A randomised, pragmatic clinical trial of ACUpuncture plus standard care versus standard care alone FOr Chemotherapy Induced peripheral Neuropathy (ACUFOCIN)
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a dose limiting toxicity posing a major clinical challenge for managing patients receiving specific chemotherapy regimens (e.g., Taxanes). There is a growing body of literature suggesting acupuncture can improve CIPN symptoms. The purpose of the A...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society 2022-10, Vol.60, p.102171, Article 102171 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 102171 |
container_title | European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Stringer, Jacqui Ryder, W. David Mackereth, Peter A. Misra, Vivek Wardley, Andrew M. |
description | Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a dose limiting toxicity posing a major clinical challenge for managing patients receiving specific chemotherapy regimens (e.g., Taxanes). There is a growing body of literature suggesting acupuncture can improve CIPN symptoms. The purpose of the ACUFOCIN trial was to collect preliminary data on the safety, feasibility, acceptability and initial effectiveness of acupuncture as a treatment for CIPN, comparing use of acupuncture plus standard care (Acupuncture) against standard care alone (Control).
At a tertiary cancer centre, a pragmatic, randomised, parallel group design study was used to investigate the effectiveness of a 10-week course of acupuncture. Participants experiencing CIPN of ≥ Grade II, recording a ‘Most Troublesome’ CIPN symptom score of ≥3 using the "Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile" (MYMOP 2), were randomised to ‘Acupuncture’ or ‘Control’ arms. Clinicians were blinded to allocated groups, however as it was not possible to blind participants, it cannot be guaranteed they did not disclose study allocation within their clinic assessments. The primary outcome measure was the number of patients reporting a ≥ 2-point improvement (success) in their MYMOP2 score at week 10. 100 participants (120 to allow for attrition) were required for a hypothesised improvement in success proportions from 30% to 55% using a primary analysis model with logistic regression adjusted for stratification factors and baseline MYMOP2 scores. Feasibility and acceptability of study design was addressed through percentage return of primary outcome, retention rate and a nested qualitative study.
Primary MYMOP2 outcome data at week 10 was available for 108/120 randomised participants; this is greater than the 100 participants required to adequately power the study. There were 36/53 (68%) successes in ‘Acupuncture’ compared to 18/55 (33%) in ‘Control’. Beneficial effects were seen in the secondary outcome data, including clinicians' grading of neuropathy, EORTC, QLQ-CIPN20, QLQ-C30 summary scores and patient reported pain scores. There were no serious adverse events reported within the study and only 16 acupuncture associated events, none of which required intervention.
A 10-week course of acupuncture resulted in measurable improvement in participants symptoms of CIPN. The results warrant further investigation.
•Acupuncture impacts the complex symptom burden associated with CIPN, not just pain.•MYMOP2 outcome data sho |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejon.2022.102171 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9592667</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1462388922000795</els_id><sourcerecordid>2702187715</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-3b6bc577adb6c81e0b1bc878213c2141f0bbd32c43c3d40f517dd4d50ea4c8063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd-KEzEUxoMo7lp9AS8klys4NX9mJlMQoQxWC8v2xr0OmeTMNmUmGZNMoQ_ju5rSdVEEb5Lw5ZzvHL4fQm8pWVJC64-HJRy8WzLCWBYYFfQZuqYVZwWjjD3P77JmBW-a1RV6FeOBELLionmJrni1qlhZk2v0c42DcsaPNoL5gKegHkaVrMZ6sM5qNeAUbD59j9ft_TQ7neYAeBrmiGPKnSoYrFWWjhDiP6IavAO82QXc7mH0aQ9BTSe8dWbWYPAEwU5nbcB3MAc_qbQ_4Zs8abNrt3fvX6MXvRoivHm8F-h-8-V7-6243X3dtuvbQpdVlQre1Z2uhFCmq3VDgXS0041oGOWa0ZL2pOsMZ7rkmpuS9BUVxpSmIqBK3ZCaL9Dni-80dyMYDS7lneQU7KjCSXpl5d8_zu7lgz_KVbVidS2ywc2jQfA_ZohJ5kA1DINy4Ocomch8GiEynQVil1IdfIwB-qcxlMgzV3mQZ67yzFVeuOamd38u-NTyG2Qu-HQpgBzT0UKQUVtwOWQbQCdpvP2f_y8Zebde</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2702187715</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A randomised, pragmatic clinical trial of ACUpuncture plus standard care versus standard care alone FOr Chemotherapy Induced peripheral Neuropathy (ACUFOCIN)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Stringer, Jacqui ; Ryder, W. David ; Mackereth, Peter A. ; Misra, Vivek ; Wardley, Andrew M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stringer, Jacqui ; Ryder, W. David ; Mackereth, Peter A. ; Misra, Vivek ; Wardley, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><description>Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a dose limiting toxicity posing a major clinical challenge for managing patients receiving specific chemotherapy regimens (e.g., Taxanes). There is a growing body of literature suggesting acupuncture can improve CIPN symptoms. The purpose of the ACUFOCIN trial was to collect preliminary data on the safety, feasibility, acceptability and initial effectiveness of acupuncture as a treatment for CIPN, comparing use of acupuncture plus standard care (Acupuncture) against standard care alone (Control).
