Disparities in Incidences of Cesarean Section Among Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the United States

Background In this study, we explored the interaction between women's race/ethnicity and insurance type and determined how these interactions affect the incidences of cesarean section (CS) among women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methodology We utilized the National Inpatient Sampl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2022-09, Vol.14 (9), p.e29400
Hauptverfasser: Akinyemi, Oluwasegun A, Lipscombe, Christina, Omokhodion, Ofure V, Akingbule, Akinwale S, Fasokun, Mojisola E, Oyeleye, Oluwagbemiga A, Tanna, Resham, Akinwumi, Bolarinwa, Elleissy Nasef, Kindha, Fakorede, Mary
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page e29400
container_title Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)
container_volume 14
creator Akinyemi, Oluwasegun A
Lipscombe, Christina
Omokhodion, Ofure V
Akingbule, Akinwale S
Fasokun, Mojisola E
Oyeleye, Oluwagbemiga A
Tanna, Resham
Akinwumi, Bolarinwa
Elleissy Nasef, Kindha
Fakorede, Mary
description Background In this study, we explored the interaction between women's race/ethnicity and insurance type and determined how these interactions affect the incidences of cesarean section (CS) among women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methodology We utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from January 2000 to September 2015 to conduct a retrospective analysis of all GDM-associated hospitalizations. We then explored the interaction between race/ethnicity and insurance types and determined how these interactions affect the incidences of CS among GDM patients, controlling for traditional risk factors for CS and patients' sociodemographics. Subsequently, we determined the risk of primary postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) in the CS group and a propensity score-matched control group who had vaginal deliveries. Results There were 932,431 deliveries diagnosed with GDM in the NIS database from January 2000 to September 2015. The mean age of the study population was 30.6 ± 5.9 years, 44.5% were white, 14.0% were black, and 26.7% were Hispanic. The CS rate was 40.5%. After controlling for covariates, women who utilized private insurance had the highest CS rate across the different races/ethnicities; white (odds ratio (OR) = 1.21 (1.17-1.25)) blacks (OR = 1.33 (1.26-1.41)), and Hispanic (OR = 1.12 (1.06-1.18)). CS patients were less likely to develop PPH compared to their matched controls with vaginal deliveries (OR = 0.67 (0.63-0.71)). Conclusions Private insurance is associated with higher incidences of CS among women with GDM, irrespective of race/ethnicity.
doi_str_mv 10.7759/cureus.29400
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9585922</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2730495975</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-c3e94b78485ede88dcd170eb877a32b0aef25623071ad56532a503bd9f9d1c663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1vFSEUxYnR2KZ259qQuHHhq3wMA2xMmtcPm9S4qE2XhIE7fTQz8AqMif-9tK821c29kPvjhHMPQu8pOZJS6C9uybCUI6Y7Ql6hfUZ7tVJUda9fnPfQYSl3hBBKJCOSvEV7vOek4323j-5PQtnaHGqAgkPEF9EFD9G1WxrxGorNYCO-AldDivh4TvEW36QZIr4JdYPPoVT7MLITPgl2gNpefodpCnV5FKwbwNcxVPD4qpFQ3qE3o50KHD71A3R9dvpz_W11-eP8Yn18uXK8Y7VV0N0gVacEeFDKO08lgUFJaTkbiIWRiZ5xIqn1ohecWUH44PWoPXV9zw_Q153udhlm8A5izXYy2xxmm3-bZIP5dxLDxtymX0YLJTRjTeDTk0BO90vzaeZQXLNmI6SlGCY54bRV3tCP_6F3acltJzuq00JL0ajPO8rlVEqG8fkzlJiHOM0uTvMYZ8M_vDTwDP8Nj_8BK6Sdeg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2730495975</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Disparities in Incidences of Cesarean Section Among Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the United States</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Akinyemi, Oluwasegun A ; Lipscombe, Christina ; Omokhodion, Ofure V ; Akingbule, Akinwale S ; Fasokun, Mojisola E ; Oyeleye, Oluwagbemiga A ; Tanna, Resham ; Akinwumi, Bolarinwa ; Elleissy Nasef, Kindha ; Fakorede, Mary</creator><creatorcontrib>Akinyemi, Oluwasegun A ; Lipscombe, Christina ; Omokhodion, Ofure V ; Akingbule, Akinwale S ; Fasokun, Mojisola E ; Oyeleye, Oluwagbemiga A ; Tanna, Resham ; Akinwumi, Bolarinwa ; Elleissy Nasef, Kindha ; Fakorede, Mary</creatorcontrib><description>Background In this study, we explored the interaction between women's race/ethnicity and insurance type and determined how these interactions affect the incidences of cesarean section (CS) among women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methodology We utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from January 2000 to September 2015 to conduct a retrospective analysis of all GDM-associated hospitalizations. We then explored the interaction between race/ethnicity and insurance types and determined how these interactions affect the incidences of CS among GDM patients, controlling for traditional risk factors for CS and patients' sociodemographics. Subsequently, we determined the risk of primary postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) in the CS group and a propensity score-matched control group who had vaginal deliveries. Results There were 932,431 deliveries diagnosed with GDM in the NIS database from January 2000 to September 2015. The mean age of the study population was 30.6 ± 5.9 years, 44.5% were white, 14.0% were black, and 26.7% were Hispanic. The CS rate was 40.5%. After controlling for covariates, women who utilized private insurance had the highest CS rate across the different races/ethnicities; white (odds ratio (OR) = 1.21 (1.17-1.25)) blacks (OR = 1.33 (1.26-1.41)), and