Impact of dosimetric factors on long-term percutaneous enteral gastrostomy (PEG) tube dependence in head and neck cancer patients after (chemo)radiotherapy—results from a prospective randomized trial
Purpose/objective To analyze dose–volume histogram (DVH)-derived data on the exposure of organs at risk with impact on long-term percutaneous enteral gastrostomy (PEG) tube dependence in head and neck cancer patients at 6 and 12 months after definitive or adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy. Materials and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 2022-11, Vol.198 (11), p.1016-1024 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1024 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1016 |
container_title | Strahlentherapie und Onkologie |
container_volume | 198 |
creator | Löser, Anastassia Grohmann, Maximilian Finger, Anna Greinert, Franziska Krause, Linda Molwitz, Isabel Krüll, Andreas Petersen, Cordula |
description | Purpose/objective
To analyze dose–volume histogram (DVH)-derived data on the exposure of organs at risk with impact on long-term percutaneous enteral gastrostomy (PEG) tube dependence in head and neck cancer patients at 6 and 12 months after definitive or adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy.
Materials and methods
Sixty-one patients were prospectively treated with (chemo)radiotherapy. Prophylactic or reactive gastrostomy tube placement was performed in 41 (67.2%) patients. Dose–volume histogram parameters were obtained for the swallowing apparatus.
Results
Median follow-up time was 25 (2–34) months. Overall survival was shorter in patients with inlying PEG tubes at 6 and 12 months (log rank
p
= 0.038 and
p
= 0.017) after therapy completion. The estimated median time of tube dependency was 6 (95% confidence interval: 2–14) months. After 6 months, 46.5% of patients were tube dependent. After 12 months, this estimated proportion fell to 31.5%. For both time points, the volume to the larynx (in %) receiving at least 50 Gy (larynx V50Gy) exceeding 53% was predictive for long-term tube feeding (6 months:
p
= 0.041 and 12 months:
p
= 0.042) being an independent predictor during multivariable analysis. There was no clinical feature influencing tube dependence after 12 months.
Conclusion
Long-term gastrostomy dependence was found to be strongly associated with an exposure of laryngeal structures (specifically, V50Gy ≥ 53%) during radiotherapy. Consequently, the avoidance of supraglottic as well as glottic structures is warranted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00066-022-01992-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9581845</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2706720153</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-55e4e50ddaf9b8227354c4d9c8d5401a5688e42e3ed48b918785b15c961dafdf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk9u1DAUxiMEokPhAqyexKZdBOzETuwNEqpKqVQJFiCxszz2y4xLYgfbqTSsOAQH4CwsOQYnwcNUIFiwsvT8fb_3R19VPabkKSWkf5YIIV1Xk6apCZWyqfmdakVZK2si5fu71YrQXtY95eKoepDSNSG0Y5Ldr47arjhZ26-q75fTrE2GMIANyU2YozMwlFKICYKHMfhNnTFOMGM0S9Yew5IAfanpETY65RhSDtMOTt6cX5xCXtYIFmf0Fr1BcB62qC1ob8Gj-QBGl3KEWWdXKAn0UFBwYrY4hdOorQt5W9jz7sfnLxHTMhbNEMME-tvXufSa0WR3gxALMUzuE1ooQ-vxYXVv0GPCR7fvcfXu5fnbs1f11euLy7MXV7VpBc0158iQE2v1INeiafqWM8OsNMJyRqjmnRDIGmzRMrGWVPSCryk3sqPFYof2uHp-4M7LekJryhLlEmqObtJxp4J26u8f77ZqE26U5IIKxgvg5BYQw8cFU1aTSwbH8XBb1fSk6xtCeVukT_6RXocl-rJeUTUdZZ0ke2BzUJlynhRx-D0MJWofFXWIiipRUb-iovam9mBKRew3GP-g_-P6CcZox9c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2726146905</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of dosimetric factors on long-term percutaneous enteral gastrostomy (PEG) tube dependence in head and neck cancer patients after (chemo)radiotherapy—results from a prospective randomized trial</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Löser, Anastassia ; Grohmann, Maximilian ; Finger, Anna ; Greinert, Franziska ; Krause, Linda ; Molwitz, Isabel ; Krüll, Andreas ; Petersen, Cordula</creator><creatorcontrib>Löser, Anastassia ; Grohmann, Maximilian ; Finger, Anna ; Greinert, Franziska ; Krause, Linda ; Molwitz, Isabel ; Krüll, Andreas ; Petersen, Cordula</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose/objective
To analyze dose–volume histogram (DVH)-derived data on the exposure of organs at risk with impact on long-term percutaneous enteral gastrostomy (PEG) tube dependence in head and neck cancer patients at 6 and 12 months after definitive or adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy.
Materials and methods
Sixty-one patients were prospectively treated with (chemo)radiotherapy. Prophylactic or reactive gastrostomy tube placement was performed in 41 (67.2%) patients. Dose–volume histogram parameters were obtained for the swallowing apparatus.