At a tertiary cancer centre, a pragmatic, randomised, parallel group design study was used to investigate the effectiveness of a 10-week course of acupuncture. Participants experiencing CIPN of ≥ Grade II, recording a ‘Most Troublesome’ CIPN symptom score of ≥3 using the "Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile" (MYMOP 2), were randomised to ‘Acupuncture’ or ‘Control’ arms. Clinicians were blinded to allocated groups, however as it was not possible to blind participants, it cannot be guaranteed they did not disclose study allocation within their clinic assessments. The primary outcome measure was the number of patients reporting a ≥ 2-point improvement (success) in their MYMOP2 score at week 10. 100 participants (120 to allow for attrition) were required for a hypothesised improvement in success proportions from 30% to 55% using a primary analysis model with logistic regression adjusted for stratification factors and baseline MYMOP2 scores. Feasibility and acceptability of study design was addressed through percentage return of primary outcome, retention rate and a nested qualitative study.
Primary MYMOP2 outcome data at week 10 was available for 108/120 randomised participants; this is greater than the 100 participants required to adequately power the study. There were 36/53 (68%) successes in ‘Acupuncture’ compared to 18/55 (33%) in ‘Control’. Beneficial effects were seen in the secondary outcome data, including clinicians' grading of neuropathy, EORTC, QLQ-CIPN20, QLQ-C30 summary scores and patient reported pain scores. There were no serious adverse events reported within the study and only 16 acupuncture associated events, none of which required intervention.
A 10-week course of acupuncture resulted in measurable improvement in participants symptoms of CIPN. The results warrant further investigation.
•Acupuncture impacts the complex symptom burden associated with CIPN, not just pain.•MYMOP2 outcome data shows significant patient benefit to using Acupuncture for CIPN.•A 10 week course of Acupuncture reduces CIPN but maintenance may be required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-3889</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-2122</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2122</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2022.102171</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35952460</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acupuncture ; Acupuncture Therapy - adverse effects ; Acupuncture Therapy - methods ; Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects ; Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy ; Controlled trial ; Humans ; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases - chemically induced ; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases - diagnosis ; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases - therapy ; Quality of Life ; Research Design ; Taxoids - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society, 2022-10, Vol.60, p.102171, Article 102171</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-3b6bc577adb6c81e0b1bc878213c2141f0bbd32c43c3d40f517dd4d50ea4c8063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-3b6bc577adb6c81e0b1bc878213c2141f0bbd32c43c3d40f517dd4d50ea4c8063</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9804-2038</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2022.102171$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,3551,27925,27926,45996</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35952460$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stringer, Jacqui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryder, W. David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackereth, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Misra, Vivek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wardley, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><title>A randomised, pragmatic clinical trial of ACUpuncture plus standard care versus standard care alone FOr Chemotherapy Induced peripheral Neuropathy (ACUFOCIN)</title><title>European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society</title><addtitle>Eur J Oncol Nurs</addtitle><description>Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a dose limiting toxicity posing a major clinical challenge for managing patients receiving specific chemotherapy regimens (e.g., Taxanes). There is a growing body of literature suggesting acupuncture can improve CIPN symptoms. The purpose of the ACUFOCIN trial was to collect preliminary data on the safety, feasibility, acceptability and initial effectiveness of acupuncture as a treatment for CIPN, comparing use of acupuncture plus standard care (Acupuncture) against standard care alone (Control).