Hispanic (OR = 1.12 (1.06-1.18)). CS patients were less likely to develop PPH compared to their matched controls with vaginal deliveries (OR = 0.67 (0.63-0.71)). Conclusions Private insurance is associated with higher incidences of CS among women with GDM, irrespective of race/ethnicity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.29400</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36304364</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cureus Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; Cesarean section ; Epidemiology/Public Health ; Ethnicity ; Gestational diabetes ; Glucose ; Hispanic Americans ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Hypertension ; Length of stay ; Native North Americans ; Obesity ; Obstetrics/Gynecology ; Pacific Islander people ; Pregnancy ; Public Health ; Risk factors ; Uninsured people ; Vagina ; Variables ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2022-09, Vol.14 (9), p.e29400</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022, Akinyemi et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022, Akinyemi et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022, Akinyemi et al. 2022 Akinyemi et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-c3e94b78485ede88dcd170eb877a32b0aef25623071ad56532a503bd9f9d1c663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-c3e94b78485ede88dcd170eb877a32b0aef25623071ad56532a503bd9f9d1c663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585922/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585922/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36304364$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Akinyemi, Oluwasegun A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipscombe, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omokhodion, Ofure V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akingbule, Akinwale S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fasokun, Mojisola E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyeleye, Oluwagbemiga A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanna, Resham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akinwumi, Bolarinwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elleissy Nasef, Kindha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fakorede, Mary</creatorcontrib><title>Disparities in Incidences of Cesarean Section Among Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the United States</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><description>Background In this study, we explored the interaction between women's race/ethnicity and insurance type and determined how these interactions affect the incidences of cesarean section (CS) among women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methodology We utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from January 2000 to September 2015 to conduct a retrospective analysis of all GDM-associated hospitalizations. We then explored the interaction between race/ethnicity and insurance types and determined how these interactions affect the incidences of CS among GDM patients, controlling for traditional risk factors for CS and patients' sociodemographics. Subsequently, we determined the risk of primary postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) in the CS group and a propensity score-matched control group who had vaginal deliveries. Results There were 932,431 deliveries diagnosed with GDM in the NIS database from January 2000 to September 2015. The mean age of the study population was 30.6 ± 5.9 years, 44.5% were white, 14.0% were black, and 26.7% were Hispanic. The CS rate was 40.5%. After controlling for covariates, women who utilized private insurance had the highest CS rate across the different races/ethnicities; white (odds ratio (OR) = 1.21 (1.17-1.25)) blacks (OR = 1.33 (1.26-1.41)), and Hispanic (OR = 1.12 (1.06-1.18)). CS patients were less likely to develop PPH compared to their matched controls with vaginal deliveries (OR = 0.67 (0.63-0.71)). Conclusions Private insurance is associated with higher incidences of CS among women with GDM, irrespective of race/ethnicity.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Cesarean section</subject><subject>Epidemiology/Public Health</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Gestational diabetes</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Hispanic Americans</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Length of stay</subject><subject>Native North Americans</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Obstetrics/Gynecology</subject><subject>Pacific Islander people</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Uninsured people</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1vFSEUxYnR2KZ259qQuHHhq3wMA2xMmtcPm9S4qE2XhIE7fTQz8AqMif-9tK821c29kPvjhHMPQu8pOZJS6C9uybCUI6Y7Ql6hfUZ7tVJUda9fnPfQYSl3hBBKJCOSvEV7vOek4323j-5PQtnaHGqAgkPEF9EFD9G1WxrxGorNYCO-AldDivh4TvEW36QZIr4JdYPPoVT7MLITPgl2gNpefodpCnV5FKwbwNcxVPD4qpFQ3qE3o50KHD71A3R9dvpz_W11-eP8Yn18uXK8Y7VV0N0gVacEeFDKO08lgUFJaTkbiIWRiZ5xIqn1ohecWUH44PWoPXV9zw_Q153udhlm8A5izXYy2xxmm3-bZIP5dxLDxtymX0YLJTRjTeDTk0BO90vzaeZQXLNmI6SlGCY54bRV3tCP_6F3acltJzuq00JL0ajPO8rlVEqG8fkzlJiHOM0uTvMYZ8M_vDTwDP8Nj_8BK6Sdeg</recordid><startdate>20220921</startdate><enddate>20220921</enddate><creator>Akinyemi, Oluwasegun A</creator><creator>Lipscombe, Christina</creator><creator>Omokhodion, Ofure V</creator><creator>Akingbule, Akinwale S</creator><creator>Fasokun, Mojisola E</creator><creator>Oyeleye, Oluwagbemiga A</creator><creator>Tanna, Resham</creator><creator>Akinwumi, Bolarinwa</creator><creator>Elleissy