Results
Median follow-up time was 25 (2–34) months. Overall survival was shorter in patients with inlying PEG tubes at 6 and 12 months (log rank
p
= 0.038 and
p
= 0.017) after therapy completion. The estimated median time of tube dependency was 6 (95% confidence interval: 2–14) months. After 6 months, 46.5% of patients were tube dependent. After 12 months, this estimated proportion fell to 31.5%. For both time points, the volume to the larynx (in %) receiving at least 50 Gy (larynx V50Gy) exceeding 53% was predictive for long-term tube feeding (6 months:
p
= 0.041 and 12 months:
p
= 0.042) being an independent predictor during multivariable analysis. There was no clinical feature influencing tube dependence after 12 months.
Conclusion
Long-term gastrostomy dependence was found to be strongly associated with an exposure of laryngeal structures (specifically, V50Gy ≥ 53%) during radiotherapy. Consequently, the avoidance of supraglottic as well as glottic structures is warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0179-7158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-099X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01992-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36006437</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Confidence intervals ; Head & neck cancer ; Histograms ; Larynx ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Oncology ; Original ; Original Article ; Ostomy ; Radiation therapy ; Radiotherapy ; Tubes</subject><ispartof>Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2022-11, Vol.198 (11), p.1016-1024</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-55e4e50ddaf9b8227354c4d9c8d5401a5688e42e3ed48b918785b15c961dafdf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-55e4e50ddaf9b8227354c4d9c8d5401a5688e42e3ed48b918785b15c961dafdf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4981-7217</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00066-022-01992-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00066-022-01992-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Löser, Anastassia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grohmann, Maximilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finger, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greinert, Franziska</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molwitz, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krüll, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Cordula</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of dosimetric factors on long-term percutaneous enteral gastrostomy (PEG) tube dependence in head and neck cancer patients after (chemo)radiotherapy—results from a prospective randomized trial</title><title>Strahlentherapie und Onkologie</title><addtitle>Strahlenther Onkol</addtitle><description>Purpose/objective
To analyze dose–volume histogram (DVH)-derived data on the exposure of organs at risk with impact on long-term percutaneous enteral gastrostomy (PEG) tube dependence in head and neck cancer patients at 6 and 12 months after definitive or adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy.
Materials and methods
Sixty-one patients were prospectively treated with (chemo)radiotherapy. Prophylactic or reactive gastrostomy tube placement was performed in 41 (67.2%) patients. Dose–volume histogram parameters were obtained for the swallowing apparatus.
Results
Median follow-up time was 25 (2–34) months. Overall survival was shorter in patients with inlying PEG tubes at 6 and 12 months (log rank
p
= 0.038 and
p
= 0.017) after therapy completion. The estimated median time of tube dependency was 6 (95% confidence interval: 2–14) months. After 6 months, 46.5% of patients were tube dependent. After 12 months, this estimated proportion fell to 31.5%. For both time points, the volume to the larynx (in %) receiving at least 50 Gy (larynx V50Gy) exceeding 53% was predictive for long-term tube feeding (6 months:
p
= 0.041 and 12 months:
p
= 0.042) being an independent predictor during multivariable analysis. There was no clinical feature influencing tube dependence after 12 months.
Conclusion
Long-term gastrostomy dependence was found to be strongly associated with an exposure of laryngeal structures (specifically, V50Gy ≥ 53%) during radiotherapy. Consequently, the avoidance of supraglottic as well as glottic structures is warranted.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Head & neck cancer</subject><subject>Histograms</subject><subject>Larynx</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Tubes</subject><issn>0179-7158</issn><issn>1439-099X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk9u1DAUxiMEokPhAqyexKZdBOzETuwNEqpKqVQJFiCxszz2y4xLYgfbqTSsOAQH4CwsOQYnwcNUIFiwsvT8fb_3R19VPabkKSWkf5YIIV1Xk6apCZWyqfmdakVZK2si5fu71YrQXtY95eKoepDSNSG0Y5Ldr47arjhZ26-q75fTrE2GMIANyU2YozMwlFKICYKHMfhNnTFOMGM0S9Yew5IAfanpETY65RhSDtMOTt6cX5xCXtYIFmf0Fr1BcB62qC1ob8Gj-QBGl3KEWWdXKAn0UFBwYrY4hdOorQt5W9jz7sfnLxHTMhbNEMME-tvXufSa0WR3gxALMUzuE1ooQ-vxYXVv0GPCR7fvcfXu5fnbs1f11euLy7MXV7VpBc0158iQE2v1INeiafqWM8OsNMJyRqjmnRDIGmzRMrGWVPSCryk3sqPFYof2uHp-4M7LekJryhLlEmqObtJxp4J26u8f77ZqE26U5IIKxgvg5BYQw8cFU1aTSwbH8XBb1fSk6xtCeVukT_6RXocl-rJeUTUdZZ0ke2BzUJlynhRx-D0MJWofFXWIiipRUb-iovam9mBKRew3GP-g_-P6CcZox9c</recordid><startdate>20221101</startdate><enddate>20221101</enddate><creator>Löser, Anastassia</creator><creator>Grohmann, Maximilian</creator><creator>Finger, Anna</creator><creator>Greinert, Franziska</creator><creator>Krause, Linda</creator><creator>Molwitz, Isabel</creator><creator>Krüll, Andreas</creator><creator>Petersen, Cordula</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4981-7217</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221101</creationdate><title>Impact