The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in a polarized political system: Lessons from the 2020 election
Given the deep polarization of the American political system in recent decades, was the 2020 presidential election an extension of the pre-existing partisan coalitions or did the Covid-19 pandemic and its economic consequences have a significant impact on the outcome? Using a national probability sa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Electoral studies 2022-12, Vol.80, p.102548-102548, Article 102548 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 102548 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 102548 |
container_title | Electoral studies |
container_volume | 80 |
creator | Miller, Jon D. Woods, Logan T. Kalmbach, Jason |
description | Given the deep polarization of the American political system in recent decades, was the 2020 presidential election an extension of the pre-existing partisan coalitions or did the Covid-19 pandemic and its economic consequences have a significant impact on the outcome? Using a national probability sample provided by AmeriSpeak and voter verification provided by Catalist, we construct a structural equation model to examine the relative influence of age, race, gender, education, religious fundamentalism, ideological partisanship, affective partisanship, and measures of Covid-19 experiences and understanding to predict the 2020 vote. We re-construct the partisan polarization landscape to examine the role of politically interested non-partisans in the center of the ideological spectrum and examine their ability to select candidates in response of specific issues. The Covid-19 pandemic had a significant marginal impact on the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.
•Ideological partisanship was the strongest predictor of vote choice in the 2020.•Among nonpartisans, understanding of Covid-19 was an important vote predictor.•The handling of the Covid-19 pandemic was an important predictor of the 2020 vote.•Nonpartisans with a high level of interest in politics comprise 13% of U.S. voters. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102548 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9595380</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0261379422001044</els_id><sourcerecordid>2730643999</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-dfd7c68ba8903575a1a5980db96907528a7e602fa7c67c25bca4eaef5559ecaf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2P0zAQhi0EYsvCXwAfuaT4I45jDkirii-pEpflbE3tCesqiYPtVlp-Pe52qeDEyWPPO8-88kvIG87WnPHu3X6NI7qSy8GvBROivgrV9k_IivdaNl1v2FOyYqLjjdSmvSIvct4zxoUx_Dm5kp3knHdqRdztHdIwLeAKjQMt9baJx-AbbugCs8cpOBpmCnSJI6TwC_2pCiU4GGm-zwWn93SLOcc50yHF6YFRPTH6YDHE-SV5NsCY8dXjeU2-f_p4u_nSbL99_rq52Tau1ao0fvDadf0OqnmptAIOyvTM70xnmFaiB40dEwNUlXZC7Ry0CDgopQw6GOQ1-XDmLofdhN7hXBKMdklhgnRvIwT7b2cOd_ZHPFqjjJI9q4C3j4AUfx4wFzuF7HAcYcZ4yFZoybpWGmOqVJ-lLsWcEw6XNZzZU0R2by8R2VNE9hxRnXz9t8vL3J9MquDmLMD6V8eAyWYXcHboQ6pA62P475Lf0Tan9g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2730643999</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in a polarized political system: Lessons from the 2020 election</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Miller, Jon D. ; Woods, Logan T. ; Kalmbach, Jason</creator><creatorcontrib>Miller, Jon D. ; Woods, Logan T. ; Kalmbach, Jason</creatorcontrib><description>Given the deep polarization of the American political system in recent decades, was the 2020 presidential election an extension of the pre-existing partisan coalitions or did the Covid-19 pandemic and its economic consequences have a significant impact on the outcome? Using a national probability sample provided by AmeriSpeak and voter verification provided by Catalist, we construct a structural equation model to examine the relative influence of age, race, gender, education, religious fundamentalism, ideological partisanship, affective partisanship, and measures of Covid-19 experiences and understanding to predict the 2020 vote. We re-construct the partisan polarization landscape to examine the role of politically interested non-partisans in the center of the ideological spectrum and examine their ability to select candidates in response of specific issues. The Covid-19 pandemic had a significant marginal impact on the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.
•Ideological partisanship was the strongest predictor of vote choice in the 2020.•Among nonpartisans, understanding of Covid-19 was an important vote predictor.•The handling of the Covid-19 pandemic was an important predictor of the 2020 vote.•Nonpartisans with a high level of interest in politics comprise 13% of U.S. voters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-3794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6890</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0261-3794</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102548</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36311165</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Affective partisanship ; And Covid-19 knowledge and understanding ; Ideological partisanship ; Presidential vote ; Religious fundamentalism</subject><ispartof>Electoral studies, 2022-12, Vol.80, p.102548-102548, Article 102548</ispartof><rights>2022</rights><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-dfd7c68ba8903575a1a5980db96907528a7e602fa7c67c25bca4eaef5559ecaf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-dfd7c68ba8903575a1a5980db96907528a7e602fa7c67c25bca4eaef5559ecaf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8714-0126</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102548$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36311165$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miller, Jon D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woods, Logan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalmbach, Jason</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in a polarized political system: Lessons from the 2020 election</title><title>Electoral studies</title><addtitle>Elect Stud</addtitle><description>Given the deep polarization of the American political system in recent decades, was the 2020 presidential election an extension of the pre-existing partisan coalitions or did the Covid-19 pandemic and its economic consequences have a significant impact on the outcome? Using a national probability sample provided by AmeriSpeak and voter verification provided by Catalist, we construct a structural equation model to examine the relative influence of age, race, gender, education, religious fundamentalism, ideological partisanship, affective partisanship, and measures of Covid-19 experiences and understanding to predict the 2020 vote. We re-construct the partisan polarization landscape to examine the role of politically interested non-partisans in the center of the ideological spectrum and examine their ability to select candidates in response of specific issues. The Covid-19 pandemic had a significant marginal impact on the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.
