Comparison of Machine Learning Models Including Preoperative, Intraoperative, and Postoperative Data and Mortality After Cardiac Surgery
Importance A variety of perioperative risk factors are associated with postoperative mortality risk. However, the relative contribution of routinely collected intraoperative clinical parameters to short-term and long-term mortality remains understudied. Objective To examine the performance of multip...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA network open 2022-10, Vol.5 (10), p.e2237970-e2237970 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e2237970 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | e2237970 |
container_title | JAMA network open |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Castela Forte, José Yeshmagambetova, Galiya van der Grinten, Maureen L. Scheeren, Thomas W. L. Nijsten, Maarten W. N. Mariani, Massimo A. Henning, Robert H. Epema, Anne H. |
description | Importance A variety of perioperative risk factors are associated with postoperative mortality risk. However, the relative contribution of routinely collected intraoperative clinical parameters to short-term and long-term mortality remains understudied. Objective To examine the performance of multiple machine learning models with data from different perioperative periods to predict 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year mortality and investigate factors that contribute to these predictions. Design, Setting, and Participants In this prognostic study using prospectively collected data, risk prediction models were developed for short-term and long-term mortality after cardiac surgery. Included participants were adult patients undergoing a first-time valve operation, coronary artery bypass grafting, or a combination of both between 1997 and 2017 in a single center, the University Medical Centre Groningen in the Netherlands. Mortality data were obtained in November 2017. Data analysis took place between February 2020 and August 2021. Exposure Cardiac surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures Postoperative mortality rates at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years were the primary outcomes. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to assess discrimination. The contribution of all preoperative, intraoperative hemodynamic and temperature, and postoperative factors to mortality was investigated using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values. Results Data from 9415 patients who underwent cardiac surgery (median [IQR] age, 68 [60-74] years; 2554 [27.1%] women) were included. Overall mortality rates at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years were 268 patients (2.8%), 420 patients (4.5%), and 612 patients (6.5%), respectively. Models including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data achieved AUROC values of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.78-0.86), 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77-0.85), and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.75-0.84) for 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year mortality, respectively. Models including only postoperative data performed similarly (30 days: 0.78 [95% CI, 0.73-0.82]; 1 year: 0.79 [95% CI, 0.74-0.83]; 5 years: 0.77 [95% CI, 0.73-0.82]). However, models based on all perioperative data provided less clinically usable predictions, with lower detection rates; for example, postoperative models identified a high-risk group with a 2.8-fold increase in risk for 5-year mortality (4.1 [95% CI, 3.3-5.1]) vs an increase of 11.3 (95% CI, 6.8-18.7) for the high-risk group identified by the full perioper |
doi_str_mv | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.37970 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9606847</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2729027526</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-9455e9c8ad17293a8f27a9f0c7bac2d7af5828fa34221ad4e2954eb510cb836b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkd1OGzEQha2qqCDgHaz2phdN8M967e1FJRRKQUpUpLbX1qzXG5zu2qntpcob8Nh1ACHK1XiOP52Z0UHoPSVzSgg928AI3ua_If4OW-vnjDA257KR5A06YkJWM66IePvifYhOU9oQQhihvKnFO3TIa6akqMURul-EcQvRpeBx6PEKzK3zFi8tRO_8Gq9CZ4eEr70Zpm4v3ERb5kbI7s5-KnqO8KIH3-GbkPKzhC8gw4O8CjHD4PIOn_fZRryA2Dkw-McU1zbuTtBBD0Oyp0_1GP26_PpzcTVbfv92vThfzkzFaZ41lRC2MQo6KlnDQfVMQtMTI1swrJPQC8VUD7xijEJXWdaIyraCEtMqXrf8GH159N1O7Wg7Y_cXDHob3QhxpwM4_f-Pd7d6He50U5NaVbIYfHwyiOHPZFPWo0vGDkOJJUxJs7IXYVKwuqAfXqGbMEVfzisUr5XinLNCfX6kTAwpRds_L0OJ3meuX2Wu95nrh8z5P2gpppw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2736883332</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Machine Learning Models Including Preoperative, Intraoperative, and Postoperative Data and Mortality After Cardiac Surgery</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Castela Forte, José ; Yeshmagambetova, Galiya ; van der Grinten, Maureen L. ; Scheeren, Thomas W. L. ; Nijsten, Maarten W. N. ; Mariani, Massimo A. ; Henning, Robert H. ; Epema, Anne H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Castela Forte, José ; Yeshmagambetova, Galiya ; van der Grinten, Maureen L. ; Scheeren, Thomas W. L. ; Nijsten, Maarten W. N. ; Mariani, Massimo A. ; Henning, Robert H. ; Epema, Anne H.