Interaction of surface topography and taper mismatch on head‐stem modular junction contact mechanics during assembly in modern total hip replacement
Implant failure due to fretting corrosion at the head‐stem modular junction is an increasing problem in modular total hip arthroplasty. The effect of varying microgroove topography on modular junction contact mechanics has not been well characterized. The aim of this study was to employ a novel, mic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of orthopaedic research 2023-02, Vol.41 (2), p.418-425 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 425 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 418 |
container_title | Journal of orthopaedic research |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Gustafson, Jonathan A. Mell, Steven P. Levine, Brett R. Pourzal, Robin Lundberg, Hannah J. |
description | Implant failure due to fretting corrosion at the head‐stem modular junction is an increasing problem in modular total hip arthroplasty. The effect of varying microgroove topography on modular junction contact mechanics has not been well characterized. The aim of this study was to employ a novel, microgrooved finite element (FEA) model of the hip taper interface and assess the role of microgroove geometry and taper mismatch angle on the modular junction mechanics during assembly. A two‐dimensional, axisymmetric FEA model was created using a modern 12/14 taper design of a CoCrMo femoral head taper and Ti6Al4V stem taper. Microgrooves were modeled at the contacting interface of the tapers and varied based on height and spacing measurements obtained from a repository of measured retrievals. Additionally, taper angular mismatch between the head and stem was varied to simulate proximal‐ and distal‐locked engagement. Forty simulations were conducted to parametrically evaluate the effects of microgroove surface topography and angular mismatch on predicted contact area, contact pressure, and equivalent plastic strain. Multiple linear regression analysis was highly significant (p 0.74) for all outcome variables. The regression analysis identified microgroove geometry on the head taper to have the greatest influence on modular junction contact mechanics. Additionally, there was a significant second order relationship between both peak contact pressure (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jor.25357 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9617811</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2658228316</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3457-65175f278d2c81604eef6c7d3768fda0ee3681a659290df94bc1c3d95fd1f8a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAURiMEokNhwQsgL2GR1nbin2yQUEWhqFIlBBI7y2PfTDxK7GA7RbPjEbriAXkSXFIqWLC6Cx-f7-p-VfWc4BOCMT3dh3hCWcPEg2pDGGtrRsWXh9UGi4bXmHJ-VD1JaY8xFoTKx9VRw1opBRWb6seFzxC1yS54FHqUlthrAyiHOeyinocD0t6irGeIaHJp0tkMqLADaPvz-03KMKEp2GXUEe0Xv4pM8Lk40QRm0N6ZhOwSnd8hnRJM2_GAnL_9BdGXpKxHNLgZRZjHkj2Bz0-rR70eEzy7m8fV5_O3n87e15dX7y7O3lzWpmmZqDkjgvVUSEuNJBy3AD03wjaCy95qDNBwSTRnHe2w7bt2a4hpbMd6S3qpWXNcvV6987KdwJoSHfWo5ugmHQ8qaKf-ffFuULtwrTpOhCSkCF7eCWL4ukDKqhzJwDhqD2FJinImKZUN4QV9taImhpQi9PcxBKvbHlXpUf3usbAv_t7rnvxTXAFOV-CbG-Hwf5P6cPVxVf4CaEut5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2658228316</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interaction of surface topography and taper mismatch on head‐stem modular junction contact mechanics during assembly in modern total hip replacement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Gustafson, Jonathan A. ; Mell, Steven P. ; Levine, Brett R. ; Pourzal, Robin ; Lundberg, Hannah J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gustafson, Jonathan A. ; Mell, Steven P. ; Levine, Brett R. ; Pourzal, Robin ; Lundberg, Hannah J.</creatorcontrib><description>Implant failure due to fretting corrosion at the head‐stem modular junction is an increasing problem in modular total hip arthroplasty. The effect of varying microgroove topography on modular junction contact mechanics has not been well characterized. The aim of this study was to employ a novel, microgrooved finite element (FEA) model of the hip taper interface and assess the role of microgroove geometry and taper mismatch angle on the modular junction mechanics during assembly. A two‐dimensional, axisymmetric FEA model was created using a modern 12/14 taper design of a CoCrMo femoral head taper and Ti6Al4V stem taper. Microgrooves were modeled at the contacting interface of the tapers and varied based on height and spacing measurements obtained from a repository of measured retrievals. Additionally, taper angular mismatch between the head and stem was varied to simulate proximal‐ and distal‐locked engagement. Forty simulations were conducted to parametrically evaluate the effects of microgroove surface topography and angular mismatch on predicted contact area, contact pressure, and equivalent plastic strain. Multiple linear regression analysis was highly significant (p < 0.001; R2 > 0.74) for all outcome variables. The regression analysis identified microgroove geometry on the head taper to have the greatest influence