of dosimetric factors on long-term percutaneous enteral gastrostomy (PEG) tube dependence in head and neck cancer patients after (chemo)radiotherapy—results from a prospective randomized trial</title><author>Löser, Anastassia ; Grohmann, Maximilian ; Finger, Anna ; Greinert, Franziska ; Krause, Linda ; Molwitz, Isabel ; Krüll, Andreas ; Petersen, Cordula</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-55e4e50ddaf9b8227354c4d9c8d5401a5688e42e3ed48b918785b15c961dafdf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Head & neck cancer</topic><topic>Histograms</topic><topic>Larynx</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Tubes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Löser, Anastassia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grohmann, Maximilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finger, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greinert, Franziska</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molwitz, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krüll, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Cordula</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Strahlentherapie und Onkologie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Löser, Anastassia</au><au>Grohmann, Maximilian</au><au>Finger, Anna</au><au>Greinert, Franziska</au><au>Krause, Linda</au><au>Molwitz, Isabel</au><au>Krüll, Andreas</au><au>Petersen, Cordula</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of dosimetric factors on long-term percutaneous enteral gastrostomy (PEG) tube dependence in head and neck cancer patients after (chemo)radiotherapy—results from a prospective randomized trial</atitle><jtitle>Strahlentherapie und Onkologie</jtitle><stitle>Strahlenther Onkol</stitle><date>2022-11-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>198</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1016</spage><epage>1024</epage><pages>1016-1024</pages><issn>0179-7158</issn><eissn>1439-099X</eissn><abstract>Purpose/objective
To analyze dose–volume histogram (DVH)-derived data on the exposure of organs at risk with impact on long-term percutaneous enteral gastrostomy (PEG) tube dependence in head and neck cancer patients at 6 and 12 months after definitive or adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy.
Materials and methods
Sixty-one patients were prospectively treated with (chemo)radiotherapy. Prophylactic or reactive gastrostomy tube placement was performed in 41 (67.2%) patients. Dose–volume histogram parameters were obtained for the swallowing apparatus.
Results
Median follow-up time was 25 (2–34) months. Overall survival was shorter in patients with inlying PEG tubes at 6 and 12 months (log rank
p
= 0.038 and
p
= 0.017) after therapy completion. The estimated median time of tube dependency was 6 (95% confidence interval: 2–14) months. After 6 months, 46.5% of patients were tube dependent. After 12 months, this estimated proportion fell to 31.5%. For both time points, the volume to the larynx (in %) receiving at least 50 Gy (larynx V50Gy) exceeding 53% was predictive for long-term tube feeding (6 months:
p
= 0.041 and 12 months:
p
= 0.042) being an independent predictor during multivariable analysis. There was no clinical feature influencing tube dependence after 12 months.
Conclusion
Long-term gastrostomy dependence was found to be strongly associated with an exposure of laryngeal structures (specifically, V50Gy ≥ 53%) during radiotherapy. Consequently, the avoidance of supraglottic as well as glottic structures is warranted.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>36006437</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00066-022-01992-5</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4981-7217</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0179-7158 |
ispartof | Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2022-11, Vol.198 (11), p.1016-1024 |
issn | 0179-7158 1439-099X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9581845 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Cancer Confidence intervals Head & neck cancer Histograms Larynx Medicine Medicine & Public Health Oncology Original Original Article Ostomy Radiation therapy Radiotherapy Tubes |
title | Impact of dosimetric factors on long-term percutaneous enteral gastrostomy (PEG) tube dependence in head and neck cancer patients after (chemo)radiotherapy—results from a prospective randomized trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A48%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20dosimetric%20factors%20on%20long-term%20percutaneous%20enteral%20gastrostomy%20(PEG)%20tube%20dependence%20in%20head%20and%20neck%20cancer%20patients%20after%20(chemo)radiotherapy%E2%80%94results%20from%20a%C2%A0prospective%20randomized%20trial&rft.jtitle=Strahlentherapie%20und%20Onkologie&rft.au=L%C3%B6ser,%20Anastassia&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.volume=198&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1016&rft.epage=1024&rft.pages=1016-1024&rft.issn=0179-7158&rft.eissn=1439-099X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00066-022-01992-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2706720153%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2726146905&rft_id=info:pmid/36006437&rfr_iscdi=true |