</creatorcontrib><description>Importance A variety of perioperative risk factors are associated with postoperative mortality risk. However, the relative contribution of routinely collected intraoperative clinical parameters to short-term and long-term mortality remains understudied. Objective To examine the performance of multiple machine learning models with data from different perioperative periods to predict 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year mortality and investigate factors that contribute to these predictions. Design, Setting, and Participants In this prognostic study using prospectively collected data, risk prediction models were developed for short-term and long-term mortality after cardiac surgery. Included participants were adult patients undergoing a first-time valve operation, coronary artery bypass grafting, or a combination of both between 1997 and 2017 in a single center, the University Medical Centre Groningen in the Netherlands. Mortality data were obtained in November 2017. Data analysis took place between February 2020 and August 2021. Exposure Cardiac surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures Postoperative mortality rates at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years were the primary outcomes. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to assess discrimination. The contribution of all preoperative, intraoperative hemodynamic and temperature, and postoperative factors to mortality was investigated using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values. Results Data from 9415 patients who underwent cardiac surgery (median [IQR] age, 68 [60-74] years; 2554 [27.1%] women) were included. Overall mortality rates at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years were 268 patients (2.8%), 420 patients (4.5%), and 612 patients (6.5%), respectively. Models including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data achieved AUROC values of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.78-0.86), 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77-0.85), and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.75-0.84) for 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year mortality, respectively. Models including only postoperative data performed similarly (30 days: 0.78 [95% CI, 0.73-0.82]; 1 year: 0.79 [95% CI, 0.74-0.83]; 5 years: 0.77 [95% CI, 0.73-0.82]). However, models based on all perioperative data provided less clinically usable predictions, with lower detection rates; for example, postoperative models identified a high-risk group with a 2.8-fold increase in risk for 5-year mortality (4.1 [95% CI, 3.3-5.1]) vs an increase of 11.3 (95% CI, 6.8-18.7) for the high-risk group identified by the full perioperative model. Postoperative markers associated with metabolic dysfunction and decreased kidney function were the main factors contributing to mortality risk. Conclusions and Relevance This study found that the addition of continuous intraoperative hemodynamic and temperature data to postoperative data was not associated with improved machine learning–based identification of patients at increased risk of short-term and long-term mortality after cardiac operations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.37970</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36287565</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Health Informatics ; Heart surgery ; Hemodynamics ; Machine learning ; Mortality ; Online Only ; Original Investigation</subject><ispartof>JAMA network open, 2022-10, Vol.5 (10), p.e2237970-e2237970</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright 2022 Castela Forte J et al. .</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-9455e9c8ad17293a8f27a9f0c7bac2d7af5828fa34221ad4e2954eb510cb836b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-9455e9c8ad17293a8f27a9f0c7bac2d7af5828fa34221ad4e2954eb510cb836b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,860,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Castela Forte, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeshmagambetova, Galiya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Grinten, Maureen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheeren, Thomas W. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nijsten, Maarten W. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariani, Massimo A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henning, Robert H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epema, Anne H.