Evaluating the Short-term Environmental and Clinical Effects of a Radiation Oncology Department's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic

During the COVID-19 pandemic, many radiation oncology departments worldwide adopted the use of shorter and more intense hypofractionated regimens. Hospital foot traffic was reduced through virtual care. This study's primary objective was to assess the collective environmental effect of these st...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 2023-01, Vol.115 (1), p.39-47
Hauptverfasser: Cheung, Ronald, Ito, Emma, Lopez, Marianela, Rubinstein, Ed, Keller, Harald, Cheung, Fred, Liu, Zhihui Amy, Liu, Fei-Fei, Wong, Philip
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 47
container_issue 1
container_start_page 39
container_title International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
container_volume 115
creator Cheung, Ronald
Ito, Emma
Lopez, Marianela
Rubinstein, Ed
Keller, Harald
Cheung, Fred
Liu, Zhihui Amy
Liu, Fei-Fei
Wong, Philip
description During the COVID-19 pandemic, many radiation oncology departments worldwide adopted the use of shorter and more intense hypofractionated regimens. Hospital foot traffic was reduced through virtual care. This study's primary objective was to assess the collective environmental effect of these strategic changes by identifying sources of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e). The rate of radiation-related adverse events from the increased use of hypofractionated treatments was assessed. All patients treated with external beam radiation therapy from April 1, 2019, to March 31, 2021, at our single institution were identified (n = 10,175) along with their radiation therapy visits (176,423 fractions) and unplanned visits to the radiation nursing clinic or emergency department. Out-patient hospital and virtual visits (n = 75,853) during this same period were also analyzed. Environmental effect measures, including linear accelerator power usage, patient travel distances, and personal protection equipment consumption were all converted into CO2e. The use of curative hypofractionated regimens increased from 17% to 27% during the pandemic year. Carbon footprint was reduced by 39% during the pandemic year (1,332,388 kg CO2e) compared with the prepandemic year (2,024,823 kg CO2e). Comparing patients in the prepandemic versus pandemic year, there was a significant reduction in the proportion of hypofractionated patients who needed a visit to either the radiation nursing clinic (39% vs 25%; P < .001) or emergency department (6% vs 2%; P < .001) during and within 90 days of radiation therapy. This is the first study to demonstrate the environmental benefits of increased use of hypofractionated regimens and virtual care, while assuring that there was no added acute radiation-related adverse event. Our findings support their continued use as one of many long-term strategies to reduce the environmental footprint of health care delivery.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.04.054
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9598491</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S036030162200596X</els_id><sourcerecordid>36309074</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-b7460409b990a8627b5f7a6beab15a301e63075a8960a13862b1b8dbf790a0c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UctuEzEUtRCIhsIfIOQdqxmuM56HN0goTaFSpaDyEDvL9txJHM3YI9uN1HV_HIeUAhtWV9Y9j3t8CHnNoGTAmnf70u6D13O5hOWyBF5CzZ-QBetaUVR1_eMpWUDVQFFl8Bl5EeMeABhr-XNyVjUVCGj5gtyvD2q8Vcm6LU07pF92PqQiYZjo2h1s8G5Cl9RIlevparTOmvxYDwOaFKkfqKI3qrdZwDu6ccaPfntHL3BWIR2ZbyO9wTh7F5Em_8titfl-dVEwQT9nTZyseUmeDWqM-OphnpNvl-uvq0_F9ebj1erDdWF4U6VCt7wBDkILAaprlq2uh1Y1GpVmtcoxMadqa9WJBhSrMkIz3fV6aDMeDFTn5P1Jd77VE_YmnxfUKOdgJxXupFdW_rtxdie3_iBFLTouWBbgJwETfIwBh0cuA3ksRe7lqRR5LEUCl7mUTHvzt-8j6XcLfw7DnP5gMchoLDqDvQ35n2Xv7f8dfgJp9KG4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the Short-term Environmental and Clinical Effects of a Radiation Oncology Department's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Cheung, Ronald ; Ito, Emma ; Lopez, Marianela ; Rubinstein, Ed ; Keller, Harald ; Cheung, Fred ; Liu, Zhihui Amy ; Liu, Fei-Fei ; Wong, Philip</creator><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Ronald ; Ito, Emma ; Lopez, Marianela ; Rubinstein, Ed ; Keller, Harald ; Cheung, Fred ; Liu, Zhihui Amy ; Liu, Fei-Fei ; Wong, Philip</creatorcontrib><description>During the COVID-19 pandemic, many radiation oncology departments worldwide adopted the use of shorter and more intense hypofractionated regimens. Hospital foot traffic was reduced through virtual care. This study's primary objective was to assess the collective environmental effect of these strategic changes by identifying sources of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e). The rate of radiation-related adverse events from the increased use of hypofractionated treatments was assessed. All patients treated with external beam radiation therapy from April 1, 2019, to March 31, 2021, at our single institution were identified (n = 10,175) along with their radiation therapy visits (176,423 fractions) and unplanned visits to the radiation nursing clinic or emergency department. Out-patient hospital and virtual visits (n = 75,853) during this same period were also analyzed. Environmental effect measures, including linear accelerator power usage, patient travel