on modular junction contact mechanics. Additionally, there was a significant second order relationship between both peak contact pressure (p < 0.001) and plastic strain (p < 0.001) with taper mismatch angle. These modeling techniques will be used to identify the implant parameters that maximize taper interference strength via large in‐silico parametric studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0736-0266</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-527X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jor.25357</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35488727</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip ; arthroplasty‐hip ; biomechanics ; Corrosion ; finite element analysis ; Hip Prosthesis ; Humans ; modeling ; Prosthesis Design ; Prosthesis Failure ; Regression Analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedic research, 2023-02, Vol.41 (2), p.418-425</ispartof><rights>2022 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3457-65175f278d2c81604eef6c7d3768fda0ee3681a659290df94bc1c3d95fd1f8a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3457-65175f278d2c81604eef6c7d3768fda0ee3681a659290df94bc1c3d95fd1f8a53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1109-9336 ; 0000-0002-6981-8690 ; 0000-0002-9786-6219</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjor.25357$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjor.25357$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,1418,1434,27929,27930,45579,45580,46414,46838</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35488727$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gustafson, Jonathan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mell, Steven P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Brett R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pourzal, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundberg, Hannah J.</creatorcontrib><title>Interaction of surface topography and taper mismatch on head‐stem modular junction contact mechanics during assembly in modern total hip replacement</title><title>Journal of orthopaedic research</title><addtitle>J Orthop Res</addtitle><description>Implant failure due to fretting corrosion at the head‐stem modular junction is an increasing problem in modular total hip arthroplasty. The effect of varying microgroove topography on modular junction contact mechanics has not been well characterized. The aim of this study was to employ a novel, microgrooved finite element (FEA) model of the hip taper interface and assess the role of microgroove geometry and taper mismatch angle on the modular junction mechanics during assembly. A two‐dimensional, axisymmetric FEA model was created using a modern 12/14 taper design of a CoCrMo femoral head taper and Ti6Al4V stem taper. Microgrooves were modeled at the contacting interface of the tapers and varied based on height and spacing measurements obtained from a repository of measured retrievals. Additionally, taper angular mismatch between the head and stem was varied to simulate proximal‐ and distal‐locked engagement. Forty simulations were conducted to parametrically evaluate the effects of microgroove surface topography and angular mismatch on predicted contact area, contact pressure, and equivalent plastic strain. Multiple linear regression analysis was highly significant (p < 0.001; R2 > 0.74) for all outcome variables. The regression analysis identified microgroove geometry on the head taper to have the greatest influence on modular junction contact mechanics. Additionally, there was a significant second order relationship between both peak contact pressure (p < 0.001) and plastic strain (p < 0.001) with taper mismatch angle. These modeling techniques will be used to identify the implant parameters that maximize taper interference strength via large in‐silico parametric studies.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip</subject><subject>arthroplasty‐hip</subject><subject>biomechanics</subject><subject>Corrosion</subject><subject>finite element analysis</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>modeling</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><issn>0736-0266</issn><issn>1554-527X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAURiMEokNhwQsgL2GR1nbin2yQUEWhqFIlBBI7y2PfTDxK7GA7RbPjEbriAXkSXFIqWLC6Cx-f7-p-VfWc4BOCMT3dh3hCWcPEg2pDGGtrRsWXh9UGi4bXmHJ-VD1JaY8xFoTKx9VRw1opBRWb6seFzxC1yS54FHqUlthrAyiHOeyinocD0t6irGeIaHJp0tkMqLADaPvz-03KMKEp2GXUEe0Xv4pM8Lk40QRm0N6ZhOwSnd8hnRJM2_GAnL_9BdGXpKxHNLgZRZjHkj2Bz0-rR70eEzy7m8fV5_O3n87e15dX7y7O3lzWpmmZqDkjgvVUSEuNJBy3AD03wjaCy95qDNBwSTRnHe2w7bt2a4hpbMd6S3qpWXNcvV6987KdwJoSHfWo5ugmHQ8qaKf-ffFuULtwrTpOhCSkCF7eCWL4ukDKqhzJwDhqD2FJinImKZUN4QV9taImhpQi9PcxBKvbHlXpUf3usbAv_t7rnvxTXAFOV-CbG-Hwf5P6cPVxVf4CaEut5g</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Gustafson, Jonathan A.</creator><creator>Mell, Steven P.</creator><creator>Levine, Brett R.</creator><creator>Pourzal, Robin</creator><creator>Lundberg, Hannah J.