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Machine Learning Models Including Preoperative, Intraoperative, and Postoperative Data and Mortality After Cardiac Surgery</title><title>JAMA network open</title><description>Importance A variety of perioperative risk factors are associated with postoperative mortality risk. However, the relative contribution of routinely collected intraoperative clinical parameters to short-term and long-term mortality remains understudied. Objective To examine the performance of multiple machine learning models with data from different perioperative periods to predict 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year mortality and investigate factors that contribute to these predictions. Design, Setting, and Participants In this prognostic study using prospectively collected data, risk prediction models were developed for short-term and long-term mortality after cardiac surgery. Included participants were adult patients undergoing a first-time valve operation, coronary artery bypass grafting, or a combination of both between 1997 and 2017 in a single center, the University Medical Centre Groningen in the Netherlands. Mortality data were obtained in November 2017. Data analysis took place between February 2020 and August 2021. Exposure Cardiac surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures Postoperative mortality rates at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years were the primary outcomes. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to assess discrimination. The contribution of all preoperative, intraoperative hemodynamic and temperature, and postoperative factors to mortality was investigated using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values. Results Data from 9415 patients who underwent cardiac surgery (median [IQR] age, 68 [60-74] years; 2554 [27.1%] women) were included. Overall mortality rates at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years were 268 patients (2.8%), 420 patients (4.5%), and 612 patients (6.5%), respectively. Models including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data achieved AUROC values of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.78-0.86), 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77-0.85), and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.75-0.84) for 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year mortality, respectively. Models including only postoperative data performed similarly (30 days: 0.78 [95% CI, 0.73-0.82]; 1 year: 0.79 [95% CI, 0.74-0.83]; 5 years: 0.77 [95% CI, 0.73-0.82]). However, models based on all perioperative data provided less clinically usable predictions, with lower detection rates; for example, postoperative models identified a high-risk group with a 2.8-fold increase in risk for 5-year mortality (4.1 [95% CI, 3.3-5.1]) vs an increase of 11.3 (95% CI, 6.8-18.7) for the high-risk group identified by the full perioperative model. Postoperative markers associated with metabolic dysfunction and decreased kidney function were the main factors contributing to mortality risk. Conclusions and Relevance This study found that the addition of continuous intraoperative hemodynamic and temperature data to postoperative data was not associated with improved machine learning–based identification of patients at increased risk of short-term and long-term mortality after cardiac operations.</description><subject>Health Informatics</subject><subject>Heart surgery</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Online Only</subject><subject>Original Investigation</subject><issn>2574-3805</issn><issn>2574-3805</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkd1OGzEQha2qqCDgHaz2phdN8M967e1FJRRKQUpUpLbX1qzXG5zu2qntpcob8Nh1ACHK1XiOP52Z0UHoPSVzSgg928AI3ua_If4OW-vnjDA257KR5A06YkJWM66IePvifYhOU9oQQhihvKnFO3TIa6akqMURul-EcQvRpeBx6PEKzK3zFi8tRO_8Gq9CZ4eEr70Zpm4v3ERb5kbI7s5-KnqO8KIH3-GbkPKzhC8gw4O8CjHD4PIOn_fZRryA2Dkw-McU1zbuTtBBD0Oyp0_1GP26_PpzcTVbfv92vThfzkzFaZ41lRC2MQo6KlnDQfVMQtMTI1swrJPQC8VUD7xijEJXWdaIyraCEtMqXrf8GH159N1O7Wg7Y_cXDHob3QhxpwM4_f-Pd7d6He50U5NaVbIYfHwyiOHPZFPWo0vGDkOJJUxJs7IXYVKwuqAfXqGbMEVfzisUr5XinLNCfX6kTAwpRds_L0OJ3meuX2Wu95nrh8z5P2gpppw</recordid><startdate>20221026</startdate><enddate>20221026</enddate><creator>Castela Forte, José</creator><creator>Yeshmagambetova, Galiya</creator><creator>van der Grinten, Maureen L.</creator><creator>Scheeren, Thomas W. L.</creator><creator>Nijsten, Maarten W. N.</creator><creator>Mariani, Massimo A.</creator><creator>Henning, Robert H.</creator><creator>Epema, Anne H.</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221026</creationdate><title>Comparison of Machine Learning Models Including Preoperative, Intraoperative, and Postoperative Data and Mortality After Cardiac Surgery</title><author>Castela Forte, José ; Yeshmagambetova, Galiya ; van der Grinten, Maureen L. ; Scheeren, Thomas W. L. ; Nijsten, Maarten W. N. ; Mariani, Massimo A. ; Henning, Robert H. ; Epema, Anne H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-9455e9c8ad17293a8f27a9f0c7bac2d7af5828fa34221ad4e2954eb510cb836b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Health Informatics</topic><topic>Heart surgery</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Online Only</topic><topic>Original Investigation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Castela Forte, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeshmagambetova, Galiya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Grinten, Maureen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheeren, Thomas W. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nijsten, Maarten W. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariani, Massimo A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henning, Robert H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epema, Anne H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Castela Forte, José</au><au>Yeshmagambetova, Galiya</au><au>van der Grinten, Maureen L.