distances, and personal protection equipment consumption were all converted into CO2e. The use of curative hypofractionated regimens increased from 17% to 27% during the pandemic year. Carbon footprint was reduced by 39% during the pandemic year (1,332,388 kg CO2e) compared with the prepandemic year (2,024,823 kg CO2e). Comparing patients in the prepandemic versus pandemic year, there was a significant reduction in the proportion of hypofractionated patients who needed a visit to either the radiation nursing clinic (39% vs 25%; P &lt; .001) or emergency department (6% vs 2%; P &lt; .001) during and within 90 days of radiation therapy. This is the first study to demonstrate the environmental benefits of increased use of hypofractionated regimens and virtual care, while assuring that there was no added acute radiation-related adverse event. Our findings support their continued use as one of many long-term strategies to reduce the environmental footprint of health care delivery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-3016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-355X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.04.054</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36309074</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Clinical Investigation ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Pandemics - prevention &amp; control ; Radiation Oncology</subject><ispartof>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2023-01, Vol.115 (1), p.39-47</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-b7460409b990a8627b5f7a6beab15a301e63075a8960a13862b1b8dbf790a0c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-b7460409b990a8627b5f7a6beab15a301e63075a8960a13862b1b8dbf790a0c03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7761-0283</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036030162200596X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36309074$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ito, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez, Marianela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubinstein, Ed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhihui Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Fei-Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Philip</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the Short-term Environmental and Clinical Effects of a Radiation Oncology Department's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic</title><title>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</title><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><description>During the COVID-19 pandemic, many radiation oncology departments worldwide adopted the use of shorter and more intense hypofractionated regimens. Hospital foot traffic was reduced through virtual care. This study's primary objective was to assess the collective environmental effect of these strategic changes by identifying sources of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e). The rate of radiation-related adverse events from the increased use of hypofractionated treatments was assessed. All patients treated with external beam radiation therapy from April 1, 2019, to March 31, 2021, at our single institution were identified (n = 10,175) along with their radiation therapy visits (176,423 fractions) and unplanned visits to the radiation nursing clinic or emergency department. Out-patient hospital and virtual visits (n = 75,853) during this same period were also analyzed. Environmental effect measures, including linear accelerator power usage, patient travel distances, and personal protection equipment consumption were all converted into CO2e. The use of curative hypofractionated regimens increased from 17% to 27% during the pandemic year. Carbon footprint was reduced by 39% during the pandemic year (1,332,388 kg CO2e) compared with the prepandemic year (2,024,823 kg CO2e). Comparing patients in the prepandemic versus pandemic year, there was a significant reduction in the proportion of hypofractionated patients who needed a visit to either the radiation nursing clinic (39% vs 25%; P &lt; .001) or emergency department (6% vs 2%; P &lt; .001) during and within 90 days of radiation therapy. This is the first study to demonstrate the environmental benefits of increased use of hypofractionated regimens and virtual care, while assuring that there was no added acute radiation-related adverse event. Our findings support their continued use as one of many long-term strategies to reduce the environmental footprint of health care delivery.</description><subject>Clinical Investigation</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pandemics - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Radiation Oncology</subject><issn>0360-3016</issn><issn>1879-355X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UctuEzEUtRCIhsIfIOQdqxmuM56HN0goTaFSpaDyEDvL9txJHM3YI9uN1HV_HIeUAhtWV9Y9j3t8CHnNoGTAmnf70u6D13O5hOWyBF5CzZ-QBetaUVR1_eMpWUDVQFFl8Bl5EeMeABhr-XNyVjUVCGj5gtyvD2q8Vcm6LU07pF92PqQiYZjo2h1s8G5Cl9RIlevparTOmvxYDwOaFKkfqKI3qrdZwDu6ccaPfntHL3BWIR2ZbyO9wTh7F5Em_8titfl-dVEwQT9nTZyseUmeDWqM-OphnpNvl-uvq0_F9ebj1erDdWF4U6VCt7wBDkILAaprlq2uh1Y1GpVmtcoxMadqa9WJBhSrMkIz3fV6aDMeDFTn5P1Jd77VE_YmnxfUKOdgJxXupFdW_rtxdie3_iBFLTouWBbgJwETfIwBh0cuA3ksRe7lqRR5LEUCl7mUTHvzt-8j6XcLfw7DnP5gMchoLDqDvQ35n2Xv7f8dfgJp9KG4</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Cheung, Ronald</creator><creator>Ito, Emma</creator><creator>Lopez, Marianela</creator><creator>Rubinstein, Ed</creator><creator>Keller, Harald</creator><creator>Cheung, Fred</creator><creator>Liu, Zhihui