The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in a polarized political system: Lessons from the 2020 election

Given the deep polarization of the American political system in recent decades, was the 2020 presidential election an extension of the pre-existing partisan coalitions or did the Covid-19 pandemic and its economic consequences have a significant impact on the outcome? Using a national probability sa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Electoral studies 2022-12, Vol.80, p.102548-102548, Article 102548
Hauptverfasser: Miller, Jon D., Woods, Logan T., Kalmbach, Jason
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 102548
container_issue
container_start_page 102548
container_title Electoral studies
container_volume 80
creator Miller, Jon D.
Woods, Logan T.
Kalmbach, Jason
description Given the deep polarization of the American political system in recent decades, was the 2020 presidential election an extension of the pre-existing partisan coalitions or did the Covid-19 pandemic and its economic consequences have a significant impact on the outcome? Using a national probability sample provided by AmeriSpeak and voter verification provided by Catalist, we construct a structural equation model to examine the relative influence of age, race, gender, education, religious fundamentalism, ideological partisanship, affective partisanship, and measures of Covid-19 experiences and understanding to predict the 2020 vote. We re-construct the partisan polarization landscape to examine the role of politically interested non-partisans in the center of the ideological spectrum and examine their ability to select candidates in response of specific issues. The Covid-19 pandemic had a significant marginal impact on the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. •Ideological partisanship was the strongest predictor of vote choice in the 2020.•Among nonpartisans, understanding of Covid-19 was an important vote predictor.•The handling of the Covid-19 pandemic was an important predictor of the 2020 vote.•Nonpartisans with a high level of interest in politics comprise 13% of U.S. voters.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102548
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9595380</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0261379422001044</els_id><sourcerecordid>2730643999</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-dfd7c68ba8903575a1a5980db96907528a7e602fa7c67c25bca4eaef5559ecaf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2P0zAQhi0EYsvCXwAfuaT4I45jDkirii-pEpflbE3tCesqiYPtVlp-Pe52qeDEyWPPO8-88kvIG87WnPHu3X6NI7qSy8GvBROivgrV9k_IivdaNl1v2FOyYqLjjdSmvSIvct4zxoUx_Dm5kp3knHdqRdztHdIwLeAKjQMt9baJx-AbbugCs8cpOBpmCnSJI6TwC_2pCiU4GGm-zwWn93SLOcc50yHF6YFRPTH6YDHE-SV5NsCY8dXjeU2-f_p4u_nSbL99_rq52Tau1ao0fvDadf0OqnmptAIOyvTM70xnmFaiB40dEwNUlXZC7Ry0CDgopQw6GOQ1-XDmLofdhN7hXBKMdklhgnRvIwT7b2cOd_ZHPFqjjJI9q4C3j4AUfx4wFzuF7HAcYcZ4yFZoybpWGmOqVJ-lLsWcEw6XNZzZU0R2by8R2VNE9hxRnXz9t8vL3J9MquDmLMD6V8eAyWYXcHboQ6pA62P475Lf0Tan9g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2730643999</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in a polarized political system: Lessons from the 2020 election</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Miller, Jon D. ; Woods, Logan T. ; Kalmbach, Jason</creator><creatorcontrib>Miller, Jon D. ; Woods, Logan T. ; Kalmbach, Jason</creatorcontrib><description>Given the deep polarization of the American political system in recent decades, was the 2020 presidential election an extension of the pre-existing partisan coalitions or did the Covid-19 pandemic and its economic consequences have a significant impact on the outcome? Using a national probability sample provided by AmeriSpeak and voter verification provided by Catalist, we construct a structural equation model to examine the relative influence of age, race, gender, education, religious fundamentalism, ideological partisanship, affective partisanship, and measures of Covid-19 experiences and understanding to predict the 2020 vote. We re-construct the partisan polarization landscape to examine the role of politically interested non-partisans in the center of the ideological spectrum and examine their ability to select candidates in response of specific issues. The Covid-19 pandemic had a significant marginal impact on the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. •Ideological partisanship was the strongest predictor of vote choice in the 2020.•Among nonpartisans, understanding of Covid-19 was an important vote predictor.•The handling of the Covid-19 pandemic was an important predictor of the 2020 vote.•Nonpartisans with a high level of interest in politics comprise 13% of U.S. voters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-3794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6890</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0261-3794</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102548</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36311165</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Affective partisanship ; And Covid-19 knowledge and understanding ; Ideological partisanship ; Presidential vote ; Religious fundamentalism</subject><ispartof>Electoral studies, 2022-12, Vol.80, p.102548-102548, Article 102548</ispartof><rights>2022</rights><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-dfd7c68ba8903575a1a5980db96907528a7e602fa7c67c25bca4eaef5559ecaf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-dfd7c68ba8903575a1a5980db96907528a7e602fa7c67c25bca4eaef5559ecaf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8714-0126</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102548$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36311165$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miller, Jon D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woods, Logan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalmbach, Jason</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in a polarized political system: Lessons from the 2020 election</title><title>Electoral studies</title><addtitle>Elect Stud</addtitle><description>Given the deep polarization of the American political system in recent decades, was the 2020 presidential election an extension of the pre-existing partisan coalitions or did the Covid-19 pandemic and its economic consequences have a significant impact on the outcome? Using a national probability sample provided by AmeriSpeak and voter verification provided by Catalist, we construct a structural equation model to examine the relative influence of age, race, gender, education, religious fundamentalism, ideological partisanship, affective partisanship, and measures of Covid-19 experiences and understanding to predict the 2020 vote. We re-construct the partisan polarization landscape to examine the role of politically interested non-partisans in the center of the ideological spectrum and examine their ability to select candidates in response of specific issues. The Covid-19 pandemic had a significant marginal impact on the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. •Ideological partisanship was the strongest predictor of vote choice in the 2020.