Monobloc press-fit cups with large-diameter bearings are safe in revision total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUNDInstability is a major cause of failure of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) which can be avoided with the use of monobloc press-fit cups with large diameter heads (LDH). OBJECTIVEThis consecutive case series analyses whether LDH monobloc components are a safe and clinically beneficial...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Orthopedic Reviews 2022-11, Vol.14 (4), p.38926-38926
Hauptverfasser: Synnott, Paul-André, Sivaloganathan, Sivan, Kiss, Marc-Olivier, Binette, Benoit, Morcos, Mina W., Vendittoli, Pascal-André
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 38926
container_issue 4
container_start_page 38926
container_title Orthopedic Reviews
container_volume 14
creator Synnott, Paul-André
Sivaloganathan, Sivan
Kiss, Marc-Olivier
Binette, Benoit
Morcos, Mina W.
Vendittoli, Pascal-André
description BACKGROUNDInstability is a major cause of failure of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) which can be avoided with the use of monobloc press-fit cups with large diameter heads (LDH). OBJECTIVEThis consecutive case series analyses whether LDH monobloc components are a safe and clinically beneficial option for revision THA. METHODSThis consecutive case series includes 47 revision THA with LDH monobloc acetabular cup. Acetabular bone defects were Paprosky type I (42), type IIA (2) and type IIC (3). The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and the Patient's Joint Perception (PJP) scores were analysed and a radiographic evaluation for signs of implant dysfunction was performed. RESULTSAfter a mean follow-up of 4.5 years, there were 5 (10.6%) acetabular cup re-revisions: 2 loss of primary fixation and 3 instabilities. Implant survivorship at 4-years was 89.4% (95% CI: 89.3 to 89.5). Recurrent hip dislocation was reported in 1 patient (2.1%) and remains under conservative treatment. The mean WOMAC and FJS were 19.5 (16.8; 0.0 to 58.3) and 57.3 (28.9; 6.3 to 100.0), respectively. Regarding the PJP, 3 (8.8%) patients perceived their hip as natural, 8 (23.5%) as an artificial joint with no restriction, 14 (41.2%) with minor restriction and 9 (26.5%) with major restriction. CONCLUSIONIn cases of revision THA with limited bone loss, press-fit primary fixation with LDH monobloc acetabular components are valuable options that offer excellent mid-term out-comes with low re-revision and joint instability rates.
doi_str_mv 10.52965/001c.38926
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9635988</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2734616563</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-a244e36e8e089ff98926d67aa7e6496c2c1227cc534889bf065a6f2ee3f0bd853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtLAzEUhQdRsNSu_ANZCjI1k0wyyUaQ4gsqbnQdM-lNJzIzGZO00n9vX4jezb1wDudy-LLsssBTRiRnNxgXZkqFJPwkGxFMWS4KXp7-uc-zSYyfeDu0KJmsRtnHi-993XqDhgAx5tYlZFZDRN8uNajVYQn5wukOEgRUgw6uX0akA6CoLSDXowBrF53vUfJJt6hxw1ZOTfBDq2PaXGRnVrcRJsc9zt4f7t9mT_n89fF5djfPDSl5yjUpS6AcBGAhrZW7FgteaV0BLyU3xBSEVMYwWgoha4s509wSAGpxvRCMjrPbQ-6wqjtYGOhT0K0agut02Civnfqv9K5RS79WklMmhdgGXB0Dgv9aQUyqc9FA2-oe_CoqUtGSF5xxurVeH6wm-BgD2N83BVZ7FmrHQu1Z0B_7335A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2734616563</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Monobloc press-fit cups with large-diameter bearings are safe in revision total hip arthroplasty</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Synnott, Paul-André ; Sivaloganathan, Sivan ; Kiss, Marc-Olivier ; Binette, Benoit ; Morcos, Mina W. ; Vendittoli, Pascal-André</creator><creatorcontrib>Synnott, Paul-André ; Sivaloganathan, Sivan ; Kiss, Marc-Olivier ; Binette, Benoit ; Morcos, Mina W. ; Vendittoli, Pascal-André</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUNDInstability is a major cause of failure of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) which can be avoided with the use of monobloc press-fit cups with large diameter heads (LDH). OBJECTIVEThis consecutive case series analyses whether LDH monobloc components are a safe and clinically beneficial option for revision THA. METHODSThis consecutive case series includes 47 revision THA with LDH monobloc acetabular cup. Acetabular bone defects were Paprosky type I (42), type IIA (2) and type IIC (3). The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and the