Amy</creator><creator>Liu, Fei-Fei</creator><creator>Wong, Philip</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7761-0283</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Evaluating the Short-term Environmental and Clinical Effects of a Radiation Oncology Department's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic</title><author>Cheung, Ronald ; Ito, Emma ; Lopez, Marianela ; Rubinstein, Ed ; Keller, Harald ; Cheung, Fred ; Liu, Zhihui Amy ; Liu, Fei-Fei ; Wong, Philip</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-b7460409b990a8627b5f7a6beab15a301e63075a8960a13862b1b8dbf790a0c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Clinical Investigation</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pandemics - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Radiation Oncology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ito, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez, Marianela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubinstein, Ed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhihui Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Fei-Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Philip</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cheung, Ronald</au><au>Ito, Emma</au><au>Lopez, Marianela</au><au>Rubinstein, Ed</au><au>Keller, Harald</au><au>Cheung, Fred</au><au>Liu, Zhihui Amy</au><au>Liu, Fei-Fei</au><au>Wong, Philip</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the Short-term Environmental and Clinical Effects of a Radiation Oncology Department's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic</atitle><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>39</spage><epage>47</epage><pages>39-47</pages><issn>0360-3016</issn><eissn>1879-355X</eissn><abstract>During the COVID-19 pandemic, many radiation oncology departments worldwide adopted the use of shorter and more intense hypofractionated regimens. Hospital foot traffic was reduced through virtual care. This study's primary objective was to assess the collective environmental effect of these strategic changes by identifying sources of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e). The rate of radiation-related adverse events from the increased use of hypofractionated treatments was assessed. All patients treated with external beam radiation therapy from April 1, 2019, to March 31, 2021, at our single institution were identified (n = 10,175) along with their radiation therapy visits (176,423 fractions) and unplanned visits to the radiation nursing clinic or emergency department. Out-patient hospital and virtual visits (n = 75,853) during this same period were also analyzed. Environmental effect measures, including linear accelerator power usage, patient travel distances, and personal protection equipment consumption were all converted into CO2e. The use of curative hypofractionated regimens increased from 17% to 27% during the pandemic year. Carbon footprint was reduced by 39% during the pandemic year (1,332,388 kg CO2e) compared with the prepandemic year (2,024,823 kg CO2e). Comparing patients in the prepandemic versus pandemic year, there was a significant reduction in the proportion of hypofractionated patients who needed a visit to either the radiation nursing clinic (39% vs 25%; P &lt; .001) or emergency department (6% vs 2%; P &lt; .001) during and within 90 days of radiation therapy. This is the first study to demonstrate the environmental benefits of increased use of hypofractionated regimens and virtual care, while assuring that there was no added acute radiation-related adverse event. Our findings support their continued use as one of many long-term strategies to reduce the environmental footprint of health care delivery.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>36309074</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.04.054</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7761-0283</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-3016
ispartof International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2023-01, Vol.115 (1), p.39-47
issn 0360-3016
1879-355X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9598491
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Clinical Investigation
COVID-19 - epidemiology
Emergency Service, Hospital
Hospitals
Humans
Pandemics - prevention & control
Radiation Oncology
title Evaluating the Short-term Environmental and Clinical Effects of a Radiation Oncology Department's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T20%3A51%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20Short-term%20Environmental%20and%20Clinical%20Effects%20of%20a%20Radiation%20Oncology%20Department's%20Response%20to%20the%20COVID-19%20Pandemic&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20radiation%20oncology,%20biology,%20physics&rft.au=Cheung,%20Ronald&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=47&rft.pages=39-47&rft.issn=0360-3016&rft.eissn=1879-355X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.04.054&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E36309074%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/36309074&rft_els_id=S036030162200596X&rfr_iscdi=true