Evaluating Measurement Properties of the Adapted Interprofessional Collaboration Scale through Rasch Analysis
This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the German and Italian versions of the Interprofessional Collaboration Scale (IPC scale) by applying a Rasch analysis. Data were gathered from 1182 nurses participating in a cross-sectional study in northern Italy. The scale demonstrated g...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Healthcare (Basel) 2022-10, Vol.10 (10), p.2007 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 2007 |
| container_title | Healthcare (Basel) |
| container_volume | 10 |
| creator | Wieser, Heike Mischo-Kelling, Maria Cavada, Luisa Lochner, Lukas Fink, Verena Naletto, Carla Vittadello, Fabio |
| description | This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the German and Italian versions of the Interprofessional Collaboration Scale (IPC scale) by applying a Rasch analysis. Data were gathered from 1182 nurses participating in a cross-sectional study in northern Italy. The scale demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.92). Item polarity of all 13 items was positive, indicating good construct validity. However, revising one item would further improve the validity of the scale. Item stability was confirmed for work experience, workplace, age range, the language version, and gender. The analysis, applying a non-classical test theory, confirmed that the IPC scale is a valid and reliable instrument to measure interprofessional collaboration between nurses and physicians. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/healthcare10102007 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9602463</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A744638975</galeid><sourcerecordid>A744638975</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-231b57c650c4dc3958cd342389b90e7fab013e5fb28fded4658be3fcba55f553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptklFPHCEUhSemJm6sf8AnEl_6spaBYRhemmw2VjfZpkZ9Jwxz2WEzA1NgTPz3stVUbQsPEPjOuRxyi-K8xJeUCvy1BzWkXqsAJS4xwZgfFQtCCF8KTMmnd_uT4izGPc5DlLShbFGMV49qmFWybod-gIpzgBFcQrfBTxCShYi8QakHtOrUlKBDG5cgTMEbiNF6pwa09sOgWh-yi3foXqsBsiL4edejOxV1j1YZe4o2fi6OjRoinL2up8XD96uH9c1y-_N6s15tl7riVVoSWraM65phXXWaCtbojlaENqIVGLhRLS4pMNOSxnTQVTVrWqBGt4oxwxg9Lb692E5zO0Knc6CgBjkFO6rwJL2y8uONs73c-UcpakyqmmaDL68Gwf-aISY52qghx3Tg5ygJJ4IR0lQ8oxd_oXs_h5z3N5WJWuDmjdrlz5HWGZ_r6oOpXPEql2wEP7z78j9Unh2MVnsHxubzDwLyItDBxxjA_MlYYnnoDflvb9BnrpKw7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2728476908</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating Measurement Properties of the Adapted Interprofessional Collaboration Scale through Rasch Analysis</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Wieser, Heike ; Mischo-Kelling, Maria ; Cavada, Luisa ; Lochner, Lukas ; Fink, Verena ; Naletto, Carla ; Vittadello, Fabio</creator><creatorcontrib>Wieser, Heike ; Mischo-Kelling, Maria ; Cavada, Luisa ; Lochner, Lukas ; Fink, Verena ; Naletto, Carla ; Vittadello, Fabio</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the German and Italian versions of the Interprofessional Collaboration Scale (IPC scale) by applying a Rasch analysis. Data were gathered from 1182 nurses participating in a cross-sectional study in northern Italy. The scale demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.92). Item polarity of all 13 items was positive, indicating good construct validity. However, revising one item would further improve the validity of the scale. Item stability was confirmed for work experience, workplace, age range, the language version, and gender. The analysis, applying a non-classical test theory, confirmed that the IPC scale is a valid and reliable instrument to measure interprofessional collaboration between nurses and physicians.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2227-9032</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2227-9032</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10102007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Classical test theory ; Collaboration ; Evaluation ; Item response theory ; Medical personnel ; Medical profession ; Nurse-physician joint practice ; Nurses ; Physicians ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Rasch model ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Healthcare (Basel), 2022-10, Vol.10 (10), p.2007</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-231b57c650c4dc3958cd342389b90e7fab013e5fb28fded4658be3fcba55f553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-231b57c650c4dc3958cd342389b90e7fab013e5fb28fded4658be3fcba55f553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9602463/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9602463/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wieser, Heike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mischo-Kelling, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavada, Luisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lochner, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fink, Verena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naletto, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vittadello, Fabio</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating Measurement Properties of the Adapted Interprofessional Collaboration Scale through Rasch Analysis</title><title>Healthcare (Basel)</title><description>This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the German and Italian versions of the Interprofessional Collaboration Scale (IPC scale) by applying a Rasch analysis. Data were gathered from 1182 nurses participating in a cross-sectional study in northern Italy. The scale demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.92). Item polarity of all 13 items was positive, indicating good construct validity. However, revising one item would further improve the validity of the scale. Item stability was confirmed for work experience, workplace, age range, the language version, and gender. The analysis, applying a non-classical test theory, confirmed that the IPC scale is a valid and reliable instrument to measure interprofessional collaboration between nurses and physicians.