Patient's Joint Perception (PJP) scores were analysed and a radiographic evaluation for signs of implant dysfunction was performed. RESULTSAfter a mean follow-up of 4.5 years, there were 5 (10.6%) acetabular cup re-revisions: 2 loss of primary fixation and 3 instabilities. Implant survivorship at 4-years was 89.4% (95% CI: 89.3 to 89.5). Recurrent hip dislocation was reported in 1 patient (2.1%) and remains under conservative treatment. The mean WOMAC and FJS were 19.5 (16.8; 0.0 to 58.3) and 57.3 (28.9; 6.3 to 100.0), respectively. Regarding the PJP, 3 (8.8%) patients perceived their hip as natural, 8 (23.5%) as an artificial joint with no restriction, 14 (41.2%) with minor restriction and 9 (26.5%) with major restriction. CONCLUSIONIn cases of revision THA with limited bone loss, press-fit primary fixation with LDH monobloc acetabular components are valuable options that offer excellent mid-term out-comes with low re-revision and joint instability rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2035-8164</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2035-8237</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2035-8164</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.52965/001c.38926</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Open Medical Publishing</publisher><ispartof>Orthopedic Reviews, 2022-11, Vol.14 (4), p.38926-38926</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-a244e36e8e089ff98926d67aa7e6496c2c1227cc534889bf065a6f2ee3f0bd853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635988/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635988/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Synnott, Paul-André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivaloganathan, Sivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiss, Marc-Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binette, Benoit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morcos, Mina W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vendittoli, Pascal-André</creatorcontrib><title>Monobloc press-fit cups with large-diameter bearings are safe in revision total hip arthroplasty</title><title>Orthopedic Reviews</title><description>BACKGROUNDInstability is a major cause of failure of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) which can be avoided with the use of monobloc press-fit cups with large diameter heads (LDH). OBJECTIVEThis consecutive case series analyses whether LDH monobloc components are a safe and clinically beneficial option for revision THA. METHODSThis consecutive case series includes 47 revision THA with LDH monobloc acetabular cup. Acetabular bone defects were Paprosky type I (42), type IIA (2) and type IIC (3). The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and the Patient's Joint Perception (PJP) scores were analysed and a radiographic evaluation for signs of implant dysfunction was performed. RESULTSAfter a mean follow-up of 4.5 years, there were 5 (10.6%) acetabular cup re-revisions: 2 loss of primary fixation and 3 instabilities. Implant survivorship at 4-years was 89.4% (95% CI: 89.3 to 89.5). Recurrent hip dislocation was reported in 1 patient (2.1%) and remains under conservative treatment. The mean WOMAC and FJS were 19.5 (16.8; 0.0 to 58.3) and 57.3 (28.9; 6.3 to 100.0), respectively. Regarding the PJP, 3 (8.8%) patients perceived their hip as natural, 8 (23.5%) as an artificial joint with no restriction, 14 (41.2%) with minor restriction and 9 (26.5%) with major restriction. CONCLUSIONIn cases of revision THA with limited bone loss, press-fit primary fixation with LDH monobloc acetabular components are valuable options that offer excellent mid-term out-comes with low re-revision and joint instability rates.</description><issn>2035-8164</issn><issn>2035-8237</issn><issn>2035-8164</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkUtLAzEUhQdRsNSu_ANZCjI1k0wyyUaQ4gsqbnQdM-lNJzIzGZO00n9vX4jezb1wDudy-LLsssBTRiRnNxgXZkqFJPwkGxFMWS4KXp7-uc-zSYyfeDu0KJmsRtnHi-993XqDhgAx5tYlZFZDRN8uNajVYQn5wukOEgRUgw6uX0akA6CoLSDXowBrF53vUfJJt6hxw1ZOTfBDq2PaXGRnVrcRJsc9zt4f7t9mT_n89fF5djfPDSl5yjUpS6AcBGAhrZW7FgteaV0BLyU3xBSEVMYwWgoha4s509wSAGpxvRCMjrPbQ-6wqjtYGOhT0K0agut02Civnfqv9K5RS79WklMmhdgGXB0Dgv9aQUyqc9FA2-oe_CoqUtGSF5xxurVeH6wm-BgD2N83BVZ7FmrHQu1Z0B_7335A</recordid><startdate>20221103</startdate><enddate>20221103</enddate><creator>Synnott, Paul-André</creator><creator>Sivaloganathan, Sivan</creator><creator>Kiss, Marc-Olivier</creator><creator>Binette, Benoit</creator><creator>Morcos, Mina W.