At a tertiary cancer centre, a pragmatic, randomised, parallel group design study was used to investigate the effectiveness of a 10-week course of acupuncture. Participants experiencing CIPN of ≥ Grade II, recording a ‘Most Troublesome’ CIPN symptom score of ≥3 using the "Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile" (MYMOP 2), were randomised to ‘Acupuncture’ or ‘Control’ arms. Clinicians were blinded to allocated groups, however as it was not possible to blind participants, it cannot be guaranteed they did not disclose study allocation within their clinic assessments. The primary outcome measure was the number of patients reporting a ≥ 2-point improvement (success) in their MYMOP2 score at week 10. 100 participants (120 to allow for attrition) were required for a hypothesised improvement in success proportions from 30% to 55% using a primary analysis model with logistic regression adjusted for stratification factors and baseline MYMOP2 scores. Feasibility and acceptability of study design was addressed through percentage return of primary outcome, retention rate and a nested qualitative study.
Primary MYMOP2 outcome data at week 10 was available for 108/120 randomised participants; this is greater than the 100 participants required to adequately power the study. There were 36/53 (68%) successes in ‘Acupuncture’ compared to 18/55 (33%) in ‘Control’. Beneficial effects were seen in the secondary outcome data, including clinicians' grading of neuropathy, EORTC, QLQ-CIPN20, QLQ-C30 summary scores and patient reported pain scores. There were no serious adverse events reported within the study and only 16 acupuncture associated events, none of which required intervention.
A 10-week course of acupuncture resulted in measurable improvement in participants symptoms of CIPN. The results warrant further investigation.
•Acupuncture impacts the complex symptom burden associated with CIPN, not just pain.•MYMOP2 outcome data shows significant patient benefit to using Acupuncture for CIPN.•A 10 week course of Acupuncture reduces CIPN but maintenance may be required.</description><subject>Acupuncture</subject><subject>Acupuncture Therapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Acupuncture Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy</subject><subject>Controlled trial</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Peripheral Nervous System Diseases - chemically induced</subject><subject>Peripheral Nervous System Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Peripheral Nervous System Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Taxoids - adverse effects</subject><issn>1462-3889</issn><issn>1532-2122</issn><issn>1532-2122</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd-KEzEUxoMo7lp9AS8klys4NX9mJlMQoQxWC8v2xr0OmeTMNmUmGZNMoQ_ju5rSdVEEb5Lw5ZzvHL4fQm8pWVJC64-HJRy8WzLCWBYYFfQZuqYVZwWjjD3P77JmBW-a1RV6FeOBELLionmJrni1qlhZk2v0c42DcsaPNoL5gKegHkaVrMZ6sM5qNeAUbD59j9ft_TQ7neYAeBrmiGPKnSoYrFWWjhDiP6IavAO82QXc7mH0aQ9BTSe8dWbWYPAEwU5nbcB3MAc_qbQ_4Zs8abNrt3fvX6MXvRoivHm8F-h-8-V7-6243X3dtuvbQpdVlQre1Z2uhFCmq3VDgXS0041oGOWa0ZL2pOsMZ7rkmpuS9BUVxpSmIqBK3ZCaL9Dni-80dyMYDS7lneQU7KjCSXpl5d8_zu7lgz_KVbVidS2ywc2jQfA_ZohJ5kA1DINy4Ocomch8GiEynQVil1IdfIwB-qcxlMgzV3mQZ67yzFVeuOamd38u-NTyG2Qu-HQpgBzT0UKQUVtwOWQbQCdpvP2f_y8Zebde</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Stringer, Jacqui</creator><creator>Ryder, W. David</creator><creator>Mackereth, Peter A.</creator><creator>Misra, Vivek</creator><creator>Wardley, Andrew M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Churchill Livingstone</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9804-2038</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>A randomised, pragmatic clinical trial of ACUpuncture plus standard care versus standard care alone FOr Chemotherapy Induced peripheral Neuropathy (ACUFOCIN)</title><author>Stringer, Jacqui ; Ryder, W. David ; Mackereth, Peter A. ; Misra, Vivek ; Wardley, Andrew M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-3b6bc577adb6c81e0b1bc878213c2141f0bbd32c43c3d40f517dd4d50ea4c8063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Acupuncture</topic><topic>Acupuncture Therapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Acupuncture Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy</topic><topic>Controlled trial</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Peripheral Nervous System Diseases - chemically induced</topic><topic>Peripheral Nervous System Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Peripheral Nervous System Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Taxoids - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stringer, Jacqui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryder, W. David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackereth, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Misra, Vivek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wardley, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stringer, Jacqui</au><au>Ryder, W. David</au><au>Mackereth, Peter A.</au><au>Misra, Vivek</au><au>Wardley, Andrew M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A randomised, pragmatic clinical trial of ACUpuncture plus standard care versus standard care alone FOr Chemotherapy Induced peripheral Neuropathy (ACUFOCIN)</atitle><jtitle>European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Oncol Nurs</addtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>60</volume><spage>102171</spage><pages>102171-</pages><artnum>102171</artnum><issn>1462-3889</issn><issn>1532-2122</issn><eissn>1532-2122</eissn><abstract>Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a dose limiting toxicity posing a major clinical challenge for managing patients receiving specific chemotherapy regimens (e.g., Taxanes). There is a growing body of literature suggesting acupuncture can improve CIPN symptoms. The purpose of the ACUFOCIN trial was to collect preliminary data on the safety, feasibility, acceptability and initial effectiveness of acupuncture as a treatment for CIPN, comparing use of acupuncture plus standard care (Acupuncture) against standard care alone (Control).