</au><au>Scheeren, Thomas W. L.</au><au>Nijsten, Maarten W. N.</au><au>Mariani, Massimo A.</au><au>Henning, Robert H.</au><au>Epema, Anne H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Machine Learning Models Including Preoperative, Intraoperative, and Postoperative Data and Mortality After Cardiac Surgery</atitle><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle><date>2022-10-26</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e2237970</spage><epage>e2237970</epage><pages>e2237970-e2237970</pages><issn>2574-3805</issn><eissn>2574-3805</eissn><abstract>Importance A variety of perioperative risk factors are associated with postoperative mortality risk. However, the relative contribution of routinely collected intraoperative clinical parameters to short-term and long-term mortality remains understudied. Objective To examine the performance of multiple machine learning models with data from different perioperative periods to predict 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year mortality and investigate factors that contribute to these predictions. Design, Setting, and Participants In this prognostic study using prospectively collected data, risk prediction models were developed for short-term and long-term mortality after cardiac surgery. Included participants were adult patients undergoing a first-time valve operation, coronary artery bypass grafting, or a combination of both between 1997 and 2017 in a single center, the University Medical Centre Groningen in the Netherlands. Mortality data were obtained in November 2017. Data analysis took place between February 2020 and August 2021. Exposure Cardiac surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures Postoperative mortality rates at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years were the primary outcomes. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to assess discrimination. The contribution of all preoperative, intraoperative hemodynamic and temperature, and postoperative factors to mortality was investigated using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values. Results Data from 9415 patients who underwent cardiac surgery (median [IQR] age, 68 [60-74] years; 2554 [27.1%] women) were included. Overall mortality rates at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years were 268 patients (2.8%), 420 patients (4.5%), and 612 patients (6.5%), respectively. Models including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data achieved AUROC values of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.78-0.86), 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77-0.85), and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.75-0.84) for 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year mortality, respectively. Models including only postoperative data performed similarly (30 days: 0.78 [95% CI, 0.73-0.82]; 1 year: 0.79 [95% CI, 0.74-0.83]; 5 years: 0.77 [95% CI, 0.73-0.82]). However, models based on all perioperative data provided less clinically usable predictions, with lower detection rates; for example, postoperative models identified a high-risk group with a 2.8-fold increase in risk for 5-year mortality (4.1 [95% CI, 3.3-5.1]) vs an increase of 11.3 (95% CI, 6.8-18.7) for the high-risk group identified by the full perioperative model. Postoperative markers associated with metabolic dysfunction and decreased kidney function were the main factors contributing to mortality risk. Conclusions and Relevance This study found that the addition of continuous intraoperative hemodynamic and temperature data to postoperative data was not associated with improved machine learning–based identification of patients at increased risk of short-term and long-term mortality after cardiac operations.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>36287565</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.37970</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2574-3805 |
ispartof | JAMA network open, 2022-10, Vol.5 (10), p.e2237970-e2237970 |
issn | 2574-3805 2574-3805 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9606847 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Health Informatics Heart surgery Hemodynamics Machine learning Mortality Online Only Original Investigation |
title | Comparison of Machine Learning Models Including Preoperative, Intraoperative, and Postoperative Data and Mortality After Cardiac Surgery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T03%3A10%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Machine%20Learning%20Models%20Including%20Preoperative,%20Intraoperative,%20and%20Postoperative%20Data%20and%20Mortality%20After%20Cardiac%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20network%20open&rft.au=Castela%20Forte,%20Jos%C3%A9&rft.date=2022-10-26&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e2237970&rft.epage=e2237970&rft.pages=e2237970-e2237970&rft.issn=2574-3805&rft.eissn=2574-3805&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.37970&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2729027526%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2736883332&rft_id=info:pmid/36287565&rfr_iscdi=true |