Nasef, Kindha</creator><creator>Fakorede, Mary</creator><general>Cureus Inc</general><general>Cureus</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220921</creationdate><title>Disparities in Incidences of Cesarean Section Among Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the United States</title><author>Akinyemi, Oluwasegun A ; Lipscombe, Christina ; Omokhodion, Ofure V ; Akingbule, Akinwale S ; Fasokun, Mojisola E ; Oyeleye, Oluwagbemiga A ; Tanna, Resham ; Akinwumi, Bolarinwa ; Elleissy Nasef, Kindha ; Fakorede, Mary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-c3e94b78485ede88dcd170eb877a32b0aef25623071ad56532a503bd9f9d1c663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Cesarean section</topic><topic>Epidemiology/Public Health</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Gestational diabetes</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Hispanic Americans</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Length of stay</topic><topic>Native North Americans</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Obstetrics/Gynecology</topic><topic>Pacific Islander people</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Uninsured people</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akinyemi, Oluwasegun A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipscombe, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omokhodion, Ofure V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akingbule, Akinwale S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fasokun, Mojisola E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyeleye, Oluwagbemiga A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanna, Resham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akinwumi, Bolarinwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elleissy Nasef, Kindha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fakorede, Mary</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akinyemi, Oluwasegun A</au><au>Lipscombe, Christina</au><au>Omokhodion, Ofure V</au><au>Akingbule, Akinwale S</au><au>Fasokun, Mojisola E</au><au>Oyeleye, Oluwagbemiga A</au><au>Tanna, Resham</au><au>Akinwumi, Bolarinwa</au><au>Elleissy Nasef, Kindha</au><au>Fakorede, Mary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Disparities in Incidences of Cesarean Section Among Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><date>2022-09-21</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e29400</spage><pages>e29400-</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>Background In this study, we explored the interaction between women's race/ethnicity and insurance type and determined how these interactions affect the incidences of cesarean section (CS) among women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methodology We utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from January 2000 to September 2015 to conduct a retrospective analysis of all GDM-associated hospitalizations. We then explored the interaction between race/ethnicity and insurance types and determined how these interactions affect the incidences of CS among GDM patients, controlling for traditional risk factors for CS and patients' sociodemographics. Subsequently, we determined the risk of primary postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) in the CS group and a propensity score-matched control group who had vaginal deliveries. Results There were 932,431 deliveries diagnosed with GDM in the NIS database from January 2000 to September 2015. The mean age of the study population was 30.6 ± 5.9 years, 44.5% were white, 14.0% were black, and 26.7% were Hispanic. The CS rate was 40.5%. After controlling for covariates, women who utilized private insurance had the highest CS rate across the different races/ethnicities; white (odds ratio (OR) = 1.21 (1.17-1.25)) blacks (OR = 1.33 (1.26-1.41)), and Hispanic (OR = 1.12 (1.06-1.18)). CS patients were less likely to develop PPH compared to their matched controls with vaginal deliveries (OR = 0.67 (0.63-0.71)). Conclusions Private insurance is associated with higher incidences of CS among women with GDM, irrespective of race/ethnicity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cureus Inc</pub><pmid>36304364</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.29400</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-8184
ispartof Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2022-09, Vol.14 (9), p.e29400
issn 2168-8184
2168-8184
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9585922
source PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Age
Cesarean section
Epidemiology/Public Health
Ethnicity
Gestational diabetes
Glucose
Hispanic Americans
Hospitalization
Hospitals
Hypertension
Length of stay
Native North Americans
Obesity
Obstetrics/Gynecology
Pacific Islander people
Pregnancy
Public Health
Risk factors
Uninsured people
Vagina
Variables
Womens health
title Disparities in Incidences of Cesarean Section Among Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the United States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T20%3A07%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Disparities%20in%20Incidences%20of%20Cesarean%20Section%20Among%20Women%20With%20Gestational%20Diabetes%20Mellitus%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Akinyemi,%20Oluwasegun%20A&rft.date=2022-09-21&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e29400&rft.pages=e29400-&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.29400&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2730495975%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2730495975&rft_id=info:pmid/36304364&rfr_iscdi=true