A Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Predictive Model Using Digital Rectal Examination Prostate Volume Category to Stratify Initial Prostate Cancer Suspicion and Reduce Magnetic Resonance Imaging Demand
A predictive model including age, PCa family history, biopsy status (initial vs repeat), DRE (normal vs abnormal), serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and DRE prostate volume ca-tegory was developed to stratify initial PCa suspicion in 1486 men with PSA > 3 ng/mL and/or abnormal DRE, in whom m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancers 2022-10, Vol.14 (20), p.5100 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 20 |
container_start_page | 5100 |
container_title | Cancers |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Morote, Juan Borque-Fernando, Ángel Triquell, Marina Campistol, Miriam Celma, Anna Regis, Lucas Abascal, José M Servian, Pol Planas, Jacques Mendez, Olga Esteban, Luis M Trilla, Enrique |
description | A predictive model including age, PCa family history, biopsy status (initial vs repeat), DRE (normal vs abnormal), serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and DRE prostate volume ca-tegory was developed to stratify initial PCa suspicion in 1486 men with PSA > 3 ng/mL and/or abnormal DRE, in whom mpMRI followed; 2- to 4-core TRUS-guided biopsies where Prostate Imaging Report and Data System (PI-RADS) > 3 lesions and/or 12-core TRUS systematic biopsies were performed in one academic institution between 1 January 2016−31 December 2019. The csPCa detection rate, defined as International Society of Uro-Pathology grade group 2 or higher, was 36.9%. An external validation of designed BCN-RC 1 was carried out on 946 men from two other institutions in the same metropolitan area, using the same criteria of PCa suspicion and diagnostic approach, yielded a csPCa detection rate of 40.8%. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of BCN-RC 1 were 0.823 (95% CI: 0.800−0.846) in the development cohort and 0.837 (95% CI: 0.811−0.863) in the validation cohort (p = 0.447). In both cohorts, BCN-RC 1 exhibited net benefit over performing mpMRI in all men from 8 and 12% risk thresholds, respectively. At 0.95 sensitivity of csPCa, the specificities of BCN-RC 1 were 0.24 (95% CI: 0.22−0.26) in the development cohort and 0.34 (95% CI: 0.31−0.37) in the validation cohort (p < 0.001). The percentages of avoided mpMRI scans were 17.2% in the development cohort and 22.3% in the validation cohort, missing between 1.8% and 2% of csPCa among men at risk of PCa. In summary, BCN-RC 1 can stratify initial PCa suspicion, reducing the demand of mpMRI, with an acceptable loss of csPCa. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/cancers14205100 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9600141</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A745272282</galeid><sourcerecordid>A745272282</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-e9e367d4bad4120f9c223669beb0ab03a9008831cff09c4ec2c629acf47e39853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEolXpmRuyxIXLtv7aJL4grbYFVioCsZSr5XUmwZVjL7FTsX-S38SkLf1YYR_ssZ95xzOeonjN6IkQip5aEywMiUlO54zSZ8UhpxWflaWSzx_tD4rjlK4oDiFYVVYviwNRcsXqWhwWfxZk6V1w1ni_I2vXBdeiETL5OsSUTQayvAmDNjTOZncN5HNswJPL5EJHzlznsvHkG9hpOf9tehdMdjE8KPyIfuwnoQxdHHYkR7LOA0LtjqyCyw4d98Otx7R1dpIxoUH1ZrQY2HQBsrNopxgmkKx60928A3oEXxUvWuMTHN-tR8Xlh_Pvy0-ziy8fV8vFxczKus4zUCDKqpEb00jGaass5wJrtYENNRsqjKIUy8Ns21JlJVhusWLGtrICoeq5OCre3-pux00PjYWA-Xi9HVxvhp2OxumnN8H91F281qqklEmGAu_uBIb4a4SUde-SBe9NgDgmzSuu5lzUFUX07R56FcchYHoTVUtZC8UeqM540C60EePaSVQvKjlHktccqZP_UDgb6J2NAVqH508cTm8dLP5PGqC9z5FRPXWh3utC9HjzuDT3_L-eE38BlojcwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2728448391</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Predictive Model Using Digital Rectal Examination Prostate Volume Category to Stratify Initial Prostate Cancer Suspicion and Reduce Magnetic Resonance Imaging Demand</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Morote, Juan ; Borque-Fernando, Ángel ; Triquell, Marina ; Campistol, Miriam ; Celma, Anna ; Regis, Lucas ; Abascal, José M ; Servian, Pol ; Planas, Jacques ; Mendez, Olga ; Esteban, Luis M ; Trilla, Enrique</creator><creatorcontrib>Morote, Juan ; Borque-Fernando, Ángel ; Triquell, Marina ; Campistol, Miriam ; Celma, Anna ; Regis, Lucas ; Abascal, José M ; Servian, Pol ; Planas, Jacques ; Mendez, Olga ; Esteban, Luis M ; Trilla, Enrique</creatorcontrib><description>A predictive model including age, PCa family history, biopsy status (initial vs repeat), DRE (normal