•Ideological partisanship was the strongest predictor of vote choice in the 2020.•Among nonpartisans, understanding of Covid-19 was an important vote predictor.•The handling of the Covid-19 pandemic was an important predictor of the 2020 vote.•Nonpartisans with a high level of interest in politics comprise 13% of U.S. voters.</description><subject>Affective partisanship</subject><subject>And Covid-19 knowledge and understanding</subject><subject>Ideological partisanship</subject><subject>Presidential vote</subject><subject>Religious fundamentalism</subject><issn>0261-3794</issn><issn>1873-6890</issn><issn>0261-3794</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU2P0zAQhi0EYsvCXwAfuaT4I45jDkirii-pEpflbE3tCesqiYPtVlp-Pe52qeDEyWPPO8-88kvIG87WnPHu3X6NI7qSy8GvBROivgrV9k_IivdaNl1v2FOyYqLjjdSmvSIvct4zxoUx_Dm5kp3knHdqRdztHdIwLeAKjQMt9baJx-AbbugCs8cpOBpmCnSJI6TwC_2pCiU4GGm-zwWn93SLOcc50yHF6YFRPTH6YDHE-SV5NsCY8dXjeU2-f_p4u_nSbL99_rq52Tau1ao0fvDadf0OqnmptAIOyvTM70xnmFaiB40dEwNUlXZC7Ry0CDgopQw6GOQ1-XDmLofdhN7hXBKMdklhgnRvIwT7b2cOd_ZHPFqjjJI9q4C3j4AUfx4wFzuF7HAcYcZ4yFZoybpWGmOqVJ-lLsWcEw6XNZzZU0R2by8R2VNE9hxRnXz9t8vL3J9MquDmLMD6V8eAyWYXcHboQ6pA62P475Lf0Tan9g</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Miller, Jon D.</creator><creator>Woods, Logan T.</creator><creator>Kalmbach, Jason</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8714-0126</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in a polarized political system: Lessons from the 2020 election</title><author>Miller, Jon D. ; Woods, Logan T. ; Kalmbach, Jason</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-dfd7c68ba8903575a1a5980db96907528a7e602fa7c67c25bca4eaef5559ecaf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Affective partisanship</topic><topic>And Covid-19 knowledge and understanding</topic><topic>Ideological partisanship</topic><topic>Presidential vote</topic><topic>Religious fundamentalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miller, Jon D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woods, Logan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalmbach, Jason</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Electoral studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miller, Jon D.</au><au>Woods, Logan T.</au><au>Kalmbach, Jason</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in a polarized political system: Lessons from the 2020 election</atitle><jtitle>Electoral studies</jtitle><addtitle>Elect Stud</addtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>80</volume><spage>102548</spage><epage>102548</epage><pages>102548-102548</pages><artnum>102548</artnum><issn>0261-3794</issn><eissn>1873-6890</eissn><eissn>0261-3794</eissn><abstract>Given the deep polarization of the American political system in recent decades, was the 2020 presidential election an extension of the pre-existing partisan coalitions or did the Covid-19 pandemic and its economic consequences have a significant impact on the outcome? Using a national probability sample provided by AmeriSpeak and voter verification provided by Catalist, we construct a structural equation model to examine the relative influence of age, race, gender, education, religious fundamentalism, ideological partisanship, affective partisanship, and measures of Covid-19 experiences and understanding to predict the 2020 vote. We re-construct the partisan polarization landscape to examine the role of politically interested non-partisans in the center of the ideological spectrum and examine their ability to select candidates in response of specific issues. The Covid-19 pandemic had a significant marginal impact on the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.
•Ideological partisanship was the strongest predictor of vote choice in the 2020.•Among nonpartisans, understanding of Covid-19 was an important vote predictor.•The handling of the Covid-19 pandemic was an important predictor of the 2020 vote.•Nonpartisans with a high level of interest in politics comprise 13% of U.S. voters.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>36311165</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102548</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8714-0126</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0261-3794 |
ispartof | Electoral studies, 2022-12, Vol.80, p.102548-102548, Article 102548 |
issn | 0261-3794 1873-6890 0261-3794 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9595380 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Affective partisanship And Covid-19 knowledge and understanding Ideological partisanship Presidential vote Religious fundamentalism |
title | The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in a polarized political system: Lessons from the 2020 election |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T03%3A00%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20the%20Covid-19%20pandemic%20in%20a%20polarized%20political%20system:%20Lessons%20from%20the%202020%20election&rft.jtitle=Electoral%20studies&rft.au=Miller,%20Jon%20D.&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=80&rft.spage=102548&rft.epage=102548&rft.pages=102548-102548&rft.artnum=102548&rft.issn=0261-3794&rft.eissn=1873-6890&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102548&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2730643999%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2730643999&rft_id=info:pmid/36311165&rft_els_id=S0261379422001044&rfr_iscdi=true |