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1109-9336</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6981-8690</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9786-6219</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>Interaction of surface topography and taper mismatch on head‐stem modular junction contact mechanics during assembly in modern total hip replacement</title><author>Gustafson, Jonathan A. ; Mell, Steven P. ; Levine, Brett R. ; Pourzal, Robin ; Lundberg, Hannah J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3457-65175f278d2c81604eef6c7d3768fda0ee3681a659290df94bc1c3d95fd1f8a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip</topic><topic>arthroplasty‐hip</topic><topic>biomechanics</topic><topic>Corrosion</topic><topic>finite element analysis</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>modeling</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gustafson, Jonathan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mell, Steven P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Brett R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pourzal, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundberg, Hannah J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gustafson, Jonathan A.</au><au>Mell, Steven P.</au><au>Levine, Brett R.</au><au>Pourzal, Robin</au><au>Lundberg, Hannah J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interaction of surface topography and taper mismatch on head‐stem modular junction contact mechanics during assembly in modern total hip replacement</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic research</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop Res</addtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>418</spage><epage>425</epage><pages>418-425</pages><issn>0736-0266</issn><eissn>1554-527X</eissn><abstract>Implant failure due to fretting corrosion at the head‐stem modular junction is an increasing problem in modular total hip arthroplasty. The effect of varying microgroove topography on modular junction contact mechanics has not been well characterized. The aim of this study was to employ a novel, microgrooved finite element (FEA) model of the hip taper interface and assess the role of microgroove geometry and taper mismatch angle on the modular junction mechanics during assembly. A two‐dimensional, axisymmetric FEA model was created using a modern 12/14 taper design of a CoCrMo femoral head taper and Ti6Al4V stem taper. Microgrooves were modeled at the contacting interface of the tapers and varied based on height and spacing measurements obtained from a repository of measured retrievals. Additionally, taper angular mismatch between the head and stem was varied to simulate proximal‐ and distal‐locked engagement. Forty simulations were conducted to parametrically evaluate the effects of microgroove surface topography and angular mismatch on predicted contact area, contact pressure, and equivalent plastic strain. Multiple linear regression analysis was highly significant (p < 0.001; R2 > 0.74) for all outcome variables. The regression analysis identified microgroove geometry on the head taper to have the greatest influence on modular junction contact mechanics. Additionally, there was a significant second order relationship between both peak contact pressure (p < 0.001) and plastic strain (p < 0.001) with taper mismatch angle. These modeling techniques will be used to identify the implant parameters that maximize taper interference strength via large in‐silico parametric studies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>35488727</pmid><doi>10.1002/jor.25357</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1109-9336</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6981-8690</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9786-6219</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0736-0266 |
ispartof | Journal of orthopaedic research, 2023-02, Vol.41 (2), p.418-425 |
issn | 0736-0266 1554-527X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9617811 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection) |
subjects | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip arthroplasty‐hip biomechanics Corrosion finite element analysis Hip Prosthesis Humans modeling Prosthesis Design Prosthesis Failure Regression Analysis |
title | Interaction of surface topography and taper mismatch on head‐stem modular junction contact mechanics during assembly in modern total hip replacement |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T13%3A15%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interaction%20of%20surface%20topography%20and%20taper%20mismatch%20on%20head%E2%80%90stem%20modular%20junction%20contact%20mechanics%20during%20assembly%20in%20modern%20total%20hip%20replacement&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20research&rft.au=Gustafson,%20Jonathan%20A.&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=418&rft.epage=425&rft.pages=418-425&rft.issn=0736-0266&rft.eissn=1554-527X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jor.25357&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2658228316%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2658228316&rft_id=info:pmid/35488727&rfr_iscdi=true |