vs abnormal), serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and DRE prostate volume ca-tegory was developed to stratify initial PCa suspicion in 1486 men with PSA > 3 ng/mL and/or abnormal DRE, in whom mpMRI followed; 2- to 4-core TRUS-guided biopsies where Prostate Imaging Report and Data System (PI-RADS) > 3 lesions and/or 12-core TRUS systematic biopsies were performed in one academic institution between 1 January 2016−31 December 2019. The csPCa detection rate, defined as International Society of Uro-Pathology grade group 2 or higher, was 36.9%. An external validation of designed BCN-RC 1 was carried out on 946 men from two other institutions in the same metropolitan area, using the same criteria of PCa suspicion and diagnostic approach, yielded a csPCa detection rate of 40.8%. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of BCN-RC 1 were 0.823 (95% CI: 0.800−0.846) in the development cohort and 0.837 (95% CI: 0.811−0.863) in the validation cohort (p = 0.447). In both cohorts, BCN-RC 1 exhibited net benefit over performing mpMRI in all men from 8 and 12% risk thresholds, respectively. At 0.95 sensitivity of csPCa, the specificities of BCN-RC 1 were 0.24 (95% CI: 0.22−0.26) in the development cohort and 0.34 (95% CI: 0.31−0.37) in the validation cohort (p < 0.001). The percentages of avoided mpMRI scans were 17.2% in the development cohort and 22.3% in the validation cohort, missing between 1.8% and 2% of csPCa among men at risk of PCa. In summary, BCN-RC 1 can stratify initial PCa suspicion, reducing the demand of mpMRI, with an acceptable loss of csPCa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/cancers14205100</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36291883</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Chi-square test ; Clinical significance ; Diagnosis ; Ethnicity ; Family medical history ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Methods ; Metropolitan areas ; Prediction models ; Prostate cancer ; Prostate-specific antigen ; Rectum ; Statistical analysis ; White people</subject><ispartof>Cancers, 2022-10, Vol.14 (20), p.5100</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-e9e367d4bad4120f9c223669beb0ab03a9008831cff09c4ec2c629acf47e39853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-e9e367d4bad4120f9c223669beb0ab03a9008831cff09c4ec2c629acf47e39853</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3212-3473 ; 0000-0002-3007-302X ; 0000-0003-0178-4567 ; 0000-0001-9401-0872 ; 0000-0003-3881-8177 ; 0000-0002-0222-584X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9600141/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9600141/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36291883$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morote, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borque-Fernando, Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triquell, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campistol, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celma, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regis, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abascal, José M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Servian, Pol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Planas, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendez, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esteban, Luis M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trilla, Enrique</creatorcontrib><title>A Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Predictive Model Using Digital Rectal Examination Prostate Volume Category to Stratify Initial Prostate Cancer Suspicion and Reduce Magnetic Resonance Imaging Demand</title><title>Cancers</title><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><description>A predictive model including age, PCa family history, biopsy status (initial vs repeat), DRE (normal vs abnormal), serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and DRE prostate volume ca-tegory was developed to stratify initial PCa suspicion in 1486 men with PSA > 3 ng/mL and/or abnormal DRE, in whom mpMRI followed; 2- to 4-core TRUS-guided biopsies where Prostate Imaging Report and Data System (PI-RADS) > 3 lesions and/or 12-core TRUS systematic biopsies were performed in one academic institution between 1 January 2016−31 December 2019. The csPCa detection rate, defined as International Society of Uro-Pathology grade group 2 or higher, was 36.9%. An external validation of designed BCN-RC 1 was carried out on 946 men from two other institutions in the same metropolitan area, using the same criteria of PCa suspicion and diagnostic approach, yielded a csPCa detection rate of 40.8%. