that the difference between intraoperative freezing and immunohistochemistry was statistically significant (P=0.000). There was a statistically significant difference between intraoperative freezing and RT-PCR detection (P=0.000). RT-PCR detection is more sensitive than intraoperative frozen detection, and is closer to the results of immunohistochemistry. ConclusionsRT-PCR had objective and rapid output advantages, and was proven to be true and reliable. RT-PCR detection can not only rapidly assess sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients during surgery, but its accuracy is also close to that of IHC. Correctly determine whether to perform axillary lymph node dissection and improve the survival rate of patients.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>2227-684X</issn><issn>2227-8575</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUV1L5TAQLYuCor7sL5jHRaibJm3TvAhy8WPhgiIu7FtI0rQ3kia1k-ty_73BexGEgZnDnDnzVRQ_K3JFK8L47xFLSsu6a34Up5RSXnYNb44OcdvV_06KC8RXQkjFaN229LT4fwPGu-CM8tA7NYaIyRlIFhPEAGljobfJmuQyigOgDckF68HvpnkDIfYWJpsUZnMILoBebEYQbJy9wglhiy6MoKAqMdkZnl_Kp9XzeXE8KI_24uDPir93ty-rh3L9eP9ndbMuDWuaVNaECEsaJsygBkYNZbVmQ697rTXhPRGGVYSY2ijBBqE7RSve17rhmghNCWdnxfVed97qyfYmj78oL-fFTWrZyaic_J4JbiPH-C5FyzouSBb4dRBY4ts2n0VODo31XuUNtygpZ03VCspFpl7uqWaJiIsdvtpURH5-SI65gMr8IfYBtamF-w</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Shang, Jiuyan</creator><creator>Zhao, Meng</creator><creator>Deng, Huiyan</creator><creator>Liu, Chang</creator><creator>Cai, Lijing</creator><creator>Liu, Yueping</creator><general>AME Publishing Company</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>A clinical diagnostic test on the detection of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast neoplasms using a 1-step RT-PCR</title><author>Shang, Jiuyan ; Zhao, Meng ; Deng, Huiyan ; Liu, Chang ; Cai, Lijing ; Liu, Yueping</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-4009e0539cfaf32c234b3fdbdbbb07d09c3100c4ca93f9b8a217d4b57b09b2073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shang, Jiuyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Huiyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Lijing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yueping</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Gland surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shang, Jiuyan</au><au>Zhao, Meng</au><au>Deng, Huiyan</au><au>Liu, Chang</au><au>Cai, Lijing</au><au>Liu, Yueping</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A clinical diagnostic test on the detection of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast neoplasms using a 1-step RT-PCR</atitle><jtitle>Gland surgery</jtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1628</spage><epage>1638</epage><pages>1628-1638</pages><issn>2227-684X</issn><eissn>2227-8575</eissn><abstract>BackgroundCurrently, assessment of sentinel lymph node (SLN) requires cytology, hematoxylin-eosin (HE), and immunohistochemistry (IHC). However, routine pathological slides still suffer from certain sampling errors and have time limitations. This study sought to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of SLN detection by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), which quantifies the expression of mammaglobin and cytokeratin-19 genes to determine SLN status. MethodsThe RT-PCR detection of cycles threshold (CT) values has a direct relationship with the lymph node metastasis. This study prospectively collected 256 sentinel lymph nodes from 150 patients diagnosed with breast cancer between August and November 2017. In the detection of metastases in lymph nodes, molecular markers can be verified at the cell-level and tissue-level of tumor cells. In this study, IHC results were used as the gold standard for judging sentinel lymph node status. Results(I) According to the established cell models, as the lymph nodes in tumor cells increase, RT-PCR CT values decrease. (II) 83 lymph nodes were first collected, and the interpretation criteria for the molecular detection results were determined based on the IHC results. (III) The statistical analysis showed that the sensitivity of the RT-PCR was 80.49% and the specificity was 91.55%. The positive predictive and negative predictive values were 64.71% and 96.06%, respectively. There was no significant difference between RT-PCR detection and IHC detection (P=0.076). Statistical chi-square analysis also showed that the difference between intraoperative freezing and immunohistochemistry was statistically significant (P=0.000). There was a statistically significant difference between intraoperative freezing and RT-PCR detection (P=0.000). RT-PCR detection is more sensitive than intraoperative frozen detection, and is closer to the results of immunohistochemistry. ConclusionsRT-PCR had objective and rapid output advantages, and was proven to be true and reliable. RT-PCR detection can not only rapidly assess sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients during surgery, but its accuracy is also close to that of IHC. Correctly determine whether to perform axillary lymph node dissection and improve the survival rate of patients.</abstract><pub>AME Publishing Company</pub><doi>10.21037/gs-22-485</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2227-684X
ispartof Gland surgery, 2022-10, Vol.11 (10), p.1628-1638
issn 2227-684X
2227-8575
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9638790
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Original
title A clinical diagnostic test on the detection of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast neoplasms using a 1-step RT-PCR
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T02%3A19%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20clinical%20diagnostic%20test%20on%20the%20detection%20of%20sentinel%20lymph%20node%20metastasis%20in%20breast%20neoplasms%20using%20a%201-step%20RT-PCR&rft.jtitle=Gland%20surgery&rft.au=Shang,%20Jiuyan&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1628&rft.epage=1638&rft.pages=1628-1638&rft.issn=2227-684X&rft.eissn=2227-8575&rft_id=info:doi/10.21037/gs-22-485&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2735169279%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2735169279&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true