</description><subject>Classical test theory</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Item response theory</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical profession</subject><subject>Nurse-physician joint practice</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Rasch model</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>2227-9032</issn><issn>2227-9032</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptklFPHCEUhSemJm6sf8AnEl_6spaBYRhemmw2VjfZpkZ9Jwxz2WEzA1NgTPz3stVUbQsPEPjOuRxyi-K8xJeUCvy1BzWkXqsAJS4xwZgfFQtCCF8KTMmnd_uT4izGPc5DlLShbFGMV49qmFWybod-gIpzgBFcQrfBTxCShYi8QakHtOrUlKBDG5cgTMEbiNF6pwa09sOgWh-yi3foXqsBsiL4edejOxV1j1YZe4o2fi6OjRoinL2up8XD96uH9c1y-_N6s15tl7riVVoSWraM65phXXWaCtbojlaENqIVGLhRLS4pMNOSxnTQVTVrWqBGt4oxwxg9Lb692E5zO0Knc6CgBjkFO6rwJL2y8uONs73c-UcpakyqmmaDL68Gwf-aISY52qghx3Tg5ygJJ4IR0lQ8oxd_oXs_h5z3N5WJWuDmjdrlz5HWGZ_r6oOpXPEql2wEP7z78j9Unh2MVnsHxubzDwLyItDBxxjA_MlYYnnoDflvb9BnrpKw7w</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Wieser, Heike</creator><creator>Mischo-Kelling, Maria</creator><creator>Cavada, Luisa</creator><creator>Lochner, Lukas</creator><creator>Fink, Verena</creator><creator>Naletto, Carla</creator><creator>Vittadello, Fabio</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Evaluating Measurement Properties of the Adapted Interprofessional Collaboration Scale through Rasch Analysis</title><author>Wieser, Heike ; Mischo-Kelling, Maria ; Cavada, Luisa ; Lochner, Lukas ; Fink, Verena ; Naletto, Carla ; Vittadello, Fabio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-231b57c650c4dc3958cd342389b90e7fab013e5fb28fded4658be3fcba55f553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Classical test theory</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Item response theory</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical profession</topic><topic>Nurse-physician joint practice</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Rasch model</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wieser, Heike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mischo-Kelling, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavada, Luisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lochner, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fink, Verena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naletto, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vittadello, Fabio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Healthcare (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wieser, Heike</au><au>Mischo-Kelling, Maria</au><au>Cavada, Luisa</au><au>Lochner, Lukas</au><au>Fink, Verena</au><au>Naletto, Carla</au><au>Vittadello, Fabio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating Measurement Properties of the Adapted Interprofessional Collaboration Scale through Rasch Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Healthcare (Basel)</jtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2007</spage><pages>2007-</pages><issn>2227-9032</issn><eissn>2227-9032</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the German and Italian versions of the Interprofessional Collaboration Scale (IPC scale) by applying a Rasch analysis. Data were gathered from 1182 nurses participating in a cross-sectional study in northern Italy. The scale demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.92). Item polarity of all 13 items was positive, indicating good construct validity. However, revising one item would further improve the validity of the scale. Item stability was confirmed for work experience, workplace, age range, the language version, and gender. The analysis, applying a non-classical test theory, confirmed that the IPC scale is a valid and reliable instrument to measure interprofessional collaboration between nurses and physicians.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/healthcare10102007</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2227-9032 |
| ispartof | Healthcare (Basel), 2022-10, Vol.10 (10), p.2007 |
| issn | 2227-9032 2227-9032 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9602463 |
| source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access |
| subjects | Classical test theory Collaboration Evaluation Item response theory Medical personnel Medical profession Nurse-physician joint practice Nurses Physicians Quantitative psychology Questionnaires Rasch model Validity |
| title | Evaluating Measurement Properties of the Adapted Interprofessional Collaboration Scale through Rasch Analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T23%3A47%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20Measurement%20Properties%20of%20the%20Adapted%20Interprofessional%20Collaboration%20Scale%20through%20Rasch%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Healthcare%20(Basel)&rft.au=Wieser,%20Heike&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2007&rft.pages=2007-&rft.issn=2227-9032&rft.eissn=2227-9032&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/healthcare10102007&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA744638975%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2728476908&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A744638975&rfr_iscdi=true |