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of BCN-RC 1 were 0.823 (95% CI: 0.800−0.846) in the development cohort and 0.837 (95% CI: 0.811−0.863) in the validation cohort (p = 0.447). In both cohorts, BCN-RC 1 exhibited net benefit over performing mpMRI in all men from 8 and 12% risk thresholds, respectively. At 0.95 sensitivity of csPCa, the specificities of BCN-RC 1 were 0.24 (95% CI: 0.22−0.26) in the development cohort and 0.34 (95% CI: 0.31−0.37) in the validation cohort (p < 0.001). The percentages of avoided mpMRI scans were 17.2% in the development cohort and 22.3% in the validation cohort, missing between 1.8% and 2% of csPCa among men at risk of PCa. In summary, BCN-RC 1 can stratify initial PCa suspicion, reducing the demand of mpMRI, with an acceptable loss of csPCa.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Chi-square test</subject><subject>Clinical significance</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Family medical history</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Metropolitan areas</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostate-specific antigen</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>White people</subject><issn>2072-6694</issn><issn>2072-6694</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEolXpmRuyxIXLtv7aJL4grbYFVioCsZSr5XUmwZVjL7FTsX-S38SkLf1YYR_ssZ95xzOeonjN6IkQip5aEywMiUlO54zSZ8UhpxWflaWSzx_tD4rjlK4oDiFYVVYviwNRcsXqWhwWfxZk6V1w1ni_I2vXBdeiETL5OsSUTQayvAmDNjTOZncN5HNswJPL5EJHzlznsvHkG9hpOf9tehdMdjE8KPyIfuwnoQxdHHYkR7LOA0LtjqyCyw4d98Otx7R1dpIxoUH1ZrQY2HQBsrNopxgmkKx60928A3oEXxUvWuMTHN-tR8Xlh_Pvy0-ziy8fV8vFxczKus4zUCDKqpEb00jGaass5wJrtYENNRsqjKIUy8Ns21JlJVhusWLGtrICoeq5OCre3-pux00PjYWA-Xi9HVxvhp2OxumnN8H91F281qqklEmGAu_uBIb4a4SUde-SBe9NgDgmzSuu5lzUFUX07R56FcchYHoTVUtZC8UeqM540C60EePaSVQvKjlHktccqZP_UDgb6J2NAVqH508cTm8dLP5PGqC9z5FRPXWh3utC9HjzuDT3_L-eE38BlojcwQ</recordid><startdate>20221018</startdate><enddate>20221018</enddate><creator>Morote, Juan</creator><creator>Borque-Fernando, Ángel</creator><creator>Triquell, Marina</creator><creator>Campistol, Miriam</creator><creator>Celma, Anna</creator><creator>Regis, Lucas</creator><creator>Abascal, José M</creator><creator>Servian, Pol</creator><creator>Planas, Jacques</creator><creator>Mendez, Olga</creator><creator>Esteban, Luis M</creator><creator>Trilla, Enrique</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3212-3473</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3007-302X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0178-4567</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9401-0872</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3881-8177</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0222-584X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221018</creationdate><title>A Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Predictive Model Using Digital Rectal Examination Prostate Volume Category to Stratify Initial Prostate Cancer Suspicion and Reduce Magnetic Resonance Imaging Demand</title><author>Morote, Juan ; Borque-Fernando, Ángel ; Triquell, Marina ; Campistol, Miriam ; Celma, Anna ; Regis, Lucas ; Abascal, José M ; Servian, Pol ; Planas, Jacques ; Mendez, Olga ; Esteban, Luis M ; Trilla, Enrique</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-e9e367d4bad4120f9c223669beb0ab03a9008831cff09c4ec2c629acf47e39853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Chi-square test</topic><topic>Clinical significance</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Family medical history</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Metropolitan areas</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostate-specific antigen</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>White people</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morote, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borque-Fernando, Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triquell, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campistol, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celma, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regis, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abascal, José M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Servian, Pol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Planas, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendez, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esteban, Luis