•Among nonpartisans, understanding of Covid-19 was an important vote predictor.•The handling of the Covid-19 pandemic was an important predictor of the 2020 vote.•Nonpartisans with a high level of interest in politics comprise 13% of U.S. voters.</description><subject>Affective partisanship</subject><subject>And Covid-19 knowledge and understanding</subject><subject>Ideological partisanship</subject><subject>Presidential vote</subject><subject>Religious fundamentalism</subject><issn>0261-3794</issn><issn>1873-6890</issn><issn>0261-3794</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU2P0zAQhi0EYsvCXwAfuaT4I45jDkirii-pEpflbE3tCesqiYPtVlp-Pe52qeDEyWPPO8-88kvIG87WnPHu3X6NI7qSy8GvBROivgrV9k_IivdaNl1v2FOyYqLjjdSmvSIvct4zxoUx_Dm5kp3knHdqRdztHdIwLeAKjQMt9baJx-AbbugCs8cpOBpmCnSJI6TwC_2pCiU4GGm-zwWn93SLOcc50yHF6YFRPTH6YDHE-SV5NsCY8dXjeU2-f_p4u_nSbL99_rq52Tau1ao0fvDadf0OqnmptAIOyvTM70xnmFaiB40dEwNUlXZC7Ry0CDgopQw6GOQ1-XDmLofdhN7hXBKMdklhgnRvIwT7b2cOd_ZHPFqjjJI9q4C3j4AUfx4wFzuF7HAcYcZ4yFZoybpWGmOqVJ-lLsWcEw6XNZzZU0R2by8R2VNE9hxRnXz9t8vL3J9MquDmLMD6V8eAyWYXcHboQ6pA62P475Lf0Tan9g</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Miller, Jon D.</creator><creator>Woods, Logan T.</creator><creator>Kalmbach, Jason</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8714-0126</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in a polarized political system: Lessons from the 2020 election</title><author>Miller, Jon D. ; Woods, Logan T. ; Kalmbach, Jason</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-dfd7c68ba8903575a1a5980db96907528a7e602fa7c67c25bca4eaef5559ecaf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Affective partisanship</topic><topic>And Covid-19 knowledge and understanding</topic><topic>Ideological partisanship</topic><topic>Presidential vote</topic><topic>Religious fundamentalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miller, Jon D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woods, Logan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalmbach, Jason</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Electoral studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miller, Jon D.</au><au>Woods, Logan T.</au><au>Kalmbach, Jason</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in a polarized political system: Lessons from the 2020 election</atitle><jtitle>Electoral studies</jtitle><addtitle>Elect Stud</addtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>80</volume><spage>102548</spage><epage>102548</epage><pages>102548-102548</pages><artnum>102548</artnum><issn>0261-3794</issn><eissn>1873-6890</eissn><eissn>0261-3794</eissn><abstract>Given the deep polarization of the American political system in recent decades, was the 2020 presidential election an extension of the pre-existing partisan coalitions or did the Covid-19 pandemic and its economic consequences have a significant impact on the outcome? Using a national probability sample provided by AmeriSpeak and voter verification provided by Catalist, we construct a structural equation model to examine the relative influence of age, race, gender, education, religious fundamentalism, ideological partisanship, affective partisanship, and measures of Covid-19 experiences and understanding to predict the 2020 vote. We re-construct the partisan polarization landscape to examine the role of politically interested non-partisans in the center of the ideological spectrum and examine their ability to select candidates in response of specific issues. The Covid-19 pandemic had a significant marginal impact on the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. •Ideological partisanship was the strongest predictor of vote choice in the 2020.•Among nonpartisans, understanding of Covid-19 was an important vote predictor.•The handling of the Covid-19 pandemic was an important predictor of the 2020 vote.•Nonpartisans with a high level of interest in politics comprise 13% of U.S. voters.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>36311165</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102548</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8714-0126</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0261-3794
ispartof Electoral studies, 2022-12, Vol.80, p.102548-102548, Article 102548
issn 0261-3794
1873-6890
0261-3794
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9595380
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Affective partisanship
And Covid-19 knowledge and understanding
Ideological partisanship
Presidential vote
Religious fundamentalism
title The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in a polarized political system: Lessons from the 2020 election
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T03%3A00%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20the%20Covid-19%20pandemic%20in%20a%20polarized%20political%20system:%20Lessons%20from%20the%202020%20election&rft.jtitle=Electoral%20studies&rft.au=Miller,%20Jon%20D.&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=80&rft.spage=102548&rft.epage=102548&rft.pages=102548-102548&rft.artnum=102548&rft.issn=0261-3794&rft.eissn=1873-6890&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102548&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2730643999%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2730643999&rft_id=info:pmid/36311165&rft_els_id=S0261379422001044&rfr_iscdi=true