</creator><creator>Vendittoli, Pascal-André</creator><general>Open Medical Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221103</creationdate><title>Monobloc press-fit cups with large-diameter bearings are safe in revision total hip arthroplasty</title><author>Synnott, Paul-André ; Sivaloganathan, Sivan ; Kiss, Marc-Olivier ; Binette, Benoit ; Morcos, Mina W. ; Vendittoli, Pascal-André</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-a244e36e8e089ff98926d67aa7e6496c2c1227cc534889bf065a6f2ee3f0bd853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Synnott, Paul-André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivaloganathan, Sivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiss, Marc-Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binette, Benoit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morcos, Mina W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vendittoli, Pascal-André</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Orthopedic Reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Synnott, Paul-André</au><au>Sivaloganathan, Sivan</au><au>Kiss, Marc-Olivier</au><au>Binette, Benoit</au><au>Morcos, Mina W.</au><au>Vendittoli, Pascal-André</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Monobloc press-fit cups with large-diameter bearings are safe in revision total hip arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>Orthopedic Reviews</jtitle><date>2022-11-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>38926</spage><epage>38926</epage><pages>38926-38926</pages><issn>2035-8164</issn><issn>2035-8237</issn><eissn>2035-8164</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUNDInstability is a major cause of failure of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) which can be avoided with the use of monobloc press-fit cups with large diameter heads (LDH). OBJECTIVEThis consecutive case series analyses whether LDH monobloc components are a safe and clinically beneficial option for revision THA. METHODSThis consecutive case series includes 47 revision THA with LDH monobloc acetabular cup. Acetabular bone defects were Paprosky type I (42), type IIA (2) and type IIC (3). The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and the Patient's Joint Perception (PJP) scores were analysed and a radiographic evaluation for signs of implant dysfunction was performed. RESULTSAfter a mean follow-up of 4.5 years, there were 5 (10.6%) acetabular cup re-revisions: 2 loss of primary fixation and 3 instabilities. Implant survivorship at 4-years was 89.4% (95% CI: 89.3 to 89.5). Recurrent hip dislocation was reported in 1 patient (2.1%) and remains under conservative treatment. The mean WOMAC and FJS were 19.5 (16.8; 0.0 to 58.3) and 57.3 (28.9; 6.3 to 100.0), respectively. Regarding the PJP, 3 (8.8%) patients perceived their hip as natural, 8 (23.5%) as an artificial joint with no restriction, 14 (41.2%) with minor restriction and 9 (26.5%) with major restriction. CONCLUSIONIn cases of revision THA with limited bone loss, press-fit primary fixation with LDH monobloc acetabular components are valuable options that offer excellent mid-term out-comes with low re-revision and joint instability rates.</abstract><pub>Open Medical Publishing</pub><doi>10.52965/001c.38926</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2035-8164
ispartof Orthopedic Reviews, 2022-11, Vol.14 (4), p.38926-38926
issn 2035-8164
2035-8237
2035-8164
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9635988
source Open Access: PubMed Central; EZB Electronic Journals Library
title Monobloc press-fit cups with large-diameter bearings are safe in revision total hip arthroplasty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T07%3A21%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Monobloc%20press-fit%20cups%20with%20large-diameter%20bearings%20are%20safe%20in%20revision%20total%20hip%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Orthopedic%20Reviews&rft.au=Synnott,%20Paul-Andr%C3%A9&rft.date=2022-11-03&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=38926&rft.epage=38926&rft.pages=38926-38926&rft.issn=2035-8164&rft.eissn=2035-8164&rft_id=info:doi/10.52965/001c.38926&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2734616563%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2734616563&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true