M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trilla, Enrique</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morote, Juan</au><au>Borque-Fernando, Ángel</au><au>Triquell, Marina</au><au>Campistol, Miriam</au><au>Celma, Anna</au><au>Regis, Lucas</au><au>Abascal, José M</au><au>Servian, Pol</au><au>Planas, Jacques</au><au>Mendez, Olga</au><au>Esteban, Luis M</au><au>Trilla, Enrique</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Predictive Model Using Digital Rectal Examination Prostate Volume Category to Stratify Initial Prostate Cancer Suspicion and Reduce Magnetic Resonance Imaging Demand</atitle><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><date>2022-10-18</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>5100</spage><pages>5100-</pages><issn>2072-6694</issn><eissn>2072-6694</eissn><abstract>A predictive model including age, PCa family history, biopsy status (initial vs repeat), DRE (normal vs abnormal), serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and DRE prostate volume ca-tegory was developed to stratify initial PCa suspicion in 1486 men with PSA > 3 ng/mL and/or abnormal DRE, in whom mpMRI followed; 2- to 4-core TRUS-guided biopsies where Prostate Imaging Report and Data System (PI-RADS) > 3 lesions and/or 12-core TRUS systematic biopsies were performed in one academic institution between 1 January 2016−31 December 2019. The csPCa detection rate, defined as International Society of Uro-Pathology grade group 2 or higher, was 36.9%. An external validation of designed BCN-RC 1 was carried out on 946 men from two other institutions in the same metropolitan area, using the same criteria of PCa suspicion and diagnostic approach, yielded a csPCa detection rate of 40.8%. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of BCN-RC 1 were 0.823 (95% CI: 0.800−0.846) in the development cohort and 0.837 (95% CI: 0.811−0.863) in the validation cohort (p = 0.447). In both cohorts, BCN-RC 1 exhibited net benefit over performing mpMRI in all men from 8 and 12% risk thresholds, respectively. At 0.95 sensitivity of csPCa, the specificities of BCN-RC 1 were 0.24 (95% CI: 0.22−0.26) in the development cohort and 0.34 (95% CI: 0.31−0.37) in the validation cohort (p < 0.001). The percentages of avoided mpMRI scans were 17.2% in the development cohort and 22.3% in the validation cohort, missing between 1.8% and 2% of csPCa among men at risk of PCa. In summary, BCN-RC 1 can stratify initial PCa suspicion, reducing the demand of mpMRI, with an acceptable loss of csPCa.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>36291883</pmid><doi>10.3390/cancers14205100</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3212-3473</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3007-302X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0178-4567</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9401-0872</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3881-8177</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0222-584X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2072-6694 |
ispartof | Cancers, 2022-10, Vol.14 (20), p.5100 |
issn | 2072-6694 2072-6694 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9600141 |
source | PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Biopsy Chi-square test Clinical significance Diagnosis Ethnicity Family medical history Magnetic resonance imaging Methods Metropolitan areas Prediction models Prostate cancer Prostate-specific antigen Rectum Statistical analysis White people |
title | A Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Predictive Model Using Digital Rectal Examination Prostate Volume Category to Stratify Initial Prostate Cancer Suspicion and Reduce Magnetic Resonance Imaging Demand |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A25%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Clinically%20Significant%20Prostate%20Cancer%20Predictive%20Model%20Using%20Digital%20Rectal%20Examination%20Prostate%20Volume%20Category%20to%20Stratify%20Initial%20Prostate%20Cancer%20Suspicion%20and%20Reduce%20Magnetic%20Resonance%20Imaging%20Demand&rft.jtitle=Cancers&rft.au=Morote,%20Juan&rft.date=2022-10-18&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=5100&rft.pages=5100-&rft.issn=2072-6694&rft.eissn=2072-6694&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/cancers14205100&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA745272282%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2728448391&rft_id=info:pmid/36291883&rft_galeid=A745272282&rfr_iscdi=true |