At a tertiary cancer centre, a pragmatic, randomised, parallel group design study was used to investigate the effectiveness of a 10-week course of acupuncture. Participants experiencing CIPN of ≥ Grade II, recording a ‘Most Troublesome’ CIPN symptom score of ≥3 using the "Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile" (MYMOP 2), were randomised to ‘Acupuncture’ or ‘Control’ arms. Clinicians were blinded to allocated groups, however as it was not possible to blind participants, it cannot be guaranteed they did not disclose study allocation within their clinic assessments. The primary outcome measure was the number of patients reporting a ≥ 2-point improvement (success) in their MYMOP2 score at week 10. 100 participants (120 to allow for attrition) were required for a hypothesised improvement in success proportions from 30% to 55% using a primary analysis model with logistic regression adjusted for stratification factors and baseline MYMOP2 scores. Feasibility and acceptability of study design was addressed through percentage return of primary outcome, retention rate and a nested qualitative study.
Primary MYMOP2 outcome data at week 10 was available for 108/120 randomised participants; this is greater than the 100 participants required to adequately power the study. There were 36/53 (68%) successes in ‘Acupuncture’ compared to 18/55 (33%) in ‘Control’. Beneficial effects were seen in the secondary outcome data, including clinicians' grading of neuropathy, EORTC, QLQ-CIPN20, QLQ-C30 summary scores and patient reported pain scores. There were no serious adverse events reported within the study and only 16 acupuncture associated events, none of which required intervention.
A 10-week course of acupuncture resulted in measurable improvement in participants symptoms of CIPN. The results warrant further investigation.
•Acupuncture impacts the complex symptom burden associated with CIPN, not just pain.•MYMOP2 outcome data shows significant patient benefit to using Acupuncture for CIPN.•A 10 week course of Acupuncture reduces CIPN but maintenance may be required.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>35952460</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejon.2022.102171</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9804-2038</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1462-3889 |
ispartof | European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society, 2022-10, Vol.60, p.102171, Article 102171 |
issn | 1462-3889 1532-2122 1532-2122 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9592667 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Acupuncture Acupuncture Therapy - adverse effects Acupuncture Therapy - methods Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy Controlled trial Humans Peripheral Nervous System Diseases - chemically induced Peripheral Nervous System Diseases - diagnosis Peripheral Nervous System Diseases - therapy Quality of Life Research Design Taxoids - adverse effects |
title | A randomised, pragmatic clinical trial of ACUpuncture plus standard care versus standard care alone FOr Chemotherapy Induced peripheral Neuropathy (ACUFOCIN) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T14%3A16%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20randomised,%20pragmatic%20clinical%20trial%20of%20ACUpuncture%20plus%20standard%20care%20versus%20standard%20care%20alone%20FOr%20Chemotherapy%20Induced%20peripheral%20Neuropathy%20(ACUFOCIN)&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20oncology%20nursing%20:%20the%20official%20journal%20of%20European%20Oncology%20Nursing%20Society&rft.au=Stringer,%20Jacqui&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=60&rft.spage=102171&rft.pages=102171-&rft.artnum=102171&rft.issn=1462-3889&rft.eissn=1532-2122&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejon.2022.102171&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2702187715%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2702187715&rft_id=info:pmid/35952460&rft_els_id=S1462388922000795&rfr_iscdi=true |